Business start up project
Faculty of Business and Law
Management, Leadership & Organisations
Business Start-up
MGT3027
Assessment 2 – Individual Challenge
Module Leader: Dr. Matthew Pauley
|
Name |
Student ID# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic Title |
||
|
|
Assessment Aims
Students are required to construct a business plan using relevant theory, research and analysis to start a feasible micro or small business. Completing a business plan forces students to assess all aspects of a business, especially the difficulties in resource availability to start a micro or small business. Each student will have the opportunity to pursue an idea and create a business using that idea. Ultimately, after the completion of this assessment students would have a professional document that could be presented to funding agencies.
Intended Learning Outcomes
1. Understand specific entrepreneurship types, and what category of entrepreneur they belong to.
3. Build research skills to critically evaluate industry and market opportunities in business creation, including a self-analysis on the development of students’ awareness on entrepreneurship.
4. Evaluate key start-up strategies to problems most nascent entrepreneurs encounter before starting a venture.
6. Evaluate relevant start-up and exit strategies for a specific venture type.
7. Provide evidence of a feasible and clearly articulated business plan.
Assessment Scheme
Formative Assessment
Students will have the opportunity to receive informal feedback prior to submitting their assessment during the surgery week and when scheduling an appointment during office hours. The formative assessment consists of discussions and feedback to help guide students on their work not to provide them with answers. It is the sole responsibility of the student(s)/group to ask for formative feedback.
Summative Assessment
Individual Business Plan (70%, 2,000 words, Week 24). Each student is required to construct a business plan using relevant theory, research and analysis to start a feasible micro or small business. This will address learning outcomes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7.
Research Ethics
The teaching, learning, assessment and research activities undertaken in this module have been considered and are not likely to require ethical approval.
Learning resources
As outlined in the Module Handbook, including:
· MDX Entrepreneurship Library Guide
· https://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/entrepreneurship
· https://www.cyclingstrengthcoach.me/
· MGT 3016 Online Reading List: https://rl.talis.com/3/mdx/lists/D22954D2-EA32-6F63-198A-D56F7E2ED437.html?lang=en
· Journal Articles
· Newspapers and Periodicals
Academic Integrity and Misconduct
You should be aware of the University’s academic integrity and misconduct policies and procedures. Taking unfair advantage over other students in assessment is considered a serious offence by the University. Action will be taken against any student who contravenes the regulations through negligence, foolishness or deliberate intent. Academic misconduct takes several forms, in particular:
· Plagiarism – using extensive unacknowledged quotations from, or direct copying of, another person’s work and presenting it for assessment as if it were your own effort. This includes the use of third-party essay writing services.
· Collusion – working together with other students (without the tutor’s permission) and presenting similar or identical work for assessment.
· Infringement of Exam Room Rules – Communication with another candidate, taking notes to your table in the exam room and/or referring to notes during the examination.
· Self-Plagiarism – including any material which is identical or substantially similar to material that has already been submitted by you for another assessment in the University or elsewhere.
Students who attempt to gain unfair advantage over others through academic misconduct will be penalised by sanctions, according to the severity of the offence, which can include exclusion from the University.
Full details on academic integrity and misconduct and the support available can be found at Academic Integrity | UniHub (mdx.ac.uk)
Late Policy and Extenuating Circumstances
There is a zero tolerance for late submissions. All late submissions
There may be difficult circumstances in your life that affect your ability to meet an assessment deadline or affect your performance in an assessment. These are known as extenuating circumstances or ‘ECs’. Extenuating circumstances are exceptional , seriously adverse and outside of your control .
NOTES
Each student is tasked with identifying an idea and building a business plan around it. Please follow the guide below, including the Microsoft Excel Financial Spreadsheet. All information pertaining to the Business Plan can be found in your Kortextbook:
· New Venture Creation: A Framework for Entrepreneurial Start-ups (Paul Burns)
Please submit on Turnitin (Module Page):
· Business plan in Microsoft Word
· Financial Template in MS Excel Spreadsheet
BUSINESS PLAN OUTLINE
1. TITLE PAGE
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (1 Page Maximum)
4. BUSINESS DETAILS (1 Page Maximum)
5. INDUSTRY AND MARKET ANALYSIS (2 Pages Maximum)
6. CUSTOMERS AND VALUE PROPOSITIONS (2 Pages Maximum)
7. MARKETING STRATEGY (2 Pages Maximum)
8. OPERATIONS PLAN (2 Pages Maximum)
9. RISK ASSESSMENT (1 Page Maximum)
10. MANAGEMENT TEAM AND COMPANY STRUCTURE (1 Page Maximum)
11. RESOURCES (1 Page Maximum)
12. FINANCING (1 Page Maximum)
13. REFLECTION (1 Page Maximum)
This is a reflection on what you have learned from the development of your business plan, and how this class has shaped your understanding of entrepreneurship; including, how it will shape your career motives moving forward. This does not mean you have to become an entrepreneur, but how can these newly learned skills transfer to other aspects of your career and life.
