9-2 Final Submission: Communication Framework and Training Plan - Submit Assignment

4-2 Revised.docx by Chaston Carter

Submission dat e : 29- Aug- 2018 11:4 5PM (UT C- 04 00) Submission ID: 994 82604 1 File name : 4 - 2 Revised.do cx Word count : 905 Charact e r count : 4 994

1

2

3 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

15% SIMILARIT Y INDEX

0% INT ERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICAT IONS

15% ST UDENT PAPERS

1 15%

Exclude quo tes On

Exclude biblio graphy On

Exclude matches Of f

4-2 Revised.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University - Continuing Education St udent Paper

FINAL GRADE

/50

4-2 Revised.docx GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Comment 1

No research- based co ntent narratives to suppo rt assertio n and ratio nale that CRM system/to o l can ef f ectively be used f o r trainning based o n this particular scenario

Comment 2

No research- based co ntent narratives to suppo rt assertio n and ratio nale that CRM system/to o l can ef f ectively be used f o r trainning based o n this particular scenario

Comment 3

Very minimal ef f o rt and it was no t at all a go o d idea to co mbine narratives o n T WO majo r critical elements [Co mmunicatio n AND Co llabo ratio n]; thus, while yo u determined co mmunicatio n strategies f o r use in training the management team, lack o f research- based narratives made f o r very inadequate co ncept & co ntent narratives - no t in- depth

Comment 4

Very minimal ef f o rt and it was no t at all a go o d idea to co mbine narratives o n T WO majo r critical elements [Co mmunicatio n AND Co llabo ratio n]; thus, while yo u determined co mmunicatio n strategies f o r use in training the management team, lack o f research- based narratives made f o r very inadequate co ncept & co ntent narratives - no t in- depth

PAGE 3

Comment 5

Go o d ef f o rt – yo u selected a training metho d(s) and justif ies with research; ho wever, training metho d is no t appro priate f o r the intended audiences o r justif icatio n is no t based in relevant research.

Comment 6

Go o d ef f o rt – yo u selected a training metho d(s) and justif ies with research; ho wever, training

Go o d ef f o rt – yo u selected a training metho d(s) and justif ies with research; ho wever, training metho d is no t appro priate f o r the intended audiences o r justif icatio n is no t based in relevant research.

Comment 7

Must quo te and pro perly/co mpletely cite (including page o r paragraph number) uno riginal verbiages o btained and used verbatim. No t do ing so is a vio latio n.

PAGE 4

Comment 8

Go o d ef f o rt; but yo ur narratives included so mewhat generic guidelines f o r creating technical co mmunicatio ns within the f o cus area, and guidelines are no t detailed. Yo u kno w, CRM is no t an ALL- IN- ALL to o l that sho uld co ntino usly be used in all narratives - even if it do es no t suppo rt so lutio n ratio nales

Comment 9

Must quo te and pro perly/co mpletely cite (including page o r paragraph number) uno riginal verbiages o btained and used verbatim. No t do ing so is a vio latio n.

Comment 10

Must quo te and pro perly/co mpletely cite (including page o r paragraph number) uno riginal verbiages o btained and used verbatim. No t do ing so is a vio latio n.

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

Comment 11

Regarding Articulatio n, must quo te AND pro perly/co mpletely cite uno riginal verbiages that are used verbatim. No t do ing so is a vio latio n.