7 pages -3.5 hours hours deadline
Servant Leadership Comprehensive Case Study
Each student will identify and select a leader that they have access to and that they would identify as a servant leader. The student will interview the leader to obtain the following information:
How do they get others committed to their vision or mission?
How do they react if they have an employee that is struggling in their work and not showing any progress? Do they think that character can be taught?
After they achieved success, how did they avoid getting a “big head?”
A leader must mentor, but they also have to discipline from time to time. How do they balance these elements? What have they learned, good and bad, from the leaders they have worked for in the past?
After completing the interview, the student must analyze the leader’s responses. Was their own self-assessment accurate? Are they truly a servant leader?
The student will synthesize the interview details and their analysis into a paper (6-7 page minimum).
NOTE: This is an essential program document and must be submitted in order to receive a final grade in the course
Grading criteria
|
Requirements |
Consistently exceeds expectations in all areas regarding the interview, analysis, and synthesis of appropriate resources. |
Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding the interview, analysis, and synthesis of appropriate resources. |
Needs improvement in some areas regarding the interview, analysis, and synthesis of appropriate resources. |
Needs improvement in most areas regarding the interview, analysis, and synthesis of appropriate resources. |
Inability to meet minimum expected standards of written work. |
|
|
34points |
28points |
26points |
24points |
0points |
|
Critical Thinking |
Demonstrates clear, insightful critical thinking and addresses the assignment using new applications. |
Demonstrates minor deficiencies in critical thinking and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Needs improvement in some areas of critical thinking and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Needs improvement in most areas of critical thinking and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Demonstrates little or no critical thinking or insight. |
|
|
34points |
28points |
26points |
24points |
0points |
|
*Ethical |
Demonstrates clear, insightful ethical application and understanding. |
Demonstrates minor deficiencies in ethical application and understanding. |
Needs improvement in some areas of ethical application and understanding. |
Needs improvement in most areas of ethical application and understanding. |
Demonstrates little or no ethical application and understanding. |
|
|
4points |
3points |
2points |
1points |
0points |
|
*Communication |
Demonstrates clear, insightful knowledge of the assignment with appropriate written communication. |
Demonstrates minor deficiencies in knowledge of the assignment with average written communication. |
Needs some improvement expressing knowledge of the assignment with written communication. |
Needs improvement in most areas of expressing knowledge of the assignment with written communication. |
Demonstrates little or no written communication skills and knowledge. |
|
|
4points |
3points |
2points |
1points |
0points |
|
*Christian Principles |
Exceeds expectations in all areas regarding Christian principles and applicable resources. |
Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding Christian principles and applicable resources. |
Needs improvement in some areas regarding Christian principles and applicable resources. |
Needs improvement in most areas regarding Christian principles and applicable resources. |
Inability to meet minimum expected standards in regards to Christian principles and applicable resources. |
|
|
4points |
3points |
2points |
1points |
0points |
|
Mechanics |
No errors in grammar, spelling, word choice, punctuation, or sentence structure. |
Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, word choice, punctuation, or sentence structure. |
Limited errors in grammar, spelling, word choice, punctuation, or sentence structure. |
Some mechanical errors that distract the reader from the intended message. |
Numerous mechanical errors that distract the reader from the intended message. |
|
|
10points |
8points |
6points |
4points |
0points |
|
Formatting |
All parts of the paper follow current APA format, including in-text citations, and title page. |
Minimal errors in following current APA format, including in-text citations, and title page. |
Limited errors in following current APA format, including in-text citations, and title page. |
Some major errors in following current APA format that distract the reader from the intended message. |
Numerous major errors in following current APA format that distract the reader from the intended message. |
|
|
10points |
8points |
6points |
4points |
0points |
|
*Technical/Quantitative Pulled from Article Review Presentation Rubric |
Demonstrates little or no technical ability or insight. |
Needs improvement in most areas of technical ability and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Needs improvement in some areas of technical ability and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Establishes minor deficiencies in technical ability and addressing the assignment using new applications. |
Etablishes adequate technical ability and addresses the assignment using new applications |
|
|
0points |
0points |
0points |
0points |
|