Disssertation Proposal
The Dissertation Title Appears in Title Case and is Centered Comment by GCU: American Psychological Association (APA) Style is most commonly used to cite sources within the social sciences. This resource, revised according to the 6th edition, second printing of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, offers examples for the general format of APA research papers, in-text citations, footnotes, and the reference page. For specifics, consult the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edition, second printing. For additional information on APA Style, consult the APA website: http://apastyle.org/learn/index.aspx NOTE: All notes and comments are keyed to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edition, second printing. GENERAL FORMAT RULES: Dissertations must be 12 –point Times New Roman typeface, double-spaced on quality standard-sized paper (8.5" x 11") with 1-in. margins on the top, bottom, and right side. For binding purposes, the left margin is 1.5 in. [8.03]. To set this in Word, go to: Page Layout > Page Setup> Margins > Custom Margins> Top: 1” Bottom: 1” Left: 1.5” Right: 1” Click “Okay” Page Layout> Orientation> Portrait> NOTE: All text lines are double-spaced. This includes the title, headings, formal block quotes, references, footnotes, and figure captions. Single-spacing is only used within tables and figures [8.03]. The first line of each paragraph is indented 0.5 in. Use the tab key which should be set at five to seven spaces [8.03]. If a white tab appears in the comment box, click on the tab to read additional information included in the comment box. Comment by GCU: Formatting note: The effect of the page being centered with a 1.5" left margin is accomplished by the use of the first line indent here. However, it would be correct to not use the first line indent, and set the actual indent for these title pages at 1.5." Comment by GCU: If the title is longer than one line, double-space it. As a rule, the title should be approximately 12 words. Titles should be descriptive and concise with no abbreviations, jargon, or obscure technical terms. The title should be typed in uppercase and lowercase letters [2.01].
Submitted by
Insert Your Full Legal Name (No Titles, Degrees, or Academic Credentials) Comment by GCU: For example: Jane Elizabeth Smith
Equal Spacing
~2.0” – 2.5”
A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Doctorate of Education
(or) Doctorate of Philosophy
(or) Doctorate of Business Administration
Equal Spacing~2.0” – 2.5” Comment by GCU: Delete yellow highlighted “Helps” as your research project develops.
Grand Canyon University
Phoenix, Arizona Comment by GCU: HINT: There are several “styles” that have been set up in this GCU Template. When you work on your proposal or dissertation, “save as” this template in order to preserve and make use of the preset styles. This will save you hours of work!
[Insert Current Date Until Date of Dean’s Signature]
GCU Proposal Template V8.3 01.18.18
GCU Proposal Template V8.3 01.18.18
© by Your Full Legal Name (No Titles, Degrees, or Academic Credentials), 2018 Comment by GCU: NOTE: This is an optional page. If copyright is not desired, delete this page. The copyright page is included in the final dissertation and not part of the proposal. Comment by GCU: For example: © by Jane Elizabeth Smith, 2012 This page is centered. This page is counted, not numbered, and should not appear in the Table of Contents.
All rights reserved.
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY Comment by GCU: The Signature Page is only included in the final dissertation and not part of the proposal.
The Dissertation Title Appears in Title Case and is Centered Comment by GCU: If the title is longer than one line, double-space it. The title should be typed in upper and lowercase letters.
by
Insert Your Full Legal Name (No Titles, Degrees, or Academic Credentials) Comment by GCU: For example: Jane Elizabeth Smith
Approved
[Insert Current Date Until Date of Dean’s Signature]
DISSERTATION COMMITTEE:
Full Legal Name, Ed.D., DBA, or Ph.D., Dissertation Chair
Full Legal Name, Ed.D., DBA, or Ph.D., Committee Member
Full Legal Name, Ed.D., DBA, or Ph.D., Committee Member
ACCEPTED AND SIGNED:
________________________________________
Michael R. Berger, Ed.D.
Dean, College of Doctoral Studies
_________________________________________
Date
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY Comment by GCU: This page is only included in the final dissertation and not part of the proposal. However, the learner is responsible for ensuring the proposal and dissertation are original research, that all scholarly sources are accurately reported, cited, and referenced, and the study protocol was executed and complies with the IRB approval granted by GCU.
The Dissertation Title Appears in Title Case and is Centered
I verify that my dissertation represents original research, is not falsified or plagiarized, and that I accurately reported, cited, and referenced all sources within this manuscript in strict compliance with APA and Grand Canyon University (GCU) guidelines. I also verify my dissertation complies with the approval(s) granted for this research investigation by GCU Institutional Review Board (IRB).
_____________________________________________ ______________________
[Type Doctoral Learner Name Beneath Signature] Date Comment by GCU: This page requires a “wet signature.” Remove the brackets and type in the learner’s name. The learner needs to sign and date this page and insert a copy into the dissertation manuscript as an image (JPEG) or PDF text box. This page must be signed and dated prior to final AQR Level 5 review.
Abstract Comment by GCU: On the first line of the page, center the word “Abstract” (boldface) Style with “TOC Heading” Beginning with the next line, write the abstract. Abstract text is one paragraph with no indentation and is double-spaced. This page is counted, not numbered, and does not appear in the Table of Contents. Abstracts do not include references or citations. The abstract should be between 150-250 words, most importantly the abstract must fit on one page. The abstract is only included in the final dissertation and not part of the proposal.
The abstract is required for the dissertation manuscript only. It is not a required page for the proposal. The abstract, typically read first by other researchers, is intended as an accurate, nonevaluative, concise summary, or synopsis of the research study. It is usually the last item completed when writing the dissertation. The purpose of the abstract is to assist future researchers in accessing the research material and other vital information contained in the dissertation. Although few people typically read the full dissertation after publication, the abstract will be read by many scholars and researchers. Consequently, great care must be taken in writing this page of the dissertation. The content of the abstract covers the purpose of the study, problem statement, theoretical foundation, research questions stated in narrative format, sample, location, methodology, design, data sources, data analysis, results, and a valid conclusion of the research. The most important finding(s) should be stated with actual data/numbers (quantitative) or themes (qualitative) to support the conclusion(s). The abstract does not appear in the table of contents and has no page number. The abstract is double-spaced, fully justified with no indentations or citations, and no longer than one page. Refer to the APA Publication Manual, 6th Edition, for additional guidelines for the development of the dissertation abstract. Make sure to add the keywords at the bottom of the abstract to assist future researchers. Comment by GCU: Please note this is crucial and must be included in the abstract at the final dissertation stage. This is required for dean’s signature.
Keywords: Abstract, assist future researchers, 150 to 250 words, vital information Comment by GCU: Librarians and researchers use the abstract to catalogue and locate vital research material.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
ABSTRACT (Dissertation Only—Not Required for the Proposal) The abstract is typically read first by other researchers and is an accurate, non-evaluative, concise summary or synopsis of the research study. The abstract provides a succinct summary of the study and MUST include the purpose of the study, theoretical foundation, research questions (stated in narrative format), sample, location, methodology, design, data analysis, and results, as well as, a valid conclusion of the research. Abstracts must be double-spaced, fully justified with no indentions. (one page) |
||||
|
The abstract provides a succinct summary of the study and MUST include: the purpose of the study, theoretical foundation, research questions stated in narrative format, sample, location, methodology, design, data sources, data analysis, results, and a valid conclusion of the research. Note: The most important finding(s) should be stated with actual data/numbers (quantitative) ~or~ themes (qualitative) to support the conclusion(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
The abstract is written in APA format, one paragraph fully justified with no indentations, double-spaced with no citations, and includes key search words. Keywords are on a new line and indented. |
|
|
|
|
|
The abstract is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Dedication Comment by GCU: The Dedication page is the first page in the dissertation with a Roman Numeral. In the final dissertation this is usually page vi, so we have set it as vi. The dedication is only included in the final dissertation, not the proposal.
An optional dedication may be included here. While a dissertation is an objective, scientific document, this is the place to use the first person and to be subjective. The dedication page is numbered with a Roman numeral, but the page number does not appear in the Table of Contents. It is only included in the final dissertation and is not part of the proposal. If this page is not to be included, delete the heading, the body text, and the page break below. Comment by GCU: If you cannot see the page break, click on the top toolbar in Word (Home). Click on the paragraph icon. ¶Show/Hide button (go to the Home tab and then to the Paragraph toolbar).
Acknowledgments Comment by GCU: See formatting note for Dedication The Acknowledgements section is included only in the final dissertation, not the proposal.
An optional acknowledgements page can be included here. This is another place to use the first person. If applicable, acknowledge and identify grants and other means of financial support. Also acknowledge supportive colleagues who rendered assistance. The acknowledgments page is numbered with a Roman numeral, but the page number does not appear in the table of contents. This page provides a formal opportunity to thank family, friends, and faculty members who have been helpful and supportive. The acknowledgements page is only included in the final dissertation and is not part of the proposal. If this page is not to be included, delete the heading, the body text, and the page break below. Comment by GCU: If you cannot see the page break, click on the top toolbar in Word (Home). Click on the paragraph icon. ¶Show/Hide button (go to the Home tab and then to the Paragraph toolbar). Do not use section breaks!
Table of Contents List of Tables xi List of Figures xii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study 1 Introduction 1 Background of the Study 6 Problem Statement 7 Purpose of the Study 10 Research Questions and/or Hypotheses 11 Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study 14 Rationale for Methodology 16 Nature of the Research Design for the Study 17 Definition of Terms 19 Assumptions, Limitations, Delimitations 21 Assumptions. 22 Limitations and delimitations. 22 Summary and Organization of the Remainder of the Study 24 Chapter 2: Literature Review 26 Introduction to the Chapter and Background to the Problem 26 Identification of the Gap 28 Theoretical Foundations and/or Conceptual Framework 30 Review of the Literature 32 Methodology and instrumentation/data sources/research materials 36 Summary 39 Chapter 3: Methodology 42 Introduction 42 Statement of the Problem 43 Research Questions and/or Hypotheses 44 Research Methodology 45 Research Design 47 Population and Sample Selection 48 Quantitative sample size 48 Qualitative sample size 50 Research Materials, Instrumentation OR Sources of Data 54 Trustworthiness (for Qualitative Studies) 58 Credibility. 59 Transferability 59 Dependability. 60 Confirmability. 61 Validity (for Quantitative Studies) 63 Reliability (for Quantitative Studies) 65 Data Collection and Management 66 Data Analysis Procedures 68 Ethical Considerations 72 Limitations and Delimitations 75 Summary 76 References 78 Appendix A. Site Authorization Letter(s) 83 Appendix B. IRB Approval Letter 84 Appendix C. Informed Consent 85 Appendix D. Copy of Instruments and Permissions Letters to Use the Instruments 86 Appendix E. Power Analyses for Sample Size Calculation (Quantitative Only) 87 Appendix F. Additional Appendices 88
List of Tables Comment by GCU: This List of Tables has been set up to update automatically (when you click to do so). The List of Figures “reads” the style “Table Title,” which should be used in the text for the table title and subtitle of each table. Check “Help” in Word on how to update the TOC. The List of Tables follows the Table of Contents. The List of Tables is included in the Table of Contents and shows a Roman numeral page number at the top right. The page number is right justified with a 1 in. margin on each page. Dot leaders must be used. The title is bolded. On the List of Tables, each table title and subtitle will appear on the same line are are single spaced if more than one line, and double-spaced between entries. See 5.01-5.19 for details and specifics on Tables and Data Display. The preferences for the Table of Figures (style for the List of Tables) have been set up in this template. The automatic List of Tables (set up here) uses the style “Table of Figures, which has been formatted to achieve correct single space/double space formatting. All tables are numbered with Arabic numerals in the order in which they are first mentioned. [5.05]
Table 1. Correct Formatting for a Multiple Line Table Title is Single Spacing and Should Look Like this Example 36
Table 2. Equality of Emotional Intelligence Mean Scores by Gender 66
Note: Single space multiple-line table titles; double space between entries per example above. The List of Tables and List of Figures (styled as Table of Figures) have been formatted as such in this template. Update the List of Tables in the following manner: [Right click Update Field Update Entire Table], and the table title and subtitle will show up with the in-text formatting. After you update your List of Tables, you will need to manually remove the italics from each of your table titles per the example above.
List of Figures Comment by GCU: This is an example of a List of Figures “boiler plate.” Freely edit and adapt this to fit the particular dissertation. In Word, “overtype” edits and adaptations. The List of Figures follows the List of Tables. The title “List of Figures” is styled as Heading 1. The List of Figures is included in the Table of Contents (which will show up automatically since it is styled as Heading 1). and shows a Roman numeral page number at the top right. The list of figures has been set up with the style “Table of Figures,” for which all preferences have been set in this template (hanging indent tab stop 5.99” right justified with dot leader). Figures, in the text of the manuscript, include graphs, charts, maps, drawings, cartoons, and photographs [5.21]. In the List of Figures, single-space figure titles and double-space between entries. This has been set up in the “Table of Figures” style in this template. See 5.20-5.30 for details and specifics on Figures and Data Display. All figures are numbered with Arabic numerals in the order in which they are first mentioned. [5.05] The figure title included in the Table of Contents should match the title found in the text. Note: Captions are written in sentence case unless there is a proper noun, which is capitalized.
Figure 1. Correlation for SAT composite score and time spent on Facebook. 69
Figure 2. IRB alert. 73
Note: single-space multiple line figure titles; double-space between entries per example in List of Tables on previous page. Use sentence case for figure titles. After you update your List of Figures, you will need to manually remove the italics per the example above.
87
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study Comment by GCU: This heading is styled according to APA Level 1 heading (style: “Heading 1”) [3.03]. Do not modify or delete as it will impact your automated table of contents
Introduction Comment by GCU: This heading is styled according to APA Level 2 heading (style: “Heading 2”) [3.03]. Do not modify or delete as it will impact your automated table of contents
Monetary policies promote price stability and economic growth in Nigeria. Ajayi and Aluko (2017) stated monetary policy is primarily concerned with the management of interest rates and the regulation of money supply in the economy. Imoisi (2019) claimed most nations use interest rates to achieve price stability, and Nigeria’s goal is to achieve sustainable economic growth. Okwori and Abu (2017) added economic growth causes variations in interest rates. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) revealed interest rates had a positive but slightly insignificant effect on economic growth in Nigeria. Furthermore, Ufoeze, Odimgbe, Ezeabalisi and Alajekwu’s (2018) research clearly showed interest rates effects 98% of the variations in economic growth in Nigeria. Interest rates have shown to significantly effect Nigeria’s economy; however, other monetary policies may be a predictor of Nigeria’s economic growth.
There is a gap in the literature relative to other monetary policies that may be a predictor of Nigeria’s growth. The aim of this study is to examine to what extent monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index. Imoisi (2018) claimed there is an existing gap in the literature relative to the effectiveness of monetary policies. Inam and Ime (2017) recommended further research to understand if the predicative relationship between the actual level of money supply and price stability. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji, (2018) further specified a detailed study should be conducted showing the variations and interactions between monetary and fiscal policies and how they predict price stability in Nigeria. This study seeks to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply, predict consumer price index in Nigeria.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Introduction This section provides a brief overview of the research focus or problem, explains why this study is worth conducting, and discusses how this study will be completed. (Minimum three to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Dissertation topic is introduced and value of conducting the study is discussed. Note: The College of Doctoral Studies recognizes the diversity of learners in our programs and the varied interests in research topics for their dissertations in the Social Sciences. Dissertation topics must, at a minimum, be aligned to General Psychology in the Ph.D. program, Leadership in the Ed.D. Organizational Leadership program, Adult Instruction in the Ed.D. Teaching and Learning program, Management in the DBA program, and Counseling Practice, Counselor Education, Clinical Supervision or Advocacy/Leadership within the Counseling field in the Counselor Education Ph.D. program. If there are questions regarding appropriate alignment of a dissertation topic to the program, the respective program chair will be the final authority for approval decisions. Specifically, although the College prefers a learner’s topic align with the program emphasis, this alignment is not “required.” The College will remain flexible on the learner’s dissertation topic if it aligns with the degree program in which the learner is enrolled. The Ph.D. program in General Psychology does not support clinically based research. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion provides an overview of what is contained in the chapter. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Background of the Study Comment by GCU: This heading uses the style “Heading 2” [3.03].
