MHA618.UAGC.CG.2021.0323.SMD.pdf

1

CGDT rev. December 2020 [Do not include this revision information in the final version of the Course Guide.]

Course Guide

MHA618

HEALTH ECONOMICS This course focuses upon the analysis of health care operations and planning decisions derived from the

theoretical concepts of demand, cost production, profit and competition. External and internal forces

challenging health care services are analyzed. Organizational effectiveness and efficiency within the

complex health care environment are emphasized.

2

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 2

COURSE AT A GLANCE ..................................................................................................................................... 5

COURSE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5

COURSE DESIGN ................................................................................................................................................. 5

LEARNING OUTCOMES ........................................................................................................................................ 5

COURSE MATERIALS ........................................................................................................................................ 6

REQUIRED TEXT ................................................................................................................................................. 6

REQUIRED RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................................... 6

Articles ........................................................................................................................................................... 6

Multimedia ..................................................................................................................................................... 6

RECOMMENDED RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................. 6

Articles ........................................................................................................................................................... 6

Multimedia ..................................................................................................................................................... 9

Websites ........................................................................................................................................................ 9

COMPONENTS OF COURSE EVALUATION ................................................................................................... 10

DISCUSSIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 10

ASSIGNMENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 10

Written Assignments .................................................................................................................................... 10

FINAL PAPER .................................................................................................................................................... 10

GRADING PERCENT BREAKDOWN ...................................................................................................................... 14

WEEK 1 .............................................................................................................................................................. 15

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 15

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 15

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 15

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 15

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 15

Recommended Resources .......................................................................................................................... 16

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 17

3

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 19

WEEK 2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 20

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 20

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 20

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 20

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 20

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 21

Recommended Resources .......................................................................................................................... 21

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 23

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 26

WEEK 3 .............................................................................................................................................................. 28

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 28

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 28

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 28

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 28

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 29

Recommended Resources .......................................................................................................................... 29

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 30

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 32

WEEK 3 .............................................................................................................................................................. 33

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 33

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 33

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 33

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 33

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 34

Recommended Resources .......................................................................................................................... 34

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 36

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 37

WEEK 5 .............................................................................................................................................................. 39

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 39

4

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 39

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 39

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 39

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 40

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 41

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 43

WEEK 6 .............................................................................................................................................................. 44

COURSE CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................ 44

Overview ...................................................................................................................................................... 44

Learning Outcomes ..................................................................................................................................... 44

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 44

Required Resources .................................................................................................................................... 44

Recommended Resources .......................................................................................................................... 45

Discussions ................................................................................................................................................. 46

Assignment .................................................................................................................................................. 47

COURSE MAP ................................................................................................................................................... 48

MHA618 ALIGNMENT MAP .............................................................................................................................. 51

5

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

COURSE AT A GLANCE

COURSE DESCRIPTION This course focuses on the analysis of health care operations and planning decisions derived from the

theoretical concepts of demand, cost production, profit and competition. External and internal forces

challenging health care services are analyzed. Organizational effectiveness and efficiency within the complex

health care environment are emphasized.

COURSE DESIGN This course examines the components of health economics from the perspective of a health care manager

focused in operations and transitioning into strategic financial planning. Throughout the course, individual

elements will be examined. When possible, this examination will take place through the lens of real-world

professional situations that affect today’s health care managers and operations officers. Students will be

provided with opportunities to design and present potential solutions in real-world simulations taking on a

variety of professional roles. The assignments within the course will culminate in a proposed feasibility study

that analyzes value, effectiveness, and return on investment to a health care organization of the student’s

choosing.

LEARNING OUTCOMES Upon successful completion of this course, students will be able to:

1. Communicate the relevance of economics to the U.S. health care system

2. Analyze economic theories that are germane to the provision of health services.

3. Analyze the role of public policy and the economics of health services.

4. Develop microeconomic models responsive to specific health care service demands.

5. Compare and contrast economic challenges and incentives among health care’s organizational models.

6. Evaluate the social-cultural issues influencing health economics.

7. Design an economical health care service that is responsive to a given market.

6

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

COURSE MATERIALS

REQUIRED TEXT Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• The full-text version of this e-book is available through your online classroom.

REQUIRED RESOURCES

Articles

Daniels, E. B., & Dickson, T.C. (1990). Assessing the feasibility, Performance of geriatric clinics. Healthcare

Financial Management, 44(2), 30-34. Retrieved from the ProQuest database

Democratic Policy & Communications Center. (n.d.) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [PDF].

Korda, H., & Eldridge, G. N. (2011). Payment incentives and integrated care delivery: Levers for health system

reform and cost containment. Inquiry 48(4), 277-287. doi:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.04.01

Leff, B., Burton, L., Mader, S., Naughton, B., Burl, J., Greenough, W.B., Burton, J. R. (2005). Hospital at home:

Feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older

patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(11), 798-808. Retrieved from ProQuest database.

Rice, T. (1997). Physician payment policies: Impacts and implications. Annual Review of Public Health, 18(1),

549. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

University of Kansas. (2013) Community tool box. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-

contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/swot-analysis/main

Multimedia

Demand Metric (2012, November 5). Feasibility study template [Video file]. Retrieved from

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNsimuW0dJU

RECOMMENDED RESOURCES

Articles

The Access Project. (2001). A community leader’s guide to hospital finance: Evaluating how a hospital gets

and spends its money. Retrieved from http://www.accessproject.org/downloads/Hospital_Finance.pdf

7

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainly and the welfare of economics of medical care. The American Economic

Review, 53(5), 941-973. Retrieved from

http://stevereads.com/papers_to_read/uncertainty_and_the_welfare_economics_of_medical_care.pdf

Bergner, A., & Thompson, M. (2013). The new economics of health care benefits. Financial Executive, 29(2),

29-32. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Baicker, K., Congdon, W. J., & Mullainathan, S. (2012). Health insurance coverage and take-up: Lessons from

behavioral economics. Milbank Quarterly, 90(1), 107-134. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00656.x

Block, D. (2013). Disruptive innovation: Contributing to a value-based health care system. Physician Executive,

39(5), 46-52. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Bowblis, J. R., & Lucas, J. A. (2012). The impact of state regulations on nursing home care practices. Journal

of Regulatory Economics, 42(1), 52-72. doi: 10.1007/s11149-012-9183-6

Cantor, J. C., Thompson, F. J., & Farnham, J. (2013). States' commitment to medicaid before the Affordable

Care Act: Trends and implications. Inquiry, 50(1), 71-84. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Custer, W. S. (2013). Consumer choice in health insurance. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 67(4),

25-27. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Davis, K., & Guterman, S. (2007). Rewarding excellence and efficiency in Medicare payments. Milbank

Quarterly, 85(3), 449-468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00495.x

Dhingra, S. S., Zack, M. M., Strine, T. W., Druss, B. G., & Simoes, E. (2013). Change in health insurance

coverage in Massachusetts and other New England states by perceived health status: Potential impact

of health reform. American Journal of Public Health, 103(6), e107-e114. doi:10.2105/

AJPH.2012.300997

Dowd, S. B. (2004). Applied game theory for the hospital manager: Three case studies. Health Care Manager,

23(2), 156-161. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Ellis, R. P., & McGuire, T. G. (1993). Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in health care. Journal of

Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 135-151. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Fottler, M. D., & Lanning, J. A. (1986). A comprehensive incentive approach to employee health care cost

containment. California Management Review, 29(1), 75-94. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Greenwald, L. M. (2000). Medicare risk-adjusted capitation payments: From research to implementation.

Health Care Financing Review, 21(3), 1-5. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Guo, J., Wade, T., Pan, W., & Keller, K. (2010). School-based health centers: Cost-benefit analysis and impact

on health care disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1617-1623.

doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.185181

8

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Haws, K. L., & Winterich, K. (2013). When value trumps health in a supersized world. Journal of Marketing,

77(3), 48-64. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Heroman, W. M., Davis, C. B., & Farmer, J. L. (2012). Demand forecasting and capacity management in

primary care. Physician Executive, 38(1), 30-34. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Hsu, S. H. (2011). Cost information and pricing: Empirical evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research,

28(2), 554-579. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01051.x

Levaggi, L., & Levaggi, R. (2010). Strategic costs and preferences revelation in the allocation of resources for

health care. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 10(3), 239-256.

doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1007/s10754-010-9079-x

Lillrank, P., Groop, P., & Malmström, T. J. (2010). Demand and supply-based operating modes: A framework

for analyzing health care service production. Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 595-615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-

0009.2010.00613.x

Luxton, D. D. (2013). Considerations for planning and evaluating economic analyses of telemental health.