BUSINESS PLAN CONTENTS
· What kind of entrepreneur are you? Innovator? Lifestyle? Income-replacement
· What kind of business are you?
· Disruptive Innovation? New-to-the-world Industries? Incremental Product/Service? Innovation? Copy-cat? Market Development Market Paradigm Shift?
· Sole Proprietorship? Partnership? Corporation? S-Corporation? Non-Profit?
· Is your business part-time or full-time work?
· Why do you want to start this business?
· Have you not added your entrepreneurial characteristics quizzes to talk about/discuss yourself in the business details? Remember YOU are your business, and the business identity is shaped in YOUR vision.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET ANALYSIS:
There is no analysis of the market or display of understanding the market.
· Market/Industry Lifecycle: New Market? Emerging? Growing? Mature? Declining?
· Market/Industry Concentration: Fragmented? Consolidated?
· Market/Industry Geographic Extent: Local, regional or national? Global?
· Competitors: Direct? Indirect? Future Competitors?
· Market Size: Potential Market? Total Available Market? Served Available Market? Penetrated Market?
· Market Analysis Techniques/Tools: Brainstorming; Mind Maps; Industry Futures: PESTEL Analysis; Attribute Analysis; Gap Analysis; SWOT Analysis;
· Identifying gaps in the market: Value Chain: Porter’s 5 Forces – inbound logistics; operations; outbound logistics; marketing and sales; after-sales service; procurement; human resource management; technology development; firm infrastructure.
· Page 97: The screening process ahead of the go/no-go decision.
· Why do you think this will work? What opportunity do you recognise? Is there a gap in the market? Are you bringing a totally new innovation?
CUSTOMERS AND VALUE PROPOSITION:
· Business Model: Low price (low cost); high differentiation; high customer focus or intimacy; Internet-based model?
· How are you ensuring that your business has a competitive advantage?
· What IS your competitive advantage?
· CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD BUSINESS MODEL: Pg 134-135.
· VALUE PROPOSITION SHOULD STATE THREE THINGS: Pg 146.
· How your product or service will solve a problem for your target customers.
· The benefits they can expect – tangible and intangible.
· Why they should buy from you rather than from your competitors.
· CREATE VALUE BY: Pg 148
· Establish an identity
· Help build a reputation
· Help develop a relationship
MARKETING STRATEGY:
· Marketing Mix
· Product/service: Quality; Performance; Design; Newness or novelty; Colours; Sizes; Specifications; Customization; Packaging; Convenience.
· Price: List Price; Discounts (volume, loyalty, etc); Auction; Negotiated; Payment Terms; Sales and Specific Offers; Differential or Segment Pricing; Reduction in cost of other products/services.
· Promotion: Communication; Advertising; PR; Word-of-mouth; Fairs and exhibitions; Sponsorship; Competitions; Point of Sale Displays; Brand.
· Place: Location; Layout; Distribution Channels; Retail/Wholesale; Internet; Telephone; Face-to-face selling; Accessibility.
· People: Relationships; Service; Advice; Support; Partnerships; Convenience of use.
· Launch Strategy;
· Sales Tactics;
· Communication Tools;
· Word of mouth; Relationships and Networks; Social Networks and Media; Blogging; Guerrilla Marketing; Publicity and Public Relations; Newspaper Advertising; Radio Advertising; TV Advertising; Internet Advertising; Sponsorship; Telephone; Posters; Flyers; Billboards; Direct Mail; Email; Texting/Tweeting.
· Minimum Viability;
· Customer Feedback and Evaluation
· Brand Development;
· Competitive Reaction;
· Product and Market Development;
· Product Modification; Product Expansion; Product Extension; Completely New Products.
· Star; Problem Child; Cash Cow; Cash Dog.
· Acquisition for product and market development.
· Growth Potential and Scale-up Plans.
· Market Penetration; Product/Service Development; Diversification (horizontal integration, backwards vertical integration, forwards vertical integration); Market Development; Franchising.
OPERATIONS PLAN:
· Key Operating Activities (i.e. Manufacturing Processes; Business Model; etc.)
· Sole Proprietorship; Partnership; Limited Liability or Corporation; Social Enterprise: Not-for-profit, Charities.
