9-3 neuropsychology
jan29
MILE2GRADE.pdf
PSY 634 Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography Guidelines and Rubric Activity: 5-3 Final Project Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography
Course: PSY-634-10852-M01 Cognitive Neuropsychology 2024 D-3 (Jul - Oct)
Name: Sule Umit
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Annotation:
Conclusion
18 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work overall in this area just keep expanding your discussion.
Annotation:
Disorder/Disability
Information
18 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work overall in this area just keep expanding your discussion.
20 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and includes
clear and relevant
details in support of
the conclusions
18 points
Provides the main
conclusions of each
resource
14 points
Provides the main
conclusion, but it is
incomplete and
missing important
information
0 points
Annotation does not
provide the main
conclusions of each
resource
20 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and provides
details to connect the
resources to the case
application paper
18 points
Provides information
about the chosen
disorder/disability
14 points
Provides the chosen
disorder/disability,
but it is incomplete or
missing important
information
0 points
Annotation does not
provide information
about the chosen
disorder/disability
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Annotation:
Treatment Options
18 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work overall in this area just keep expanding your discussion.
Annotation:
Usefulness
18 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Good work overall in this area just keep expanding your discussion.
20 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and includes
treatment options
supported through
research
18 points
Provides possible
treatment options
14 points
Provides treatment
options for the
disorder/disability,
but they are
incomplete or missing
important
information
0 points
Annotation does not
provide possible
treatment options
20 points
Meets “Proficient”
criteria and includes
specific details about
how the resource will
be useful for the final
paper
18 points
Explains why the
resource will be
useful for the final
paper
14 points
Explains usefulness,
but the explanation is
incomplete or missing
important
information
0 points
Annotation does not
explain why the
resource will be
useful for the final
paper
Total 90 / 100
Overall Score
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Articulation of
Response
18 / 20
Criterion Feedback
Keep working on APA style.
20 points
Submission is free of
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
is presented in a
professional and
easy-to-read format
18 points
Submission has no
major errors related
to citations,
grammar, spelling, or
syntax
14 points
Submission has major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
that negatively
impact readability
and articulation of
main ideas
0 points
Submission has
critical errors related
to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
that prevent
understanding of
ideas
Exemplary Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Proficient
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
Instructors should not modify this
row (it will automate from the
scores above). This score
represents the average evaluation
across all rubric criteria.