Psychological Services, 10(3), 276-282. doi:10.1037/a0030658

Mango, P. D., & Riefberg, V. E. (2009). Three imperatives for improving US health care. Mckinsey Quarterly,

(2), 40-44. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Porter, M. E., & Lee, T. H. (2013). The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review 91(10), 50-

70. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Rohr, R. (2012). Cost control: The new frontier of medical management. Physician Executive, 38(4), 82-83.

Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Saleh, S. S., Freire, C., Morris-Dickinson, G., & Shannon, T. (2012). An effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis

of a hospital-based discharge transition program for elderly medicare recipients. Journal of the

American Geriatrics Society, 60(6), 1051-1056. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03992.x

Smith, G. K. (2013). Medical price transparency. Insurance Advocate, 124(7), 40. Retrieved from the

EBSOhost database.

Westhoff, W. W., Cohen, C. F., Cooper, E., Corvin, J., & McDermott, R. J. (2012). Cooperation or competition:

Does game theory have relevance for public health? American Journal of Health Education, 43(3), 175-

183. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.

Yu, T., & Hong Yih, C. (2007). Is health care really a luxury? A demand and supply approach. Applied

Economics, 39(9), 1127-1131. doi:10.1080/00036840500461857

9

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Multimedia

Forbes. (2014, December 15). The top health industry trends to watch in 2015 [Video file]. Retrieved from

https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0

Websites

The Agency for Health Research and Quality (www.ahrq.gov)

Hospital Corporation of America (http://hcahealthcare.com)

Tenet Health System (http://www.tenethealth.com/pages/home.aspx )

United States Department of Health & Human Services (http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/)

United States Department of Labor (http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/)

Vaikom Hospital & Healthcare (http://vaikomhealthcare.com/project-cost-estimates)

10

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

COMPONENTS OF COURSE EVALUATION

Multiple measures of evaluation are used in the course, allowing students opportunities to demonstrate their

learning in more than one way, and giving consideration to individual learning styles. Course components that

will be evaluated include:

DISCUSSIONS Each week students will participate in online discussions with classmates, which are related to the week’s

readings. These discussions replace the interactive dialogue that occurs in the traditional classroom setting.

Each week, students’ initial discussion posts are due by 11:59 p.m. (of the time zone in which each student

resides) on Day 3 (Thursday). Students will have until 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 (the following Monday) to make the

required minimum number of response posts to classmates. Discussions represent 38% of the overall

course grade.

ASSIGNMENTS

Written Assignments

There is a written assignment due in Weeks Two and Four of this course. These assignments must reflect

college-level writing and critical thinking. Assignments represent 23% of the overall course grade.

FINAL PAPER The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is for you to culminate the

learning achieved in the course by presenting a feasibility study based on the Week Six article by Daniels and

Dickson (1990). The Final Project represents 39% of the overall course grade.

Focus of the Final Paper

Building on the work you completed in Weeks Two and Four, you will complete a feasibility study based on a

pre-approved health care project of your choice. Using the feasibility study outlined in the Daniels and Dickson

(1990) article as a model, and including a minimum of six other relevant resources and readings, create a 12-

to15-page feasibility study that includes the following headings and supporting information:

Evaluating Feasibility

11

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

The concept of a feasibility study is central to viability, the “worth to the effort” ratio, and return on investment

(ROI). What needs to be taken into consideration to create a feasibility study (e.g., human resources,

community needs, technological advances, federal and state regulatory issues)? Within this section, you will

research and design an economical health care service that is responsive to a given market. This research

stems from understanding your target population and present need in health services. Furthermore, as you

have seen from the Daniels and Dickson (1990) article, you must appraise your human resources, capital

investment, and how your effort will yield a return on investment from your facilities perspective as well as the

intangible greater good of providing healthcare to a community.

Strategic Effect

Analyze the role of public policy with regard to your project. What policies and processes should be in place to

create an effective program? How will you measure the effectiveness of your program and your provision of

health care services? Develop a microeconomic model that is responsive to the specific health care service

demands of your target population. For example, the current trend of the medical home model, which allows for

the coordination of care, allows for better communication among service providers as well as convenience for

patients. Is the population a market priority? How does your program serve a need for your target population?

Market Analysis

Within this section you will identify the population demographics, who your competitors are, and whether or not

a real need for the services you are proposing exists in the community. As you examine the demographic and

population needs using Census data and other reliable sources, you must also consider what competitors, if

any, exist in the present climate. This requires an evaluation of the present socioeconomic and cultural trends

influencing how people make decisions in health care. In addition, in this analysis you will need to compare

and contrast economic challenges and incentives among health care’s organization models. This comparison

requires an understanding of past challenges and incentives that other organizations have implemented.

Financial Analysis

This section includes the revenue, expenses, and net income. Compare and contrast economic challenges and

incentives by finding and describing multiple sources of public and private funding (e.g., grants, donations,

awards, special projects) for this project. Include a reference list for your funding sources that is formatted in

APA as outlined in the Writing Center. Next, identify the funding constraints for each source. Include limitations

of monies awarded, timing issues, fitting the needs of the funding sources, difficulties of connecting with private

12

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

funders, etc. Finally, specify the internal ramifications of moving forward using SWOT analysis. What are the

fixed and variable costs associated with your project? What are the annual maintenance and operation costs?

Elaborate on how you arrived at your sensitivity analysis conclusions.

Operations Performance

This section examines the incremental effect of how your proposed service will impact all aspects of health

services. This portion of the study explores how the statistical data you have researched affects the proposed

service in terms of efficiency and value. This can be difficult to measure initially. However, through incremental

and ongoing evaluation of operations, you can begin to see what constitutes the best performance in this

instance and how it serves the target population. In this section, you will further illustrate the incentives and

challenges faced by a health organization and communicate the relevance of economics within the U.S. health

care system as it pertains to your proposed services.

Inpatient

If your proposed study has an inpatient component, this section will elaborate on volume of patients, types of

payers, and how utilization rates impact your proposed study. In addition, you will further explain how your new

inpatient service will add value for patients and improve the financial viability of the institution. This section will

require you to use both qualitative and quantitative data to justify the plan. Hospitals operate in terms of how

many beds are occupied relative to how many are empty. Most CEOs want to see that a unit is running at near

full capacity and that volume is increasing year to year. Analyze how your proposal will meet these demands

by explaining the data you have collected and predicting potential financial outcomes. Finally, evaluate and

explain how value-based care will impact your ability to maintain margins within this newly proposed service.

Outpatient

If your proposed study has an outpatient component, examine how admissions, revenue, and workflow of staff

will improve the efficiency of your proposed service. Analyze how your outpatient service will add value for

patients and improve the financial viability of the institution. Justify your plan with appropriate data. As stated in

the inpatient section, the content here applies much the same way. However, the caveat for outpatient services

lies in the ambulatory setting. This aspect should be most interesting under conditions created by the

Affordable Care Act. The new paradigm shift will be toward more preventative, primary, and outpatient care

settings to reduce the numbers of patients being admitted to hospitals. Please explain how your proposal takes

these conditions into consideration. In this section, you will further compare and contrast economic challenges

13

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

and incentives among health care’s organization models in an outpatient setting. You will also further augment

your design in an economic framework that is responsive to your market.

Outlook

This section examines future implications of your proposed services and how they will impact the future health

outcomes of the community and financial health of the services being provided. Analyze economic theories

that are germane to the provision of your proposed health services. What adjustments might you need to make

in terms of what the “unintended consequences” may be? For example, Baylor Hospital in Houston proposed

and spent 250 million to create a brand new hospital that currently stands empty because it was built during

the U.S. economic downturn, the loan was no longer able to finance the construction, and the initial

examination of its necessity did not play out as expected. Provide conclusions and implications of how your

feasibility study fits within the larger context of the system of services currently being provided. How do they

work with one another within the larger health care system? Finally, evaluate how your study will respond to

market and design models that impact the community based on current regulatory and market needs.

Finally, evaluate how your study will respond to market and design models that impact the community based

on current regulatory and market needs.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper

• Must be 12 to 15 double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as

outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

• Must include the listed headings with the content required under each.

• Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

14

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

• Must use at least six scholarly sources that were published within the last five years, including a

minimum of three peer-reviewed sources from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.

• Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in

the Writing Center.

GRADING PERCENT BREAKDOWN

Activity Grading Percent

Discussions 38

Assignments 23

Final Paper 39

Total 100

15

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 1

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the first week of class.

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Post Your Introduction Day 1

Discussion 2

Value and Consumer Preference Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

The Importance of Economics for Health Care

Leaders

Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Prepare for the Week Two Assignment: “Final

Paper Topic and Area of Interest”

Day 7 Assignment

N/A

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Analyze economic models that are specific to consumer preference.

2. Analyze trends in potential payer mixes as they relate to changing demographics.

Introduction

This week begins with a look at the various topics covered in the course and a discussion of these topics in

terms of individual student’s professional aspirations. Students will examine the important relationship between

perceived value and consumer preference within the arena of health service providers. Then, they will delve

into the issue of shifting demographics in a payer market through a real-world managerial scenario. Students

are encouraged to look ahead to the Week Two written assignment as they complete this week’s work.

Required Resources

Required Text

16

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• Chapter 1: Why Health Economics?

• Chapter 2: An Overview of the U.S. Healthcare System

Recommended Resources

Articles

Bergner, A., & Thompson, M. (2013). The new economics of health care benefits. Financial Executive, 29(2),

29-32. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This paper provides a succinct overview of the new realities and challenges facing how health

care benefits impact cost and the delivery of health services.

Baicker, K., Congdon, W. J., & Mullainathan, S. (2012). Health insurance coverage and take-up: Lessons from

behavioral economics. Milbank Quarterly, 90(1), 107-134. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00656.x.

Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This paper provides fundamental lessons on how behavioral economics impacts how insurance

companies decide on coverage and benefits. It offers lessons on the importance of human

psychology in the delivery of health care.

Haws, K. L., & Winterich, K. (2013). When value trumps health in a supersized world. Journal of Marketing,

77(3), 48-64. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This paper provides an overview of the concept of value and what it means in health care.

Porter, M. E., & Lee, T. H. (2013). The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review 91(10), 50-

70. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• Porter’s work is notable in many health care management circles. Here, he proposes ways to

improve health care and the strategy used going forward.

Website

The Agency for Health Research and Quality (www.ahrq.gov)

• This website provides extensive resources regarding health outcomes and costs.

17

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 1. Post Your Introduction. Introduce yourself to your classmates and the

instructor by stating who you are, where you live, and any interests or aspirations that you have. As part

of your introduction, review the weekly overviews in the left navigation bar and identify topics in the

course that are of particular interest to you. Explain your reasoning as to why you are looking forward to

learning more about these topics. In addition, communicate the relevance of economics within the U.S.

health care system as it pertains to your career aspirations.

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and welcome at least three of your peers.

If possible, respond to at least one classmate whose interests differ from yours and at least one whose

interests are similar. Be sure to discuss how learning more about the topics your classmates are

interested might add to your personal and professional knowledge and skills.

2. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Value and Consumer Preference. Prior to engaging in this discussion, read

Chapters 1 and 2 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you also

review the recommended articles to glean any helpful information. The idea that value depends on

consumers’ preferences is often considered radical. In your initial post, analyze the economic theories

that are germane to the provision of health services, and comment on how one or two specific model(s)

might explain the framework or context of patient/consumer preference with regard to the health care

services they have experienced. Compare and contrast economic challenges and incentives within

health care’s organizational models that might influence patient preference. How would value (both in

quality and impact of care) differ where you have increase in access and decrease in reimbursement

rates set by most insurance companies?

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. If you disagree, offer an alternative that is better in process and efficiency.

Explain your reasoning and provide at least one reference to support your position. You must also

comment specifically on one aspect of your classmate’s post with which you agree. In addition to

responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you reply to at least one person

who responded to your original post by either respectfully defending your conclusion or by listing how

you might implement the changes your classmate suggested.

18

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

3. 1st Post Due by Day 3. The Importance of Economics for Health Care Leaders. Prior to engaging in

this discussion, be sure to review the Chapters 1 and 2 in the text as well as any relevant Instructor

Guidance. It is suggested that you also review the recommended articles to glean any helpful

information. In the present paradigm, it has become evident that operational leaders and strategic

leaders in health care must be able to appraise how economics impacts health care in the United

States. Furthermore, it is critical successful leaders to possess an understanding of the variables and

nuances that shape how supply and demand in this heavily regulated industry so they may observe

trends and opportunities that lead to a functional organizational system.

Imagine that you are a manager running a unit in a rehabilitation center. Up to this point, your primary

population of payers has been elderly patients who come into the center for physical therapy. Recently,

there has been a demographic shift in the community. A large number of your primary population has

moved out of the area or died, which has caused a shift in your revenues. You have been tasked by

your director to illustrate the cost and revenue numbers relative to insurance payouts to ensure that

your cost does not exceed your revenue. Drawing on your current professional expertise and

understanding drawn from the required resources for this week, create an initial post in which you

communicate how the potential payer mix relates economically to changing demographics in your given

community. What potential solutions would you suggest to your director that might overcome the

demographic shift? Analyze economic theories that are germane to your provision of services and

identify one theory that might apply to this specific situation.

Guided Response: Taking on the role of the director of the rehabilitation center, review the posts

provided by your classmates and provide a substantive written response to at least two of your peers.

Did the post effectively communicate the economic issues at hand? Were the suggested solutions

appropriate and manageable given the current situation? In your position as the director of the center,

analyze the role of public policy (e.g., the passing of the Affordable Care Act) in your provision of

services. What other sources of potential capital might you seek out to ensure that the cost to revenue

ratio remains consistent with viability?

19

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Prepare for the Week Two Assignment: “Final Paper Topic and Area of Interest.”

Although you do not have a graded assignment to turn in this week, it is highly recommended that you

look ahead to the assignment for next week. In Week Two, you will be expected to choose and submit

a topic and area of interest for your Final Paper for this course, which is a completed feasibility study.

20

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 2

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the second week of class.

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Finance, Risk, and Cost Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Overinsured, Underinsured, and Uninsured Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Feasibility Study Topic and Area of Interest Day 7

Assignment 8

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Discuss common approaches to managing risk.

2. Create an investment scenario for a potential health services project.

3. Discuss the relationship between cost and quality.

4. Examine major trends in health insurance.

Introduction

Understanding and managing costs and risks are core administrative tasks. Regardless of the mission of the

health organization, leaders must consider cost control a priority. In addition, they must be able to make

decisions even when important information is incomplete or missing. When leaders do not have all the

necessary data, they must appraise the risk to determine if it is worth taking and what the best strategy for

dealing with it might be. In light of this, insurance is all about managing risk. It is important for leaders to

understand how it is structured in both private and public settings.

This week we will be determining the risk and assessing the cost of a proposed venture. You will have the

opportunity to take on the role of the presenter as well as that of the reviewer, which will allow you to

21

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

experience two professional perspectives on the same problem. You will also be delving into the implications of

accessibility and distribution through the lens of health insurance.

Required Resources

Required Text

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• Chapter 3: An Overview of the Healthcare Financing System

• Chapter 4: Describing, Evaluating, and Managing Risk

• Chapter 5: Understanding Costs

Articles

Daniels, E. B., Dickson, T.C. (1990). Assessing the feasibility, performance of geriatric clinics. Healthcare

Financial Management, 44(2): 30-34. Retrieved from the ProQuest database

• This article will be used in conjunction with your feasibility study assignments.

Democratic Policy & Communications Center. (n.d.) The patient protection and affordable care act [PDF].

Retrieved from http://www.dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill52.pdf

• This online report is the U.S. Senate’s version of pertinent facts related to the Affordable Care

Act.

Leff, B., Burton, L., Mader, S., Naughton, B., Burl, J., Greenough, WB., …Burton, J. R. (2005). Hospital at

Home: Feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older

patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(11): 798-808. Retrieved from ProQuest database.

• This provides an example of a feasibility study.

Recommended Resources

Articles

The Access Project. (2001). A community leader’s guide to hospital finance: Evaluating how a hospital gets

and spends its money. Retrieved from http://www.accessproject.org/downloads/Hospital_Finance.pdf.

• This article provides a community or systems perspective on how hospitals receive payment

and spend money for services to maintain operability of an organization.