· Safeguarding your business;
· Intellectual Property Law: Patent; Trademark; Registered Design; Copyright.
· Partnerships;
· Business Controls;
· IP Issues;
· Scalability.
· Operations Plan.
· Gantt Chart
RISK ASSESSMENT (see Page 9 below for the template to use for this section)
· Identified Risks;
· Pre-launch activities; Post-launch Operations.
· Risk Monitoring and Mitigation;
· Pre-launch Delays; Competitors; Competitive Advantage; Market; Customer Value Proposition; Product/Service quality; Customer Service; Cash Flow; Sales; Profits; Operations; Productivity; Administration; Brand Identity; IP; Technology; Investment; Stocks/Inventory; Merchandising; Debtors/Receivables; Interest rates; Exchange Rates; Management.
· Critical Success Factors;
· Things that are essential to get right if the business is to achieve its mission.
· Assessing Risk: Impact; Probability; Control;
· Strategic Options
· Affordable loss and lean start-up; Borrowing and bootstrapping; Compartmentalizing risk; High margins and low fixed costs;
MANAGEMENT TEAM:
· Key People; their functions and background;
· Culture
· Organizational processes
· Leadership Styles: Authoritarian; Democratic; Laissez-faire;
· Structures;
· Controls and rewards;
· Empowerment;
· Routines; Rituals; Rites and Taboos
· Stories; Symbols and Myths.
· Cognitive Processes
· Ethics; Beliefs; Assumptions and Attitudes;
· Norms and Rules of Conduct.
· Behaviours
· How things actually get done: Rational v. Politicking; Following v. Bending.
· Vocabulary: Job Titles; Slogans; Metaphors; Signals; Gossip.
· Business Organization or Structure;
· Spider’s Web Structure?
· Hierarchical Structure?
· Matrix and Teamworking Structure?
· Directors, Advisors or Other Key Partners;
· Skills, Gaps and Plans for filling them.
RESOURCES:
· Human Capital;
· Staff
· Recruiting people:
· Job description?
· Where do you find them?
· What kind of people do you need? What skills/education?
· Full-time? Part-time? Contract?
· Salary? Hourly? Piecework? Commission?
· Social Resources;
· Accountants?
· Lawyers?
· Business Consultants?
· Mentors?
· Emotional Support?
· Financial Resources;
· Premises and Facilities;
· Machinery and equipment;
FINANCING:
· Founder’s contribution;
· Loan and/or equity finance requirements;
· Gearing/leverage;
· Timescale and exit routes for equity investors;
· Financial Projections:
· Income Projections;
· Cash Flow Projections;
· Balance Sheet Projections;
· Key Ratios;
· The assumptions on which your projections are based.
RISK ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE
3 High, 3 Medium, 3 Low Risks
SO: Strategic Options
M: Mitigating Risk
CSF: Critical Success Factors
1. Risk (Medium | External): Snowstorm in winter.
0. SO: Online store.
0. M: Late opening.
0. CSF: Open communication with customers.
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
1. SO:
1. M
1. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
2. SO:
2. M
2. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
3. SO:
3. M
3. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
4. SO:
4. M
4. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
5. SO:
5. M
5. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
6. SO:
6. M
6. CSF:
1. Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
7. SO:
7. M
7. CSF:
Risk (High/Medium/Low | Internal or External): ……?
7. SO:
7. M
7. CSF:
GRADING
Grade Allocation
Assessment 2 – Business Plan (70%)
* Each student will be required to submit a business plan 2,000 Words (+/- 10%).
Reassessment and Deferrals
A student may apply for a deferral through the Student Office when the student has documented good cause to defer. Deferral will mean taking the substitute assessment; it does not mean handing in the current work later on. A deferral can be granted in exceptional circumstances, usually on medical grounds, and only when a reassessment opportunity will be available at a future point. Students must apply to the assessment manager in writing, submitting supporting documentation. The application for deferral must be submitted without a delay. The applications that have been unjustifiably delayed will not be processed. To help the module team keep track of deferrals, the student should inform the module leader of his/her intentions to apply for deferral before doing so.
Deferral means that you could undertake and submit your assessment (please note that this can be a different assessment) at a later date, decided between the School and the Module Leader. If a student receives a deferral, they should immediately forward the approval email to the module leader to discuss the next possible date for the student to undertake the missed assessment. This arrangement is intended to help students to complete the module within the schedule. Please note that self-deferral is not allowed in the Business School.
Further information is available at
https://unihub.mdx.ac.uk/study/assessment
Feedback on your assignments
You will be provided with feedback on all coursework that is helpful and informative, consistent with aiding the learning and development process. The nature of the feedback shall be determined at programme level but may take a variety of forms including: written comments; individual and group tutorial feedback; peer feedback; or other forms of effective and efficient feedback.
