Risk Management Audit and mini case study 3
7/7/22, 7:34 AM Mini Case Study 3 Assignment - HRMN 495 6981 Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management Practice (2225) - UMGC…
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1281875&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=685146 1/2
Mini Case Study 3 Course: HRMN 495 6981 Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management Practice (2225)
Criteria Exceed Standard Meets Standard Approaches Standard
Does Not Meet Standard
Criterion Score
Describe the
relationship
between
leadership,
motivation,
and
retention.
/ 40
Recommend
a plan for
action that
takes into
account
ethics and
accountabilit
y
/ 40
40 points
Addresses the
relationship
between the
three concepts
in detail and is
supported by
the relevant
literature.
32 points
The three
concepts are
described in
detail.
However, the
relationship
between the
three is not
clear.
28 points
One of the
concepts is not
addressed or is
inaccurate.
24 points
Two of the
concepts are
not addressed
or are
inaccurate.
40 points
The
recommendati
ons are clear,
feasible,
relevant to the
situation, and
supported by
the literature.
The
recommendati
ons address
accountability
to stakeholders
as well as
employee well-
being and
motivation.
32 points
The
recommendati
ons are
feasible and
relevant to the
situation, but
include
opinions that
are not fully
supported by
cited literature.
The
recommendati
ons address
accountability
and employee
well-being.
28 points
The
recommendati
ons are largely
feasible and
relevant to the
situation, but
there is
insufficient
support from
cited literature.
Recommendati
ons may be
superficial in
addressing
accountability
and/or
employee well-
being and
motivation.
24 points
The
recommendati
ons may be
infeasible,
irrelevant, or
unsupported
by the cited
literature
and do not
fully address
accountability
and employee
well-being and
motivation.
7/7/22, 7:34 AM Mini Case Study 3 Assignment - HRMN 495 6981 Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management Practice (2225) - UMGC…
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=1281875&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=685146 2/2
Total / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Exceed Standard Meets Standard Approaches Standard
Does Not Meet Standard
Criterion Score
Communicat
es
information
clearly and
professionall
y with
appropriate
supporting
evidence,
formatting,
and grammar.
/ 2020 points
The
information is
clearly and
professionally
presented,
without errors
in grammar or
mechanics.
Citations are
used
appropriately,
and the
formatting is
correct for
APA style.
16 points
The
information is
clearly and
professionally
presented,
with minor
errors in
grammar or
mechanics.
Citations are
used
appropriately
but may have
some small
errors in style.
14 points
Most of the
information is
clearly and
professionally
presented,
with some
errors in
grammar,
mechanics,
and/or
citations.
12 points
The
information is
not clearly and
professional
presented,
with
substantial
errors in
grammar,
mechanics,
and/or
citations.
Exceeds Standard 90 points minimum
Meets Standard 80 points minimum
Approaches Standard 70 points minimum
Does Not Meet Standard 60 points minimum