UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT

profileaq24
MN551_Assignment_Rubrics.docx
Home>Nursing homework help>UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT

PG Logo

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

· One of the assigned Unit 2 case study topics for assignment paper: Cell Function and Growth, Inflammation, Infection, or Immunity is chosen.

· Displays complete understanding of all critical concepts by answering all case study questions thoroughly, utilizing evidence-based practice.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 2 case study topics for assignment paper: Cell Function and Growth, Inflammation, Infection, or Immunity is chosen.

· Displays understanding of case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 1-2 questions with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 2 case study topics for assignment paper: Cell Function and Growth, Inflammation, Infection, or Immunity is chosen.

· Displays understanding of patient case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 3-4 questions with errors/omissions or lack of detail.

· Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of one or more critical concepts.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 7

Level II Max Points

Points: 5.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.2

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. 

· There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

· Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations

generally, make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

· Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

· Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

65

52

39

0

Minimum Total Points

53 points minimum

40 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 3 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

· One of the assigned Unit 3 case study topics for assignment paper: Hemostasis, Red Blood Cell Disorders, or Cardiovascular System is chosen.

· Displays complete understanding of all critical concepts by answering all case study questions thoroughly, utilizing evidence-based practice.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 3 case study topics for assignment paper: Hemostasis, Red Blood Cell Disorders, or Cardiovascular System is chosen.

· Displays understanding of case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 1-2 questions with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 3 case study topics for assignment paper: Hemostasis, Red Blood Cell Disorders, or Cardiovascular System is chosen.

· Displays understanding of patient case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 3-4 questions with errors/omissions or lack of detail.

· Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of one or more critical concepts.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 7

Level II Max Points

Points: 5.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.2

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. 

· There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

· Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations

generally, make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

· Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

· Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

65

52

39

0

Minimum Total Points

53 points minimum

40 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 6 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

· One of the assigned Unit 6 case study topics for assignment paper: Acid/Base, Respiratory, Renal, or Gastrointestinal Disorders is chosen.

· Displays complete understanding of all critical concepts by answering all case study questions thoroughly, utilizing evidence-based practice.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 6 case study topics for assignment paper: Acid/Base, Respiratory, Renal, or Gastrointestinal Disorders is chosen.

· Displays understanding of case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 1-2 questions with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 6 case study topics for assignment paper: Acid/Base, Respiratory, Renal, or Gastrointestinal Disorders is chosen.

· Displays understanding of patient case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 3-4 questions with errors/omissions or lack of detail.

· Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of one or more critical concepts.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the cover page and reference page(s).

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 7

Level II Max Points

Points: 5.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.2

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. 

· There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

· Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations

make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

· Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

· Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

65

52

39

0

Minimum Total Points

53 points minimum

40 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 7 Assignment Rubric

Unit 7 Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

· One of the assigned Unit 7 case study topics for assignment paper: Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Pain, Visual, or Endocrine Disorders is chosen.

· Displays complete understanding of all critical concepts by answering all case study questions thoroughly, utilizing evidence-based practice.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 7 case study topics for assignment paper: Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Pain, Visual, or Endocrine Disorders is chosen.

· Displays understanding of case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 1-2 questions with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· One of the assigned Unit 7 case study topics for assignment paper: Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Pain, Visual, or Endocrine Disorders is chosen.

· Displays understanding of patient case study critical concepts by answering all case study questions; there may be 3-4 questions with errors/omissions or lack of detail.

· Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of one or more critical concepts.

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present

0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the title page and reference page(s).

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the title page and reference page(s).

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Meets the assignment paper length requirement of at least four full content pages, excluding the title page and reference page(s).

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 7

Level II Max Points

Points: 5.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.2

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. 

· There may be 1-2 sentences, or one paragraph that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

· Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences, or two paragraphs that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations

generally, make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three paragraphs that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the paper.

· Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

· Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

· Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

65

52

39

0

Minimum Total Points

53 points minimum

40 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 9 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 60

Level II Max Points

Points: 48

Level I Max Points

Points: 36

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

· One of the assigned Unit 9 topics for PowerPoint narration assignment: Type II Diabetes, Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, Depression, or Urinary Tract Infection is chosen.

· Displays complete understanding of all critical concepts of chosen assignment topic including: 1) Risk factors and causes, 2) Possible consequences, 3) Prevention strategies, and 4) Treatment modalities.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· Voice-over narration was clear and applicable to presentation PowerPoint slides.

· Slides presentation notes section included information that follows narration.

· One of the assigned Unit 9 topics for PowerPoint narration assignment: Type II Diabetes, Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, Depression, or Urinary Tract Infection is chosen.

· Displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen assignment topic including: 1) Risk factors and causes, 2) Possible consequences, 3) Prevention strategies, and 4) Treatment modalities; there may be 1-2 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Supports opinions and ideas with evidence-based practice details and examples where appropriate.

· Voice-over narration was clear and applicable to presentation PowerPoint slides.

· Slides presentation notes section included information that follows narration.