Feedback will normally be provided within 15 WORKING DAYS of the published coursework component submission date.
Assignment Grading
The following diagram provides an overview of the marking process for your module assessment. Further information on the role of external examiners can be found at. https://www.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/policies/academic-quality/handbook (section 4)
Anonymous Marking Assessment Policy
We have worked with the Middlesex University Students’ Union (MDXSU) to create an anonymous marking policy, in response to student feedback. Anonymous marking ensures that your identity (your name, student number and other personal/identifiable information) is not made available to academics when they are marking your work. This means that you can have confidence that your assessments will be marked fairly and consistently. However, there are some forms of assessment for which anonymity cannot be guaranteed and these are recognised in the policy. We believe that it is important to provide you with the support and guidance needed to help you develop and prepare for your final assessments (those which count towards your final grades i.e. summative assessments). Therefore, anonymous marking will not apply to learning activities and assessments that do not contribute to your final grades (i.e. formative assessments). If you require further information and support to understand how anonymous marking works in your programme modules, please contact the Module Leader for more information.
The Anonymous Marking Assessment Policy is available at: https://www.mdx.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0037/563599/anonymous-marking-assessment-policy.pdf
Each assessment component is marked whether this be in percentages or marked directly to the 20-point scale. The overall module grade is calculated from the component grades following the latest university guidance. The general assessment criteria for the module are:
|
Grades |
Criteria (Description) |
|
1-4 |
Knowledge is impressive and reflects wide reading, including using theory and practice in relevant and well-sustained argument(s). Presentation is highly literate. |
|
5-8 |
The knowledgebase in judged sound and relevant by developing an ability to relate theory and practice, concepts and ideas. Content is always relevant and well-presented, generally well-focused but can lack breadth or depth. |
|
9-12 |
Occasional analysis but generally cannot rise above well-articulated assertions. Presents some analysis but lacks clarity or focus. Occasional grammatical lapses. |
|
13-16 |
Written work is heavily descriptive, not grasping the difference between assertion and analysis. Can offer unjustified, arbitrary assertions that are poorly expressed. |
|
17-18 |
Work may be accurate but is often irrelevant. Presentation is poor. No evidence of appropriate reading. |
|
19-20 |
Work is neither relevant nor accurate or is so inarticulate as to negate what relevance there might otherwise be. |
Business Start-up MGT3027
11 MGT3027 Assessment 2 Guide
7.5.1 Assessment 1 Group Challenge and Presentation (30%)
|
Example - Assessment Brief |
|||||
|
Module code |
MGT3027 |
||||
|
Module title |
Business Start-up |
||||
|
Submission date, time |
March 31, 2023 @ 23:59 |
||||
|
Feedback type & date |
Summative, 14 business days after deadline |
||||
|
Word count |
2,000 Words (+/- 10%) |
||||
|
Assignment type |
Business Plan |
||||
|
Assignment structure, format and details |
Each student is responsible for completing a business plan. A business plan assessment guide will be distributed to give direction on how to best complete the project, a professional business plan. All business ideas must be approved by the Module Leader.
General Submission Guidelines: Business Plan · Address and fully discuss all topic areas · Submit the assignment through Turnitin by the submission deadline · Include your names and student numbers in the submitted document · Your answers should contain evidence of the following: · Knowledge and understanding of key concepts; · Critical analysis of issues; · Application of the relevant management concepts to practice; · Relevant use of examples and additional supporting literature; · Broad research; · Logical structure of the report; · Accurate use of references and in-text citations.
Additional Guidelines You should present your report professionally by following the instructions below · MS Word document ONLY (No other formats are allowed) · Normal page margins · Standard A4 Page Size · Use 2.0-line space · Pages are numbered · Label all charts, tables, graphs, diagrams, etc. · Use Harvard referencing style ONLY · Meet the word count requirement within 10% margin of the word limit
When submitting the coursework, you must: · Submit via Turnitin ONLY – Do not use any other mode of submission · Make sure your cover page contains all relevant information: · Your university-registered full name · Your student number · The module title and code · Tutor’s name · The report title in full · Word count
For more info on Harvard Referencing Style: http://www.citethemrightonline.com.
