| Unit _10_ Assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. |
| Total available points = | | | | | | | 110 |
| Content Rubric | Introductory - Not submitted or largely incomplete. Work may indicate very little if any comprehension of content. | Emergent - Work shows some comprehension but errors indicating miscomprehension may be present. | Practiced - Work indicates overall progress toward comprehension. Minor errors may present. | Proficient/Mastered - Work is complete and indicates full comprehension of content. | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 0 - 1.9 | 2 - 2.9 | 3 - 3.9 | 4 |
| Introduction | No introduction provided or is brief and lacking details. | Introduction contains one of the following: student information, program track, and purpose for presentation | Introduction contains two of the following: student information, program track, and purpose for presentation | Contains student information, program track, and purpose for presentation.
| | 5% | 0.00 |
| Conceptual Framework / Grand Nursing Theory | No conceptual framework/grand nursing theory identified or only briefly described. | Identified rationale for choosing a conceptual framework/grand nursing theory and provided brief information about it. | Described a conceptual framework/grand nursing theory, identified rationale for the choice and applied it to professional nursing practice. | Identified rationale for choosing the conceptual framework/grand nursing theory, provided overview, described how it aligns with worldview, and provided how it will be applied in a future advanced nursing role. Content is supported with peer reviewed credible sources. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Theroretical Model | No theoretical model identified or only briefly described. | Some characteristics of the theoretical model described and applied to professional nursing practice. | Characteristics of the theoretical model fully described and applied to professional nursing practice. | Characteristics of the theoretical model fully described and applied to an advanced nursing role and supported with peer-reviewed credible sources. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Middle-Range or Practice Theory | No theory identified, nor theory identified is not a middle-range or practice theory. | Contains two of the following: key concepts of the theory, how it was used in research, or how student will apply theory in practice upon graduation. | Brief information about key concepts of the theory, how it was used in research, and how student will apply theory in practice upon graduation. Missing credible source support. | Key concepts of the theory fully explained, use in research and how student will apply theory in practice upon graduation well described. Support from peer-reviewed credible sources used. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Graphical representation | No graphical representation provided or not developed by student. | Graphical representation needs more clarity to illustrate how the conceptual framework/grand nursing theory, theoretical model, and middle-range / practice theory fit together. | Graphical representation illustrates how the 3 components fit together, but simplistic in nature and no credible source support provided. | Graphical representation is creative, contains all 3 components, illustrates substantial integration of course materials and use of upper level thinking, and has peer-reviewed credible source support. | | 15% | 0.00 |
| Presentation | Presentation is simplistic and does not have any audio narration. | Presentation slides basic with audio narration only on some slides, or narration may be unclear and difficult to understand. | Presentation slides are well composed. Presentation matches narration. All slides have audio narration, but there may be times where the narration is unclear and difficult to understand. | Presentation slides are creative,well composed, and match narration. All slides have audio narration, and narration is clear throughout. Presentation flow is fluid and practiced. | | 15% | 0.00 |
| Conclusion | No conclusion or conclusion is brief or inappropriate for presentation. | The conclusion is brief without any support. | The conclusion restated the main idea, no support provided. | Conclusion summarized the main ideas and was supported with with peer reviewed credible source support. | | 5% | 0.00 |
| (Do Not Change criteria below) | | | | | | Content Score | 0 |
| Writing Deduction Rubric (everyone starts with 4's = no deductions) | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score |
| | 0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Grammar & Punctuation | The overall meaning of the presentation is difficult to understand.
Phrasing structure, subject verb agreement errors, and missing punctuation cause confusion. | The overall presentation meaning is mostly clear. Confusing phrases, subject verb agreement errors, and missing punctuation make understanding parts of the presentation difficult. | The overall presentation meaning is clear. Some confusing phrases or phrase structure, subject verb agreement errors, or missing punctuation make a few parts of the presentation difficult to follow. | The overall presentation meaning is clear. There may be one or two areas of confusing phrases, subject verb agreement errors, or missing punctuation; however, these errors do not interfere with the meaning. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 |
| Spelling | The many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with understanding the content of the presentation. | Misspelled words or the use of incorrect words makes understanding difficult in some places. | Some misspelled words or the misuse of words is sometimes confusing. However, intent is still clear. | One or two misspelled words may be present but do not interfere with the overall readability of the presentation. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 |
| Order of Ideas & Length Requirement | Presentation has basic information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. | Presentation has some good information or research, but the order of information is confusing in several places, which interferes with the meaning or intent of the presentation. The presentation follows most assignment directions. | Presentation has good information and research, but the information may be confusing in a few places. The lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the presentation in a minor way. All assignment directions followed. | Presentation has good information and research, and the overall order is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There may be minor organizational issues, but the presentation follows all assignment directions. | 4 | 20% | 0.80 |
| APA | APA formatting and citing for presentations not followed. Citation information on slides is missing, or citation mistakes make authorship unclear. No references included, or reference sources not accurate or incomplete and do not follow APA format. No source attribution for pictures/graphs on slide used. | There is an attempt to use APA formatting and citing for presentations. Citation information on slides may be missing, incomplete or incorrect. References included at end of presentation incomplete but attempt to follow APA format. Source attribution for many of the pictures/graphs on slides missing. | APA citation style for presentation used. There are some formatting and citation errors, but all sources used are cited both in the slides and on the reference list at the end of the presentation and mostly follow APA format. Appropriate source attribution for pictures/graphs on most slides. | APA formatting and citation style for presentation used. All sources used are cited both in the slides and on the reference list at the end of the presentation. There are very few APA formatting or citation errors. All pictures/graphics have appropriate source attribution on slide. | 4 | 10% | 0.40 |
| | | | | | | Writing Deduction | 0 |
| | | | | | | Final Score | 0 |
| | | | | | | Percentage | 0% |
| Feedback: |
aq24
MN502_Unit_10_Assignment_Grading_Rubric.xlsx