22

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Custer, W. S. (2013). Consumer choice in health insurance. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 67(4),

25-27. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• Custer (2013) states that “the health insurance market is likely to become more complex with

full implementation of the Affordable Care Act. There is a good deal of research that suggests

that consumers' choices may not be rational when the number of alternatives is large, the

alternatives are complex, and information is limited or costly. Overcoming the limitations in

consumer decision making requires reducing complexity, increasing information, and providing

computational resources.”

Dhingra, S. S., Zack, M. M., Strine, T. W., Druss, B. G., & Simoes, E. (2013). Change in health insurance

coverage in Massachusetts and other New England states by perceived health status: Potential impact

of health reform. American Journal of Public Health, 103(6), e107-e114. doi:10.2105/

AJPH.2012.300997. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• This article examines the impact of health reform in Massachusetts and its public health

component (enacted in 2006) on change in health insurance coverage by perceived health.

Fottler, M. D., & Lanning, J. A. (1986). A comprehensive incentive approach to employee health care cost

containment. California Management Review, 29(1), 75-94. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• The article discusses the use of a comprehensive incentive approach to employee health care

cost containment. A comprehensive approach would involve system controls to shrink the

system as well as incentives for both providers and health care consumers to reduce utilization,

be more price conscious, and provide services more quickly.

Mango, P. D., & Riefberg, V. E. (2009). Three imperatives for improving US health care. Mckinsey Quarterly,

(2), 40-44. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• The article discusses actions that the author feels should be taken to address the high cost of

health care within the United States. Specific problems that the authors feel the U.S.

government should address are discussed, such as the cost associated with treating diseases

related to people's lifestyles and wastes within the health care system

Rohr, R. (2012). Cost control: The new frontier of medical management. Physician Executive, 38(4), 82-83.

Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• The article offers the author's insights regarding the medical care cost control in the United

States. The author states that the Affordable Care Act has instructed a reduction in spending

from the current levels. He says that the value-based purchasing will lessen total payments from

the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the United States.

23

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Multimedia

Forbes. (2014, December 15). The top health industry trends to watch in 2015 [Video file]. Retrieved from

https://youtu.be/fRym_jyuBc0

• This video reviews how the U.S. healthcare industry will begin to look and feel more like the rest

of the business world: catering to wired customer who expect one-click service and fast access

to data.

Websites

Hospital Corporation of America (http://hcahealthcare.com)

• This is the main website for a major hospital system covering the United States.

Tenet Health System (http://www.tenethealth.com/pages/home.aspx )

• This is a competitor hospital health care system similar in size and scale to Hospital Corporation

of America.

United States Department of Health & Human Services (http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/)

• This website offers information on the Affordable Care Act from the perspective of the U.S

Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees it.

United States Department of Labor (http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/)

• The U.S Department of Labor provides an annual review of occupational health statistics as

they relate to market forces.

Vaikom Hospital & Healthcare (http://vaikomhealthcare.com/project-cost-estimates)

• This website offers a sample of the basic tenants that go into a cost estimate and the

breakdown of the variables.

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Finance, Risk, and Cost. Prior to engaging in this discussion, read Chapters 3

and 4 from the text review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you review the

recommended resources to glean any helpful information. You are an associate director in a 300-bed

hospital located in an urban area. For the purposes of your presentation, the location will be the closest

city to your current residence (this may be your city of residence). A sum of money is available for

investment in the facility. You have been tasked by the hospital CEO to present a possible investment

24

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

scenario in which you renovate your existing facility, expand the current facility, or clinically integrate

your electronic health records (EHRs). There is only enough money to fund one of the potential

projects. Your primary sources of data and information may or may not be reliable. Please see the

“Finance, Risk, and Cost” document for the data needed to create your presentation.

Suggested Resource:

The Top Health Industry Trends to Watch in 2015

Next year the $2.8 trillion U.S. healthcare industry will finally begin to look and feel more like the rest of

the business world: catering to wired customers who expect one-click service and fast access to data.

In this discussion, you will be create a five-minute presentation using PowerPoint and Jing, Screencast-

o-matic, or an alternative program with audio, wherein you propose one of the potential projects and

defend its viability as the best option at the present time. Your PowerPoint presentation slides must

include the following information:

• A basic design of the projected service/project (i.e., the option you are promoting)

• An analysis of the role of public policy in terms of your provision of health care services and

provide justification of your choice

• An explanation of the relevance of the current financial data in terms of the projected outcome

of the project

• A compare and contrast discussion of the economic challenges and incentives related to your

project

Once you have created your PowerPoint presentation, use Jing, Screencast-o-matic, or an alternative

program with audio, to create a screencast of your presentation with voiceover. Include a title for your

presentation in the description box when you publish your screencast. The hospital CEO has limited

your presentation time to three to five minutes, so you will need to incorporate as many characteristics

of an effective speaker as you can within this timeframe. These characteristics may include but are not

limited to storytelling, facts only, pace, and volume. Since there is no video of the presenter (just the

presentation itself), you will not have the benefit of body language, so be sure to create a convincing

screencast. Do not read your slides; rather, elaborate on your bullet points and/or financial maps within

the slides.

25

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Copy and paste the URL to your screencast into your discussion board response section and attach

your PowerPoint (.ppt) file to the post prior to submitting it. Your presentation must utilize at least two

scholarly sources, in addition to your textbook, that are cited in APA format as outlined in the Writing

Center. All sources used within the presentation must be cited properly on the slides and included on

required reference slide, which will be the last slide of the PowerPoint presentation. Due to the time

limit of your presentation, you are not required to speak or read through the reference slide. However,

you must include your reference list within the discussion post along with the URL for your screencast

and submit your PowerPoint presentation by attaching the PowerPoint (.ppt) file to your initial

discussion post.

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Taking on the role of the hospital CEO, review the presentations provided

by at least two of your peers. Evaluate the social issues that influenced the choice of project. Does the

initiative match the mission and vision of the facility? Does the presentation effectively defend the

project in terms of financial impact on the facility? Will the project meet regulatory needs? Is the cost of

the project worth the financial risk? Why, or why not? In addition to responding to at least two other

students’ posts, it is recommended that you reply to at least one person who responded to your original

presentation by either respectfully defending your conclusions or by listing how you might consider

other alternatives.

2. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Overinsured, Underinsured, and Uninsured. Prior to engaging in this

discussion, be sure to read Chapters 4 and 5 from the textbook and review the information included in

the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” detailed summary, the information provided on the

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website, and any relevant Instructor Guidance.

Presently, the United States is a fragmented system that offers a misdistribution of “haves” and “have

nots” which impact the cost of delivering health care. The United States is currently a nation of

overinsured, underinsured, and uninsured people. In light of the passage of the Affordable Care Act

(ACA), how do you see these issues being corrected so that a majority of the population has access to

quality health care? In an initial post of 250-300 words, communicate the relevant aspects of the ACA

that will impact these issues. Analyze and describe how the role of public policy will affect changes in

this distribution. Evaluate and explain some of the social-cultural issues that might present potential

26

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

problems as this plays out across the country. What implications associated with the ACA might lead to

a paradigm shift in the ways in which we view access to health care?

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Did your classmates identify the same or different potential problems than

you included in your post? How might you reconsider your original position based on the problems

presented by your peers? What specific aspects of the paradigm shift did your classmates present that

made you reflect differently on the potential outcomes of the ACA? Explain your reasoning.

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Feasibility Study Topic and Area of Interest. A detailed feasibility study is an

essential element in the process of diligently assessing any new health services business venture.

According to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the health care industry is currently one of

the fastest growing fields in the United States, and it is projected that the field will grow by 22 percent

by 2018. This is compared to an 11 percent average growth rate for all other industries (United States

Department of Labor, 2012). Whether you are considering new medical service lines, an expansion of

your current operation, or any other type of health care business venture, a feasibility study is an

essential planning tool for any future health care leader.

In this assignment, you will be taking the first step toward the completion of your final assignment by

settling on the topic for your feasibility study. Please read the Leff, et al (2005) article, “Hospital at

Home: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Program to Provide Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill

Older Patients.” Reflect on the procedures and content found in the article to aid you in choosing and

shaping a topic for your feasibility study. The topic you select should be of interest and meaningful to

you and your career, and it must be related to health care delivery.

Create a document that includes the following:

• Title: Proposed title for the feasibility study

• Topic: Topic of the feasibility study

• Description: A brief description (250-500 words) of how the proposal will impact the quality,

availability, accessibility, and affordability of care

27

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

• List of Resources: A list of five scholarly sources that you plan to use as you complete your

feasibility study

Writing the Feasibility Study Topic and Area of Interest

The Paper

• Must be one to two double-spaced pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages, and

formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

• Must address the topic with critical thought.

