MGT302 Case3 and SLP3

profilebrigginsk
MGT302SLP3Q.docx

Module 3 - SLP

GROUPS AND TEAMS AT WORK

For the Module 3 SLP assignment, you will continue making journal entries about applying the background material to your workplace environment. 

Keep Calm and Journal On

In this SLP assignment, the focus is on your work in groups or teams. For this module, your journal entries should focus on questions suggested by the background material on groups and teams:

For example:

· What barriers to team effectiveness are there for teams in which you are a member?

· In what stage of group development is a particular team of which you are a member and why?

· How does decision making function within a team in which you are a member?

As in the previous modules’ SLP assignments, each of your journal entries should be a paragraph or so in length and you should make 4 or 5 journal entries over the course of the module.

Also, as in the previous SLP assignments, before you submit your journal entries, review what you have written, and add in-text citations from the background material as appropriate. Also include a reference page at the end of your paper that gives the references that correspond to the in-text citations that you have used. For completeness, don’t forget to add a title page.

Upload your assignment to the SLP 3 Dropbox. Be sure to review your TurnItIn Originality report. If the score is over 20%, you may not be writing in your own words and you will need to contact your professor and arrange to revise and resubmit your assignment.

SLP Assignment Expectations

The SLP papers in this course will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:

· Assignment-Driven Criteria: Does the paper cover all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way?

· Critical Thinking: Does the paper demonstrate a college-level of analysis in conceptualizing the problem? Are viewpoints and assumptions critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper demonstrate that the student has read, understood, and can apply the background materials for the module?

· Scholarly Writing/Oral Communication: Does the student demonstrate college-level skill in scholarly written/oral communication to an appropriately specialized audience?

· Assignment Organization and Quality of References: Does the student demonstrate understanding of a consistent (e.g., APA) style of referencing by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Are appropriate sources from the background material included? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?