ENGLISH RESEARCH PAPER
Student X 1
Sample Student X
Misaghi
English 1
June 8th, 2017
Online Harassment
As our technology advances, it becomes apparent that people are placing more and more
of their own personal information on the internet. This type of exposure creates easy targets for
people who, for a variety of reasons, attack online users with the information that is readily
available on the internet. This dilemma has caused numerous debates regarding how to deal with
this situation. Even moreso, there is a confusion on who to blame; the attackers, or the victims
for providing the information so readily. While online harassment happens digitally, the effects
can be long lasting and life altering. In order to navigate away from these situations, you need to
be well informed on the who, what, and why of online harassment.
The amount of people who experience vicious harassment is staggering. According to the
Pew Research Center, 40% of internet users have experienced some form of harassment. Within
that statistic, 22% report that they experience a less harsh form of harassment, while 18%
confirm that they experience more violent forms of harassment (Duggan). There are various
forms of online harassment that can greatly affect an individual. Doxing is the action of
researching a person’s information, such as street address, phone number, and family members.
That information is then used to harass, threaten, and discredit the the individual. Swatting is the
act of alerting the FBI, or swat team, about a situation at a person’s home; this results in the
person getting roughly handled, their home being destroyed, and possible public embarrassment
occurring. Revenge porn is one of the most aggressive forms of harassment. It is the act of
Student X 2
posting naked pictures of someone without their consent. These photos could be ones that were
sent to the offender, or someone may have obtained them by hacking into their personal
computers in order to gain the image. These images are then posted on specific websites,
sometimes with the person’s phone number or address. While both men and women experience
online harassment, there is definitely a difference in how each party experiences the harassment.
Times Magazine posted an article by Soraya Chemaly who informed us that “For girls and
women, harassment is not just about “un-pleasantries.” It’s often about men asserting
dominance, silencing, and frequently, scarring and punishing them” (8). All of these types of
harassment have one thing in common; they all use information that is accessed through the
social media people use everyday. Many will happily provide a plethora of information without
realizing the repercussions. The possibility of harassment can be avoided if people take the
necessary precautions in order to protect their information.
Coincidentally, not long after I had begun writing this paper, I myself was a victim of
online harassment due to the actions of a close friend. On January 1, my friend Wendy was
involved in a protest turned brawl between the Alt-right and Anti-Fascist political groups.
Wendy, formally just a politically charged teenager, became the target of the Alt-right after
pictures of her fighting became viral. This hurled Wendy to become the accidental symbol of the
Anarchist Oak Roots Collective, a group who have been know to be very aggressive with their
protesting. In addition, this made her a target for the technologically advanced Alt-Right group.
Wendy experience doxxing, threats, and faced intimate pictures of her being found and spread to
her friends and family. The hackers were also able to gain access to her Facebook friends list,
where many people, including myself, received threatening messages in regards to our
connection to Wendy. Friends who, like myself, had absolutely no connection to this group. Yet
Student X 3
people who wanted to attack Wendy were happy to settle for harassing her friends and family.
This type of behavior can affect anyone, anytime, anywhere. It does not matter if you merely
frequent fishing forums; some people, drunk with the power of easily accessible information, can
absolutely use some of your most intimate information against you.
The internet’s most dangerous attribute is its constant archiving of information. The core
of how all harassment is executed online has to do with this easy access to other’s information.
Carrie Goldberg, attorney at C.A. Goldberg PLLC, engages with a variety of clients who have
had their lives altered due to attacks on them via the internet. She conveys about “clients whose
bikinis are photoshopped off and posted onto revenge porn sites, who are filmed getting dressed
or engaging in a sexual act without their knowledge [and] are advertised as prostitutes for sex on
websites such as Craigslist and Backpage” (Goldberg p 5). These clients reveal an unnerving
truth; it does not matter if a person has never taken a naked photo of themselves. If someone
wishes to portray a person as a sexual deviant, they have a plethora of easily accessible tools.
There is also the possibility that individuals in your own life can also use your image against you
with very little technological ability. Goldberg mentions one instance where one of her clients,
after turning down a woman, got “his name and social-media profile picture [posted] afterward
on an online STD registry” (p 6). Information is posted on forums that are willing and ready to
engage with the harasser. Forum style websites like 4chan, 9gag, and Reddit contain web pages
that are dedicated to posting photos and information of people in order for the victim to
experience a large amount of harassment at once. It is because of websites like these that group
harassment has been made all the more streamlined.
Pornagraphic photos that are posted on revenge porn websites will also contain the
victim's personal information, with the intent that viewers with continue the harassment.
Student X 4
Revenge porn worked as “pay back” by the poster. The picture will usually be accompanied by
numerous comments criticizing and attacking the victim. It is the intention that the victim, as
well as their family, get sent the webpages in order to further humiliate the victim. The practice
of revenge porn is not all that new to begin with. Cristen and Caroline, hosts of the podcast
“Stuff Your Mom Never Told You”, explain that in 1980 it was actually a “a hustler feature that
asked for nude photos of woman, with info including their hobbies, their fantasies, and
sometimes their real name” (Stuff Your Mom Never Told You, 2017). Hustler was then barraged
with women calling in and complaining; apparently, they had their photos and personal
information submitted to the magazine without their permission. While the only difference
between current times and now is there are sites dedicated to posting revenge porn, the
similarities are too close to ignore. So why hasn’t this been spoken about in detail? Anna
Richardson, a British Journalist, tackles this issue within her documentary “Revenge Porn”.
