WEEK 5 PROJECT/ Quality management plan controls

MHC6303 Week 5 Project INSTRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC

Before beginning work on this assignment, please review the expanded grading rubric for specific instructions relating to content and formatting.

This assignment will ask for you to utilize information gained on previous course projects and reflect on the following quality management plan controls:

· Discuss issues to be considered with the implementation of the improvement program.

· Staff acceptance of change

· Implementation time frame

· Discuss issues involved in the collection and analysis of data.

· Data collection

· Data analysis process

· Identify and describe a desired outcome of the quality improvement plan.

Submission Details:

· To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

· Your assignment should be addressed in a 5- to 6-page document.

· Name your document SU_MHC6303_W5P_LastName_FirstInitial.doc and submit to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

RUBRIC

Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

Unsatisfactory

51 points

Emerging

59 points

Proficient

66 points

Exemplary

75 points

Criterion Score

Includes all assignment components and meets graduate level critical thinking. A purpose statement is identified for the response.

Student did not submit assignment

Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided.

Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague.

Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment.

Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.

/ 75

Integrates and understands assignments concepts and topics.

Student did not submit assignment

Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.

Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts.

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.

/ 75

Synthesizes, analyses, and evaluates resources to apply concepts in the assignment.

Student did not submit assignment

Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment.

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment.

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.

/ 75

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

Unsatisfactory

16 points

Emerging

19 points

Proficient

21 points

Exemplary

25 points

Criterion Score

Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary. Provides credible resources using correct APA format.

Student did not submit assignment

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors.

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors.

/ 25

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

/ 250

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Evidence0 points minimum

Unsatisfactory169 points minimum

Emerging196 points minimum

Proficient219 points minimum

Exemplary250 points minimum