Price instability is a problem for developing countries. Manu (2018) stated price instability is the main problem for Africa and Nigeria during the past thirty years. Studies conducted by Gertler and Gilchrist (1991), Batini (2004), Folawewo and Osinubi (2006), Onyemu (2012), and Fasanya et al. (2013) noted irrespective of efforts aimed at achieving macroeconomics objectives by means of monetary policy, there has been an unacceptable rate of inflation, especially in less developed economies. Nigeria is not an exception to this rule.
Nigeria is an oil rich nation plagued with price instability. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) stated monetary policy is the tool used in achieving monetary and price stability. Itodo, Akadiri and Ekundayo (2017) stated price instability tops the list of economic challenges negatively affecting the Nigerian economic environment. Imoisi (2019) added price instability causes the problem of unmanageable economic growth and development in Nigeria. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) stated that the Nigerian economy has also witnessed periods of growth and shrinkage with an unmanageable growth pattern. Imoisi (2018) stated monetary policy if targeted directly towards inflation stimulates growth directly. Nevertheless, the issue of whether monetary policy effectively curtails price instability is still unsolved.
There is a gap in the literature relative to other monetary policies that may be a predictor of Nigeria’s growth. The aim of this study is to examine to what extent monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index. Imoisi (2018) analyzed how monetary policies promoted economic growth in Nigeria from 1980-2017. The result showed approximately 62% of gross domestic product (GDP) is explained by variables monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply. Imoisi concluded monetary policies did not have a significant impact on Nigeria’s economic growth in the short run but significantly affected the country’s growth in the long run. Imoisi (2018) claimed there is an existing gap in the literature relative to the effectiveness of monetary policies. Ubi-Abai and Ekere (2018) analyzed the effects of fiscal and monetary policies on economic growth in a panel of 47 sub-Saharan African economies from 1996 to 2016. The findings showed that fiscal and monetary policies affected economic growth positively in the sub-region. Ubi-Abail and Ekere stated it is not clear how other monetary policies strategies effectively curtails price instability in the sub-Saharan region and therefore recommended future research examine this problem. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji, (2018) examined the impact of the interactions between fiscal and monetary policies on stock market behavior (ASI) and the impact of the volatility of these interactions on the Nigerian stock market. The study analyzed monthly data using the ARDL and EGARCH models. The results show the interaction between monetary and fiscal policies influence on stock market returns in Nigeria. The ARDL results show evidence of long run relationship between stock market behavior (ASI) and Monetary-fiscal policies. The results from the volatility estimates showed the stock market behavior (ASI) volatility is largely sensitive to volatility in the interactions between the two policy instruments. Future research was recommended to examine the relationship between monetary policies and price variations in the Nigerian economy. This study seeks to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply, predict consumer price index in Nigeria. Comment by Roselyn Polk: both are really good because it ssupports smaller sample size.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Background of the Study Minimum two to three paragraphs or approximately one page |
||||
|
The background section of Chapter 1 provides a brief history of the problem. Provides a summary of results from the prior empirical research on the topic.
Using results, societal needs, recommendations for further study, or needs identified in three to five research studies (primarily from the last three years), the learner identifies the stated need, called a gap. Builds a justification for the current study, using a logical set of arguments supported by citations.
The problem is discussed as applicable beyond the local setting and contributes to societal and/or professional needs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Problem Statement Comment by GCU: Levels of headings must accurately reflect the organization of the paper [3.02–3.03]. For example, this is a level 2 heading, and has been “styled” as Heading 2.
It is not known if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria. The population affected is the Nigerian economy. The unit of analysis is annual time series data measuring the Nigerian economy. This study would contribute to existing knowledge on monetary policies and how these policies predicts price stability in Nigeria. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) stated the Nigerian economy has experienced economic expansions and depressions with an inconsistent growth. Nigeria suffers from poor monetary policies that continuously keeps Nigerian citizenry underprivileged. This study will be of great importance to scholars, policy makers, economists, governmental agencies seeking to understand and examine economic policies in developing countries that experience inconsistent growth due to economic expansions and depressions.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Problem Statement Minimum three or four paragraphs or approximately one page |
||||
|
States the specific problem proposed for research with a clear declarative statement. Discusses the problem statement in relation to the gap or need in the world, considering such issues as: real issues affecting society, students, or organizations; the frequency that the problem occurs; the extent of human suffering the problem produces, the perceived lack of attention in the past; the discussion of the problem in the literature and research about what should be addressed vis à vis the problem; the negative outcomes the issue addresses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the general population affected by the problem. The general population refers to all individuals that could be affected by the study problem. Example: All older adults in the US who are 65 yrs or older. The target population is a more specific sub-population of interest from the general population, such as low income older adults (≥ 65 yrs) in AZ. Thus, the sample is derived from the target population, not from the general one. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the unit of analysis, which is the phenomenon, individuals, group or organization under study. |
|
|
|
|
|
Discusses the importance, scope, or opportunity for the problem and the importance of addressing the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
The problem statement is developed based on the need or gap defined in the Background to the Study section. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this quantitative correlational study is to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria from 1963 to 2015. The predictor variables are monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio and money supply. The criterion variable is consumer price index.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Minimum two to three paragraphs |
||||
|
Begins with one sentence that identifies the research methodology and design, target population, variables (quantitative) or phenomena (qualitative) to be studied and geographic location. This can be presesnted as a declarative statement: "The purpose of this study is...." that identifies the research methodology and design, population, variables (quantitative) or phenomena (qualitative) to be studied and geographic location. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the target population and geographic location. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Studies : Defines the variables and relationship of variables. Qualitative Studies: Describes the nature of the phenomena to be explored. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Research Questions and/or Hypotheses Comment by GCU: Insert the correct heading based on the methodology for your study. Qualitative studies use the header “Research Questions”; Quantitative and Mixed Method studies use the header “Research Questions and Hypotheses.”
RQ1: To what extent does monetary policy rate (MPR) predicts consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria.
RQ 2: To what extent does cash reserve ratio (CRR) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
RQ 3: To what extent does liquidity ratio (LQR) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
RQ 4: To what extent does money supply (MS) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
H01: Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) does not predict Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H1: Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) predicts Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H02: Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) does not predict Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H2: Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) predicts Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H03: Liquidity Ratio (LQR) does not predict Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H3: Liquidity Ratio (LQR) predicts Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H4: Money Supply does not predict Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
H04: Money Supply (MS) predicts Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Nigeria.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Research Question(s) and/or Hypotheses Minimum two to three paragraphs or approximately one page |
||||
|
Qualitative Studies: States the research question(s) the study will answer and describes the phenomenon to be studied. Note: The research questions provide guidance for the data which will be collected to answer the research questions; they do not identify the instruments. Quantitative Studies : States the research questions the study will answer, identifies and describes the variables, and states the hypotheses (predictive statements) using the format appropriate for the specific design and statistical analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
This section includes a discussion of the research questions, relating them to the problem statement. The research questions need to be connected to the theory(s) or model(s) from the theoretical foundation section, as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Advancing Scientific Knowledge and Significance of the Study
There is a gap in the literature relative to other monetary policies that may be a predictor of Nigeria’s growth (Imosi, 2018; Ubi-Abai & Ekere, 2018; Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, & Nwanji, Iman & Ime (2017). Nyoni and Bonga (2018) stated attention should be focused on the main determinants of economic growth. This study will seek to close the gap in literature by examine examining if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria.
This study will add to current literature on economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria. According to Adigwe and Onyeagba (2015), one problem that militate against the effectiveness of the monetary policy in achieving stability in Nigeria is lack of coordination between the monetary and other macroeconomic policies in the country. Understanding how economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria may lead to policy makers, economists, and governmental agencies to practices to create economic stability in Nigeria and other developing countries.
This study will add to the monetary theory of inflation. According to Friedman (1963), change in money supply is the major reason for changes in economic activities. When monetary theory is put into practice, central banks, which control monetary policy, can exercise a great deal of power over economic growth rates. According to Ibrahim (2019), effective monetary policy implementation should combine money supply while controlling and manipulating monetary policy instruments such as short-term interest rate and lending rates.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
ADVANCING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Clearly identifies the “gap” or “need” in the literature that was used to define the problem statement and develop the research questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes how the study will address the “gap” or “identified need” defined in the literature and contribute to the body of literature. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes how the research fits with and will contribute to or advance the current literature or body of research |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the potential practical applications from the research. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies the theory(ies) or model(s) that provide the theoretical foundations or conceptual frameworks for the study. |
|
|
|
|
|
Connects the study directly to the theory and describes how the study will add or extend the theory or model. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes how addressing the problem will add value to the population, community, or society. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Rationale for Methodology
This study will utilize a quantitative methodology. According to Smith (1983), quantitative research uses numerical data to provide information about variables relative to relations, comparisons, and predictions. Hagan (2014) stated quantitative research enables researchers to analyze different groups, perform statistical test, and analyze differences between groups. Quantitative research attempts to remove the investigator from the investigation. This methodology is appropriate because this study will use numerical data to examine the variables of monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio and money supply and consumer price index.
|
Criterion* (Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Rationale for Methodology (Minimum two to three paragraphs) |
||||
|
Identifies the specific research methodology for the study. |
|
|
|
|
|
Justifies the methodology to be used for the study by discussing why it is an appropriate approach for answering the research question(s) and addressing the problem statement. Quantitative Studies: Justify in terms of problem statement and the variables for which data will be collected. Qualitative Studies: Justify in terms of problem statement and phenomenon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Uses citations from seminal (authoritative) sources (textbooks and/or empirical research literature) to justify the selected methodology. Note: Introductory or survey research textbooks (such as Creswell) are not considered seminal sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Nature of the Research Design for the Study
This quantitative research will utilize a correlational research design. According to Smith (1983), a correlational research design collects data on two or more variables in a research study. Smith further explained correlational design is appropriate when seeking to understand a non-causal relationship between two or more non manipulated variables. More specifically, this study will use a correlational predictive design to identify predictive relationship between predictor and criterion variables. This design is appropriate because this study seeks to examine the relationship between non-causal variables relative to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria. Comment by Roselyn Polk: not much discussion on correlational design.
The target population is Nigerian annual data. The sample is 52 years of annual data measuring monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply ranging from 1963 to 2015. The data was not collected prior to 1963 because no data on these variables existed prior to 1963. The annual data used in this study would be retrieved from Knoema Integrated Global Database Comment by Roselyn Polk: while before I noted the use of 4 variables so needed larger sample size. however, you demonstrated in introduction/background similar research with finite number of years.
|
*(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Nature of the Research Design for the Study Minimum three to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Identifies and describes the selected design for the study. |
|
|
|
|
|
Justifies why the selected design addresses the problem statement and research questions. Quantitative Studies: Justifies the selected design based on the appropriateness of the design to address the research questions and data for each variable. Qualitative Studies: Justifies the selected design based on appropriateness of design to address research questions and study the phenomenon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Briefly describes the target population and sample for the study. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies the sources and instruments that will be used to collect data needed to answer the research questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Briefly describes data collection procedures to collect data on the sample. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the unit(s) of observation, which may be individuals, groups, documents, artifacts, databases, based on the data collection plan and instruments/sources. For example, units of observation may be individuals or documents. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Definition of Terms
The Definition of Terms section of Chapter 1 defines the study constructs and provides a common understanding of the technical terms, exclusive jargon, variables, phenomena, concepts, and technical terminology used within the scope of the study. Terms are defined in lay terms and in the context in which they are used within the study. Each definition may be a few sentences to a paragraph in length. This section includes any words that may be unknown to a lay person (words with unusual or ambiguous meanings or technical terms).
Definitions must be supported with citations from scholarly sources. Do not use Wikipedia to define terms. This popular “open source” online encyclopedia can be helpful and interesting for the layperson, but it is not appropriate for formal academic research and writing. Additionally, do not use dictionaries to define terms. A paragraph introducing this section prior to listing the definition of terms can be inserted. However, a lead-in phrase is needed to introduce the terms such as: “The following terms were used operationally in this study.” This is also a good place to “operationally define” unique phrases specific to this research. See below for the correct format:
Abbreviations. Do not use periods with abbreviated measurements, (e.g., cd, ft, lb, mi, and min). The exception to this rule is to use a period when abbreviated inch (in.) to avoid confusion with the word “in.” Units of measurement and statistical abbreviations should only be abbreviated when accompanied by numerical values, e.g., 7 mg, 12 mi, M = 7.5 measured in milligrams, several miles after the exit, the means were determined [4.27]. Comment by GCU: All terms should be styled as Heading 4 (level 4 headings).
Spaces. Do not use periods or spaces in abbreviations of all capital letters unless the abbreviation is a proper name or refers to participants using identity-concealing labels. The exception to this rule is that a period is used when abbreviating the United States as an adjective. Use a period if the abbreviation is a Latin abbreviation or a reference abbreviation [4.02]. Use standard newspaper practice when presenting AM and PM times, as in 7:30 PM or 6:00 AM.
Term. Write the definition of the word. This is considered a Level 4 heading., Make sure the definition is properly cited (Author, 2010, p.123). Terms often use abbreviations. According to the American Psychological Association [APA] (Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 2010), abbreviations are best used only when they allow for clear communication with the audience. Standard abbreviations, such as units of measurement and names of states, do not need to be written out. APA also allows abbreviations that appear as words in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (2005) to be used without explanation [4.22-4.30]. Comment by GCU: It is vital to include page numbers with in-text citations: “p.” for a single page, “pp.” for more than one page (e.g., p.12, and pp. 123-124). NOTE: Page or paragraph numbers are included with a direct quote.
Time units. Only certain units of time should be abbreviated. Do abbreviate hr, min, ms, ns, s. However, do not abbreviate day, week, month, and year [4.27]. To form the plural of abbreviations, add “s” alone without apostrophe or italicization (e.g., vols, IQs, Eds). The exception to this rule is not to add “s” to pluralize units of measurement (12 m not 12 ms) [4.29].
|
Criterion* (Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Definitions of Terms (Each definition may be a few sentences to a paragraph.) |
||||
|
Defines any words that may be unknown to a lay person (words with unusual or ambiguous meanings or technical terms) from the research or literature. |
|
|
|
|
|
Defines the variables for a quantitative study or the phenomena for a qualitative study from the research or literature. |
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions are supported with citations from scholarly sources. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Assumptions, Limitations, Delimitations
This section identifies the assumptions and specifies the limitations, as well as the delimitations, of the study. Define the terms and then list the limitations, delimitations and assumptions. Provide a rationale for all statements.