Within her documentary, Richardson investigated every nook of the revenge porn culture.
Lauren, the first of the interviewed, retold a horrendous event in which her ex-boyfriend posted
photos he had coaxed her into sending him onto a revenge porn website. Not long after they had
broken up, Lauren received a link from an anonymous user to the website in which she was
being featured; and what she found terrified her. She found herself, “with [her] full name, and
the 21 pictures [she sent], and a description of where [she’s] from, [her] uni, [her] course, [her]
sports, what team [she plays] for, where [she goes] on holidays. The worst part were to
comments”. The comments were there to further humiliate the victim. Hannah Robertson, an
anti-revenge porn activist, explained exactly what these websites were trying to accomplish.
According to Robertson, the revenge aspect is supposedly a communal experience for the posters
and the commenters. The goal is to humiliate the girl as much as possible. A reason is given
Student X 5
along with the posted pictures; whether it is a messy break up, cheating, or rejection, the main
goal is to defend the poor slighted soul that only wants revenge. So, the troops are sent to do
whatever they can to harass. Folami was not the first to know she had been targeted. It was
actually her 22 year old daughter who received the message that her mother’s nude photos had
been posted on a revenge porn website. Folami was awestruck at the whole situation,
particularity disturbed at the fact that 48,000 people had viewed the photo, stating that she had
“never felt more violated, and never felt more ill”. Revenge porn can be traced back to one man,
who started the whole trend with his own website. Hunter Moore, a 31 year old Californian,
stated the site “Is Anyone Up?” with the intend to allow men to get back at women they felt
wronged them. Moore was all too happy to help, especially considering his site was trafficking
over 30 million hits, taking in $13,000 a month. The brutal tactics used would include harassing
the family, and occasionally posting suicide notes written by some girls; the commenters took
joy in trying to convince them to do it. This didn’t last long, however, due to the fact that Moore
started hacking into women’s computers and stealing their naked photos. Anna Richardson
discovered through her own posting of a picture just how quickly one of these photos can travel.
Her own photo reached 18,000 views with a matter of hours. The comments were gruesome and
brutal; and the messages she received though the fake email she created borderlined
psychopathic behavior. Revenge porn is one of the worst of the harassments a person can face
due to its ability to ruin a life.
As these issues are fairly recent, there is a struggle amongst law enforcement and the
government; no one can agree on how to tackle and rectify the issue. Over the last decade, there
has been numerous attempts to criminalize online harassment; though there has been an
overwhelming apathy from government officials. A Boston Democratic representative, Katherine
Student X 6
Clark, has become a prominent figure in the fight against online harassment. Clark contacted the
FBI to discuss the matters of how to handle online harassment; though she did not make much
progress, as Clark explained that "They were pretty frank in saying that even if we had the
resources, this is not where we would put them" (p5). This attitude trickles down to law
enforcement, who equally regard this type of harassment as trivial. Clark argues how law
enforcement believes that online harassment "just [doesn’t] have a real-life impact…[and] many
don't seem to appreciate how devastating this can be to one's sense of safety and even financial
stability” (p6). This seems to be the common case; reporting these types of harassment is a
difficult experience. Clark herself had an encounter with swatting; right after she testified before
congress against it. Those who did not grow up with such a vast array of technology, are also the
ones deciding on the laws that coincide. As with any issue that threatens the livelihood of people,
the laws surrounding online harassment need to be strengthened and taken more seriously. There
needs to be more awareness to the issues; this is not school-aged “Cyberbullying”, this is an
attack on a person’s livelihood.
In order to disrupt the actions of these harassers, there needs to be more efforts from law
enforcement, as well as a greater of education, in accordance to online harassment. California
has been a forerunner with this issue, most likely due to the fact that it is where the phenomenon
originated. California has done a couple things that should be more widespread. First, California
has enacted an e-crime unit that is dedicated to tackling crime digitally; this is foremost the most
important step in order to take this type of harassment more seriously. By getting an entire
division dedicated towards the subject, we are normalizing the fact that there are repercussions
when you overstep legal boundaries. The Guardian's reports show that “38% of those who had
experienced online harassment chose to ignore it, and only 10% reported it to police” (Hunt p.
Student X 7
10). The last decade has seen a struggle to regulate crime on the internet due to the accessibility
of anonymity. What seems to be the constant issue with Revenge Porn, is it seems as though
there isn’t much recognition on the subject. Many do not know what it is until they are the
victims of it.
The internet is still considered entirely new territory, that has been growing at a speed so
rapid that laws are usually made after a significant number of people have already suffered.
