unit 1 discussion
Rubric Title: Unit 2, 4, 6 Lab – Virtual Reality Rubric
***Students: It is IMPORTANT to remember to utilize both the “Guided Mode” and “Expert Mode” in the VR Lab Simulation case scenario experiences, as you practice the VR Lab scenario(s). The “Guided Mode” and “Expert Mode” allow you to have multiple tries/attempts to practice the case. THEN, when you feel you are ready, you will choose the VR Lab “Exam Mode” (that you can ONLY attempt once); the score you receive in “Exam Mode” will then be your final grade in the VR Lab. If you have any questions regarding this, please follow up with your course instructor.
Rubric Title: Unit 3, 5, 7 SOAP Journal Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
0 Points |
|
Content Quality- Subjective Data
|
Subjective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of virtual reality patient case including: · Name, age, gender · Chief complaint · History of present illness (HPI) that follows OLD CARTS pneumonic · Medications · Allergies · Past medical history · Past surgical history · Pertinent family history · Social history · Review of Systems |
· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Subjective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Criteria 2
|
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content Quality- Objective Data
|
Objective data displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including: · Vital signs · Body systems that are pertinent to specific case |
· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Objective data displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points Points: 4 |
Level II Max Points Points: 3.2 |
Level I Max Points Points: 2.4 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content Quality- Assessment |
Assessment displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:
· Primary diagnosis · Pathophysiology of primary diagnosis · Three differential diagnoses · Rationales for differential diagnoses |
· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1 critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Assessment displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points Points: 4 |
Level II Max Points Points: 3.2 |
Level I Max Points Points: 2.4 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content Quality- Plan of Care
|
Plan displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case including:
· Medications · Non-pharmacological recommendations · Diagnostic tests · Patient education · Cultural considerations · Health promotion · Referrals · Follow-Up |
· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 1 critical concept with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Plan displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen virtual reality patient case; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details. |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Criteria 5 |
Level III Max Points Points: 3 |
Level II Max Points Points: 2.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 1.8 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Collegiate-level academic writing
|
· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability. · Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information. · Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources. · All reference sources are within the past five years.
|
· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability. · Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information. · Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources. · All reference sources are within the past five years. |
· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability. · Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information. · Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source. · Reference sources are within the past five years. |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Criteria 6
|
Level III Max Points Points: 3 |
Level II Max Points Points: 2.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 1.8 |
0 Points |
|
Citations and Formatting
|
● The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues. ● Correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. ● Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. |
● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper. ● Correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. ● Quotation marks and citations generally, make authorship clear. |
● The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper. ● Attempts to cite. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. ● Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect. ● Authorship may be unclear in areas. |
· Does not meet criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
30 |
24 |
18 |
|
|
Minimum Total Points |
25 |
19 |
|
|
Rubric Title: Unit 8 Journal Rubric