Assumptions. An assumption is a self-evident truth. This section lists what is assumed to be true about the information gathered in the study. State the assumptions being accepted for the study which may be methodological, theoretical, or topic-specific. Provide a rationale for each assumption. Additionally, identify any potential negative consequences of the assumptions for the study. For example, the following assumptions were present in this study: Comment by GCU: This heading is formatted according to APA Level 3 heading (style: “Heading 3”) [3.03]. Do not modify or delete as it will impact your automated table of contents The preferences have been set for this style; those preferences are: ., 12 pt. Times New Roman, Indented, Boldface, Lowercase Heading. [See 3.03]
1. It is assumed that survey participants in this study were not deceptive with their answers, and that the participants answered questions honestly and to the best of their ability. Provide an explanation to support this assumption. Comment by GCU: Formatting numbered lists: Use the style, set in this template, called “List Number.” It has been set up according to the following specifications: Indent .25 inches from the left margin. Text that wraps around to the next line is indented using the Hanging Indent feature at .5.” Each number or bullet ends with a period. Bullet lists use “List Bullet” Style. Numbered lists use “List Number” Style.
1. It is assumed that this study is an accurate representation of the current situation in rural southern Arizona. Provide an explanation to support this assumption.
Limitations and delimitations. Limitations are things that the researcher has no control over, such as bias. In contrast, delimitations are things over which the researcher has control, such as location of the study. Identify the limitations and delimitations of the research design. Provide a rationale for each limitation and delimitation, discuss associated consequences for the generalizability and applicability of the findings based on the limitations and delimitations. Address study limitations inherent in the method, study design, sampling strategy, data collection approach or instruments, and data analysis. For example: The following limitations/delimitations were present in this study:
1. Lack of funding limited the scope of this study. Provide an explanation to support this limitation. Discuss associated consequences for the generalizability and applicability of the findings.
2. The survey of high school students was delimited to only rural schools in one county within southern Arizona, limiting the demographic sample. Provide an explanation to support this delimitation. Discuss associated consequences for the generalizability and applicability of the findings.
|
*(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations (Minimum three to four paragraphs) |
||||
|
Provides a definition of the terms: assumptions, limitations, assumption, limitation and delimitations at the beginning of each section. |
|
|
|
|
|
States the assumptions being accepted for the study (methodological, theoretical, and topic-specific).
Provides a rationale for each assumption. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies limitations of the research method, design sampling strategy, data collection approach, instruments and data analysis.
Provides a rationale for each limitation.
Discusses associated consequences for the generalizability and applicability of the findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies delimitations of the research design and associated consequences for the generalizability and applicability of the findings.
Provides a rationale for each delimitation. |
|
|
|
|
|
The section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Summary and Organization of the Remainder of the Study
This section summarizes the key points of Chapter 1 and provides supporting citations for those key points. It then provides a transition discussion to Chapter 2 followed by a description of the remaining chapters. For example, Chapter 2 will present a review of current research on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Chapter 3 will describe the methodology, research design, and procedures for this investigation. Chapter 4 details how the data was analyzed and provides both a written and graphic summary of the results. Chapter 5 is an interpretation and discussion of the results, as it relates to the existing body of research related to the dissertation topic. For the proposal, this section should also provide a timeline for completing the research and writing up the dissertation. When the dissertation is complete, this section should be revised to eliminate the timeline information. Comment by GCU: When it is necessary to divide a paragraph at the end of the page, two lines must appear at the bottom of the page (widow) and two at the top of the following page (orphan). This is called “widow/orphan” control, and has been set up on the Normal Style in this template.
|
Criterion* (Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Chapter 1 Summary and Organization of the remainder of the study (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Summarizes key points presented in Chapter 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
Provides citations from scholarly sources to support key points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the remaining Chapters and provides a transition discussion to Chapter 2. For proposal only, a timeline for completing the research and dissertation is provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
The chapter is correctly formatted to dissertation template using the Word Style Tool and APA standards. Writing is free of mechanical errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
All research presented in the chapter is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected academic, professional, original sources. In-text citations are accurate, correctly cited, and included in the reference page according to APA standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Introduction to the Chapter and Background to the Problem Comment by Derrick Tennial: In this section, please do the following: 1. Introduction: Provide an orienting paragraph so the reader knows what the literature review will address. 2. Introduction: Describe how the chapter will be organized (including the specific sections and subsections). 3. Introduction: Describe how the literature was surveyed so the reader can evaluate thoroughness of the review. This includes search terms and databases used. 4. Background: Discuss how the problem has evolved historically into its current form. 5. Background: Describe the “gap” or “need” defined in the current literature and how it leads to the creation of the topic and problem statement for the study. Note: This section should be a significant expansion on the Background to the Problem section in Chapter 1. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This paragraph is too long; I’m not sure what its purpose. Here is what it is supposed to be: Introduction: Provide an orienting paragraph so the reader knows what the literature review will address.
The purpose of this quantitative correlational study is to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria from 1963 to 2015. Ajayi and Aluko (2017) stated monetary policy is primarily concerned with the management of interest rates and the regulation of money supply in the economy. Osuala, and Onyeike (2013) studied the impact of price stability on Nigeria’s economic growth and development over thirty-one years. The results from the study shows a statistically positive effect on price stability on economic growth in Nigeria. The results also showed no causality amongst the variables under study. Taiwo (2011) investigated the impact of inflation and investment on economic growth in Nigeria with the use of ordinary least square (OLS) method and annual secondary data from 1981 to 2006, the investigation based on inflation-GDP revealed inflation has negative and insignificant impact on economic growth, meaning as inflation increases economic growth falls. Ifionu and Akinpelumi (2015) studied the impact and consequence of money supply (M2), applying secondary data derived from annual data from the Central Bank Statistical Bulletin (2013). Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Granger causality testing and Co-integration was used to estimate the long-run and short-run association amongst the variables under study. The outcomes showed a long-run relationship amongst variables used and it showed price instability had a negative association amongst money supply (M2) and a positive impact between gross domestic product and money supply. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do not use personal pronouns except when included in the problem statement or a direct quote. Replace pronoun with the appropriate common or proper noun. throughout entire document.
This study will add to current literature on economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria.
Chapter two will include a discussion of the background to the problem, identification of the gap, theoretical foundation, a review of the literature, and provide a summary. The review of the literature will provide an in-depth analysis of the causality between money supply and economic growth. The review of the literature would further explain how monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Describe how the review of literature is organized into sections and sub sections. Comment by Derrick Tennial: I need to know the headings of each section here. This is not specific enough.
A review of empirical studies was conducted that align to the problem of the current study and the research questions proposed. Numerous databases were utilized to explore these topics, including Academic Search Complete, ERIC, ProQuest Central, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. There were a variety of search terms used to gather information. The search terms included but were not limited to the following terms: monetary policy, monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, money supply. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This is not specific enough. Describe how the literature was surveyed so the reader can evaluate thoroughness of the review. This includes search terms and databases used. How many article did these terms yield. Please address each highlighted item above.
Background to the Problem Comment by Derrick Tennial: 4. Background: Discuss how the problem has evolved historically into its current form. 5. Background: Describe the “gap” or “need” defined in the current literature and how it leads to the creation of the topic and problem statement for the study. Note: This section should be a significant expansion on the Background to the Problem section in Chapter 1.
Price instability is a problem for developing countries. Manu (2018) stated price instability is the main problem for Africa and Nigeria during the past thirty years. Studies conducted Price instability is a problem for developing countries. Manu (2018) stated price instability is the main problem for Africa and Nigeria during the past thirty years. Studies by Gertler and Gilchrist (1991) noted irrespective of efforts aimed at achieving macroeconomics objectives by means of monetary policy, there has been an unacceptable rate of inflation, especially in less developed economies. Nigeria is not an exception to this rule. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This cannot be straight copy and paste from chapter 1.
Nigeria is an oil rich nation plagued with price instability. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) stated monetary policy is the tool used in achieving price stability. Itodo, Akadiri and Ekundayo (2017) stated price instability tops the list of economic challenges negatively affecting the Nigerian economic environment. Imoisi (2019) added price instability causes the problem of unmanageable economic growth and development in Nigeria. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) stated the Nigerian economy has also witnessed periods of growth and shrinkage with an unmanageable growth pattern. Imoisi (2018) stated monetary policy if targeted directly towards inflation stimulates growth directly. Nevertheless, the issue of whether monetary policy effectively curtails price instability is still unsolved
Inflation in Nigeria is a nationwide crisis which has crippled the Nigerian economy for over thirty years. Kanu (2002) stated inflation is a high and persistent increase in the general price level of an economy. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This paragraph is not cohesive. Make sure that it flows.
Masha (1995) stated price increases in Nigeria is occurs due to excess demand and excess supply of consumer goods.
Folaweuro and Osinubi (2006) in their study clearly stated price increases, development and production have established the long-term inverse association between price variations and growth. According to Batini (2004), price instability is the main challenge for Africa and Nigeria, specifically over the past thirty years. Dating back to the initial oil shock in Nigeria during the mid-1970s, the price increases averaged greater than 15% a year. Folaweuro and Osinubi (2006) in their study clearly stated price increases, development and production have established the long-term inverse association between price variations and growth. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Sentence does not make sense. Please revise.
Monetary policies promote price stability and economic growth in Nigeria. Ajayi and Aluko (2017) stated monetary policy is primarily concerned with the management of interest rates and the regulation of money supply in the economy. Imoisi (2019) claimed most nations use interest rates to achieve price stability, and Nigeria’s goal is to achieve sustainable economic growth. Okwori and Abu (2017) added economic growth causes variations in interest rates. Ayodeji and Oluwole (2018) revealed interest rates had a positive but slightly insignificant effect on economic growth in Nigeria. Furthermore, Ufoeze, Odimgbe, Ezeabalisi and Alajekwu’s (2018) research clearly showed interest rates effects 98% of the variations in economic growth in Nigeria. Interest rates have shown to significantly effect Nigeria’s economy; however, other monetary policies may be a predictor of Nigeria’s economic growth.
There is a direct relationship between money supply and price stability in Nigeria. According to Mishkin (2011), previous monetarist emphasized the importance of the association between money supply and inflation, arguing that price increases is constantly and universally a monetary phenomenon. Friedman (1983) suggested inflation is a monetary policy issue because inflation occurs from an increase in the money supply in circulation even though price variations may not be directly proportional to an increase in the amount of cash in circulation. Aron et al. (2004) concluded monetary policy tools are more active in curtailing inflationary trends in the Nigerian economy. Aron et al.’s study revealed monetary policy instruments are significantly associated with price increases in an economy. Jaafar (2016) discovered monetary policy instruments had lesser impact in curtailing price variations in Nigeria, and as such recommend monetary policy in addition to other price stabilization strategies to simultaneously minimize price instability in the economy. Monetary policies can be used to curb inflation in Nigeria.
One of the fundamental purposes of having an effective monetary policy in Nigeria is the need for price stability. Gherman (2010) stated monetary policy focus on ensuring price stability. Alain kabundi et al. (2015) stated regardless of the numerous monetary policy regimes adopted by the Central Bank of Nigeria, inflation remains a significant menace to Nigeria’s monetary and economic development. The Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) annual publication on the performance, operation and success of monetary policy in Nigeria (CBN 2016 bulletin) stated monetary policy is most effective when measures of and guaranteeing relative price stability in the Nigerian economy. Folawewo and Oshinubi (2006) claimed for several years controlling the supply of money has been the Central Bank of Nigeria’s key focus of monetary policy. Price stability promotes economic growth and development in the Nigerian economy. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Sentence is too long. Break it up into 2 sentence. Add transitional sentence.
Globally, the most important function of the apex banking institution (monetary authority or central bank) of any country is the design and application of monetary policy. According to Ajayi (1999), The CBN has since formation played the traditional role anticipated of a central bank, which is the monitoring and regulation of the money supply in the Nigerian economy thereby promoting the social welfare in the Nigerian economy. Folaweuro and Osinubi (2006) stated most economies have price stability as the goal of its monetary policy. This economic objective remains essential for the achievement of short run as well as and long term monetary and economic growth and development.. Folawewo (2006) mentioned the reduced-price variations of the last years occurred as a result of a combination of economic strategies, advantageous to curtailing inflation, tracked by limiting monetary and fiscal procedures and a neutral budgetary strategy. The monetary policy was primarily categorized by increased interest rates, currency appreciation and mandatory reserves. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do not use personal pronouns except when included in the problem statement or a direct quote. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Explain in this is way the common person can understand.
There is a gap in the literature relative to other monetary policies that may be a predictor of Nigeria’s growth. The aim of this study is to examine to what extent monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index. Imoisi (2018) claimed there is an existing gap in the literature relative to the effectiveness of monetary policies. Inam and Ime (2017) recommended further research to understand if the predicative relationship between the actual level of money supply and price stability. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji, (2018) further specified a detailed study should be conducted showing the variations and interactions between monetary and fiscal policies and how these policies predict price stability in Nigeria. This study seeks to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply, predict consumer price index in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do not use personal pronouns except when included in the problem statement or a direct quote.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION (TO THE CHAPTER) AND BACKGROUND (TO THE PROBLEM) (Minimum two to three pages) |
||||
|
Introduction : Provides an orienting paragraph so the reader knows what the literature review will address. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Introduction : Describes how the chapter will be organized (including the specific sections and subsections). |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Introduction: Describes how the literature was surveyed so the reader can evaluate thoroughness of the review. This includes search terms and databases used. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Background: Discusses how the problem has evolved historically into its current form. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Background : Describes the “gap” or “need” defined in the current literature and how it leads to the creation of the topic and problem statement for the study. Note: This section should be a significant expansion on the Background to the Problem section in Chapter 1. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Identification of the Gap Comment by Derrick Tennial: The Identification of the Gap. Please organize this section in the following manner: Paragraph 1 - Describe the societal issue or need. Paragraph 2 - Summarize gap article 1 – identify the topic, data collection procedure, the results, and recommendation for future research. Paragraph 3 - Summarize gap article 2 – identify the topic, data collection procedure, the results, and recommendation for future research. Paragraph 4 - Summarize gap article 3– identify the topic, data collection procedure, the results, and recommendation for future research. Paragraph 5 - Summarize gap article 4– identify the topic, data collection procedure, the results, and recommendation for future research. Paragraph 6 - Summarize gap article 5– identify the topic, data collection procedure, the results, and recommendation for future research. Paragraph 7 - Synthesis of all the recommendations from the gap articles that lead to your problem statement. From the findings of research studies and evolution of recent literature on the topic, defines the problem statement for the study. Comment by Derrick Tennial: In each one of these gap articles, you skip over how data was collected. Also, you did not mention the recommendation for future research or limitation to the study on which your gap is based.
Price stability in Nigeria is key for economic growth and development. Numerous studies have been conducted showing how price instability negatively affects the Nigerian economy. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This paragraph is incomplete. Where is the description of the problem or societal need?
yomitunde, Akinwuyi, Omotayo and Abayomi (2019) examined the relationship between monetary policy and exchange rate in Nigeria. The results of former empirical studies show that studies have failed to use the methodology in this research, which has created a gap in the literature. The study revealed Treasury bill rate and credit reserve requirement have an inverse association with exchange rate. However, broad money supply and monetary policy rate have a direct association with exchange rate in the country. The study recommends the need for future research on how monetary policies promote price stability in Nigeria. A gap still exists in the literature relative to the impact of monetary policy on price stability in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: How was data collected? Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do not use this term. There was a recommendation.