• Must include the listed headings with the content required under each.

• Must use at least five scholarly sources that were published within the last five years, including

a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources from the University of Arizona Global Campus

Library.

• Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in

the Writing Center.

28

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 3

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the third week of class

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Demand Theory and Its Application Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Appreciating Supply and Demand Analysis Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Prepare for the Week Four Assignment:

“Concept Paper Submission”

Day 7

Assignment N/A

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Develop microeconomic models based on the health service demands of a given population.

2. Evaluate publicly available data tools that assist in the formulation of basic demand and supply curves.

Introduction

Health care markets are in a constant state of flux in relation to supply and demand theory. Policies change.

Prices rise and fall. Volumes rise and fall. Having an understanding of the supply and demand curve will help

any health care leader better forecast the effects of changes in policy or demographics. Furthermore, any

working organization must keep in mind the notion that “with no margin, there is no mission.” It is important to

understand where leaders can reasonably maximize profits to keep a system financially viable and remain

competitive.

This week we will be utilizing demand theory to defend a financial venture within a health care organization.

You will have the opportunity to practice research gathering and presentation skills that are crucial to your

professional success. Further, you will be evaluating publicly available data tools and formulating demand and

29

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

supply curves to examine and explain pricing and value-based care. You are encouraged to look ahead to the

Week Four written assignment as you complete this week’s work.

Required Resources

Required Text

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• Chapter 7: The Demand for Health Care Products

• Chapter 10: Supply and Demand Analysis

• Chapter 11: Maximizing Profits

Recommended Resources

Articles

Block, D. (2013). Disruptive innovation: Contributing to a value-based health Care System. Physician

Executive, 39(5), 46-52. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• The article discusses how hospitals can use disruptive innovation to improve health care quality,

safety and outcomes by reducing the costs of healthcare delivery. The author says health care

delivery in the United States is at least 20 years behind the development of other industries in

the country.

Ellis, R. P., & McGuire, T. G. (1993). Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in health care. Journal Of

Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 135-151. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This article focuses on the supply side and demand side of cost sharing in health care. Ellis &

McQuire (1993, p.137) states that ”economists and others concerned with health care policy

have debated the meaning of "demand" in health care. After all, as Arrow (1963) emphasized

early on, the relationship between patients and their physicians (and other health care

providers) involves agency, information, trust, and professionalism. A key unresolved issue in

health policy is the magnitude of this provider-induced demand, and how it is determined.”

Heroman, W. M., Davis, C. B., & Farmer, J. L. (2012). Demand forecasting and capacity management in

primary care. Physician Executive, 38(1), 30-34. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

30

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

• The article examines how a practical approach to demand forecasting and capacity

management helps primary care clinics run smoothly and efficiently. The authors state that a

demand forecast determines the gap relative to the capacity of the practice to provide health

care which can affect all the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles.

Lillrank, P., Groop, P., & Malmström, T. J. (2010). Demand and supply-based operating modes: A framework

for analyzing health care service production. Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 595-615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-

0009.2010.00613.x. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• “The structure of health organizations that provide services should reflect the possibilities of and

constraints on production that arise from the market segments they serve. Organizational

segmentation in health care is based on urgency and severity as well as disease type, bodily

function, principal method, or population subgroup. The result is conflicting priorities, goals, and

performance metrics. A managerial perspective is needed to identify activities with similar

requirements for integration, coordination, and control” (Lillrank, Groop, & Malrnstrom, 2010)..

Yu, T., & Hong Yih, C. (2007). Is health care really a luxury? A demand and supply approach. Applied

Economics, 39(9), 1127-1131. doi:10.1080/00036840500461857 Retrieved from the EBSCOhost

database.

• Yu & Hong (2007) suggest that many studies have found strong and positive relationship

between per capita income and health care expenditure. These studies usually adopt the

assumptions that (1) the relationships among the variables are constant; and/or (2) the supply-

side market for health care could be treated by using standard demand functions models. To

take into account of the supply side of health care, we use the demand and supply approach

with the co-integration model to re-examine this issue.

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Demand Theory and Its Application. Prior to engaging in this discussion,

please read Chapters 6 and 9 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested

that you review the recommended articles to glean any helpful information. In this discussion, you will

be taking on the role of an associate director of a hospital who is considering the proposed opening of

an urgent care clinic about 20 miles from your main campus. You have been charged with gathering

demographic information that might affect the demand for the new clinic and creating a presentation

that will be delivered to the hospital CEO. Consider what data might be relevant and why. What would

you want to show the CEO to prove that this project would be feasible for the organization? As with the

31

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

“Finance, Risk, and Cost” discussion in Week Two, you will be creating a five-minute presentation using

PowerPoint and Jing, Screencast-o-matic, or an alternative program with audio, to present your findings

on the feasibility of this project to your CEO.

Today’s health care landscape is placing new importance on the economics of health care. Reflecting

on the exercises you have completed thus far and incorporating information from the text, analyze how

demand theory applies to public policy and the economics of health services. What elements,

responsive to the specific health care service demands of your given population, would you want to

present as you develop a microeconomic model based on this proposed opening of an urgent care

clinic?

Your PowerPoint presentation slides must include the following information:

• Your basic microeconomic model of the projected service/project

• An analysis of the role that public policy plays in terms of your provision of health care services

• A justification of your model

• The relevance of the current financial data in terms of the projected outcome of the project

• A compare and contrast discussion of the economic challenges and incentives related to your

project

Once you have created your PowerPoint presentation, use Jing, Screencast-o-matic, or an alternative

program with audio, to create a screencast of your presentation with voiceover. Include a title for your

presentation in the description box when you publish your screencast. The hospital CEO has limited

your presentation time to three to five minutes, so you will need to incorporate as many characteristics

of an effective speaker as you can within this timeframe.

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. In your responses, you will take on the role of the hospital CEO. As the

CEO, you have the responsibility of presenting this work in front of the Board of Regents that has to

authorize the “go ahead” to fund the project. With this in mind, review the presentations provided by at

least two of your peers. Does the initiative match the mission and vision of the facility? Does the

presentation effectively defend the project in terms of financial impact on the facility? Will the project

meet regulatory needs? Is the cost of the project worth the financial risk? Why, or why not? In addition

32

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

to responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you reply to at least one

person who responded to your original presentation by either respectfully defending your conclusions or

by listing how you might consider other alternatives.

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Appreciating Supply and Demand Analysis. Prior to engaging in this

discussion, please review Chapters 6 and 9, read Chapter 10 in the text, and review any relevant

Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you review a few of the recommended articles to glean any

helpful information. Supply and demand analysis aids health care leaders in ascertaining the effects of

changes in policy on service lines that impact a community’s health (e.g., whether to expand existing

services or perhaps close services). Identify and evaluate publicly available tools that provide data and

assist in formulating the basic shapes of demand and supply curves. Communicate and elaborate on

the relevance of these economic indicators in terms of pricing. Evaluate and comment on the social-

cultural implications of value-based care.

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree, offer an alternative as to why

value-based care may impact the system. Specifically speak to the change in the supply and demand

curves that we have traditionally understood. Provide at least one scholarly reference that supports

your comments. Comment on any insights you gained from your classmate’s post.

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Prepare for the Week Four Assignment: “Concept Paper Submission.” Although

you do not have a graded assignment to turn in this week, it is highly recommended that you look

ahead to the assignment for next week. In Week Four, you will create a draft or concept paper for your

Final Paper based on the approved topic and area of interest you submitted in Week Two.

33

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 3

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the fourth week of class

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Economic Analyses and Interventions Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Pricing and Transparency Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Concept Paper Submission Day 7

Assignment 15

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Compare and contrast cost benefit analysis and cost utility analysis.

2. Analyze the role of pricing transparency in health care.

3. Develop a SWOT analysis for a proposed health care services project.

Introduction

Price setting and profitability depend on several factors as stated by Porter’s model, which include nature of

rivalry, bargaining power of customers (patients) and risk of entry by potential rivals. This week, we will explore

health administrative innovations with an eye toward health care delivery and service demands. It is critical to

appraise projects using cost benefit analysis and utility analysis to ascertain if a procedure is worth the cost or

if a specific process can be done more efficiently. In addition, this has to take into account pricing. As noted in

our text, “Pricing is a continuing challenge for healthcare organizations for three reasons” (Lee, 2009, p. 169).

