Managing Difficult Conversations
Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.html
WCM 620 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
For this milestone, you will complete a draft of the first two sections of your final project based on the final project case study.
The following critical elements must be addressed:
- Overview: Summarize the pattern of facts leading up to this interpersonal conflict, identifying the stakeholders in the conflict.
- Conflict Analysis: In this section, you will analyze the transcripts provided and determine how stakeholders’ self-perception and communication practices influenced the conflict. Be sure to address the following:
- Assess how the stakeholders’ self-perception influenced the conflict. Provide specific examples to support your assessment. In other words, how might the involved stakeholders’ self-perceptions be at odds with how others see them?
- Describe the communication practices, implicit or explicit, that were used. What implications did they have for the conflict?
- Assess how communication practices might be changed to de-escalate the conflict. Provide specific examples to support your assessment.
What to Submit
Your paper should be 2 to 3 pages in length with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and APA formatting.
Milestone One Rubric
| Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview: Pattern of Facts | Summarizes the pattern of facts leading up to this interpersonal conflict, identifying the stakeholders in the conflict | Summarizes the pattern of facts leading up to this interpersonal conflict, identifying the stakeholders in the conflict, but summary is verbose or contains inaccuracies | Does not summarize the pattern of facts leading up to this interpersonal conflict | 23 |
| Conflict Analysis: Stakeholders’ Self-Perception | Assesses how the stakeholders’ self-perception influenced the conflict and provides specific examples to support assessment | Assesses how the stakeholders’ self-perception influenced the conflict and provides examples to support assessment, but assessment is cursory or contains inaccuracies, or examples are not specific or relevant to argument | Does not assess how the stakeholders’ self-perception influenced the conflict | 23 |
| Conflict Analysis: Communication | Describes the communication practices, implicit or explicit, that were used and their implications for the conflict | Describes the communication practices, implicit or explicit, that were used and their implications for the conflict, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies | Does not describe the communication practices, implicit or explicit, that were used and their implications for the conflict | 23 |
| Conflict Analysis: De-escalate the Conflict | Assesses how the communication practices might be changed to de-escalate the conflict, providing specific examples to support assessment | Assesses how the communication practices might be changed to de-escalate the conflict, providing examples to support assessment, but assessment is cursory or contains inaccuracies, or examples are not specific or relevant to argument | Does not assess how the communication practices might be changed to de-escalate the conflict, providing examples to support assessment | 23 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 8 |
| Total: | 100% |