There is a significant relationship between price stability and economic growth in Nigeria. Idris (2019) examined the relationship between monetary policy and economic growth in Nigeria using time series data covering the period of 1980 to 2017. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do you know how this data was collected?
The results revealed the existence of long-run relationship between monetary policy indicators and economic growth meaning monetary policies significantly impacts on economic growth over an extended time period. The results also revealed money supply has positive effect, while both exchange rate and interest rate have negative effect on the real GDP. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Where is the recommendation for future research?
Monetary policies are tools which the government of any country can use to efficiently attain the anticipated economic growth and development of their various economies. Imoisi (2018) examined the degree to which monetary strategies can encourage economic development in Nigeria from 1980-2016. The results revealed monetary policies did not have a significant impact on Nigeria’s economic growth in the short run, but significantly affected the country’s growth in the long run. Imoisi stated that there exists a gap in literature between monetary policy formulation and implementation. The study clearly shows efficient coordination of monetary and fiscal policies promotes economic growth in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: How was data collected? Comment by Derrick Tennial: Do not use personal pronouns except when included in the problem statement or a direct quote. Replace pronoun with the appropriate common or proper noun. throughout entire document. Comment by Derrick Tennial: They did not say this. There was not a gap….they made a recommendation for future research? Revise this.
The first (topic) sentence and last (linkage or transitional) sentence should not include a citation. Please revise. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji, (2018) This study examined the impact of the interactions between fiscal and monetary policies on stock market behavior (ASI) and the impact of the volatility of these interactions on the Nigerian stock market. The results from the variations predicts how instability in the stock market behavior (ASI) is mostly sensitive to instability in the interactions between the two policy instruments. There is a gap in literature which suggests more research should be conducted to study how adjustments in monetary policies influences price stability in the Nigerian stock market. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This is not a complete sentence. How was data collected? Comment by Derrick Tennial: There was a not gap….they made a recommendation for future research? Revise this.
Money supply significantly influences economic growth. Inam and Ime (2017) Studied the effect of money supply in enhancing economic growth in Nigeria and Ghana. The findings reveal that broad money supply (M2) has an insignificant negative influence on RGDP in Nigeria, but in Ghana the impact is significant and positive. The study among others suggests that the Monetary Authorities in the two countries should come up with monetary policy strategies that will help drive the economy better and such policies should consider M2 and Credit to Private Sectors more as their contributions are necessary for economic expansion that lead to more output and employment.
There is a gap in the literature relative to other monetary policies that may be a predictor of Nigeria’s growth. Ayomitunde, Akinwuyi, Omotayo and Abayomi (2019) recommended the need for future research on how monetary policies promote price stability in Nigeria. Idris (2019) suggests there is exists a gap in literature meaning appropriate monetary actions which might boost borrowing through effective interest rate as well as stable exchange rate. Imoisi (2018) claimed there is an existing gap in the literature relative to the effectiveness of monetary policies. Inam and Ime (2017) recommended further research to understand if the predicative relationship between the actual level of money supply and price stability. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji, (2018) further specified a detailed study should be conducted showing the variations and interactions between monetary and fiscal policies and how they predict price stability in Nigeria. This study seeks to examine if and to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply, predict consumer price index in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This cannot be a straight copy and paste a previous section. You must say the thing you are say here, but you must use different wording.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
CHAPTER 2: IDENTIFICATION OF THE GAP (Minimum two pages) |
||||
|
Summarizes the “societal” or big problem. Highlights what has been discovered and what still needs to be discovered related to the topic from literature or research dated within the last five years. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Discusses and synthesizes the evolution of the research on the problem. Specifically: · Identifies the key sources used as the basis for the gap · Identifies trends in research and literature. · Identifies how the research focus has changed over the recent past (five years). · Discusses key findings that emerged from recent studies. · Discusses limitations or prior research and defined future research needs. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
From the findings of research studies and evolution of recent literature on the topic, defines the problem statement for the study. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Theoretical Framework Comment by Derrick Tennial: Ch 2.3 - Theoretical Foundation Minimum 2-3 pages Identify the theory or conceptual framework(s) that will be the foundation for the study. Describe the origin and historical evolution of the theory. Identify and define tenets, beliefs, and/or characteristics of the theory using seminal works and authors. Explain why the theoretical foundation/conceptual framework is appropriate for your study. Each paragraph is 4-8 sentences (ca 125 words) & written using MEAL Plan (if applicable) Comment by Derrick Tennial: Please address each highlighted item above. Make sure it item is clearly identified.
Monetary theory of inflation is the theoretical framework for this study. This theory states that change in money supply is the major reason for changes in economic activities. When monetary theory is put into practice, central banks, which control monetary policy, can exercise a great deal of power over economic growth rates. Monetarism refers to the followers of M. Friedman who hold that “Only money matters “and as such, monetary policy is a more potent instrument instruments than fiscal policy in economic stabilization. Monetary theory states that According to Friedman (1963), money supply is the key factor affecting the wellbeing of the economy. According to Ahuja (2011), monetarists argue that money has significant effect on price level or inflation in the economy in the long run and have real effects on output and employment in the short run. Khabo, (2002) Monetarists believe that “money matter” therefore there is a direct link between monetary sector and the real sector of the economy. Friedman (1963) equally argued that changes in money supply will therefore have both direct and indirect effect on spending and investment respectively since money supply is substitutive not just for bonds but also for many goods and services. This research would contribute to existing knowledge by clearly identifying the long and short run relationship between monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio and money supply on consumer prices. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Citation(s) needed. Comment by Derrick Tennial: Sentence is not formatted properly.
The monetarist theory of inflation (a reaffirmation of quantity theory of money). Friedman (1963) stated, Monetarists stressed money supply as the main issue significantly affecting the state of the economy. Ahuja (2011) stated, the monetarists claim that money significantly affects inflation or price levels in the long run in addition to having visible effects on employment and productivity in the short run. Khabo (2002) Monetarists therefore believe that there is a direct connection amongst the real sector and monetary sector of the economy. Friedman (1963) likewise maintained that variations in money supply would therefore have indirect and direct outcome on costs and investment since money supply is an alternative for many consumer goods and also services. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This is not a sentence.
Inflation has been well-defined by researchers from nations founded on antecedence incidence on their economies. Okere and Sanni (2005) clearly described inflation as an overall increase in the general price level which can negatively affect the monetary policy strategy of governments in the long or short run. Afolabi & Olayemi (1995) Inflation could also be defined as a state of persistent, unacceptable and rapid increase in the overall price of consumer goods in an economy causing to overall loss of buying power. Basically, rising inflation negatively impacts the value of currency by applying a descending and rising compression on it. According to Okere & Sanni (2005), inflation is an economic phenomenon of consistent rising prices. Inflation has nevertheless weakened since the early 1990’s. In developed economies for example, the average inflation rate has reduced in the 1980’s from 7% to 2% in the present era. In emergent markets, the average price increases rate has reduced from 9% to 4%. According to the International Monetary Fund’s world economic outlook, regular price increases in current years remain at their lowermost points since the 1970’s.
The use of the monetarist theory of inflation would lead to the development of the following research questions or the current study:
RQ1: To what extent does monetary policy rate (MPR) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria.
RQ 2: To what extent does cash reserve ratio (CRR) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
RQ 3: To what extent does liquidity ratio (LQR) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
RQ 4: To what extent does money supply (MS) predict consumer price index (CPI) in Nigeria?
This study would add to the theory of inflation by clearly outlining exactly how monetary policies as measured by monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio and money supply directly impacts on price stability in Nigeria. Comment by Derrick Tennial: This underdeveloped.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
theoretical foundations and/or conceptual framework (Minimum two to three pages) |
||||
|
Identifies a model(s) or theory(ies) from seminal source(s) that provide a reasonable conceptual framework or theoretical foundation to use in developing the research questions, identifying variables/phenomena, and selecting data collection instruments. |
|
1 |
X |
|
|
Cites the appropriate seminal source(s) for each theory or model. |
|
0 |
X |
|
|
Includes a cogent discussion/synthesis of the theory or model and justifies the theoretical foundation/framework as relevant to the study. Connects the study directly to the theory and describes how the study will add or extend the theory or model. Quantitative Studies: Have one theory for each variable. For example, use the model the survey is based on. Use the theory or model upon which the instrument is based. Distinguishes between the model/theories being used for research questions and data collection versus the background models and theories generically relevant to the study. |
|
0 |
X |
|
|
Builds a logical argument of how the research questions are developed based on the theoretical foundation for the study. |
|
0 |
X |
|
|
Reflects understanding of the foundational, historical, research relevant to the theoretical foundation/framework. |
|
0 |
X |
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
X |
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Review of the Literature Comment by Derrick Tennial: You are not out to prove anything. You are surveying the literature relative to your topic. I do not know how this review of literature is organized. Please make sure throughout the document you observe the 75/25 rule. 75% of your sources must be (1) empirical articles (2) and must within 5 years of your date of graduation. At points, 75% of your articles should be 2020, 2019, 2018. Articles from 2017 are marginal and would require you to graduate by Dec. 2021 or you would have to get rid of all of your 2017 articles. I see a lot of 2009-2016; these sources are too old.
The literature review outlines monetary policies and its impact on price stability in Nigeria. This review of the literature will provide an in-depth analysis of the causality between money supply and economic growth. The review of the literature would further explain how monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria.
Monetary policies significantly impact economic growth in small-open economies. While examining the effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policy instrument instabilizing the Nigerian economy, Adegoriola (2018) affirmed a positive association between money supply and economic growth while interest rate had a negative association with economic growth within the study period from 1981 to 2015. Comment by MICHAEL K SAALE: In a study that examined the r/s btw … Adegoriola (2018) affirmed… detailed but coinsise… a paragraph canbe 8 sentences long… you can add more info about this study without stating the author until you cite another author.this currently has 5 sentences. Comment by MICHAEL K SAALE: What study period, explain .. include if necessary the year of the study.
In a study which observed a model of monetary/fiscal policy mix, c admitted monetary policies led to high inflation. In a study that examined the relative impacts of fiscal and monetary policy on economic growth in Algeria, Bokreta and Benanaya (2016) added fiscal policy had a powerful influence than monetary policy towards fast-tracking the rate of sustainable economic growth. In the study of Fiscal and monetary policies Gusti (2014), alleged monetary policies have substantial impact on the economic growth of Indonesia. When studing the impact of monetary and fiscal policy on the economic growth of Iran, Khosravi and Karimi (2010) argued inflation has negative impact on economic growth while expansionary monetary policies showed a positive impact on the economic growth.
Monetary policies and government poliies are very important towards sustaining economic growth and development. Examining the phenomenon of monetary and financial policies in Ghana, Quartey and Afful-Mensah (2014) believed fiscal imbalances surrounding Ghana’s economic growth has hindered the monetary outcomes. Abata, Kehinde and Bolarinwa (2012) in their study of the impact of fiscal and monetary policy and how it influences the development process in Nigeria, confirmed a long-run equilibrium relationship between economic growth and monetary and fiscal policy. In the study of impact of an increase in the Brazilian policy interest rate on the fiscal cost taking into considerations the direct and the indirect effects on the yield of public bonds, Carvalho, Diniz, Pedrosa and Rossi (2016) confirmed a policy mix between monetary and fiscal policies in Brazil to be of high significance. Further more, Ehikioya, Uduh and Edeme (2018) while studying the impact of fiscal and monetary policies on the growth of SMEs in Nigeria confirmed that fiscal policy is more effective and efficient than the monetary policy in encouraging the output growth performance of SMEs in Nigeria for the period under review. Musa, Asare and Gulumbe (2013) while examining the effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies interaction on price and output growth in Nigeria revealed both monetary and fiscal policy has a significant impact on economic growth, but the government spending appears more relevant for sustainable growth. Monetary and fiscal policies are instrumental for economic growth and development. Comment by MICHAEL K SAALE: Ensure the topic sentence is not too choppy Comment by MICHAEL K SAALE: Give more details of the study before stating aurthors findings. For instance ensure each paragraph focuses on one topic… stress the main points that supports the paragraph… The literature review is supported based on each paragraph... does the para support the section? Does the section support the literature? Comment by MICHAEL K SAALE: Each paragraph must connect to the next paragraph… must transend.
There exists a significant relationship between Monetary policy and economic growth. While studying the impact of fiscal and monetary policy on the economic growth of 47 Sub-Saharan African countries covering the period of 1996 to 2016, Praise and Jacob (2018) noted a positive relationship between monetary policy and economic growth across the examined countries under consideration. On the contrary, while studying comparative effect of fiscal and monetary policy on the economic growth of Pakistan using annual time series data spanning 1984 to 2014, Saqib and Aggarwal (2017) added that there exists a positive and significant impact of fiscal and monetary policy indicators on economic growth. Jawaid, Qadri and Ali (2011) in their study the effect of monetary, fiscal and trade policy on the economic growth of Pakistan using annual time series data covering 1981 to 2009 observed the presence of significant and positive long-run and short-run relationship between monetary and fiscal policy with economic growth. The authors also added that monetary policy is more effective than fiscal policy in Pakistan. In the study that examined the relative effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy on economic growth in Nigeria suing the annual time series data covering the period of 1970 to 2007 Adefeso and Mobolaji (2010) confirmed the effects of monetary policy to be more effective for promoting economic growth. Da Silva and Vieira (2017) in their study on the conduct of monetary and fiscal policies for a panel data of 113 advanced and emerging/developing economies for the period prior to the beginning of the crisis (2001–2008) and for the period after the financial crisis (2009–2012) alleged monetary policy seems to be countercyclical only for advanced economies in the period prior to the international financial crisis, while the fiscal policy behaves in a procyclical way only in the pre-crisis period. There is a positive relationship between monetary policy and and economic growth and development.
Economic growth is mostly promoted by monetary policies. Rahman (2009) in their study the relative effects of monetary and fiscal policies in enhancing the real output growth in Bangladesh, confirmed that monetary policy is more effective towards accelerating economic growth in Bangladesh. In the study of the comparative effects of fiscal and monetary policy in Pakistan for the period covering 1981 to 2009 using time series data, Havi and Enu (2014) in their study on the relative impacts of monetary and fiscal policy on economic growth in Ghana and further evaluates the superiority of these policies in enhancing output growth, affirmed a positive relationship between monetary and fiscal policies with economic growth. Jawaid, Arif and Naeemullah (2010) confirmed the effectiveness of monetary policy on economic growth. In a study which studied impact of monetary and fiscal policies on economic growth in Bangladesh using annual data spanning 1979 to 2013, Noman and Khudri (2015) revealed monetary policy variables have positive and significant impact on economic growth except inflation and interest rate. Sharma and Sharma (2014), while studing the pertinent issues surrounding monetary and fiscal policies towards accelerating rapid economic growth, verified monetary policies possess powerful influence on the pace and pattern of economic growth of a nation. In a study examining macro-model with endogenous asset liquidity to understand monetary–fiscal interactions with liquidity frictions Cui (2016) mentioned appropriate mix of both monetary and fiscal policies can avoid a deep financial recession. There is a significant relationship between monetary policy and economic growth.