First, leaders don’t have clear pricing strategy. Second, leaders lack the necessary data to make a good

decision and, finally, one pricing model does not fit every department or organization (Lee, 2009). This week

34

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

we will explore aspects of pricing transparency as well as ideas on how clear strategies and accurate data are

necessary in good decision making.

Required Resources

Required Text

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• Chapter 12: Pricing

• Chapter 14: Economic Analysis of Clinical and Managerial Interventions

• Chapter 15: Profits, Market Structure, and Market Power

Articles

Daniels, E. B., Dickson, T.C. (1990). Assessing the feasibility, performance of geriatric clinics. Healthcare

Financial Management, 44(2): 30-34. Retrieved from the ProQuest database

• This article will be used in conjunction with your feasibility study assignments.

University of Kansas. (2013) Community tool box. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-

contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/swot-analysis/main

• This webpage provides an overview of SWOT analysis from the community context.

Multimedia

Demand Metric (2012, November 5). Feasibility study template [Video file]. Retrieved from

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNsimuW0dJU

• This video shows you what goes into a feasibility study as a template used.

Recommended Resources

Articles

Luxton, D. D. (2013). Considerations for planning and evaluating economic analyses of telemental health.

Psychological Services, 10(3), 276-282. doi:10.1037/a0030658. Retrieved from the EBSOhost

database.

• This article discusses the economic evaluation of telemental health (TMH) to inform ways to

decrease the cost of delivering care, to improve access to care, and to make decisions about

35

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

the allocation of resources. Previous reviews of telehealth economic analysis studies have

concluded that there are significant methodological deficiencies and inconsistencies that limit

the ability to make generalized conclusions about the costs and benefits of telehealth programs

(Luxton, 2013).

Guo, J., Wade, T., Pan, W., & Keller, K. (2010). School-based health centers: Cost-benefit analysis and impact

on health care disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1617-1623.

doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.185181. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• This article evaluated the impact of school-based health centers--which provide essential health

care for students by aiming to eliminate many access barriers--on health care access disparities

and conducted a cost--benefit analysis.

Hsu, S. (2011). Cost information and pricing: Empirical evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2),

554-579. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01051.x. Retrieved from the EBSOhost database.

• The article examines the relationship between service prices and unit-allocated capacity costs in

firms that have committed themselves to long-term capacity requirements. Specifically, the

author studies a private hospital in California using data gleaned from the years 1993 through

1999.

Saleh, S. S., Freire, C., Morris-Dickinson, G., & Shannon, T. (2012). An effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis

of a hospital-based discharge transition program for elderly medicare recipients. Journal of the

American Geriatrics Society, 60(6), 1051-1056. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03992.x. Retrieved from

the EBSOhost database.

• This paper investigated the business case of post discharge care transition (PDCT) among

Medicare beneficiaries by conducting a cost-benefit analysis.

Smith, G. (2013). Medical price transparency. Insurance Advocate, 124(7), 40. Retrieved from the EBSOhost

database.

• The author reflects on the challenges in bringing transparent pricing in health care and

discusses the steps to be taken to resolve the problem. He mentions that medical facilities need

to exhibit transparent pricing to emerge from a competitive market and market economy. He

informs that a tertiary hospital from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma is providing upfront pricing for

procedures for an outpatient center

36

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Economic Analyses and Interventions. Prior to engaging in this discussion,

please read Chapters 13 and 14 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested

that you review the recommended articles to glean any helpful information. Analyze and comment on

economic analyses of health administrative innovations that are germane to the provision of health

services. How have these innovations become more important in health care delivery within the context

of the Affordable Care Act? Develop a list of similarities and differences between cost benefit analysis

and cost effectiveness analysis as they pertain to specific health care service demands. Compare and

contrast economic challenges and incentives as they relate specifically to cost benefit and cost

effectiveness analyses.

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Choose one aspect with which you disagree and offer an alternative that

illustrates innovations in health care delivery. Explain why this alternative would be a better option and

provide at least one peer-reviewed reference outside of your textbook to support your position. You

must also comment specifically on one aspect of your classmate’s post with which you agree. Provide a

brief explanation as to why the statements were effective, and support your opinion and assertions with

appropriate research. In addition to responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended

that you reply to at least one person who responded to your original post by either respectfully

defending your conclusions or by listing how you might implement the changes your classmate

suggested.

2. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Pricing and Transparency. Prior to engaging in this discussion, please read

Chapter 11 in your text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you review the

recommended articles to glean any helpful information. Analyze the role of the paradigm shift under the

Affordable Care Act and discuss how transparency will play a greater role in pricing of health care. In

your opinion, will consumers begin to demand increasing transparency in pricing? Provide at least one

peer-reviewed reference outside of your textbook to support your position. Do you believe accrediting

commissions (e.g., the Joint Commission) will demand greater transparency in pricing? How will these

demands be weighted as compared to individual consumers’ demands? Again, be sure to cite research

that supports your statements.

37

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Choose one aspect with which you disagree and offer an explanation as to why

your assertions regarding the new paradigm shift toward transparency will enhance the consumer

experience. Explain how your assertions more accurately tie in with the potential demands of

accreditation groups like the Joint Commission. Provide at least one reference to support your position.

Comment specifically on one aspect of your classmate’s post with which you agree. Provide a brief

explanation as to why your colleague’s statements were effective, and bring in research that supports

your assertions. In addition to responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that

you reply to at least one person who responded to your original post either by respectfully defending

your conclusion or by listing how you might implement the changes your classmate suggested.

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Concept Paper Submission. The primary purpose of the Concept Paper is to obtain

instructor feedback to ensure that you are on track with the completion of your feasibility study. The

complete instructions for the feasibility study can be found in Week Six of the online course.

The Concept Paper is a draft version of your Final Paper with the initial list of relevant scholarly

sources. In this draft, be certain to include and (at least) briefly address the content of the headings

listed in the Final Paper instructions for Week Six.

You must include a preliminary Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats SWOT analysis for

your chosen project. For further assistance, please view the Feasibility Study Template video and view

the online article “Community Assessment,” both of which include specific information on elements of

the SWOT analysis required for your final paper.

Remember, your concept paper is a draft, NOT the final product. Submit your Concept Paper with the

required headings to your instructor by the end of this week. Be sure to review the article, “Assessing

the Feasibility, Performance of Geriatric Clinics,” for further information as you complete your

assignment. Be certain to include your list of references with your draft.

38

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Writing the Feasibility Study Concept Paper

The Paper

• Must be a minimum of three double-spaced pages in length, excluding title and reference

pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

• Must include the listed headings in the Week Six feasibility study instructions with the content

required under each.

• Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

• Must list at least six scholarly sources that were published within the last five years, including a

minimum of three peer-reviewed sources from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.

• Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

• Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in

the Writing Center.

39

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 5

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the fifth week of class

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Inseparability of Markets and Regulations Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Applying Game Theory to Strategy Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Prepare for the Week Six Final Paper Day 7

Assignment N/A

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Analyze the policy creation role professional licensing groups have on the economics of health

services.

2. Apply game theory to business strategy.

3. Evaluate the influence economic culture and social issues have on pricing competition.

Introduction

Strategic thinking is critical for any health care leader. In any market, leaders routinely negotiate contracts and

quest for market power and control. It is important to keep in mind the extensive role that regulation plays in

health care. As we have seen in previous weeks, markets and regulation are inseparable. This week, we will

examine the role of health profession licensing agencies in the creation of policies within the profession itself

as well as on the regulation of health services. We will also learn how using game theory allows for leaders to

simulate and identify the consumer’s best response, how each may behave, and how the outcome may be one

of a cooperative or non-cooperative game in the context of understanding current regulations and rules. In

addition, we will develop models that are responsive to the service demands of a specified market and apply

game theory in the creation of a business strategy.

40

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Required Resources

Required Text

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com

• Chapter 17: Regulation

• Chapter 18: Behavioral Economics

Recommended Resources

Articles

Bowblis, J. R., & Lucas, J. A. (2012). The impact of state regulations on nursing home care practices. Journal

of Regulatory Economics, 42(1), 52-72. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1007/s11149-

012-9183-6. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This article assesses the effect of the minimum quality standards of deficiencies and nurse

staffing requirements on the nursing home care practices of physical restraint, indwelling urinary

catheter, and feeding tube use. National longitudinal data on nursing homes reveal that the

effect of specific deficiency citations on care practice use depends on the clinical

complementarity or substitutability of the deficiency and the specific care practice.

