| Unit _2_ Assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. |
| Total available points = | | | | | | | 110 |
| Content Rubric | Introductory - Not submitted or largely incomplete. Work may indicate very little if any comprehension of content. | Emergent - Work shows some comprehension but errors indicating miscomprehension may be present. | Practiced - Work indicates overall progress toward comprehension. Minor errors may present. | Proficient/Mastered - Work is complete and indicates full comprehension of content. | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 0 - 1.9 | 2 - 2.9 | 3 - 3.9 | 4 |
| Introduction. | This section of the assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The introduction does not identify the purpose of the assigment. | The introduction identifies the purpose in a well-constructed paragraph. | The purpose of the assignment is clearly stated in a fully formed paragraph of at least five sentences in length supported with relevant background and peer reviewed source support. | | 15% | 0.00 |
| Identify a nursing conceptual framework /conceptual model | This section of the assignment does not address any or all of this section. | Identified a nursing conceptual framework in a fully formed paragraph. | Identified a nursing conceptual framework in a fully formed paragraph with source support. | Identified a nursing conceptual framework fully described the goal and function of the conceptual framework in a fully formed paragraph with peer reviewed source support | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Describe major concepts of nursing according to the conceptual framework/conceptual model. | This section of the assignment does not address any or all of this section. | Briefly described concepts of nursing (person, environment, health, and nursing) specific to the conceptual model. | Fully described concepts of nursing (person, environment, health, and nursing) specific to the conceptual model. | Fully described concepts of nursing (person, environment, health, and nursing) specific to the model with peer reviewed source support. | | 30% | 0.00 |
| Describe value of conceptual framework/conceptual model to advance nurse roles. | This section of the assignment does not address any or all of this section. | Briefly described value of conceptual framework/conceptual model to advance nurse roles. | Fully described value of conceptual framework/conceptual model to research and nursing practice | Fully described the value of conceptual framework/conceptual model to research and nursing practice with peer reviewed sources of support | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Conclusion. | This section of the assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The conclusion is brief no support given. | The conclusion restated the main idea in a fully formed paragraph of at least five sentences. | The conclusion restated the main idea, summarized at least three subpoints, in a fully formed paragraph of a minimum of five sentences in length with peer reviewed source support. | | 15% |
| | | | | | | Content Score | 0 |
| | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Grammar & Punctuation | The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. | Several confusing sentences, or 1 to 2 confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. | A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. | There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences. | | 35% | 0.00 |
| Spelling | The many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability. | Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places. | Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear. | A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper. | | 35% | 0.00 |
| Order of Ideas & Length Requirement | Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. | The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall. | The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way. | The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| APA | There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. | This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e. Websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. | There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. | There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. | | 10% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | Writing Deduction | 0 |
| | | | | | | Final Score | 0 |
| | | | | | | Percentage | 0% |
| Feedback: |
Johan.KK
MN502_Unit_2_Assignment_Grading_Rubric.xlsx