There exists a significant relationship between macroeconomic growth and monetary policy. Jarocinski and Mackowiak (2018), while studying how monetary and fiscal policies are conducted in the euro area, output, inflation, and government bond default premia are indeterminate, emphasized monetary-fiscal policy interactions have significant impact on macroeconomic stability. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide, and Nwanji (2018) in their study of effect of policy interactions between monetary and fiscal policies on the stock market behavior and further measures the volatility of these interactions on the Nigerian stock market, mentioned the presence of long-run relationship between the All Share Index (ASI) and the monetary-fiscal policy interactions. In the study which examined the impacts of monetary and fiscal policies on output growth during the period of financial crises characterised by a sudden stop in net capital inflows in developing and emerging market economies. Hutchison, Noy and Wang (2007) revealed that both monetary and fiscal tightening at the time of a sudden stop crisis significantly worsens output losses. Alavi, Moshiri and Sattarifar (2016) in their study which examined the application of IS-MP-AS framework to the Iranian economy and further evaluates the monetary and fiscal policies using this approach, affirmed both monetary and fiscal policies are effective and significant in the Iranian economy and equally enhances the nation’s aggregate income. While studying the impact of fiscal and monetary policies on the unemployment problems in Nigeria spanning the sample period of 1980 to 2013. Attamah, Anthony and Ukpere (2015) stated monetary policy indicators have significant impact on the unemployment challenges in Nigeria. Ryan-Collins and Van Lerven (2018) confirmed that monetary and fiscal policy are highly essential in enhancing economic growth.
Monetary policy controls inflation. Rehman and Ahmed (2002) in their study on substance to monetary measures for sustainable growth in the economy, affirmed money supply, is an effective tool to influence and control the monetary assets in Pakistan. Ferdiun (2005) in the study on how monetary policy cause economic instability in Turkey agreed monetary policy effectiveness in Turkey’s controls inflation ensuring price stability . Dilshad, et al. (2016) also revealed money supply significantly impacted on the economic growth in Pakistan.
Causality between Money Supply and Economic Growth
There exists causality between money supply and Economic Growth. Hussain (2005) affirmed a short-run significant relationship amongst money supply, growth, and price increases between devaluing currency and a high and persistent increase in the general price level. Abbas (1991) recognized a two-way causality amongst income and money and one-way connection between cash and earnings in Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand. Aziakpono (2003) verified supply of money significantly affects real output and economic development in the Nigeria economy.
There is causality between money supply and gross domestic output. Obaid (2007) identified mutual causality connection supports the prediction of the Gross Domestic Product performance within the assumed measurements of currency supply in Egypt. El-Seoud (2014) confirmed there was unidirectional causality from real Gross domestic product to real money supply in the long and short-run. Asogun (1998) revealed clearly an increase in the supply of money supply which creates s positive macro-economic productivity.
.
Monetary policy directly impacts on money supply. Tan and Baharumshah (1999) confirmed there exists a connection amongst prices, money and income. Lee and Li (1983) affirmed a bidimensional connection between revenue and money also unidirectional connection from currency to prices. Ahmed and Suliman (2011) studied the long-run association amongst three real Gross Domestic Product (GDP), macroeconomic variables, Price Level (CPI) and Money Supply (MS) from 1960 to 2005. Granger causality assessment was used and the result showed no causation between real money supply and Gross Domestic Product in Sudan from 1960 – 2005. There is a direct link between monetary policy and the supply of money in Nigeria.
There exists a significant connection between output, money and price. Omoke and Ugwuancy (2010) clearly outlined money supply Granger caused both productivity and price increases. Chimobi and Uche (2010) showed money supply Granger caused both prices, output and money supply (M2) had causal effects on output and prices. Olusanya and Akinade (2012) affirmed no causality connection amongst money supply (M2) and economic growth (GDP). The author further noticed there exists a uni-directional connection amongst economic growth and money supply.
Money supply significantly influences price stability. Amassoma and Onyedikachi (2018) stated no causality exists amongst money supply and inflation in Nigeria between 1970 to 2016. Avila and Le Roux, P. (2017) revealed price instability was triggered by expansionary monetary policy (increasing money supply in proposed monetary policy is effective in explaining variations in economic growth and development in Rwanda. Developing countries should rely on monetary policy as a tool to ensuring price stability.
Monetary policies determine stock performance of African countries. Suhaibu, Harvey, and Amidu (2017) affirmed an inverse relationship between money supply and real interest rates have a significant influence on the Nigerian stock market. Busari et al (2002) clearly showed a negative but significant effect on economic growth and price stability. Money supply had a positive relationship on price stability. Ezeaku, Ibe, Ugwuanyi, Modebe, and Agbaeze (2018) clearly showed monetary policy have a long-run association with real industrial output growth, and instability in the system is adjusted at the speediness of 72.2% yearly.
Monetary policy encourages price stability and industrial sector growth. Matousek and Solomon (2017) confirmed a significant loan growth being sensitive to bank capitalization and size positively impacts on the bank lending channel (BLC). it is not known what specific interest rate bank lending channel (BLC) impacts on price stability. Furthermore, Twinoburyo, E. N., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2018) outlined developing economies with weak structural and underdeveloped monetary markets need focus on policies that promote economic growth the nexus between monetary policies and economic growth remains inconclusive.
Monetary policies outcomes have unpredictable outcomes on Nigeria’s financial sector. Tule, and Oduh, (2017) admitted financial innovations improves interest rates of monetary policy and the overall efficiency of the financial sector. Lawal, Somoye, Babajide and Nwanji (2018) argued adjusting monetary policies when formulating stock market policies as there exists a significant connecting between monetary policies and consumer prices reflected by stock market behavior. Onoh and Obioma (2017) revealed that money supply significantly affects inflation. The null hypothesis which stated that money supply has no significant effect on inflation was rejected.
Monetary policy directly influences inflation. Hossain et al. (2012) studied the impact of price variations on economic growth and development. Hossain observed a connection between price variations and economic growth. Jaganath (2014) confirmed there exists a positive association of price instability with economic development. Bakare, et al (2015), revealed a negative impact of price instability on economic growth. There is a direct relationship between monetary policy and price instability.
Price instability impacts economic growth and development in Nigeria. Oladipo et al.(2015), observed that that price variations negatively affects economic development. Kasidi and Mwakanmela (2013) verified a negative long-run causality between inflation and economic development. Kasidi and Mwakanmela also identified a significant short-run relationship between price stability and economic growth. Inyiama (2013) discovered a short-run relationship between price instability and economic stability.
Interest rates directly impacts on consumer price index. Mutinda (2014) noted a direct effect of interest rates on consumer prices and consumption. Idoko et al. (2014) noted interest rates has no substantial influence on economic development. Hatane & Stephanie (2015) outlined the presence of opposing significant connection amongst interest rates, economic growth and development. Interest rates have a significant influence on consumer prices. There is a positive relationship between interest rates and consumer price index.
Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the impact of money supply on inflation and economic growth. Mamo (2012) noted causality between economic growth and inflation and vice versa. Chaturvedi, Kumar, & Dholakia (2009) concluded that inflation is harmful to economic growth on the other hand, the effects from economic growth is beneficial to inflation. Doroshenko (2001) established a long run connection between money growth and inflation. Inflation can be beneficial or detrimental to every economy.
Income directly impacts on the money supply in the Nigerian economy. Tomori (1972) emphasized interest rate, income and real income are determinants of demand for money in Nigeria. Mai-Lafia (1995) asserted interest rates have been stable having very little variation on the demand for money. Mai-Lafia also stated the substitution amongst real assets and money supply might be more important than money and financial assets. Gatawa, Akinola, Muftau, & Olarinde (2017) noted that with the exception interest rate, inflation and broad money supply were inversely inked to economic growth. Omoke and Ugwuanyi (2010) revealed money supply Granger caused both output and inflation.
Monetary policy promotes price stability and economic growth and development in Nigeria. Akujuobi (2010) noted that Liquidity Ratio (LQR), Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR), Minimum Rediscount Rate (MRR), interest rate, and the treasury bill rate significantly impacted on economic development of Nigeria. Chimobi and Uche (2010) clearly showed monetary stability contributes towards price stability since the price instability is caused by money supply and inflation is a monetary phenomenon. Usman and Adejare (2014) stated money supply had a significant impact on the economic growth.
Monetary policy promotes economic growth and development. Rehman and Ahmed (2002) studied monetary strategies for promoting sustainable economic growth. Outcomes of the research clearly identified monetary stocks (M2) as an efficient tool needed to influence and effectively manage Pakistan’s monetary policy.
Ferdiun (2005) assessed monetary policies and how it influences price instability in Turkey. Outcomes from the research showed how effective monetary policies
in Turkish economy foster price stability and economic growth. Berument and Dincer (2008) studied the importance of monetary policy for Turkish economic growth. The results of the study showed the effect of monetary policy on output, resulting to a decline in output as well as a short-run price reduction while price volatility affect monetary policy instruments.
Monetary policies directly impact on the gross domestic product of the Nigerian economy. Hameed and Amen (2011) researched on the effect of monetary policy on GDP gathering information from1980 to 2009. Results from the study validates inflation, money supply and interest rate have a positive influence on growth of Gross Domestic Product in Pakistan. Waliullah and Rabbi (2011) validated the relationship amongst money supply price level, and GDP are key for formulating monetary policies in developing countries such as Pakistan. Results from the research clearly showed the function of monetary policies in Pakistan’s economic activities. Gul et al (2012) studied the association amongst monetary policies and economic development. Outcomes of the research showed a significant association between the dependent and independent variables.
Monetary policies directly foster economic growth and development in Nigeria. Onyeiwu (2012) studied monetary policy and how it impacts on economic development in Nigeria. results of the study clearly showed a significant effect monetary policy has on GDP while monetary policy had a negative effect on inflation rate. Garg and Gupta (2013) studied the important functions of monetary policy for India’s economy. The results of the study noted that monetary policy significantly improved the Indian economy by fostering economic growth and price stability. Okoro (2013) studied the significance of monetary policies in Nigeria from 1970 to 2010. Outcomes from the study mentioned that monetary policy had positive effects on Nigerian economic growth.
Monetary policies promote macroeconomic growth in less developed countries. Saifullah (2013) studied how monetary policies influences the economic development in Pakistan. Empirical results of the study showed external reserve, exchange rate and inflation rate having positive impact on monetary policy. Precious and Palesa (2014) mentioned how effective monetary strategies are to elevate economic growth. The empirical results clearly showed that monetary policy significantly impacts economy’s growth and development of an economy.Agbonlahor (2014) examined monetary policies and how it impacted on United Kingdom. The result from the study clearly showed the connetion between money supply and Inflationary rate, foster economic growth in United Kingdom. Less developed countries need monetary policies to promote economic growth and development.
Monetary policy strategies are effective for promoting economic activities thereby promoting growth and development in Nigeria. Baghebo and Stephen (2014) stated monetary strategies that influence directly promoting economic growth. The results proved monetary policy and investments in the ecoomy improves economic growth and development. Sulaiman and Migiro (2014) studied monetary policies and economic advancement in Nigeria. Empirical results showed continuous economic growth In the Nigerian economy.Nibeza and Tumusherure (2015) observed the impact of monetary policies on Rwanda’s economic growth. Outcomes of the study showed the Rwanda’s Central Bank’s monetary policies helped eradicate inflationary trends in the Rwandan economy as well as promoting investment in the economy. Okafor et al (2015) observed monetary policy strategies and how they impact on economic growth in Nigeria. Empirical results showed money supply impacts on Nigerian growth and development.
Methodology and instrumentation/data sources/research materials. Comment by Michael Saale: Discuss the methodologies used in the literature here. This section goes into CH 1, CH 3 is entirely different from 1 and 2.
This study will utilize a quantitative methodology. According to Smith (1983), quantitative research uses numerical data to provide information about variables relative to relations, comparisons, and predictions. Hagan (2014) stated quantitative research enables researchers to analyze different groups, perform statistical test, and analyze differences between groups. Quantitative research attempts to remove the investigator from the investigation. This methodology is appropriate because this study will use numerical data to examine the variables of monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio and money supply and consumer price index.
This quantitative research will utilize a correlational research design. According to Smith (1983), a correlational research design collects data on two or more variables in a research study. Smith further explained correlational design is appropriate when seeking to understand a non-causal relationship between two or more non manipulated variables. More specifically, this study will use a correlational predictive design to identify predictive relationship between predictor and criterion variables. This design is appropriate because this study seeks to examine the relationship between non-causal variables relative to what extent economic indicators other than interest rates, specifically monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply predict consumer price index in Nigeria.
The target population is Nigerian annual data. The sample is 52 years of annual data measuring monetary policy rate, cash reserve ratio, liquidity ratio, and money supply ranging from 1963 to 2015. The data was not collected prior to 1963 because no data on these variables existed prior to 1963. The annual data used in this study would be retrieved from Knoema Integrated Global Database.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE (Minimum 30 pages) |
||||
|
This section must be a minimum of 30 pages. The purpose of the minimum number of pages is to ensure that the overall literature review reflects a foundational understanding of the theory or theories, literature and research studies related to the topic. A well-written comprehensive literature review that reflects the current state of research and literature on the topic is expected and will likely exceed 30 pages. Literature reviews should be updated continuously. This is an ongoing process to dissertation completion. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Quantitative Studies: Describes each research variable in the study discussing the prior empirical research that has been done on the variables and the relationship between the variables. Qualitative Studies: Describes the phenomena being explored in the study discussing the prior research that has been done on the phenomena. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Themes or Topics (Required): Discusses and synthesizes studies related to the proposed dissertation topic. May include (1) studies focused on the problem from a societal perspective, (2) studies describing and/or relating the variables (quantitative) or exploring related phenomena (qualitative), (3) studies on related research such as factors associated with the themes, (4) studies on the instruments used to collect data, (5) studies on the broad population for the study, and/or (6) studies similar to the proposed study. The themes presented and research studies discussed and synthesized in the Review of Literature demonstrates understanding of all aspects of the research topic and the research methodology. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Methodologies used in prior research on the topic (required): Section is built on prior research studies and does not include references to methodology books and articles. What other methods have been done in similar studies on the topic? Discusses and synthesizes the various methods that have been used in prior empirical research related to the study to present the best methodology for the proposed study. This section demonstrates broad understanding of methodologies used in research area. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Instruments/data sources/research materials used in prior studies on the topic (required): Provides discussion of instruments, sources of data or research materials used in closely-related empirical studies on the topic (dated within last 3 to 5 years). Demonstrates understanding of the instruments used in prior studies on the topic. Synthesizes the information to recommend the instruments to be used for the study. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Structures literature review in a logical order, including actual data and accurate synthesis of results from reviewed studies as related to the learners own topic. Provides synthesis of the information not just a summary of the findings. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Includes in each major section (theme or topic) within the Review of Literature an introductory paragraph that explains why the particular topic or theme was explored relative to the overall dissertation topic. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Includes in each section within the Review of Literature a summary paragraph(s) that (1) compares and contrasts alternative perspectives on the topic and (2) provides a synthesis of the themes relative to the research topic discussed that emerged from the literature, and (3) identifies how themes are relevant to the proposed dissertation topic and research methodology. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Provides additional arguments for the need for the study that was defined in the Background to the Problem section. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Ensures that for every in-text citation a reference entry exists. Conversely, for every reference list entry there is a corresponding in-text citation. Note: The accuracy of citations and quality of sources must be verified by learner, chair and committee members. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Uses a range of references including founding theorists, peer-reviewed empirical research studies from scholarly journals, and government/foundation research reports. Note: A minimum of 50 peer-reviewed, empirical research articles are required for the literature review. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Verifies that 75% of all references are scholarly sources within the past 4 years for the proposal and 5 years for the dissertation. The 5-year time frame is referenced at the time of the proposal defense date and the 5-year timeframe is referenced at the time of the dissertation defense date. Note: Websites, dictionaries, publications without dates (n.d.), are not considered scholarly sources and should not be cited or present in reference list. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Avoids overuse of books and dissertations. Comment by GCU: When citing books and dissertations this implies that you have read the entire book or dissertation. Be mindful of this as you select sources. Dissertations are not considered peer-reviewed research, so limit the number of referenced dissertations to 3-5 total. Books: Maximum of 10 scholarly books that present cutting edge views on a topic, are research based, or are seminal works. Dissertations: Maximum of 5 published dissertations. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
X |
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Summary
This section succinctly restates what was written in Chapter 2 and provides supporting citations for key points. The summary section reflects that the learner has done his/her "due diligence" to become well-read on the topic and can conduct a study that will add to the existing body of research and knowledge on the topic. It synthesizes the information from the chapter to define the "gaps" in or "identified research needs" arising from the literature, the theory(is) or model(s) to provide the foundation for the study, the problem statement, the primary research question, the methodology, the design, the variables or phenomena, the data collection instruments or sources, and the population to be studied. Overall, this section should help the reader clearly see and understand the relevance and importance of the research to be conducted. The criteria listed in the table below are required for this section. The Summary section transitions to Chapter 3 by building a case for the study, in terms of research design and rigor, and it formulates the research questions based on the gaps and tensions in the literature.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
Chapter 2 Summary (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Synthesizes the information from all prior sections in the Literature Review using it to define the key strategic points for the research. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Summarizes the gaps and needs in the background and introduction describing how it informs the problem statement. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Identifies the theory(ies) or model(s) describing how they inform the research questions. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Justifies the methodology, design, variables or phenomena, data collection instruments or sources, and population to be studied. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Builds a case (argument) for the study in terms of the value of the research and how the research questions emerged from the review of literature. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Reflects that the learner has done his or her “due diligence” to synthesize the existing empirical research and write a comprehensive literature review on the research topic. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Summarizes key points in Chapter 2 and transitions into Chapter 3. |
|
|
X |
|
|
The chapter is correctly formatted to dissertation template using the Word Style Tool and APA standards. Writing is free of mechanical errors. |
|
|
X |
|
|
All research presented in the chapter is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, academic, professional, original sources. In-text citations are accurate, correctly cited and included in the reference page according to APA standards. |
|
|
X |
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
X |
|
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Chapter 3: Methodology
Introduction
Chapter 3 documents how the study is conducted in enough detail so that replication by others is possible. The introduction begins with a summary of the research focus and purpose statement to reintroduce the reader to the study. This can be summarized in three to four sentences from Chapter 1. This section also outlines the expectations for this chapter.