Cantor, J. C., Thompson, F. J., & Farnham, J. (2013). States' commitment to medicaid before the Affordable

Care Act: Trends and implications. Inquiry, 50(1), 71-84. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• Medicaid insures more than 65 million low-income people, and the Affordable Care Act of 2010

gives states the option to enroll millions more. Historical trends in state Medicaid effort possess

important implications for health policy going forward. Nearly all states steadily ratcheted up

their Medicaid effort in the period from 1992 to 2009, holding out promise that most will sustain

their programs and ultimately participate in the expansion authorized by the Affordable Care

Act.

Dowd, S. (2004). Applied game theory for the hospital manager: Three case studies. Health Care Manager,

23(2), 156-161. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This article reviews the more complex aspects of game theory than those presented in a recent

HCM article. Following a basic overview of terminology and simplified examples, case studies

are presented to show the hospital manager how game theory is a useful modeling strategy for

41

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

predicting human interactions and the potential outcomes of certain decisions, especially

economic ones.

Levaggi, L., & Levaggi, R. (2010). Strategic costs and preferences revelation in the allocation of resources for

health care. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 10(3), 239-256.

doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1007/s10754-010-9079-x. Retrieved from the

EBSCOhost database.

• This article examines the resources allocation process in the internal market for health care in

an environment characterized by asymmetry of information. We analyze the strategic behavior

of the provider and show how, by misreporting its cost function and reservation utility, it might

shift the allocation of resources away from the purchaser's objectives.

Westhoff, W. W., Cohen, C. F., Cooper, E., Corvin, J., & McDermott, R. J. (2012). Cooperation or competition:

Does game theory have relevance for public health? American Journal of Health Education, 43(3), 175-

183. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.

• In this paper, we use game theory to understand decisions to cooperate or to compete in the

delivery of public health services. Health care is a quasi-public good that is often associated

with altruistic behavior, yet it operates in an increasingly competitive environment. With

mounting health care regulation and changes in privatization, altruistic arguments give way to

more competitive rationales for market decisions.

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Inseparability of Markets and Regulations. Prior to engaging in this

discussion, please read Chapter 17 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is

suggested that you review the recommended articles to glean any helpful information. To begin you

initial post, research one of the health profession licensing agencies in your state. Analyze and

comment on the role this professional licensing group plays in the creation of policy within the

profession as well as the impact those policies potentially have on the economics of health services.

Then, specifically look at the composition of the licensing agency’s board of directors. Describe the

present composition of the board membership. Evaluate the social-cultural issues that might influence

health economics in your state based on the diversity of the board in question. Is the present

composition a fair representation of the community the board is supposed to serve? What, if any,

consumer representation exists on the board? Compare and contrast economic challenges and

incentives among health care’s organizational models such as the licensing agency you have selected.

42

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Choose one aspect with which you disagree and offer your ideas as to how the

licensing agency can remain relevant in the new health care setting under the Affordable Care Act.

Provide at least one peer-reviewed reference outside of your textbook to support your position. You

must also comment specifically on one aspect of your classmate’s post with which you agree. Provide a

brief explanation as to why the statements were effective, and support your opinion and assertions with

research. In addition to responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you

reply to at least one person who responded to your original post either by respectfully defending your

conclusion or by listing how you might implement the changes your classmate suggested.

2. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Applying Game Theory to Strategy. Prior to engaging in this discussion,

please read Chapter 16 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you

review the recommended articles to glean any helpful information. Imagine that you own a pharmacy in

your area. One of your competitors launches a “We will not be undersold” campaign, which promises

consumers 150 % of any difference between its prices and the advertised prices of other pharmacies.

Evaluate the social issues in your community as well as the economic culture that is influencing this

type of pricing competition. Develop and describe a microeconomic model that is responsive to the

service demands of your market. Based on your conclusions, how would you react to this situation and

with what business strategy would you approach this? How might you apply game theory to the

creation of your strategy?

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Choose one aspect with which you disagree and offer an option of how game

theory could illustrate a coherent framework to best react to a competitor. Explain why you believe this

is a better option than what your classmate already proposed, and provide at least one scholarly

reference to support your position. You must also comment specifically on one aspect of your

classmate’s post with which you agree. Provide a brief explanation as to why the proposed course of

action would be effective, and support your opinion and assertions with research. In addition to

responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you reply to at least one person

43

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

who responded to your original post by either respectfully defending your conclusion or by listing how

you might implement the changes your classmate suggested.

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Prepare for the Week Six Final Paper. Although you do not have a graded assignment

to turn in this week, it is highly recommended that you look ahead to the assignment for next week. In

Week Six, you will be expected to turn in your Final Paper based on the approved topic and area of

interest you submitted in Week Two and the feedback you received on your Concept Paper Submission

in Week Four.

44

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

WEEK 6

COURSE CONTENT To be completed during the sixth week of class

Overview

Assignment Due Date Format Grading Percent

Consumer Incentives Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Opportunism in Health Care Day 3

(1st post)

Discussion 3

Final Paper Day 7 Assignment 39

Learning Outcomes

This week students will:

1. Evaluate the influence of social-cultural issues on adverse selection in insurance markets.

2. Analyze the influence that public policy has on the operational costs of health services centers.

3. Create a feasibility study for a student proposed health care services project.

Introduction

This week presents often neglected aspects of a health care manager’s job: opportunism and incentives. Lee

(2009) suggests that “vendors often know more about the strength and weakness of their products than do

purchasers. Subordinates know more about the effort they have put into an assignment than do their superiors”

(p.183). One must view this asymmetric challenge as an opportunity to grow and align the interests of all

stakeholders. This week, we will examine appropriate incentives and strategize how to best employ them. We

will also evaluate conditions of and propose strategies for reducing adverse selection in health insurance within

specific markets.

Required Resources

Required Text

45

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Lee, R. H. (2015). Economics for health care managers (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Care Administration

Press

• Chapter 13: Asymmetric Information and Incentives

Articles

Daniels, E. B., Dickson, T.C. (1990). Assessing the feasibility, performance of geriatric clinics. Healthcare

Financial Management, 44(2): 30-34. Retrieved from the ProQuest database

• This article will be utilized as reference in conjunction with your feasibility study assignments.

Korda, H., & Eldridge, G. N. (2011). Payment incentives and integrated care delivery: Levers for health system

reform and cost containment. Inquiry 48(4), 277-287. doi:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.04.01. Retrieved from

the EBSCOhost database.

• This article reviews evidence about integrated care delivery, payment methods, and financial

incentives to improve value in health care purchasing. It also addresses how these approaches

can be used to advance health system change.

Rice, T. (1997). Physician payment policies: Impacts and implications. Annual Review of Public Health, 18(1),

549. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• This article reviews recent changes in physician payment policies, examines evidence on their

impacts, and discusses their implications for researchers and policy makers. It also develops a

conceptual framework to help explore the economic incentives inherent in different physician

payment schemes.

Recommended Resources

Articles

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainly and the welfare of economics of medical care. The American Economic

Review, 53(5), 941-973. Retrieved from

http://stevereads.com/papers_to_read/uncertainty_and_the_welfare_economics_of_medical_care.pdf

• This article is a sentinel paper discussing the issue of uncertainly and economic provisions in

health care.

Davis, K., & Guterman, S. (2007). Rewarding excellence and efficiency in medicare payments. Milbank

Quarterly, 85(3), 449-468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00495.x. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost

database.

46

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

• This article examines the variations in cost and quality in the provision of episodes of care and

describes how a pay-for-performance payment system could be designed to narrow those

variations and serve as a transition to a new Medicare payment policy that would align

physicians' incentives with improvements in both quality and efficiency.

Greenwald, L. M. (2000). Medicare risk-adjusted capitation payments: From research to implementation.

Health Care Financing Review, 21(3), 1. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

• The article introduces the reader to the concept of risk adjustment and its implications on

payment models in health care.

Discussions

1. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Consumer Incentives. Prior to engaging in this discussion, please read

Chapter 12 in the text and review any relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you review the

recommended articles to glean any helpful information. Imagine that you run a nursing home facility in

your area. Analyze and comment on the role public policy has in the economic aspect of running this

type of health services center. Compare and contrast the economic challenges and incentives this type

of health care model presents. What are some of the ways in which you could inform or signal potential

consumers that your nursing home is of high quality? Evaluate the social-cultural issues that influence

the consumers of this type of health service. Which of your proposed methods are most apt to be

reliable signals that significantly communicate to consumers so they are able to make more informed

decisions?

