Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Smart Cites

MBA Program – MGT675 Rubric 2019-2020

Business Administration Department

P a g e 1 | 5

College of Administrative and Financial Sciences

Business Administration Department

Evaluation Sheet- Project- MGT675

Student

Name

Supervisor Name

Student ID Evaluator Name

CRN

Evaluation Date

Project

Title

Student’s Total Marks / 100

MBA Program – MGT675 Rubric 2019-2020

Business Administration Department

P a g e 2 | 5

Criteria/Section

Weight Items Item Weight

Feedback Abstract

5

Contents

Excellent

(2.5)

Very Good

(2)

Good

(1.5)

Poor

(1)

Very Poor

(0.5)

Score

 The level to which the different sections of abstract are in the form of well-developed paragraphs, which are unified, coherent, concise and provide logical connections between materials included?

 The level to which the abstract contains the sections on background, purpose, research design, major methods, major findings, implications and directions for future research?

Introduction and Literature Review

20

Contents

Excellent

(5)

Very Good

(4)

Good

(3)

Poor

(2)

Very Poor

(1)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the introduction provides relevant background on existing knowledge gap and the importance of bridging that gap?

 The level to which the review cites an extensive, up to date, relevant and thorough body of literature on the topic?

 The level to which the literature offers critical review, or comparison of different approaches which reveals any methodological flaws in research methods, inconsistencies in theories or findings which need further study?

 The level to which the literature review unambiguously lead to research question(s), hypothesis (es), and objective(s)?

MBA Program – MGT675 Rubric 2019-2020

Business Administration Department

P a g e 3 | 5

Methodology Outlook

10

Contents

Excellent

(5)

Very Good

(4)

Good

(3)

Poor

(2)

Very Poor

(1)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the methodology contains details of what, when, where, and how the research was performed so that other researcher can repeat the method for similar studies?

 The level to which the methodology is relevant to each objective, hypothesis, or research question?

Analysis and Results

10

Contents

Excellent

(2.5)

Very Good

(2)

Good

(1.5)

Poor

(1)

Very Poor

(0.5)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the results of the study are clear, concise, and presented in a logical order for each objective, hypothesis, or research question?

 The level to which the artwork (tables, figures, pictures and images etc.) are legible, labelled, described and referred properly in the text?

 The level to which the study establishes the validity and robustness of the results in synchronization with the appropriate analytical techniques used in the study?

 The level to which the analysis of data is adequate enough to sufficiently reveal the significance of the study?

Discussion

10

Contents

Excellent

(5)

Very Good

(4)

Good

(3)

Poor

(2)

Very Poor

(1)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the discussion is logically and sequentially presented in a concise manner for

MBA Program – MGT675 Rubric 2019-2020

Business Administration Department

P a g e 4 | 5

each objective, hypothesis and research question or statement?

 The level to which the findings adequately linked

to relevant literature with proper citation?

Conclusions

and

Implications

10

Contents

Excellent

(5)

Very Good

(4)

Good

(3)

Poor

(2)

Very Poor

(1)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the study draw reasonable conclusions which are consistent with the results or development of the argument in the analysis?

 The level to which the study identifies and acknowledges the limitations and does it provide reasonable directions for future research?

Novelty/ Originality

10

Contents

Excellent

(10)

Very Good

(8)

Good

(6)

Poor

(4)

Very Poor

(2)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the work represents a novel approach or findings? Also indicate the level to which the study have significant theoretical & practical implications?

Soft Copy Submission

10

Contents

Excellent

(10)

Very Good

(8)

Good

(6)

Poor

(4)

Very Poor

(2)

Score

Feedback

 The level to which the submitted soft copy complies the approved guidelines?

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Poor

Very Poor

MBA Program – MGT675 Rubric 2019-2020

Business Administration Department

P a g e 5 | 5

Presentation Delivery

15

Contents (7.5)

(6.5)

(5.5)

(4.5)

(3.5)

Score Feedback

The Presenter

 The level to which the presenter presented the material in a clear and structured manner, demonstrated time management and was able to handle the queries.

The Presentation  The level to which the presentation was concise & comprehensive with appropriate use of examples, and techniques etc.

TOTAL GRADE /100