MGT3045 WK3 Project

MGT3045 Week 3 Project Rubric Course: MGT3045-Human Resource Management SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Applied HR

recruiting and

selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case.

/ 40Did not identify HR

recruiting and

selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified HR

recruiting and

selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described HR

recruiting and

selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case.

Weakly supported

with research.

Applied HR recruiting

and selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Application of HR

recruiting and

selection laws,

theories and that

might apply to the

case was compelling

and well-considered.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Analyzed an

effective

recruitment process

and how it might

reduce turnover.

/ 40Did not identify

effective recruitment

process.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified effective

recruitment process.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described effective

recruitment process.

Weakly supported

with research.

Analyzed effective

recruitment process

and how it might

reduce turnover.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Analysis of an

effective recruitment

process and how it

might reduce turnover

was compelling and

well developed.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Compared the two

formal disciplinary

processes, including

recommending a

disciplinary process

the maintenance

department might

adopt at Community

State University to

reduce turnover.

/ 40Did not analyze two

formal disciplinary

processes.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified two formal

disciplinary processes.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described two formal

disciplinary processes.

Weakly supported

with research.

Compared two formal

disciplinary processes,

including

recommending a

disciplinary process

the maintenance

department might

adopt at Community

State University to

reduce turnover.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Comparison of two

formal disciplinary

processes, including

recommending a

disciplinary process

the maintenance

department might

adopt at Community

State University to

reduce turnover was

compelling and logical

for the case scenario.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (24-28) 28 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (28-32) 32 points

Proficient (B Range) (32- 36) 36 points

Exemplary (A Range) (36-40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Defended three

specific recruitment

and discipline

recommendations

based on the

research findings

presented in the

paper.

/ 40Did not identify

specific recruitment

and discipline

recommendations.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified specific

recruitment and

discipline

recommendations.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described specific

recruitment and

discipline

recommendations.

Weakly supported

with research.

Defended three

specific recruitment

and discipline

recommendations

based on the research

findings presented in

the paper.

Sufficiently support

with research.

Defense of three

specific recruitment

and discipline

recommendations

based on the research

findings presented in

the paper was

compelling, with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9- 10) 10 points

Criterion ScoreCriteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9- 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Communication:

Use of tone, word

choice, audience,

transitions, and

progression of

ideas.

/ 10Submission contained

no discernible overall

intent in author’s

selection of ideas.

Submission contained

random presentation

of ideas, which

prevented

understanding the

majority of author’s

overall intent.

Ideas presented in a

way that forced the

reader to make

repeated inferences in

order to identify and

follow the author’s

overall intent.

The reader could

follow the author’s

overall intent as

stated.

The writer’s overall

argument and

language were clear

and tightly focused,

leaving the reader

with no room for

confusion about

author’s intent.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (6-7) 7 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (7-8) 8 points

Proficient (B Range) (8-9) 9 points

Exemplary (A Range) (9- 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Mechanics: Use of

grammar, sentence

structure, and

spelling.

/ 10Errors in basic writing

conventions were

sufficiently numerous

to prevent reader

comprehension.

Errors in basic writing

conventions were

sufficiently numerous

to prevent reader

comprehension of

majority of the work.

Errors in basic writing

conventions

interfered with, but

did not prevent,

reader

comprehension.

The reader noticed a

few errors in basic

writing conventions

but these few errors

did not interfere with

reader

comprehension.

Test was basically

error free, so that a

reader would have to

purposely search to

find any errors that

may be present.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Total / 200

Overall Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points

Proficient (B Range) (16- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Academic/APA/PPT

Formatting Use of

citations,

references, and

structural

formatting including

such elements as

title page, running

head, page

numbers, headings,

title slides, graphics,

data, notes section,

(as appropriate),

introduction, and

conclusio

/ 20No attempt at

Academic/APA/PPT

formatting in

presentation.

Academic/APA/PPT

format attempted, but

errors were

significant, preventing

comprehension of

message.

Academic/APA/PPT

format attempted but

errors were

distracting.

Used

Academic/APA/PPT

format accurately.

Errors noticeable but

minor.

Used

Academic/APA/PPT

format proficiently.

Work basically error

free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D Range) 140 points minimum

Satisfactory (C Range) 160 points minimum

Proficient (B Range) 180 points minimum

Exemplary (A Range) 200 points minimum