Competency 1 599 competency 2 599 competency 3 599

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

MHACB/599 Competency 1 Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Capstone: Leading the Organization through Change

Competency Assessment Title: Capstone Project Part 1 and Part 2 - Defining the Health Problem and Program Design

Assignment Directions This assessment has two parts, Part 1 and Part 2 of your Capstone project. Complete Part 1 and Part 2 and submit them together.

Part 1 - Defining the Health Problem

The state of health care in the United States is such that costs are sky-high; those who have health insurance get it through their employer, or it can be purchased at a premium that is somewhat commensurate with income. Solving problems is a big part of the administrative work in health care.

For your Capstone Project at the center of this course, you are to develop a health care program that addresses an evident need in a community. The project will be completed in 5 parts.

Review the following documents in full to understand the scope of the project, requirements, and deliverables. You will also find instructions, resources, and examples to guide you through the project.

• Capstone Project

• Capstone Project Calculations

Complete Part 1 of the Capstone Project document

Part 2 - Program Design

In this part, you progress to Part 2 of your Capstone Project, in which you further develop the program you conceived in Part 1 based on an identified health care need in a community.

Part 2 begins the planning of strategic, operational, and financial decisions of starting and running such a program, including goal development, facility, and staffing, and performing a SWOT analysis to determine the potential risks and opportunities of the proposed program.

Complete Part 2 of the Capstone Project document.

Cite any references to support your assignment.

Format your citations according to APA guidelines.

MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric Page 2 of 4

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Submit your assignment, including both Part 1 and Part 2.

Resources

• Center for Writing Excellence

• Reference and Citation Generator

• Grammar Assistance

MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric Page 3 of 4

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria

Mastery 100%

Meets Expectations 85%

Not Met 0%

1. P1: County and Hospital/Health System/Clinic and Sources of Data

(weight 10%)

Provided a clear and through rationale as to why the city was selected, including any prior experiences or knowledge about the existing health care system in that city

Provided a general rationale as to why the city was selected, including any prior experiences or knowledge about the existing health care system in that city

Did not provide a rationale as to why the city was selected, including any prior experiences or knowledge about the existing health care system in that city

2. P1: Health Issues 1& 2 Description and Analysis of Data and Description of Condition(s)

(weight 25%)

Thoroughly explained the source(s) of data and the types of analyses conducted to reach the findings; thoroughly described the condition(s) identified in the data analysis, the extent of the health problems, and why they warrant a program or service to address their impact on the population; provided complete demographic information on the county population, including age, gender, income, employment and other relevant information for the program; thoroughly summarized the health 2 problem affecting this population and how it will be addressed

Generally explained the source(s) of data and the types of analyses conducted to reach the findings; generally described the condition(s) identified in the data analysis, the extent of the health problems, and why they warrant a program or service to address their impact on the population; provided partial demographic information on the county population, including age, gender, income, employment and other relevant information for the program; thoroughly summarized the health 2 problem affecting this population and how it will be addressed

Did not complete the description or analysis of data or provide description of the condition for health issue 1

3. P2: Goals and Objectives and Description of Program and Facility

(weight 10%)

Developed a clear and appropriate goal and 2 clear and appropriate related objectives for the program; thoroughly described the facility and its services, including the target population and demographics

Developed a somewhat appropriate goal and somewhat appropriate related objectives for the program; generally described the facility and its services, including the target population and demographics

Failed to develop a goal or related objectives for the program; did not describe the facility and its services, including the target population and demographics

4. P2: Impact on Marginalized Groups

(weight 10%)

Thoroughly examined the impact of this program on uninsured, low- income populations; provided a clear answer to how these groups

Moderately examined the impact of this program on uninsured, low- income populations; provided a somewhat clear answer to how

Did not examine the impact of this program on uninsured, low-income populations; did not provide an answer to how these groups of

MHACB/599 Competency 1 Rubric Page 4 of 4

Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria

Mastery 100%

Meets Expectations 85%

Not Met 0%

of people will get access to the services.

these groups of people will get access to the services

people will get access to the services

5. P2: Staffing and Support

(weight 10%)

Provided an accurate and clear initial estimate of the staff required to operate this facility, including physicians, nurses, receptionists, and other support staff; appropriately and clearly applied standards on the ratio of clinical and support staff per physician

Provided a general initial estimate of the staff required to operate this facility, including physicians, nurses, receptionists, and other support staff; generally applied standards on the ratio of clinical and support staff per physician.

Did not provide an estimate of the staff required to operate the facility; did not apply standards on the ration of clinical and support staff per physician

6. P2: SWOT Analysis

(weight 10%)

Thoroughly evaluated the potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that can impact the targeted outcome of this program

Generally evaluated the potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that can impact the targeted outcome of this program

Did not evaluate the potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that can impact the targeted outcome of this program

7. P2: Policies, Procedures, Incentives

(weight 10%)

Thoroughly described policies, procedures, and incentives that would make the program a transformative work environment

Moderately described policies, procedures, and incentives that would make the program a transformative work environment

Did not describe policies, procedures, and incentives that would make the program a transformative work environment

8. P2: Literature Review

(weight 10%)

Conducted a thorough literature review and listed at minimum 5 appropriate sources to identify programs that exist to address the identified health problem

Conducted a moderate literature review and listed some appropriate sources to identify programs that exist to address the identified health problem

Did not conduct a literature review; did not list any sources

9. Grammar and Writing Mechanics

(weight 5%)

Accuracy in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice enhanced content; citations accurately formatted as per APA guidelines.

Rare inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice did not detract from the content; rare inaccuracies/errors in formatting citations as per APA guidelines.

Occasional or frequent inaccuracies/errors in grammar, sentence structures, sentence boundaries, and word choice detracted from the content; occasional or frequent inaccuracies/errors in formatting citations as per APA format.