· One of the assigned Unit 9 topics for PowerPoint narration assignment: Type II Diabetes, Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, Depression, or Urinary Tract Infection is chosen.

· Displays understanding of critical concepts of chosen assignment topic including: 1) Risk factors and causes, 2) Possible consequences, 3) Prevention strategies, and 4) Treatment modalities; there may be 3-4 critical concepts with errors/omissions or lack of details.

· Opinions and ideas may indicate misconceptions or little understanding of one or more critical concepts.

· Voice-over narration was clear and applicable to presentation PowerPoint slides.

· Slides presentation notes section included information that follows narration.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 8

Level II Max Points

Points: 6.4

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.8

Not Present0 Points

Collegiate-level academic writing

· Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the assignment length requirement of 8-12 PowerPoint slides, excluding the title and reference slide(s).

· Supports all opinions and ideas with relevant and credible reference sources of information.

· Provides three or more peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability.

· Meets the length requirement of 8-12 PowerPoint slides, excluding the title and reference slide(s).

· Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information.

· Provides two peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references sources.

· All reference sources are within the past five years.

· Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors that makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability.

· Meets the length requirements of 8-12 PowerPoint slides, excluding the title and reference slide(s).

· Not all references utilized are relevant and/or credible sources of information.

· Provides one peer-reviewed or evidence-based practice scholarly references source.

· Reference sources are within the past five years.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 7

Level II Max Points

Points: 5.6

Level I Max Points

Points: 4.2

Not Present

0 Points

Citations and Formatting

· The overall order of information is clear and contributes to the meaning of the assignment. 

· There may be 1-2 sentences or one PowerPoint slide that is out of order, or other minor organization issues.

· Strong attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. One or two formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 3-4 sentences or two PowerPoint slides that may be out of order, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the presentation.

· Overall attempt at APA formatting and correctly citing all reference sources. 3-4 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur. 

· Quotation marks and citations

make authorship clear.

· The overall order of information is confusing in places due to 5-6 sentences or three PowerPoint slides that may be out of place, or other organization issues that interfere with the meaning or intent of the presentation.

· Attempts to use APA formatting and citing. 5-6 formatting, in-text, or reference citation errors may occur.

· Quotation marks and citations may be missing or incorrect.

· Authorship may be unclear in areas.

· Does not meet the criteria.

Maximum Total Points

75

60

45

0

Minimum Total Points

61 points minimum

46 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content

Quality

?

One of the assigned

Unit 2 case study

topics for assignment

paper: Cell Function

and Growth,

Inflammation,

Infection, or Immunity

is chosen.

?

Displays complete

understanding of all

critical concepts by

answering all case

study questions

tho

roughly, utilizing

evidence

-

based

practice.

?

Supports opinions and

ideas with evidence

-

based practice details

and examples where

appropriate.

?

One of the

assigned Unit 2

case study topics

for assignment

paper: Cell

Function and

Growth,

Inflammation,

Infectio

n, or

Immunity is

chosen.

?

Displays

understanding of

case study critical

concepts by

answering all case

study questions;

there may be 1

-

2

questions with

errors/omissions or

lack of details.

?

Supports opinions

and ideas with

evidence

-

based

practice details an

d

?

One of the assigned Unit

2 case study topics for

assignment paper: Cell

Function and Growth,

Inflammation, Infection,

or Immunity is chosen.

?

Displays understanding

of patient case study

critical concepts by

answering all case

study

questions; there may be

3

-

4 questions with

errors/omissions or lack

of detail.

?

Opinions and ideas may

indicate misconceptions

or little understanding of

one or more critical

concepts.

?

Does not

meet

the criteria.

Rubric Title: MN551 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria Level III Level II Level I Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 50

Level II Max Points

Points: 40

Level I Max Points

Points: 30

Not Present

0 Points

Content Quality

? One of the assigned

Unit 2 case study

topics for assignment

paper: Cell Function

and Growth,

Inflammation,

Infection, or Immunity

is chosen.

? Displays complete

understanding of all

critical concepts by

answering all case

study questions

thoroughly, utilizing

evidence-based

practice.

? Supports opinions and

ideas with evidence-

based practice details

and examples where

appropriate.

? One of the

assigned Unit 2

case study topics

for assignment

paper: Cell

Function and

Growth,

Inflammation,

Infection, or

Immunity is

chosen.

? Displays

understanding of

case study critical

concepts by

answering all case

study questions;

there may be 1-2

questions with

errors/omissions or

lack of details.

? Supports opinions

and ideas with

evidence-based

practice details and

? One of the assigned Unit

2 case study topics for

assignment paper: Cell

Function and Growth,

Inflammation, Infection,

or Immunity is chosen.

? Displays understanding

of patient case study

critical concepts by

answering all case study

questions; there may be

3-4 questions with

errors/omissions or lack

of detail.

? Opinions and ideas may

indicate misconceptions

or little understanding of

one or more critical

concepts.

? Does not meet

the criteria.