There are 34 states within the united states that currently have laws pertaining to revenge porn;
however, most of them do not protect against the harassment of those who commented and
furthered the harassment, as well as various other forms of harassment. Goldberg, who works
closely with harassment laws, informs us that “harassment laws typically require direct contact
with the victim and a course of conduct” (par 6). What that means is if the perpetrator simply
posts the photo, and the harassment from the commenters is all digital, then there is no technical
crime committed. Tracking down a digital offender is definitely a daunting task, as the animity
of the internet allows a broad reaching of people to attack others, regardless of if they are one
two different hemispheres. There has been ah influx of legislation being proposed by legislators
that have dedicated that careers to protecting the victims of online harassment. Representative
Katherine M Clark, with her dedication to eradicate online harassment, has herself proposed
“One bill [that] criminalizes the malicious publication of private information, another [that]
prevents blackmailed demands for sexual acts, and a third [that] punishes people who falsely
report emergencies causing SWAT teams to be dispatched” (Goldberg 7). Clark is also pushing
for a division that focuses solely on cyber crime, much like the unit california has been
implementing over the past couple of years. This is a very costly venture; creating a whole new
crimes division will take a numerous amount of time and effort. However, there is no amount of
Student X 8
money that can compare to the way lives are destroyed but those who do not think twice about
who they harm. In addition to these types of laws being implemented, there is also the fact that
many people do not understand the dangers of putting up all of their personal information online.
The budding technological society we live in today promotes online lives that display every
aspect of ourselves, including our full names, addresses, and other personal details. I propose that
there should be a dedicated class within high school that informs students on how to protect
themselves from these situations. Adolescents are taught of many dangers that they can protect
themselves from, such as STIs and rape preventions. There should be more care when one is
putting personal information on the internet, and it all starts in what is normalized, and what is
taught. Young men and women should understand that the they can go to authority figures in the
situation that someone has posted a photo of them without their consent, no matter if that photo
has been shared to said person. Colleges as well should tackle this issue, as it seems as though
young adults in that age range suffer the most from online harassment. If other types of
prevention are taught to young adults, prevention from these types of situations should be taught
as well. Alongside the laws being passed, and the generation being informed, a decline in online
harassment can be possible and achievable.
Many feel angered towards what is being done to innocent victims online, however, they
are also at a loss as to what they can do to help. While men like Hunter Moore have been put
behind bars, there is still a numerous number of people that have taken his place, continuing the
cycle of harassment. The animity of the internet has caused a shift in sympathy among people;
many have a hard time seeing the victims as real people, due to this shift. How people act
towards each other online starts with shunning others who pursue an internet career in
harassment. Therefore, a shift in how we approach our digital interactions can be the first step to
Student X 9
combat this issue. Recognizing how much our presence on social media and the internet can aid
in making online harassment far more taboo, leading to some sort of decline in the subject. The
internet allows our most vulnerable groups to be harassed without much protection. The data
society reports that “Internet users ages 15-29, Black internet users, and those who identify as
lesbian, gay, or bisexual are all more likely to witness online harassment… women experience a
wider variety of online abuse, including more serious violations” (Data Society, 8). Our society
cannot move forward if we allow those who seek to harm others for their identities to pursue
such violent forms of harassment. The onslaught of harassment has been targeted at these groups
of people, because those harassers feel safe that there is seemingly no repercussion. In addition,
there is a significant amount that can be done from our own homes. We are in a start right now
where laws are still being actively debated and created. Making an effort to call your
representative for congress can have a significant impact on what laws are being considered.
Student X 10
Works Cited
Chemaly, Soraya. “There’s No Comparing Male and Female Harassment Online.”
Times Magazine, 9 September 2014, http://time.com/3305466/male-female
-harassment-online/
Duggan, Maeve. “Online Harassment.” Pew Research Center, 13 May 2017,
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/
Goldberg, Carrie. "How to Curb Online Harassment? Technology, Law and Advocacy Can
Help." The Washington Post, 2016. EBSCOhost,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/12/21/my-clients-get-stalked-
doxxed-and-humiliated-online-all-for-turning-down-a-date/
Hunt, Elle. “Online Harassment of Women at Risk of Becoming ‘Established Norm,’ Study
Finds”. The Guardian, 7 March 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyl
e/2016/mar/08/online-harassment-of-women-at-risk-of-becoming-established-norm-study
Pitcher, Justin. "The State of the States: The Continuing Struggle to Criminalize Revenge Porn."
Brigham Young University Law Review, vol. 2015, no. 5, 15 May 2016, pp. 1435-1466.
EBSCOhost, libdb.smc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/l
ogin.aspx?direct=true&db=bsh&AN=115858558&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Revenge Porn. Directed by Amanda Rees, performance by Anna Richardson, 2015.
“The Revenge Porn Wars” Stuff Mom Never Told You, from howstuffworks, 27 March 2017,
http://www.stuffmomnevertoldyou.com/podcasts/the-revenge-porn-wars.htm
Young, Seth. “New Report Shows the Reach of Online Harassment, Digital abuse, and
Cyberstalking.” The Data Society, 21 November 2016. https://datasociety.net
/blog/2016/11/21/online-harassment/