Week 2: Student Response to Discussion One and Two

FridayJan 19 at 11:13am

Manage Discussion Entry

Nathaniel,

In our assigned text, there is a passage that reads, “It may be impossible for reporters who are on the scene where dramatic events, such as those taking place during a war, are unfolding not to become a part of the action.” Although this quote is more-or-less speaking of war, it is highly relatable to the scenario. I would come at this story with a clear head and with the utmost professionalism. I would proceed by sitting down and interviewing Riley Frederickson – that would be my first move. Seeing that I am close to him, I would advise him to give me all the facts before I find out myself. I would also demand to know what constitutes as “general expenses” at the high school. “General expenses” comes off as too vague. Of course, I would advise Riley of the repercussions assuming the Auto Club does not meet curriculum standards. To avoid bias and deliver the facts, I would disclose my full relationship with Riley. Not doing so would lead to other people pointing it out. It would be best for me to flat out describe Riley and I’s relationship rather than people finding out. Admitting we are friends would add to my credibility. I would not ignore Riley because there is a possibility that might cause some problems in the future. As Dale Jacquette puts it: “…in many instances it is not physically possible for journalists to have the firsthand information essential for some news reporting unless, to a considerable extent, they become part of the stories on which they are reporting” (2007). Or in other words, a journalist must be engaged in the story to get the facts.

Reference

Jacquette, D. (2007). Journalistic Ethics: Moral Responsibility in the Media. Pearson Learning Solutions. VitalBook file.