Standards of care

profileMissyCarl
MN506_U4_Assignment_Rubric.xlsx

U4 Assignment Rubric

Unit 4 Assignment: Grading Rubric Total Available Points = 100
Instructions:
Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered Final
1 2 3 4 Score Weight Score
Criterion 1 The role of the APN - Administrator, Practitioner, or Educator - is clearly stated, content of paper pertains to the identified role The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. The role of the APN is identified but is not specific to the administrator or practitioner or educator areas. The APN perspective is applied to some aspects of the case. Content is not supported. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). The role of the APN (administrator or practitioner or educator) is identified, and applied to some aspects of the case. Content is not adequately supported. Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). The APN role (practitioner, educator or administrator) was clearly identified and discussed for all aspects of the case. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. 10% 0.00
Criterion 2 All standards of care violations pertaining to the identified APN role (administrator, practitioner, or educator) are identified. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Some information on codes of conduct presented. Codes of conduct identified are not relevant to the APN role (Administrator, Practitioner, or Educator) identified. Content is not supported. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Some codes of conduct are identified, not all codes of conduct identified are relevant to the APN role (Administrator, Practitioner, or Educator) identified. Content support is not adequate. Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). All standards of care violations related to the APN role stated were clearly identified and described. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. 10% 0.00
Criterion 3 Paper clearly identifies who violated the standards of care, and how the standards of care were violated The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Some individuals responsible for the violations were identified. The standard of care violated by each individual is not described. There is no information on how the individuals violated the standard of care. Content is not supported. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Some individuals responsible for the violations were identified. Each individual's standards of care violation is described, no information on how the violation happened. Content support is not adequate. Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). The individuals responsible for the violations were identified. Each individual's standards of care violation is described, including how the violation happened. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. 20% 0.00
Criterion 4 Identifies risk management steps relevant to the APN role (Administrator, Practitioner, or Educator) before event to prevent such adverse events The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. The paper identifies one or more risk management steps that need to be taken before the event. Risk management steps are not relevant to the event or to the APN role identified in the paper. Content is not supported. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). The paper describes some risk management steps that need to be taken before the event. Paper does not identify all risk management measures that could be implemented. Some of the risk management measures are not appropriate to the relevant adverse event. Content support is not adequate Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). The paper describes all the relevant risk management steps that need to be taken before the event in order to prevent adverse events. Risk management measures are relevant to the APN role identified. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. 20% 0.00
Criterion 5 Identifies risk management steps to be taken that are relevant to the APN role (Administrator, Practitioner, or Educator) after event to prevent future adverse events The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The paper identifies one or more risk management steps that need to be taken after the event. Risk management steps are not relevant to the event or to the APN role identified in the paper. Content is not supported. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). The paper describes some of the relevant risk management steps that need to be taken after the event in order to prevent adverse events. Risk management measures are not appropriate to the APN role identified. Some of the risk management measures are not appropriate to the relevant adverse event. Content support is not adequate Content support is not adequate. Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). The paper describes all the relevant risk management steps that need to be taken after the event in order to prevent adverse events. Risk management measures are relevant to the APN role identified. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. 20% 0.00
Length Less than 3 pages. NA NA At least 4 pages. 10% 0.00
Format/Style Did not follow APA format Major errors with APA formatting Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. 10% 0.00
100% 0.00
Final Score 0
Percentage 0.00%
Feedback: 4