Remember, throughout this chapter, that verb tense must be changed from present or future tense (proposal) to past tense (dissertation manuscript). At the dissertation stage, all comments regarding “the proposed research” or “the proposal” must be removed and edited to reflect the fact that the research has been conducted. Furthermore, consider what happened during data collection and analysis. Sometimes, the research protocol ends up being modified based on committee, AQR review, or Institutional Review Board (IRB) recommendations. After the research study is complete, make sure this chapter reflects how the study was actually conducted.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION (Minimum two to three paragraphs) |
||||
|
The introduction restates the purpose statement to the study. This section also outlines the expectations for this chapter. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Statement of the Problem
This section restates the research problem for the convenience of the reader. Then, edit, blend, and integrate the problem statement into a narrative discussion that addresses how the problem statement addresses the gap in the literature, as described in the Problem Statement section in Chapter 1. Change future tense in proposals to past tense for dissertation manuscripts.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM (Minimum one to two paragraphs) |
||||
|
The research problem (Problem Statement) is restated for the convenience of the reader from Chapter 1. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Research Questions and/or Hypotheses
This section restates the research question(s) (qualiative and quantitative) and the hypotheses (quantiative) for the study from Chapter 1. For a quantitative study, it then presents the matching hypotheses and explains the variables. For a qualitative study, it then describes the phenomena to be understood as a result of the study. The section also briefly discusses the approaches to collecting the data to answer the research questions. For a quantitative study, it describes the instrument(s) or data source(s) to collect the data for each and every variable. The variables are described at the conceptual, operational and measurement levels. For example, a conceptual level of a variable in a school setting may be student achievement. The operational level of the variable may be student performance in social studies. The measurement level for the variable may be individual student scores on the high stakes test, or percentage of overall students passing the test (at the school level).
For a qualitative study, this describes the instrument(s) or data source(s) to collect the data to answer each research question. It also discusses why the design was selected to be the best approach to answer the research questions, test the hypotheses (quantitative), or understand the phenomena (qualitative). Remember to change future tense to past tense for dissertation manuscripts.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND/OR HYPOTHESES (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Qualitative Studies: Restates the research questions and the phenomena for the study from Chapter 1. Quantitative Studies: Describes the variables, at the conceptual, operational and measurement levels, then restates the research questions from Chapter 1, and presents the matching hypotheses. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes the nature and sources of necessary data to answer the research questions (primary versus secondary data, specific people, institutional archives, Internet open sources, etc.). Quantitative Studies: Describes the data collection methods, instrument(s) or data source(s) to collect the data for each variable. Qualitative Studies : Describes the data collection methods, instruments, and/or data sources to collect the data to answer each research question. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Research Methodology
This section describes the research methodology for the study (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) and explains the rationale for selecting this particular methodology. It also describes why this methodology was selected as opposed to the alternative methodologies. This section should elaborate on the Methodology section (from Chapter 1) providing the rationale for the selected research method (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed). This section may bring in additional arguments based on the empirical studies used in the Methodology section in Chapter 2. This section justifies why the selected methodology is better than the alternative methodologies. Arguments are supported by citations from articles and books on research methodology and/or design. It is also appropriate in this section to outline the predicted results in relation to the research questions and hypotheses based on the existing literature. Learners should refer to their course e-books, specifically the RES-866 e-book (Grand Canyon University, 2016), for more information on developing this chapter.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Provides a rationale for the research methodology for the study (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) based on research books and articles. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Provides a rationale for the selected the methodology based on empirical studies on the topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
Justifies why the methodology was selected as opposed to alternative methodologies. |
|
|
|
|
|
Uses authoritative source(s) to justify the selected methodology. Note: Do not use introductory research textbooks (such as Creswell) to justify the research design and data analysis approach. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Research Design
This section elaborates on the nature of the Research Design for the Study section from Chapter 1. It includes a detailed description of, and a rationale for, the specific design for the study and describes how it aligns to the selected methodology indicated in the previous section. GCU core designs for quantitative studies include descriptive/survey, correlational, causal-comparative, quasi-experimental, and experimental. GCU core designs for qualitative designs include case study, narrative, grounded theory, and phenomenological. Additionally, this section must describe why the selected design is the best option to collect the data to answer the research questions and test the hypotheses. Learners should refer to their course e-books (Grand Canyon University, 2015, 2016, 2017b), for more information on developing this section.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
RESEARCH DESIGN (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Elaborates on the research design from Chapter 1. Provides the rationale for selecting the research design supported by empirical references. Justifies why the design was selected as the best approach to collect the needed data, as opposed to alternative designs. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Quantitative Studies: Provides the variable structure and states the unit of analysis. and unit of observation. If multiple data sources have different units of observation, specify the key variable for matching cases. Qualitative Studies: Provides the unit of analysis and the unit of observation. If multiple data sources have different units of observation, specify the matching cases. In qualitative study designs the units of analysis (or observation) are each sample participant. In case study design (single or multiple), the unit of analysis is a “bounded system” in its own right. This could include one individual, one family, one group, one community, one school, one policy, one region, one state, one country, etc. The sample may include several participants, but these must be members of a homogeneous unit representing the “bounded system” that is the case study unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
Uses authoritative source(s) to justify the design. Note: Do not use introductory research textbooks (such as Creswell) to justify the research design and data analysis approach. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Population and Sample Selection
This section discusses the setting, the population of interest, target population, and study sample. Researchers should identify each of these explicitly within the section. The discussion of the sample includes the research terminology specific to the type of sampling for the study. This section should include the components listed in the criterion table.
Quantitative sample size. The purpose of computing the sample size for a proposed study is to state the target sample size. The sample size needs to be computed for the unit of analysis. In quantitative studies, it is important to distinguish between the computed minimum sample size (a priori sample size) and the target sample size. The target sample size should be 15-20% larger than the computed minimum sample size. The following steps will be useful:
1. State the computed minimum sample size, and
2. Provide the evidence, which would be one of the following:
a. G*Power output(s) of the sample size computation(s) for the statistical procedure(s) needed to answer the research questions;
b. In case G*Power does not include a planned procedure, the computation can be done using an alternative software. G*Power software, which can be downloaded from this link: http://www.gpower.hhu.de/en.html (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007; Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, & Lang, 2009). GCU recommends using an alpha error of 0.05, a medium effect size, and statistical power of 0.80, for calculating the sample size. In rare instances, the learner can justify why their sample may not be that suggested by G-Power and as such it becomes a study limitation. Include a graphic image of the G*Power in an Appendix, with a screen shot.
c. For a nonparametric procedure, the computation for the corresponding parametric procedure + 15% (state this generic rule of thumb with appropriate reference), or
d. Authoritative reference(s) from statistics sources regarding range of sample size for which a specific procedure is appropriate.
e. For repeated measures (using primary data) and longitudinal studies (using secondary data), discuss attrition rate and compute the target sample size (number of complete cases in the final dataset) considering that rate.
Planning ahead. It is important to anticipate that attaining sufficient sample size may not go according to plan. The following steps help researchers develop a plan to handle problems that may (and often do) emerge. For studies with planned parametric statistical procedures, provide the minimum sample for the parametric analysis as well as for the alternative nonparametric analysis, in case the data show major violations in the test(s) of assumption that cannot be resolved. In such a case, retain the largest number as the computed minimum sample size. To be on the safe side, consider the need to discard from the raw data file incomplete cases and outliers—to be able to do that, the target sample size should be 15-20% larger than the computed minimum sample size.
Qualitative sample size. Sample sizes in qualitative research are smaller than those in quantitative research. The criterion table below specifies sample size and adequacy of data for several qualitative research designs. GCU has provided guidelines regarding sample size for each of the core designs, which are based on the traditions of design and analysis in qualitative research (Grand Canyon University, 2015, 2016, 2017a, 2017b). See Guest, Bunce, and Johnson (2006), and Mason (2010) for two examples that discuss the sufficiency of sample size in qualitative research.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
POPULATION AND SAMPLE SELECTION (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Describes: The population of interest (The group to which the results of the study will be generalized or applicable) (such as police officers in AZ),
The target population from which the sample is selected (such as police officers in AZ who belong to the police fraternal association).
The study sample (individuals drawn from target population who provide final source of data) (final number from whom complete data were collected).
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Site Authorization and Recruitment Describes the process for obtaining site authorization to access the target population. Describes the site authorization process (what needs to be included in request) confidentiality measures, study participation requirements, and geographic specifics. If public data sources or social media are used to collect data, although site permission is not required, provide arguments and evidence as to why these sources can be used without site permission. Describes the sampling strategy and process for recruiting individuals to comprise the sample. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Sample Size Requirements Describes the expected study sample and the proposed and rationale: An a priori or equivalent analysis and/or post hoc Power Analysis is required to justify the study sample size based on the anticipated effect size and selected design. Certain procedures are applicable for small samples. Those situations must be justified through computation or literature. Justification is based on the selected design and statistical procedures. G*Power or equivalent computation is required. G*Power software can be downloaded from the link presented below http://www.gpower.hhu.de/en.html using an alpha error of 0.05, a medium effect size and statistical power of 0.80 for each statistical analysis that is proposed.” |
|
|
|
X |
|
For proposals, this section discusses a priori computation and for dissertation, this section discusses both a priori and post hoc computation of statistical power based on actual sample size obtained through data collection. Screenshots of the computation for each statistical test (proposals – a priori and dissertation – a priori and post hoc) should be included in the Appendix When calculating the expected return rate for questionnaires and surveys, assume the return rate is 5-10% when no incentives are provided and 15-20% when incentives are provided. Attrition: When doing repeated measures studies in an experiment, learners should consider probable loss to attrition. Qualitative Sample Size Requirements: The sample size should be stated for each form of data collection including interviews, observations, questionnaires, documents, artifacts, visual data such as drawings and photographs, etc. Case Study: Guideline: A minimum of 10 participants or cases in the final sample for interviews. Learners should pursue a minimum 20 individuals to recruit to account for attrition; minimum of three sources of data; must demonstrate triangulation of the data across two sources for each RQ. Case study interviews may include closed-ended questions with a dominance of open-ended questions; should be no less than 30 minutes; no less than five pages of participant responses/speech in the transcribed data per interview, single spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman. A minimum of 50 questionnaires if the questionnaires will be used for thematic analysis. The size for other sources (e.g., number of documents or artifacts, observations, etc. should also be identified. Phenomenology : Guideline: Minimum of 8 interviews. Learners should pursue 12 individuals to interview to account for attrition. Interviews should be 60-90 minutes. There should be no less than 12 pages of transcribed data, single spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman, per interview. Interview questions must be open-ended. Descriptive: Guideline: A minimum of 10 participants in the final sample. Learners should pursue a minimum 20 individuals to recruit; 2 sources of data; no less than 5 pages of transcribed data, single spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman, per interview. Narrative: Purpose is a collection of stories around a phenomenon. Protocol offers questions that get the participant to tell their personal story regarding a phenomenon including the roles of stakeholders. Guideline: Minimum of 8 interviews. Learners should pursue 12 participants to account for attrition. Interviews should be 60-90 minutes. There should be no less than 12 pages of transcribed data, single spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman, per interview. Interview questions must be open-ended. Note: A key criterion for selecting a sample size for a narrative study is to elicit long, in-depth of stories about the phenomenon which may be hours long. Grounded Theory: Grounded theory studies yield a theory or model. Usually two rounds of data collection with interim analysis. Minimum of 50 pages of transcribed data from interviews, open-ended questionnaires, or other data sources. Transcripts are 12point font and single spaced. Studies typically have a minimum of 10-30 interviews (45-60 minutes in length) and/or 40-60 open-ended questionnaires. Interview questions must be open-ended. Questionnaires or Surveys: If used in the study the minimum number should be 40. This data collection method can be used in different qualitative designs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategies to account for attrition: Students should consider the anticipated sample size will not be reached, so must provide a justification or alternative plan for the study (expanding time frame, expanding target population, changing design to bring down sample size needed, or adding an additional data collection approach, adjust an analysis). |
|
|
|
|
|
Defines and describes the sampling procedures (such as convenience, purposive, snowball, random, etc.) supported by scholarly research sources. Includes discussion of sample selection, and assignment to groups (if applicable), and strategies to account for participant attrition. For a purposive sample identify the screening criteria and device for screening the participants (egg: demographic questionnaire, expert knowledge of topic, screening questions such as years of experience in a position). |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes the study sample size. Provides evidence (based on the empirical research) literature that sample size is adequate for the research design and meets GCU required sample size requirements (listed in criteria below). |
|
|
|
|
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Research Materials, Instrumentation OR Sources of Data Comment by GCU: For quantitative studies use Instrumentation for the heading. For qualitative studies use Sources of Data for the heading.
