Law - Criminal MINI-PAPER: PROBATION AND PAROLE ASSIGNMENT
Criteria Ratings Points
Goals, History and Development of Probation.
34 to >30 pts
Advanced
Four reasons for probation and the goals achieved throughout the process are identified and clearly discussed.
30 to >23 pts
Proficient
Four reasons for probation and the goals achieved throughout the process are identified and for the most part clearly discussed. However, the explanation does not display a full understanding.
23 to >0 pts
Developing
Less than four reasons for probation and the goals achieved throughout the process are identified and/or the identifications are ambiguous, confusing or incomplete. There is minimal indication of full understanding.
0 pts
Not Present
34 pts
Discussion: Types of Parole & Conditions Assigned to the Offender, Collaboration & Accountability in Proper Execution, and Impact of these Forms of Community Corrections on the Correctional Process.
34 to >30 pts
Advanced
• Types of parole and the conditions that are often assigned to the offender are clearly identified and explained. • A clear and accurate understanding of the kind of collaboration and accountability that is necessary to ensure the proper execution of these correctional methods (e.g. probation officers, parole officers) is presented. • Clear consideration of the impact that these forms of community corrections have on the correctional process is demonstrated.
30 to >23 pts
Proficient
• Types of parole and the conditions that are often assigned to the offender are adequately identified and explained. • An adequate understanding of the kind of collaboration and accountability that is necessary to ensure the proper execution of these correctional methods (e.g. probation officers, parole officers) is presented. • Adequate consideration of the impact that these forms of community corrections have on the correctional process is demonstrated.
23 to >0 pts
Developing
• Types of parole and the conditions that are often assigned to the offender are not adequately identified or well explained. • An insufficient understanding of the kind of collaboration and accountability that is necessary to ensure the proper execution of these correctional methods (e.g. probation officers, parole officers) is presented. • Inadequate and/or very litter consideration of the impact that these forms of community corrections have on the correctional process is demonstrated.
0 pts
Not Present
34 pts
Mini-Paper: Probation and Parole Grading Rubric | CJUS320_B03_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Research Engagement
20 to >17 pts
Advanced
• At least two relevant and reliable scholarly sources identified. • A significant integration of Biblical truth is present in the paper.
17 to >13 pts
Proficient
• Only one relevant and reliable scholarly source identified. • There is an adequate integration of Biblical truth.
13 to >0 pts
Developing
• References used are not scholarly, relevant or reliable. • There is a lack of specific and significant Biblical integration.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
APA Formatting 15 to >13 pts
Advanced
Paper successfully meets the requirements of APA formatting.
13 to >10 pts
Proficient
Paper satisfactorily meets the requirements of APA formatting.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper does not meet the requirements of appropriate APA formatting.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Quality of Writing 15 to >13 pts
Advanced
There are few to no errors in sentence structure, paragraph design, spelling, grammar or punctuation.
13 to >10 pts
Proficient
There are several errors in sentence structure, paragraph design, spelling, grammar or punctuation.
10 to >0 pts
Developing
There are significant issues in sentence structure, paragraph design, spelling, grammar or punctuation.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Page Length 7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Paper meets the 3 page maximum requirement.
6 to >4 pts
Proficient
Paper exceeds the 3 page maximum requirement by 1 page.
4 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper exceeds the 3 page maximum requirement by over two pages.
0 pts
Not Present
7 pts
Total Points: 125
Mini-Paper: Probation and Parole Grading Rubric | CJUS320_B03_202620