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. Discuss whether or not you agree with the conclusions provided in your

classmate’s initial post. Choose one aspect with which you disagree and offer alternative ways in which

your colleague’s nursing home might genuinely deliver the quality care expected by consumers. Explain

how supporting data can be made transparent so that it makes sense to the consumer. Provide at least

one reference to support your position. You must also comment specifically on one aspect of your

classmate’s post with which you agree. Provide a brief explanation as to why the proposed methods

were effective, and support your opinion and assertions with research. In addition to responding to at

least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you reply to at least one person who responded

to your original post by either respectfully defending your conclusion or by listing how you might

implement the changes your classmate suggested.

47

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

2. 1st Post Due by Day 3. Opportunism in Healthcare. Prior to engaging in this discussion, please read

Chapter 12 in the text, read the Rice (1997) and the Korda and Eldridge (2011) articles, and review any

relevant Instructor Guidance. It is suggested that you also take a moment to review a few of the

recommended articles to glean any potential helpful information. Opportunism in health care is

especially perceptible in the health insurance markets. Consider the area in which you live, specifically

your state and local communities. Evaluate the social-cultural issues that are influencing adverse

selection in insurance markets. Propose some strategies for reducing adverse selection in health

insurance within these markets. Develop a microeconomic model that is responsive to your local

service demands. Communicate how these issues are relevant to the economics of the greater U.S.

health care system. What are the future implications with the Affordable Care Act?

Guided Response: Read several of your classmates’ posts and provide a substantive written response

to at least two of your peers. In your responses, imagine that you are an associate director of a health

insurance company and have been given the charge of examining how the Affordable Care Act will

allow your company to thrive and grow under the increasing constraints of reduced reimbursement

rates. How might your classmate’s proposed strategies affect your plans? In what ways would the

microeconomic model your classmate described adversely affect your profit margin? In what ways

might the model benefit your profitability? Provide at least one reference to support each of your

positions. In addition to responding to at least two other students’ posts, it is recommended that you

reply to at least one person who responded to your original post by either respectfully defending your

conclusions or by listing how you might implement the changes your classmate suggested.

Assignment

1. Due by Day 7. Final Paper. The complete instructions for the Final Paper can be found in Week Six of

your online course or in the “Components of Course Evaluation” section of this guide.

48

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

COURSE MAP

The course map illustrates the careful design of the course through which each learning objective is supported

by one or more specific learning activities in order to create integrity and pedagogical depth in the learning

experience.

Learning Outcome Week Assignment

1. Communicate the relevance of

economics to the U.S. health care

system.

1

1

2

2

2

3

3

4

6

▪ Post Your Introduction – Discussion

▪ The Importance of Economics for

Health Care Leaders – Discussion

▪ Finance, Risk, and Cost –

Discussion

▪ Overinsured, Underinsured, and

Uninsured – Discussion

▪ Feasibility Study Topic and Area of

Interest – Assignment

▪ Demand Theory and Its Application

– Discussion

▪ Appreciating Supply and Demand

Analysis – Discussion

▪ Concept Paper Submission –

Assignment

▪ Opportunism in Health Care –

Discussion

2. Analyze economic theories that are

germane to the provision of health

services.

1

1

4

▪ Value and Consumer Preference –

Discussion

▪ The Importance of Economics for

Health Care Leaders – Discussion

▪ Economic Analyses and

Interventions – Discussion

3. Analyze the role of public policy and the

economics of health services.

1

▪ The Importance of Economics for

Health Care Leaders – Discussion

49

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

2

2

3

4

4

5

6

▪ Finance, Risk, and Cost –

Discussion

▪ Overinsured, Underinsured, and

Uninsured – Discussion

▪ Demand Theory and Its Application

– Discussion

▪ Pricing and Transparency –

Discussion

▪ Concept Paper Submission –

Assignment

▪ Inseparability of Markets and

Regulations – Discussion

▪ Consumer Incentives – Discussion

4. Develop microeconomic models that are

responsive to specific health care

service demands.

3

4

4

5

6

6

▪ Demand Theory and Its Application

– Discussion

▪ Economic Analyses and

Interventions – Discussion

▪ Concept Paper Submission –

Assignment

▪ Applying Game Theory to Strategy –

Discussion

▪ Opportunism in Healthcare –

Discussion

▪ Final Paper

5. Compare and contrast economic

challenges and incentives among health

care’s organizational models.

1

2

4

5

▪ Value and Consumer Preference –

Discussion

▪ Finance, Risk, and Cost –

Discussion

▪ Economic Analyses and

Interventions – Discussion

▪ Inseparability of Markets and

Regulations – Discussion

50

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

6

6

▪ Consumer Incentives – Discussion

▪ Final Paper

6. Evaluate the social-cultural issues

influencing health economics.

2

2

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

6

▪ Finance, Risk, and Cost –

Discussion

▪ Overinsured, Underinsured, and

Uninsured – Discussion

▪ Appreciating Supply and Demand

Analysis – Discussion

▪ Pricing and Transparency –

Discussion

▪ Concept Paper Submission –

Assignment

▪ Inseparability of Markets and

Regulations – Discussion

▪ Applying Game Theory to Strategy –

Discussion

▪ Consumer Incentives – Discussion

▪ Opportunism in Health Care –

Discussion

▪ Final Paper

7. Design an economical health care

service that is responsive to a given

market.

2

6

▪ Finance, Risk, and Cost –

Discussion

▪ Final Paper

51

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

MHA618 ALIGNMENT MAP

The alignment map illustrates the careful design of the course through the alignment of course learning

outcomes with both program learning outcomes and professional standards, to ensure integrity and

pedagogical depth in the learning experience.

Course Learning Outcome Program Learning Outcome Professional Standards

(ACHE & NCHL)

PLO 1. Communicate the

relevance of economics to

the U.S. health care system.

PLO9 Professional Knowledge

Communicate

The responsibility of a health

care professional remaining

current in their professional

knowledge.

ACHE1: Communication and

Relationship Management: The ability

to communicate clearly and concisely

with internal and external customers,

establishes and maintains

relationships, and facilitates

constructive interactions with

individuals and groups.

ACHE5. Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.

PLO 2. Analyze economic

theories that are germane to

the provision of health

services.

PLO7: Economic Perspectives

of Health Policies

Apply health care economic

perspectives in the

interpretation of health policy.

ACHE5. Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.

PLO 3. Analyze the role of

public policy and the

economics of health

services.

PLO7: Economic Perspectives

of Health Policies

Apply health care economic

perspectives in the

interpretation of health policy.

ACHE3: Professionalism: The ability

to align personal and organizational

conduct with ethical and professional

standards that include a responsibility

to the patient and community, a service

orientation, and a commitment to

lifelong learning and improvement.

52

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Course Learning Outcome Program Learning Outcome Professional Standards

(ACHE & NCHL)

PLO 4. Develop

microeconomic models that

are responsive to specific

health care service

demands.

PLO8 Health Care Issues Apply

problem-

Solving approaches in the

resolution of health care issues.

ACHE5. Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.

PLO 5. Compare and

contrast economic

challenges and incentives

among health care’s

organizational models

PLO7: Economic Perspectives

of Health Policies

Apply health care economic

perspectives in the

interpretation of health policy.

ACHE5. Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.

PLO 6. Evaluate the social-

cultural issues influencing

health economics.

PLO5 Diversity Demonstrate

sensitivity to diversity in the

health care setting.

ACHE2: Leadership

The ability to inspire individual and

organizational excellence, create a

shared vision and successfully manage

change to attain the organization’s

strategic ends and successful

performance.

ACHE4: Knowledge of the

Healthcare Environment

The understanding of the healthcare

system and the environment in which

healthcare managers and providers

function.

ACHE5: Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.

PLO 7. Design an

economical health care

PLO1: Apply health care

financial and accounting

ACHE5. Business Skills and

Knowledge: The ability to apply

53

MHA618: HEALTH ECONOMICS COURSE GUIDE

Course Learning Outcome Program Learning Outcome Professional Standards

(ACHE & NCHL)

service that is responsive to

a given market.

concepts in organizational

decision making.

business principles, including systems

thinking, to the healthcare environment.