This section fully identifies and describes the types of data that will be collected, as well as the specific research materials, instruments, and sources used to collect those data (tests, questionnaires, interviews, data bases, media, etc.). Discuss the specific research materials, instrument, or source to collect data for each variable or group for a quantitative study. Discuss the specific research materials, instrument(s), or source(s) to collect information to describe the phenomena being studied for a qualitative study. Use the “Instrumentation” heading for a quantitative study. Use the “Sources of Data” heading for qualitative research. Use the “Research Materials” heading is using materials for experiments other than instruments. Use appropriate APA level subheadings for each data collection instrument, sources, or research material and place a copy of all instruments and research materials in an appendix. For example, a subheading of “Sources of Data” might be “Interviews,” which should begin a new paragraph, and the term “Interviews” should be styled as Heading 3.
If you are using an existing instrument, make sure to discuss the characteristics of the instrument in detail. For example, on a preexisting survey tool describe: how the instrument was developed and constructed, the validity and reliability of the instrument, the number of items or questions included in the survey, the calculation of the scores, and the scale of measurement of data obtained from the instrument. Learners must also obtain all appropriate use permissions from instrument authors. Please note that GCU does not recommend developing or modifying instruments for quantitative studies and permission to do so must be obtained from the Assistant Dean.
For quantitative studies, distinguish between the validated instruments and the questions added by the researcher. The latter have to be justified as (1) data for one or more variables of interest in the study (included in the analysis), or (2) data needed for the sample profile (must be relevant to the topic), or (3) combination of both. Separate appendices required for each instrument; the validated instruments (or watermarked samples thereof) have to be accompanied by authors' or vendors' permission to use. Information required for quantitative validated instruments: (1) number and labels of scales (and subscales); (2) number or items per scale (and subscale); (3) type of scale/data (e.g., Likert scales produce technically ordinal data—ONLY SOME have a format that allows for APPROXIMATION to continuous data—required justification of approximation, with references); (4) method of data aggregation (e.g., for continuous scales: sum vs. mean vs. other mathematical formula).
For quantitative studies, describe the method of instrument administration. All instruments will be administered together, in a single session via online survey. If different instruments are administered separately to different participants, generate separate data files, establish the unit of analysis and create an identification for that as the key variable that will be used to merge the files—make sure to collect data for the key variable from all participants (include the key variable in all instruments).
If using research materials for an experiment for a quantitative study, discuss in detail not only the materials, but also the structure of the experiment or study. Describe all materials and how they will be used. Describe how the participant(s) interact with the materials during the experiment. In psychology and business, an experiment can be run to collect data for experimental, correlation and causal comparative designs. If using psychology data collection software tools such as e-Prime, learners should provide a copy of the software contract showing they are licensed to use the software. Validity and reliability of the experiment and materials must be argued using literature and similar studies.
For qualitative and quantitative studies, the learner often uses data sources other than instruments. These data sources may include databases, journals, participant drawings, photographs, documents, artifacts, and media. Additionally, learners will most likely develop their own interview or focus group guide, observation checklist, or other protocol when conducting a qualitative study. Therefore, learners must describe in detail the process used to develop the instrument, including the research, literature, theory or expert in the field used to develop and justify the questions. Additionally, learners must describe how the validity and reliability of the instrument was established, which often include expert panel review, member checking, field testing and/or pilot testing.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
RESEARCH MATERIALS, INSTRUMENTATION, OR SOURCES OF DATA (Minimum one to three pages) |
||||
|
Data Collection Instruments/Materials : Provides a detailed discussion of the instrumentation and/or materials for data collection which includes validity and reliability of the data. collection instrument or experiment. Includes citations from original publications by instrument developers (and subsequent users as appropriate) or related studies. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Data Collection Instruments/Materials: Describes the structure of each data collection instrument and data sources (tests, questionnaires, interviews, observations data bases, media, etc.). When using materials for an experiment, describes the structure of the experiment and the materials used for it. Specifies the type and level of data collected with each instrument. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Trustworthiness (for Qualitative Studies)
This section describes the four key elements that together serve to produce confidence in the research procedures and results of a qualitative study. These elements constitute the overarching concept of “trustworthiness.” The four elements are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Credibility and transferability are the qualitative version of validity, and dependability and confirmability are the qualitative version of reliability.
Learners can start this discussion by (1) defining the concept (e.g., credibility), (2) identifying the “threats” (biases or weaknesses) inherent in their methodology (design, sampling, data collection procedures and sources of data/instruments, and data analysis), and (3) describing how they will minimize such threats (e.g., reflexivity for subjective bias in qualitative data analysis). The following are steps taken by a qualitative researcher to ensure the research is trustworthy, and are from Shenton (2004, p. 73), based on Guba’s (1981) four criteria for trustworthiness. The researcher should address as many as are applicable to the design selected.
Credibility. Credibility refers to how well the study’s findings accurately represent the experiences of participants for the sample under study. In other words, credibility describes the internal validity of the study. Some strategies qualitative researchers use to ensure credibility include:
Adoption of a well-established data collection plan.
Fundamental knowledge of naturalistic inquiry, which is the essence of naturalistic inquiry is that research is conducted in natural settings, that is, in settings where the participants live or engage in activities that are relevant to the phenomenon under study. (Armstrong, 2010; Lincoln & Guba, 1985)
Deep engagement, which means sufficient time is given to listen, document, and achieve saturation of data.
Member checking, which increases the authenticity of the final transcript.
Narrative truth, which means the researcher represents the authenticity of participants’ reflections, comments, stories, and perspectives.
Negative cases and rival explanations, which include evidence that does not fit the pattern that emerges during analysis, and provide explanation.
Researcher reflexivity, which is how the researcher maintain awareness about how results unfold, documenting emerging patterns. The researcher’s positionality or “reflective commentary:” allows researcher to clearly state the lens through which the social world is interpreted and discuss how the researcher’s background influences data collection and analysis (Lincoln & Guba, 1985).
Thick description, which is the context(s) of the participants be described in a rich and detailed manner.
Triangulation via use of different data collection methods, different informants, different locations
Researcher experience, which includes a description of background, qualifications, and experience of the researcher (researcher positionality)
Transferability. Transferability refers to the degree to which findings are applicable to policy, practice, and future research, or the degree to which the results of a qualitative study apply to other people or contexts. Transferability addresses the external validity and is the qualitative version of “generalizability” of the study’s results.
Thick description that provides background data to establish context of study and detailed description of phenomenon in question to allow comparisons of the context can be made to other contexts. The greater the detailed description of the phenomena, the more meaningful the results may be when informing another context.to be made.
Sampling sufficiency, which refers both to the sample size and to the appropriateness of the sample, so that the participants experience the phenomena so that the data collected from them provide insight into the phenomena.
Dependability. Dependability refers to the degree to which research procedures are documented and are reliable. Techniques used to demonstrate dependability include:
Audit trail, which is documentation of the inquiry process.
Evidence, which includes full transcripts, careful documentation of data gathering sessions, media (audiotapes, videotapes, documents, photographs) Employment of “overlapping methods.”
An in-depth methodological description that provides a comprehensible record of how data were collected and analyzed. Meticulous description increases soundness of study that can be useful for future studies.
Records of the data analysis process, which includes codebooks, how coding schemes were developed, documentation of initial codes secondary codes, categories, with multiple examples from the dataset (interview transcripts, observational records, focus group transcripts, for example).
Clear alignment of gap, problem statement, research questions, methodology, research design.
Peer debriefing, which includes consulting with mentors or experienced qualitative researchers to discuss and receive feedback on the study, prior to, during, and after the completion of the study.
Test the strength of the analysis and interpretation, which includes checking analysis and interpretation against documents, records, recordings (the dataset).
Confirmability. Confirmability refers to the objectivity or the ability of others to confirm or corroborate findings (Chess, 2017, section 3, para. 3). Qualitative researchers develop confirmability through:
Coding, which is clear and well defined; the naming of patterns identified in the data; patterns can include stories, ideas, specific participant-offered terms, and phrases.
Providing ample evidence to support claims.
Intercoder reliability. The extent to which two researchers, coding data based on the same codebook (an inductively developed list of codes and their definitions) code the data in the same way.
Rival explanations and negative cases. Identify examples that do not fit a pattern that is emerging. These might indicate an alternative organizing scheme, or may be the exception that proves the rule (Creswell & Miller, 2000; Patton, 1999)
Researcher reflexivity, which is how the researcher maintain awareness about how results unfold, documenting emerging patterns. The researcher’s positionality or “reflective commentary:” allows researcher to clearly state the lens through which the social world is interpreted and discuss how the researcher’s background influences data collection and analysis (Lincoln & Guba, 1985).
In-depth methodological description to allow integrity of research results to be scrutinized.
Admission or statement of researcher’s beliefs and assumptions.*
Recognition of shortcomings in study’s methods and their potential effects.*
*These are covered in the assumptions and limitations sections of the dissertation.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
TRUSTWORTHINESS (for Qualitative Studies) Trustworthiness is the term used to describe the elements that establish the credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability of the study. (Minimum two to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Qualitative “validity” is composed of credibility and transferability. Strategies generally include rigorous techniques and methods, thick description, audit trails, evident methodological processes and procedures, well-defined coding, ample examples of quotes, and findings that clearly emerge from the data. |
||||
|
· Defines the concepts of credibility, transferability · Credibility: discusses how the study represents the participants’ experiences · Transferability: discusses how the study’s findings may be applicable to policy, practice, future research |
|
|
|
X |
|
· Describes the threats to the credibility and transferability of the study inherent in the study design, sampling strategy, data collection method/instruments, and data analysis · Addresses how these threats will be minimized |
|
|
|
X |
|
Qualitative “reliability” is composed of dependability and confirmability. Establishes consistency and repeatability of data collection through in-depth documented methodology; detailed interview/observation/data collection protocols and guides; creation of research data-base; and/or use of triangulation. |
||||
|
· Defines concepts of dependability and confirmability |
|
|
|
X |
|
· Dependability: discusses how the study documents research procedures |
|
|
|
X |
|
· Confirmability: discusses how the study could be confirmed or findings corroborated by others |
|
|
|
X |
|
· Describes the threats to dependability and confirmability of the study inherent in the study design, sampling strategy, data collection method/instruments, and data analysis · Addresses how these threats will be minimized |
|
|
|
X |
|
Appendices must include copies of instruments, materials, qualitative data collection protocols, codebook(s), and permission letters from instrument authors (for validated instruments, surveys, interview guides, etc.) |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Validity (for Quantitative Studies)
This section describes and defends the procedures used to determine the validity of the data collected. Validity refers to the degree to which a study accurately reflects or assesses the specific concept that the researcher is attempting to measure. Ask if what is being measured is what was set out to be measured. Researchers must be concerned with both external and internal validity. External validity refers to the extent to which the results of the study are generalizable (quantitative) or transferable (qualitative) to the population. Internal validity refers to the rigor with which the study was conducted (study design, theory instrumentation, measurements, etc.). For this section, provide specific validity statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how they were developed. Explain specific approaches on how validity will be addressed for qualitative data collection approaches.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
|
|
VALIDITY (for Quantitative Studies)/TRUSTWORTHINESS (for Qualitative Studies) (Minimum two to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Quantitative Studies : Provides specific validity statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how they were developed. Validated surveys cannot be used in part or adapted. Validated instruments borrowed by the learner must be included in the proposal/dissertation appendices as a pdf or jpeg document along with the learner’s word file of his/her version of the instrument (whose content should be identical with that of the original pdf). NOTE: Learners should not modify or develop quantitative instruments without permission from the Director of Dissertations. Qualitative Studies : Trustworthiness is the term used to describe the elements that establish the credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability of the study. Strategies generally include rigorous techniques and methods, thick description, audit trails, evident methodological processes and procedures, well-defined coding, ample examples of quotes, and findings that clearly emerge from the data. Defines the concept of credibility or dependability. Describes the threats to the credibility or dependability of the study inherent in the study design, sampling strategy, data collection method/instruments, and data analysis Addresses how these threats will be minimized. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Appendices must include copies of instruments, materials, qualitative data collection protocols, codebooks, and permission letters from instrument authors (for validated instruments, surveys, interview guides, etc.) |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Reliability (for Quantitative Studies)
This section describes and defends the procedures used to determine the reliability of the data collected. Reliability is the extent to which an experiment, test, or any measuring procedure is replicable and yields the same result with repeated trials. For this section, provide specific reliability statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how the statistics were developed. Explain specific approaches on how reliability will be addressed for qualitative data collection approaches.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
RELIABILITY (Minimum two to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Quantitative Studies: Provides specific reliability statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how the statistics were developed. Explains specific approaches on how reliability will be addressed for qualitative data collection approaches. Qualitative Studies: Establishes consistency and repeatability of data collection through in-depth documented methodology; detailed interview/observation/data collection protocols and guides; creation of research data-base; and/or use of triangulation. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Data Collection and Management
This section details the entirety of the process used to collect the data. Describe the step-by-step procedures used to carry out all the major steps for data collection for the study in a way that would allow another researcher to replicate the study. Think of this section of Chapter 3 as a recipe, that needs to be carefully followed to produce the best possible study results (or “entrée”). Review the Criteria Table below for the exact requirements in this section. It is critical this section is clear, comprehensive, and details the exact steps used in the data collection process.
If you were to inset a table in this chapter, set it upas shown below. Refer to Table 1 for formatting instructions.
Table 2. Equality of Emotional Intelligence Mean Scores by Gender
|
t test for Equality of Means |
|||
|
|
t |
df |
p |
|
EI |
1.908 |
34 Comment by GCU: Do not exceed 3 decimal points for numerical values in tables. |
.065 Comment by GCU: To vertically center text in each cell, highlight cells, right click when cursor is in cells to format, click Table Properties > Cell > click on image with centered text |
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT (Minimum one to three pages) |
||||
|
Quantitative Studies: Describes the procedures for the actual data collection that would allow replication of the study by another researcher, including how each instrument or data source was used, how and where data were collected, and recorded. Includes a linear sequence of actions or step-by-step of procedures used to carry out all the major steps for data collection. Includes a workflow and corresponding timeline, presenting a logical, sequential, and transparent protocol for data collection that would allow another researcher to replicate the study. Data from different sources may have to be collected in parallel (e.g., paper-and-pen surveys for teachers, corresponding students, and their parents AND retrieval of archival data from the school district). A flow chart is ok—"linear" may not apply to all situations Qualitative Studies: Provides detailed description of data collection process, including all sources of data and methods used, such as interviews, member checking, observations, surveys, and expert panel review. Note: The collected data must be sufficient in breadth and depth to answer the research question(s) and interpreted and presented correctly, by theme, research question and/or instrument. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes the procedures for obtaining participant informed consent and for protecting the rights and well-being of the study sample participants. Include site authorization letter(s) and participants' informed consent (parents' consent and children's consent, as needed) in appendices. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes how raw data are prepared for analysis (i.e., transcribing interviews, conducting member checking, downloading from SPSS and checking for missing data). Describes (for both paper-based and electronic data) the data management procedures adopted to maintain data securely, including the length of time data will be kept, where it will be kept, and how it will be destroyed |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Data Analysis Procedures
This section provides a step-by-step description of the procedures to be used to conduct the data analysis. The key elements of this section include the process by which raw data were prepared for analysis and then subsequently analyzed. Overall, be sure that the language used to describe the data analysis procedure is consistently used in Chapters 4 and 5.
