Assignment for network security

profileZubair
MN5022017T2Assignment2MELSYDV5.docx

Unit Code: MN502 Unit Name: Overview of Network Security Page#2 of 4

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Trimester

2, 2017

Unit Code

MN502

Unit Title

Overview of Network Security

Assessment Type

Individual

Assessment Title

Security Challenges in Emerging Networks

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)

The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills to independently think of innovation. Students will be able to complete the following ULOs:

d. Identify and report network threats, select and implement appropriate countermeasures for network security

e. Use security policies to manage operational security, and then administer those policies to ensure compliance by users in an organization

f. Demonstrate professional and ethical behaviour with regard to network security.

Weight

20%

Total Marks

50

Word limit

1500 - 2000

Due Date

29/09/2017 11:55PM

Submission Guidelines

· All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page.

· The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.

· Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.

Extension

· If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:

http://www.mit.edu.au/about - mit/institute - publications/policies - procedures - and - guidelines/special considerationdeferment

Academic Misconduct

· Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure . For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

Assignment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills to independently think of innovation. In this assignment students will first learn how to develop knowledge based on current state of the art of an emerging knowledge domain. Then they will learn how to identify plausible security issues in this emerging technology and finally learn the skill of adding knowledge to existing domain by theoretically developing the corresponding protection mechanism for a particular issue.

Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging area in computer networking. Internet of Things could refer to a network of devices with embedded technology including Sensors, Radio Frequency Identification tags, actuators, with the ability to continuously sense and exchange data to perform a range of tasks. The IoT will have a major impact on aspects of everyday-lives and behaviour of users. Security of Internet of Things is a prime concern.

The assignment should be written in IEEE conference format: https://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/conferences/2014_04_msw_a4_format.doc

This assignment includes four parts

1. Literature review on Internet of Things (IoT)

You need to write 800 word literature on IoT. Your literature should be supported by at least three (3) academic (Journal/Conference) papers chosen from the current state of the art.

2. Analyse critically, three current or future security issues in IoT.

In this section you will analyse critically, three security issues in Internet of Things. These issues could be taken from the current state of the art or could be evolved from your own independent innovative thinking. This section must be supported by at least three (3) references.

3. Propose a possible solution for one of the threats identified in section (2).

In this part you need to apply knowledge to the existing knowledge domain of IoT. You need to choose one of the issues identified in the previous section and propose a possible solution to this particular security issue.

4. Create a 3 - 5 minutes presentation and present your work during the Lab.

You have to create a 3 - 5 minutes presentation to present your work in front of your class fellows and tutor during the Lab in Week 11.

Submission Guidelines

The assignment should be submitted on the Moodle in two separate files:

1. The report should be submitted as a Word file

2. The presentation should be submitted as a PPT file

Marking criteria:

Section to be included in the report

Description of the section

Marks

Introduction

Introduction of Internet of Things

5

Literature Review

Literature review of Internet of Things

15

Analyse critically

Analyse critically, three security vulnerabilities of Internet of Things.

6

Propose a possible solution

Discuss a threat mitigation technique for one of the security vulnerability

6

Report Layout

The report should be written in IEEE conference format

5

Reference style

Follow IEEE reference style

5

Presentation Slides

The presentation slides should be well organised and clear.

4

Oral Presentation

Delivery of the presentation

4

Total

50

Marking Rubric for Assignment #2: Total Marks 50

Grade

Mark

HD

40-50

DI

35-39

CR

30-34

P

25-29

Fail

<25

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Introduction

/5

All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated

Topics are relevant and soundly analysed.

Generally relevant and analysed.

Some relevance and briefly presented.

This is not relevant to the assignment topic.

Literature Review

/15

Finding is clearly linked and well justified

Finding is clearly linked and justified

Finding is linked and convincing

Finding is not linked and unjustified

Finding is not available

Analyse Critically

/6

Exceptional discussion on security vulnerabilities for the system. Identifying highly sophisticated and well referenced vulnerabilities

Exceptional discussion on security vulnerabilities for the system.

Discussion on three security vulnerabilities

Discussion on Two security vulnerabilities

Unable to identify security vulnerabilities

Propose a possible solution

/6

Advance discussion on threats mitigation using latest technologies and procedures

Good discussion on threats mitigation using technologies and procedures

Good discussion on threats and mitigation

Discussion on threats and mitigation

Lacking discussion on threats and mitigation

Report Layout

/5

Well designed layout and proper formatting in IEEE Conference Style

Well designed layout in IEEE Conference style

Layout in IEEE Conference style

Report layout and formatted but not in IEEE Conference style

Report lacks a proper layout

Reference style

/5

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

Clear referencing style

Generally good referencing style

Sometimes clear referencing style

Lacks consistency with many errors

Presentation slides

/4

Well organised and resourceful

Organised and resourceful

Resourceful but could be better organised

Resourceful slides

Neither resourceful nor well organised

Oral Presentation

/4

Good delivery, easy to follow and good interaction

Delivered, easy to follow and provided a level of interaction

Delivered and provided a level of interaction

Delivered

No oral presentation

Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: Dr Fariza Sabrina August, 2017

Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: Dr Fariza Sabrina August, 2017