Design Thinking Script
Capstone Rubric MHA 4
|
Category |
Unacceptable (0) |
Acceptable (4) |
Target (5) |
|
Design Ideas |
Develops a capstone project that is not analytical; fails to demonstrate how the ideas for the project were formulated. |
Develops an analytical, critical capstone project; demonstrates how the ideas for the project were formulated. |
Develops an analytical, critical capstone project; provides a detailed description of how the ideas for the project were formulated. |
|
Research |
Lacks awareness of similar work done by others in the field or elsewhere. |
Reflects awareness of similar work done by others and provides an acceptable presentation of this synthesis. |
Reflects a thorough understanding of similar work done by others and presents an expert presentation of this synthesis. |
|
Choices |
Lacks justification of choices within the capstone design and execution - little or no references to functional, social, economic, or environmental considerations |
Justifies choices made within the capstone design and execution - reference to functional, social, economic, or environmental considerations |
Demonstrates sophisticated justification of choices within the capstone design and execution - reference to functional, social, economic, or environmental consideration |
|
Establishing Criteria |
Lacks establishment of criteria for analysis, development, and critique of the topic |
Establishes criteria for analysis, development, and critique of the topic |
Establishes detailed criteria for analysis, development, and critique of the topic |
|
Implementation |
Does not demonstrate evidence of planning and implementing in development of the project |
Demonstrates evidence of planning and implementing in development of the project |
Demonstrates sophisticated evidence of planning and implementing in development of the project |
|
Professional comportment |
Demonstrates poor use of grammar, syntax, and professional presentation to establish and articulate the value of the project |
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and professional presentation to establish and articulate the value of the project |
Demonstrates sophisticated use of grammar, syntax, and professional presentation to establish and articulate the value of the project |
|
Analysis / Insight |
Provides insufficient evidence of creative thinking and personal insight regarding the project and the journey toward its completion |
Provides sufficient evidence of creative thinking and personal insight regarding the project and the journey toward its completion |
Provides sophisticated evidence of creative thinking and personal insight regarding the project and the journey toward its completion |
|
Score range |
0/35 = 0% = F |
28/35 = 80% = C |
35/35 = 100% = A |
Krahe 3/30/17