Final paper Phyllis Young

profileroebob7l6g
milestone2comments.docx

https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/sets/set08/editpage_on.gif

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Top of Form

Name: ACC 646 Final Project Milestone Two Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

 

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Business Environment and the Industry: Industry-Specific Challenges https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

9.5 (19%)

Determines the industry-specific challenges the organization faces and how they relate to the company’s business environment

Feedback:

Points:

7.13 (14.25%)

Determines the industry-specific challenges the organization faces but does not determine how they relate to the company’s business environment

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not determine the industry-specific challenges the organization faces

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Behaviors https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

9.5 (19%)

Describes the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud and the pressures employees faced from management that may have led to the fraud and how they could have been avoided

Feedback:

Points:

7.13 (14.25%)

Describes the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud but does not describe the pressures employees faced from management that may have led to the fraud and how they could have been avoided or description is cursory or contains inaccuracies

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not describe the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Internal Controls https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

9.5 (19%)

Assesses the strength of the organization’s internal controls and discerns the weaknesses and how they may have led to fraud

Feedback:

Points:

7.13 (14.25%)

Assesses the strength of the organization’s internal controls but does not discern the weaknesses and how they may have led to fraud

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not assess the strength of the organization’s internal controls

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Weaknesses https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

9.5 (19%)

Determines how the weaknesses could be improved and what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Feedback:

Points:

7.13 (14.25%)

Determines how the weaknesses could be improved but does not determine what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not determine how the weaknesses could be improved and what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Anomalies https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

9.5 (19%)

Determines the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis and directly relates them to the potential fraudulent activity

Feedback:

Points:

7.13 (14.25%)

Determines the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis but does not relate them to the potential fraudulent activity or contains inaccuracies

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Does not determine the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis

Feedback:

Articulation of Response https://bb.snhu.edu/images/ci/icons/cmlink_generic.gif

Points:

2.5 (5%)

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Feedback:

Points:

1.88 (3.75%)

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Feedback:

Points:

0 (0%)

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Business Environment and the Industry: Industry-Specific Challenges--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 9.5 (19%) points

Determines the industry-specific challenges the organization faces and how they relate to the company’s business environment

Needs Improvement 7.13 (14.25%) points

Determines the industry-specific challenges the organization faces but does not determine how they relate to the company’s business environment

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Does not determine the industry-specific challenges the organization faces

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Behaviors--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 9.5 (19%) points

Describes the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud and the pressures employees faced from management that may have led to the fraud and how they could have been avoided

Needs Improvement 7.13 (14.25%) points

Describes the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud but does not describe the pressures employees faced from management that may have led to the fraud and how they could have been avoided or description is cursory or contains inaccuracies

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Does not describe the behaviors employees exhibited in the case study that were indicative of fraud

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Internal Controls--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 9.5 (19%) points

Assesses the strength of the organization’s internal controls and discerns the weaknesses and how they may have led to fraud

Needs Improvement 7.13 (14.25%) points

Assesses the strength of the organization’s internal controls but does not discern the weaknesses and how they may have led to fraud

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Does not assess the strength of the organization’s internal controls

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Weaknesses--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 9.5 (19%) points

Determines how the weaknesses could be improved and what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Needs Improvement 7.13 (14.25%) points

Determines how the weaknesses could be improved but does not determine what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Does not determine how the weaknesses could be improved and what measures could be taken to ensure improvement

Feedback:

Business Environment and the Industry: Anomalies--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 9.5 (19%) points

Determines the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis and directly relates them to the potential fraudulent activity

Needs Improvement 7.13 (14.25%) points

Determines the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis but does not relate them to the potential fraudulent activity or contains inaccuracies

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Does not determine the sorts of anomalies present in the financial statements or additional financial analysis

Feedback:

Articulation of Response--

Levels of Achievement:

Proficient 2.5 (5%) points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Needs Improvement 1.88 (3.75%) points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Not Evident 0 (0%) points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

Feedback:

Raw Total: 35.62 (of 50.0)

Feedback to Learner

Name:ACC 646 Final Project Milestone Two Rubric

Bottom of Form

0.1900000

0.1425000

0.0000000

0.0500000

0.0375000

9.5 <span class='

7.13 <span class=

0 <span class='ra

Exit

0.1900000

0.1900000

2.5 <span class='

1.88 <span class=