Here is an example of a figure and its caption:
Figure 1. Correlation for SAT composite score and time spent on Facebook. Comment by GCU: In general, high quality graphics software handle the technical aspects of constructing figures.” [5.22]. Each figure must be numbered in sequence throughout the entire dissertation (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.), or within chapters (Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2 for Chapter 1; Figure 2.1, Figure 2.2 for Chapter 2, etc.). Comment by GCU: Formatting Tip: The caption for each figure should be placed below the figure, and be “styled” as “Caption” (as this one is).
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES (Minimum one to three pages) |
||||
|
Lists the problem statement or purpose statement, along with the research question(s). Also includes the null and alternative hypotheses for quantitative studies. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes in detail the relevant data collected for each stated research question and/or each variable within each hypothesis (if applicable). Quantitative Studies: "In detail" means scales (and subscales) of specified instruments AND type of data for each variable of interest. IMPORTANT: For (quasi) experimental studies, provide detailed description of all treatment materials per treatment condition, as part of the description of the independent variable corresponding to the experimental manipulation.
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes, in detail, the data management practice including how the raw data were organized and prepared for analysis, i.e., ID matching of respondents who may respond to more than one survey/instrument, coding/recoding of variables, treatment of missing values, scoring, calculations, etc. Qualitative Studies: (1) describes transcription process for interviews, focus groups, descriptive statistics (mean scores, percentages) calculated for surveys, observation checklists, etc. |
|
|
|
X |
|
What: Describes, in detail, statistical and non-statistical analysis to be used and procedures used to conduct the data analysis. Quantitative Studies: (1) describe data file preparation (descriptive statistics used to check completeness and accuracy; for files from different sources, possibly aggregating data to obtain a common unit of analysis in all files, necessarily merging files (using the key variable defining the unit of analysis); (2) computation of statistics for the sample profile; (3) computation of (subscales and) scales; (4) reliability analysis for all scales and subscales; (5) computation of descriptive statistics for all variables of interest in the study (except those already presented in the sample profile); (6) state and justify all statistical procedures ("tests") needed to generate the information to answer all research questions; and (7) state assumptions checks for all those statistical procedures (including the tests and / or charts to be computed).
Qualitative Studies: This section begins by identifying and discussing the specific analysis approach or strategy, followed by a discussion of coding procedures used. Note: coding procedures may be different for Thematic Analysis, Narrative Analysis, Phenomenological Analysis, or Grounded Theory Analysis. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Why: Provides the justification for each of the (statistical and non-statistical) data analysis procedures used in the study. If a change in analysis was made, explains what was actually done versus what was planned and why. |
|
|
|
X |
|
How: Demonstrates how the statistical and non-statistical data analysis techniques align with the research questions/design. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Quantitative Analysis - states the level of statistical significance for each test as appropriate, and describes tests of assumptions for each statistical test. Qualitative Analysis - evidence of qualitative analysis approach, such as coding and theming process, must be completely described and included the analysis /interpretation process. Clear evidence from how codes moved to themes must be presented. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Provides evidence that quantity and quality of data is sufficient to answer the research questions. This must be present in this section or in an appendix including data samples. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Ethical Considerations
This section should demonstrate adherence to the key principles of the Belmont Report (respect, justice and beneficence) in the study design, sampling procedures, and within the theoretical framework, research problem, and questions. Learners should clearly discuss how data will be stored, safeguarded, and destroyed, as well as how the results of the study will be published. This section should also reference IRB approval to conduct the research, which includes subject recruiting, informed consent processes, and the voluntary nature of study. Please see the Figure 2 below regarding IRB approval requirements. Additionally, the learner should identify the potential risks for harm that are inherent in the study, in lieu of just listing what they are doing to ensure confidentiality. Finally, the IRB approval letter with the protocol number, informed consent/subject assent documents, site authorization letter(s), or any other measures required to protect the participants or institutions, must be included in the appendices.
IRB Alert
Please be aware that GCU doctoral learners may not screen, recruit, or collect any data until they receive Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and obtain a signed D-50 form. IRB review occurs after the proposal is approved by AQR and the proposal defense is completed. Learners are responsible for knowing, understanding, and following the IRB submission and review processes. Screening, recruiting participants, and collecting data in advance of IRB approval is a serious research ethical violation, with legal and federal regulatory implications to the University. If a learner chooses to screen or recruit study participants, or collects data in advance of obtaining IRB approval (IRB approval letter and D-50 form), s/he will be subject to serious academic disciplinary action by the Institutional Review Board and Code of Conduct committee. This may include collecting new data or requiring the learner to start over with a new research study. In addition, the Code of Conduct committee will issue a disciplinary action that may include warning, suspension, or dismissal from the program.
Note: Learners should NEVER proceed with any aspect of participant screening, recruiting, interacting with participants, or collecting data in advance of receiving the IRB approval letter and the signed D-50 form. The chairs and committee members are trained on these requirements; however, the learner is ultimately responsible for understanding and adhering to all IRB requirements as outlined in the University Policy Handbook and Dissertation Milestone Guide.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS (Minimum three to four paragraphs or approximately one page) |
||||
|
Provides a discussion of ethical issues, per Belmont Report and IRB guidelines, related to the study and the study population of interest.
Explains which principles / issues are relevant to the study.
Identifies the potential risks for harm that are inherent in the study. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes the procedures for obtaining informed consent and for protecting the rights and well-being of the study sample participants. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Addresses key ethical criteria of anonymity, confidentiality, privacy, strategies to prevent coercion, and any potential conflict of interest. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Describes the data management procedures adopted to store and maintain paper and electronic data securely, including the length of time data will be kept, where it will be kept, and how it will be destroyed. Explains what he/she planned to do / did to implement each of the principles / issues that are relevant the study data management, data analysis, and publication of findings. Note: Learners are required to securely maintain and have access to raw data/records for a minimum of three years. If asked by AQR reviewer or CDS representative, learner must provide all evidence of data including source data, Excel files, interview transcripts, evidence of coding or data analysis, or survey results, etc. No dissertation will be allowed to move forward in the review process if data are not produced upon request. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Includes copy of IRB Informed Consent (Proposal) and IRB Approval letter (Dissertation) in an Appendix. All approvals, consent forms, recruitment, and data collection materials are mentioned in the Data Collection section and included in separate appendixes (with appropriate in-text references). |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
Limitations and Delimitations
While Chapter 1 addresses the broad, overall limitations and delimitations of the study, this section discusses, in detail, the limitations and delimitations related to the research methodology and design and potential impacts on the results. The section also describes any limitations and delimitations related to the methods, sample, instrumentation, data collection process and analysis. Other methodological limitations and delimitations of the study may include issues regarding the study design, sample in terms of size, population and procedure, instrumentation, data collection processes, and data analysis. This section also contains an explanation of why the existing limitations are unavoidable and are not expected to affect the results negatively.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
LIMITATIONS AND DELIMITATIONS (Minimum two to three paragraphs) |
||||
|
Reiterates those limitations listed in Ch. 1 and explains why the existing limitations are unavoidable. Describes any delimitations related to the methodology, sample, instrumentation, data collection process and analysis. Note: This section must be updated as limitations emerge in the data collection/analysis, and then incorporated in Chapter 5 the limitations overall and how the study results were affected. |
|
|
|
X |
|
States consequences of each limitation and delimitation in terms of data quantity, quality, and validity / generalizability of the findings.
Discusses strategies to minimize and/or mitigate the negative consequences of limitations and delimitations. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Summary
This section restates what was written in Chapter 3 and provides supporting citations for key points. The summary should demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the overall research design and analysis techniques. The Chapter 3 summary ends with a discussion that transitions the reader to Chapter 4.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY (Minimum one to two pages) |
||||
|
Summarizes key points presented in Chapter 3 using authoritative, empirical sources/citations. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Document shows alignment of title, problem statement, purpose statement, RQs and hypotheses, methodology, design, data collection and instruments, and analysis. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Ends Chapter 3 with a transition discussion to focus for Chapter 4. |
|
|
|
X |
|
The Chapter is correctly formatted to dissertation template using the Word Style Tool and APA standards. Writing is free of mechanical errors. |
|
|
|
X |
|
All research presented in the Chapter is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected academic, professional, original sources. In-text citations are accurate, correctly cited and included in the reference page according to APA standards. |
|
|
|
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
|
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments:
|
References Comment by GCU: This page must be entitled “References.” This title is centered at the top of the page. All text should be in 12-point Times New Roman font and double-spaced. The Reference list should appear as a numbered new page following Chapter 5 and preceding the Appendices. The title of the section “References” should be styled as Heading 1.. The Reference list provides necessary information for the reader to locate and retrieve any source cited in the body of the text. Each source mentioned must appear in the Reference list. Likewise, each entry in the Reference list must be cited in the text. The citations in the Reference list should be styled using the “Refs” style. NOTE: The “Refs” style has been set up as a hanging indent of 0.5” and be double-spaced. Examples of common references are provided below. See APA 6.0 Edition Chapter 7, 6.22 for specific reference formatting instructions. For more information on references or APA Style, consult the APA website: at http://apastyle.org
Armstrong, J. (2010). Naturalistic inquiry. In N. J. Salk (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 880-885). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Comment by GCU: After completing the Reference list, it is important to cross-reference the in-text citations with the items in the Reference list to be certain that all in-text citations are in the Reference list and all items in the Reference list have an in-text citation. Using the Ctrl-F function helps to search for references within the dissertation.
Barzun, J., & Graff, H.F. (1992). The modern researcher: A classic work on research and writing completely revised and brought up to date. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Brands, H. W. (2000). The first American: The life and times of Benjamin Franklin. New York: Doubleday.
Calabrese, R. L. (2006). The elements of an effective dissertation & thesis: a step-by-step guide to getting it right the first time. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield Education.
Chess, P.S. (2017). Chapter 3: Validity and reliability in qualitative research. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), GCU doctoral research: Advanced qualitative research methods. Retrieved from http://lc.qa.gcumedia.com/res855/gcu-doctoral-research-advanced-qualitative-research-methods/v1.1/#/chapter/3
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
Grand Canyon University. (Ed.). (2015). GCU doctoral research: Foundations and theories. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from http://lc.gcumedia.com/res850/gcu-doctoral-research-foundations-and-theories/v1.1/#/home
Grand Canyon University (Ed.). (2016). GCU doctoral research: Quantitative and qualitative research concepts. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from: http://lc.gcumedia.com/res866/gcu-doctoral-research-quantitative-and-qualitative-research-concepts/v1.1/#/home
Grand Canyon University. (2017a). GCU doctoral research: Advanced qualitative research methods. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from: http://lc.qa.gcumedia.com/res855/gcu-doctoral-research-advanced-qualitative-research-methods/v1.1/#/home
Grand Canyon University. (2017b). GCU doctoral research: The dissertation process. Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from: http://lc.gcumedia.com/res885/gcu-doctoral-research-the-dissertation-process/v1.1/#/home
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59-82
Hacker, D., Somers, N., Jehn, T., & Rosenzweig, J. (2008). Rules for writers. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Laub, J. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (SOLA) instrument (Doctoral Dissertation, Florida Atlantic University). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. (UMI No. 9921922)
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE
Krysik, J.L & Flynn, J. (2013). Research for effective social work practice (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Research 11(3).
Nock, A. J. (1943). The memoirs of a superfluous man. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (2010). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (6th edition) (ISBN 10: 1-4338-0559-6; ISBN 13: 978-1-4338-0561-5; ISBN 10: 1-4338-0561-8). Comment by GCU: NOTE: If the author is not named, list the reference by the title.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
Squires, D. A., & Kranyik, R. D. (1995). The comer program: changing school culture. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 29-32.
Strunk, W. I., & White, E.B. (1979). The elements of style. New York: Macmillan Publishing, Inc.
|
Criterion *(Score = 0, 1, 2, or 3) |
Learner Score |
Chair Score |
Methodologist Score |
Content Expert Score |
|
QUALITY OF SOURCES & REFERENCE LIST For every in-text citation a reference entry exists; conversely, for every reference list entry there is an in-text citation. Uses a range of references including founding theorists, peer-reviewed empirical research studies from scholarly journals, and government/foundation research reports. The majority of all references must be scholarly, topic-related sources published within the last 5 years. Websites, dictionaries, and publications without dates (n.d.) are not considered scholarly sources and should not be cited or present in the reference list. In-text citations and reference list must comply with APA 6th Ed. |
||||
|
Ensures that for every in-text citation a reference entry exists. Conversely, for every reference list entry there is a corresponding in-text citation. Note: The accuracy of citations and quality of sources must be verified by learner, chair and committee members. |
|
|
X |
X |
|
Uses a range of references including founding theorists, peer-reviewed empirical research studies from scholarly journals, and government /foundation research reports. Note: A minimum of 50 peer-reviewed, empirical research articles are required for the literature review. |
|
|
X |
X |
|
Verifies that 75% of all references are scholarly sources within the last 5 years. The 5-year time frame is referenced at the time of the proposal defense date and at the time of the dissertation defense date. Note: Websites, dictionaries, publications without dates (n.d.), are not considered scholarly sources and should not be cited or present in reference list. |
|
|
X |
X |
|
Avoids overuse of books and dissertations. Books: Maximum of 10 scholarly books that present cutting edge views on a topic, are research based, or are seminal works. Dissertations: Maximum of 5 published dissertations. |
|
|
X |
X |
|
Section is written in a way that is well structured, has a logical flow, uses correct paragraph structure, uses correct sentence structure, uses correct punctuation, and uses correct APA format. |
|
|
X |
X |
|
*Score each requirement listed in the criteria table using the following scale: 0 = Item Not Present or Unacceptable. Substantial Revisions are Required. 1 = Item is Present. Does Not Meet Expectations. Revisions are Required. 2 = Item is Acceptable. Meets Expectations. Some Revisions May be Suggested or Required. 3 = Item Exceeds Expectations. No Revisions are Required. |
||||
|
Reviewer Comments: |
Appendix A. Site Authorization Letter(s) Comment by GCU: FORMATTING TIP: after the Appendix Title use SHIFT + RETURN to create a “soft return.” This will ensure the title and subtitle have the same heading style (e.g., Heading 1), and will ensure the subtitle automatically shows up in the TOC. See note below the TOC in this Template.
This is a required Appendix for Level 2 and Level 5 Reviews.
For purposes of confidentiality, this will be removed prior to Dean’s signature and the following text will be inserted:
Site authorization(s) on file at Grand Canyon University.
Appendix B. IRB Approval Letter
This is not the D-form! Use the approval letter that you received upon IRB approval.
This Appendix is required in the full dissertation only.
Appendix C. Informed Consent
This is a required Appendix. The text to the informed consent that will be provided to learners after IRB approval (at proposal stage), or the text of informed consent that was provided (without signatures) at dissertation stage, should be attached here.
Appendix D. Copy of Instruments and Permissions Letters to Use the Instruments
This is a required Appendix.
Appendix E. Power Analyses for Sample Size Calculation (Quantitative Only)
Required for both proposal and dissertation:
Proposal must include the a priori computation of the sample size;
The dissertation must include the a priori computation of sample size, and, if the recruited sample size is smaller than the a priori sample size, it must also include a post hoc computation of the effect size at power level 0.80.
Include a screen shot (graphic image) of the G*Power output.
Appendix F. Additional Appendices
Additional appendices may include statistical results, interview transcripts, raw data (as appropriate), or other critical information pertinent to the dissertation. Consult with the chair on additional appendices appropriate for the dissertation.
GCU Proposal Template V8.4 05.09.19