9-3 neuropsychology

PSY 634 Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric Activity: 7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Rough Draft

Course: PSY-634-10852-M01 Cognitive Neuropsychology 2024 D-3 (Jul - Oct)

Name: Sule Umit

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Cognitive

Processes:

Psychological and

Physiological

Aspects

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Good work providing a thoughtful discussion overall of this section with support from references.

10 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and supports

the psychological and

physiological aspects

using relevant

examples

9 points

Describes

psychological and

physiological aspects

of cognitive

processes and

provides a rationale

to support thinking

7 points

Describes the

psychological and

physiological aspects

of cognitive

processes, but the

description lacks

detail

0 points

The psychological

and physiological

aspects of cognitive

processes are not

evident

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Cognitive

Processes:

Relationship

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Good work providing a thoughtful discussion overall of this section with support from references.

Cognitive

Processes:

Negative Effects on

Daily Functioning

9 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Make a separate section with heading for this section to match the rubric here and expand on both discussions.

10 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and uses

appropriate scholarly

resources for

substantiation

9 points

Clarifies the

relationship between

psychological and

physiological aspects

of cognitive

processes

7 points

Clarifies the

relationship between

psychological and

physiological aspects

of cognitive

processes, but the

relationship is loosely

identified

0 points

The relationship

between

psychological and

physiological aspects

of cognitive

processes is not

evident

10 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and includes

insightful examples

validated by research

9 points

Evaluates the

negative effects of

psychological and

physiological

dysfunction on daily

functioning

7 points

Evaluates the

negative effect of

psychological and

physiological

dysfunction on daily

functioning, but the

evaluation lacks detail

or accuracy

0 points

The negative effect

of psychological and

physiological

dysfunction on daily

functioning is not

evident

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Technological

Advancements:

Technological

Impact

13.5 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Expand here for final paper.

Diagnosis and

Treatment:

Neuropsychological

Methods

15 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Good work providing a thoughtful discussion overall of this section with support from references.

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and uses

relevant resource

examples

13.5 points

Analyzes the impact

of technological

advancements in the

field of

neuropsychology in a

well-supported

manner

10.5 points

Analyzes the impact

of technological

advancements in the

field of

neuropsychology, but

the analysis lacks

breadth and depth

0 points

Does not analyze the

impact of

technological

advancements in the

field of

neuropsychology

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and supports

methods with

scholarly research

13.5 points

Provides appropriate

neuropsychological

methods for

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive

dysfunctions

10.5 points

Provides

neuropsychological

methods for

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive

dysfunction, but the

methods are not

solidly identified

0 points

The

neuropsychological

methods for

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive dysfunction

are not evident

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Diagnosis and

Treatment:

Neuropsychological

Assessment

13.5 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Make a separate section with heading for this section to match the rubric here and expand on both discussions.

Coping

Mechanisms and

Prevention

Strategies: Coping

Mechanisms

15 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Good discussion overall but be sure to expand and include references throughout this section for your final paper.

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and includes

insightful examples

validated by research

13.5 points

Adequately assesses

the role

neuropsychological

assessment plays in

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive dysfunction

10.5 points

Minimally assesses

the role that

neuropsychological

assessment plays in

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive dysfunction

0 points

Does not assess the

role that

neuropsychological

assessment plays in

diagnosing and

treating common

cognitive dysfunction

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and includes

an explicit

explanation of the

rationale behind the

recommended coping

mechanism

13.5 points

Recommends coping

mechanisms for

children or

adolescents who are

at risk or

experiencing

cognitive issues

10.5 points

Recommends coping

mechanisms for

children or

adolescents that are

loosely aligned with

the cognitive issue

0 points

Coping mechanisms

for children or

adolescents who are

at risk or

experiencing

cognitive issues are

not evident

Total 93 / 100

Overall Score

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Articulation of

Response

7 / 10

Criterion Feedback

APA style changes needed.

10 points

Submission is free of

errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, and syntax

and is presented in a

professional and

easy-to-read format

9 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to citations, grammar,

spelling, or syntax

7 points

Submission has major

errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, or syntax

that negatively

impact readability

and articulation of

main ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors related

to citations, grammar,

spelling, or syntax

that prevent

understanding of

ideas

Exemplary Instructors should not modify this

row (it will automate from the

scores above). This score

represents the average evaluation

across all rubric criteria.

Proficient

Instructors should not modify this

row (it will automate from the

scores above). This score

represents the average evaluation

across all rubric criteria.

Needs Improvement

Instructors should not modify this

row (it will automate from the

scores above). This score

represents the average evaluation

across all rubric criteria.

Not Evident

Instructors should not modify this

row (it will automate from the

scores above). This score

represents the average evaluation

across all rubric criteria.