|
||||
|
Assessed learning outcome (s) |
1, 3, 4, 6, 7. |
||||
|
Assessment weighting % |
70% |
||||
|
Key reading and learning resources |
Focus on literature relevant to the topic field you choose. For example, if you select the ‘Managing People’ Challenge, your literature will be dominated by Human Resources literature. |
||||
|
Assessment marking criteria rubric (presentation) As part of the assessment and fairness policy and guidance the university has approved a set of rubrics for use with all assignments. See policy and guidance for more details https://www.intra.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/services/centre-for-academic-practice-enhancement/policy-bank/Assessment-Fairness-Principles,-Polices-and-Requirements.pdf |
|||||
|
Criteria |
1-4 First |
5-8 Upper Second |
9-12 Lower Second |
13-16 Third |
17-20 Refer |
|
|
70%+ |
60%-69% |
50%-59% |
40%-49% |
Less than 40% |
|
Content: Topic chosen relevant and informative, with a depth of knowledge and understanding. |
Excellent and well-informed understanding of theories and concepts involved with topic. |
Good understanding of theories and concepts involved with topic. |
Demonstrate satisfactory knowledge and understanding of topics theories and concepts. |
Adequate content, and limited depth of knowledge and understanding. |
Inadequate content and limited depth of knowledge and understanding. |
|
Communication: Interesting, relevant language, explanation of terminology. |
Very well expressed and very good understanding of content. |
Very well expressed; good understanding of content. |
Well expressed; understanding of content. |
Unclear expression of information; little understanding of content. |
Unclear and confusing; lack of understanding of content. |
|
References: Reference to sources including directions for further study. |
Broad and relevant readings examined and used selectively in presentation. |
Good range of appropriate references used during the presentation. |
Conventional references and readings used within presentation. |
Adequate but limited use of references during presentation. |
Critique relies on no or one reference; evidence of unexamined personal opinion. |
|
Technology: Use of video, PowerPoint, tools etc. to present the chosen topic. |
Very good selection, use and integration of technology. |
Good use of appropriate AV. |
Technology used but poor integration. |
Technology used but poorly. |
Absence of any technology use. |
|
Workload: Balance between students. |
All students share presentation role equally with good transition. |
Presentation shared but with poor transition. |
Presentation shared unequally. |
Presentation shows little sharing. |
No sharing, one student presents. |
The following table details the support you will be receiving for this assessment and the feedback opportunities you will have.
|
Support and draft feedback sessions for Assessment 1 |
|
Coursework briefing One seminar will be devoted to explaining the challenge and expectations, including assessment criteria. |
|
Draft feedback opportunities Students will have opportunities in the seminars to discuss and receive formative feedback, up to and until 2 weeks before the submission deadline. |
|
Additional support For additional support, please contact the Module Leader or Library Liaison.
|
University 20-point Scale
|
20-point scale |
General scale |
General scale (full ranges) |
Percentage used for aggregation purposes only |
|
1 |
80% - 100% |
79.50% - 100% |
90% |
|
2 |
76% - 79% |
75.50% - 79.49% |
77.5% |
|
3 |
73% - 75% |
72.50% - 75.49% |
74% |
|
4 |
70% - 72% |
69.50% - 72.49% |
71% |
|
5 |
67% - 69% |
66.50% - 69.49% |
68% |
|
6 |
65% - 66% |
64.50% - 66.49% |
65.5% |
|
7 |
62% - 64% |
61.50% - 64.49% |
63% |
|
8 |
60% - 61% |
59.50% - 61.49% |
60.5% |
|
9 |
57% - 59% |
56.50% - 59.49% |
58% |
|
10 |
55% - 56% |
54.50% - 56.49% |
55.5% |
|
11 |
52% - 54% |
51.50% - 54.49% |
53% |
|
12 |
50% - 51% |
49.50% - 51.49% |
50.5% |
|
13 |
47% - 49% |
46.50% - 49.49% |
48% |
|
14 |
45% - 46% |
44.50% - 46.49% |
45.5% |
|
15 |
42% - 44% |
41.50% - 44.49% |
43% |
|
16 |
40% - 41% |
39.50% - 41.49% |
40.5% |
|
17 |
35% - 39% |
34.50% - 39.49% |
37% |
|
18 |
30% - 34% |
29.50% - 34.49% |
32% |
|
19 |
0% - 29% |
0.01% - 29.49% |
15% |
|
20 |
Non-participation |
0% |
0% (non-submission of a component) |
1
2
3
4
5
You submit your assignment
The first marker grades the work and provides feedback; this could be completed anonymously depending on the assessment type.
A moderator or second marker reviews a sample of the work to quality assure the grades and feedback, to ensure they are accurate. A final mark for the work is agreed between the first marker and the moderator or second marker.
Your final grades are submitted to the subject assessment board.
A sample of work is sent to the External Examiner to check that the grading and feedback is at the right level and in line with external subject benchmarks (this applies to levels 5 & 6 only)