5-3 neuropsych

Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric.html

PSY 634 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt

You will complete an annotated bibliography for Milestone Two. This assignment requires you to gather the initial research on your chosen topic needed to complete your final paper. The annotated bibliography should list at least eight resources you will use in your case application paper. You should include the APA citation for each resource and a brief paragraph stating the conclusion of each resource and addressing how the information in the resource will support your project. The resources should include information about the chosen individual’s disorder/disability and information regarding treatment for the disorder/disability. Your research and annotations will help you write your final project.

Each annotation should do the following:

• Provide the main conclusions of each resource
• Provide information about the chosen disorder or disability
• Provide possible treatment options
• Explain the usefulness of the resource to the final paper

Cite the resource using APA style (see below for example).

Sample Annotated Bibliography of a Journal Article

The following example is what your final product for each resource should look like. This example (for the psychological research article), “A Bad Taste in the Mouth: Gustatory Disgust Influences Moral Judgment,” employs APA style for the journal citation. The writer of this annotation follows the above points to create an annotation that summarizes the article’s main points and draws connections between that resource and other resources:

Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299.

Annotation: In this article, Eskine and colleagues describe the results of an experiment that examined whether the taste in a person’s mouth influences the moral judgments that the person makes. The authors, who are researchers at the City University of New York, hypothesized that there would be a relationship between these two variables because prior research has shown that there are strong links between basic emotions and moral judgments. Indeed, the authors found that participants given a bitter drink made harsher moral judgments than those given a non-bitter drink. This article is extremely useful for my paper because it provides evidence that seemingly unimportant sensory information can influence moral judgments. Also, it nicely complements the work of Chapman et al. (2009), who found that emotional disgust and morality utilize similar brain regions.

What to Submit

The annotated bibliography should follow these formatting guidelines: includes at least 8 resources, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and citations in APA format. For each reference, the 3- to 5-sentence annotation should be indented in block format (similar to a direct quotation of greater than 40 words) and directly follow the reference.

Milestone Two Rubric

Criteria	Exemplary (100%)	Proficient (90%)	Needs Improvement (70%)	Not Evident (0%)	Value
Annotation: Conclusion	Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes clear and relevant details in support of the conclusions	Provides the main conclusions of each resource	Provides the main conclusion, but it is incomplete and missing important information	Annotation does not provide the main conclusions of each resource	20
Annotation: Disorder/ Disability Information	Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides details to connect the resources to the case application paper	Provides information about the chosen disorder/disability	Provides the chosen disorder/disability, but it is incomplete or missing important information	Annotation does not provide information about the chosen disorder/ disability	20
Annotation: Treatment Options	Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes treatment options supported through research	Provides possible treatment options	Provides treatment options for the disorder/disability, but they are incomplete or missing important information	Annotation does not provide possible treatment options	20
Annotation: Usefulness	Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes specific details about how the resource will be useful for the final paper	Explains why the resource will be useful for the final paper	Explains usefulness, but the explanation is incomplete or missing important information	Annotation does not explain why the resource will be useful for the final paper	20
Articulation of Response	Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format	Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax	Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas	Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas	20
Total:	100%