Critical thinking #5
PHL 111 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In Milestone One, you organized the Introduction section and Parts A, B, and C of the Presented Argument section of your final project, the critical essay.
For Milestone Two, you will use the Milestone Two Worksheet to organize parts D and E of the Presented Argument and the Counterargument sections of your critical essay. This work will help you to further establish your final project.
Prompt: Complete the Milestone Two Worksheet and use your answers to draft a paragraph for each of the sections below.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
II. Presented Argument: Explore the position advanced in your chosen article. D. Bias: Describe the bias or lack of bias in the article that you selected.
Provide specific examples to support your observations. E. Credibility: Discuss the credibility of the overall argument.
Were the resources used to support the argument credible? Why or why not?
Does the credibility of the resources support or undermine the article’s claims? How?
III. Counterargument: Begin to craft a counterargument to the argument presented in the primary article for your chosen topic.
A. Alternative Argument: Submit the claim that you are making in your alternative argument.
Include premises, presuppositions, and your conclusion. Support your response using the provided resources in the Additional Resources and Scholarly Resources sections found on the Final
Project Topics and Resources page. B. Logic and Reasoning: Explain the logic and reasoning you used to craft the argument.
What are the assumptions you are keeping in mind and resources you are using? C. Weaknesses: Identify weaknesses in the argument that would require additional research of support
What are some areas of weakness in the argument? D. Bias: Explain how your previously identified personal experience with the topic may create emotional influences, values, or bias.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Complete the Milestone Two Worksheet.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Presented
Argument: Bias Explains bias in the selected article and provides examples
Explains bias in the selected article but does not provide examples
Does not explain the selected article’s bias or give examples
15
Presented Argument: Credibility
Provides assessment of the credibility of the argument and its resources and the impact on the argument
Provides assessment of the credibility of the argument and its impact but lacks clarity or is too wordy
Does not provide assessment of the credibility of the selected article or its impact on the argument
15
Counterargume nt: Alternative
Argument
Constructs an alternative argument to the artifact, supported by the provided resources or additional research
Constructs an alternative argument to the artifact but does not provide specific support or support provided is cursory, illogical, or inaccurate
Does not construct an alternative argument to the artifact
15
Counterargume nt: Logic and
Reasoning
Explains the logic and reasoning used to craft the argument
Explains the logic and reasoning used to craft the argument but explanation is cursory, illogical, or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain the logic and reasoning used to craft the argument
15
Counterargume nt: Weaknesses
Identifies any weaknesses within the argument that require additional research or support
Identifies any weaknesses within the argument but identification is cursory, illogical, or contains inaccuracies
Does not identify any weaknesses within the argument
15
Counterargume nt: Bias
Explains how previously identified personal experience with the topic may create emotional influences, values, or other bias
Explains how previously identified personal experience with the topic may create emotional influences, values, or other bias, but explanation is cursory or illogical
Does not explain how previously identified personal experience with the topic may create emotional influences, values, or other bias
15
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%