-----------------------------
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 1-1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Conflict
and
Negotiation
14
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Learning Objectives
Describe the three types of conflict and the two loci of conflict.
Outline the conflict process.
Contrast distributive and integrative bargaining.
Apply the five steps of the negotiation process.
Show how individual differences influence negotiations.
Assess the roles and functions of third-party negotiations.
14-3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Three Types of Conflict and
Three Loci of Conflict
Conflict: a process that begins when one party
perceives that another party has negatively
affected, or is about to negatively affect,
something that the first party cares about.
If no one is aware of a conflict, then it is
generally agreed no conflict exists.
Also needed to begin the conflict process are
opposition or incompatibility and interaction.
14-4
LO 1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Three Types of Conflict and
Three Loci of Conflict
Contemporary perspectives differentiate types
of conflict based on their effects.
Functional conflict supports the goals of
the group and improves its performance.
Conflicts that hinder group performance are
dysfunctional or destructive forms of
conflict.
14-5
LO 1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Three Types of Conflict and
Three Loci of Conflict
14-6
LO 1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Three Types of Conflict and Three Loci of Conflict
Types of Conflict
Researchers have classified conflicts into
three categories:
Task conflict relates to the content and
goals of the work.
Relationship conflict focuses on
interpersonal relationships.
Process conflict is about how the work
gets done. 14-7
LO 1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Three Types of Conflict and Three Loci of Conflict
Loci of Conflict
Another way to understand conflict is to consider its locus, or where the conflict occurs.
There are three basic types:
Dyadic conflict is conflict between two people.
Intragroup conflict occurs within a group or team.
Intergroup conflict is conflict between groups or teams.
14-8
LO 1
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
14-9
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
14-10
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
14-11
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
14-12
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
Stage V: Outcomes
Conflict is constructive when it…
Improves the quality of decisions, stimulates creativity and innovation, encourages interest and curiosity, provides the medium through which problems can be aired and tensions released, and fosters an environment of self-evaluation and change.
Conflict is destructive when it…
Breeds discontent, reduces group effectiveness, and threatens the group’s survival.
14-13
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
Managing Functional Conflict
One of the keys to minimizing counterproductive conflicts is recognizing when there really is a disagreement.
Many apparent conflicts are due to people using different language to discuss the same general course of action.
Successful conflict management recognizes these different approaches.
Attempts to resolve them by encouraging open, frank discussion focused on interests rather than issues.
14-14
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
Groups that resolve conflicts successfully discuss differences of opinion openly.
The most disruptive conflicts are those that are never addressed directly.
Managers need to emphasize shared interests in resolving conflicts.
Groups with cooperative conflict styles and an underlying identification to group goals are more effective than groups with a more competitive style.
14-15
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline the Conflict Process
Differences across countries in conflict
resolution strategies may be based on
collectivistic tendencies and motives.
Collectivist cultures see people as deeply
embedded in social situations.
They will avoid direct expression of conflicts,
preferring indirect methods for resolving
differences of opinion.
14-16
LO 2
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining
Negotiation is a process in which two or
more parties exchange goods or services and
attempt to agree upon the exchange rate for
them.
We use the terms negotiation and
bargaining interchangeably.
14-17
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining
14-18
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining
14-19
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining
Research shows that when you’re engaged
in distributive bargaining, one of the best
things you can do is make the first offer, and
make it an aggressive one.
Shows power.
Establishes an anchoring bias.
Another distributive bargaining tactic is
revealing a deadline.
14-20
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining Why don’t we see more integrative bargaining in
organizations?
Need the right conditions:
Parties who are open with information and
candid about their concerns.
A sensitivity by both parties to the other’s
needs.
The ability to trust one another.
A willingness by both parties to maintain
flexibility. 14-21
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Contrast Distributive
and Integrative Bargaining
Compromise might be your worst enemy in
negotiating a win-win agreement.
The reason is that compromising reduces
the pressure to bargain integratively.
14-22
LO 3
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Apply the Five Steps
of the Negotiation Process
14-23
LO 4
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
How Individual Differences
Influence Negotiations
Personality Traits in Negotiation
Can you predict an opponent’s negotiating
tactics if you know something about his/her
personality?
The evidence says “sort of.”
Moods/Emotions in Negotiation
Influence negotiation, but the way they do
appears to depend on the type of
negotiation.
14-24
LO 5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
How Individual Differences
Influence Negotiations Culture in Negotiations
Do people from different cultures negotiate
differently? Yes, they do.
People generally negotiate more effectively
within cultures than between them.
In cross-cultural negotiations, it is especially
important that the negotiators be high in
openness.
Negotiators need to be especially aware of the
emotional dynamics in cross-cultural negotiation. 14-25
LO 5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
How Individual Differences
Influence Negotiations Gender Differences in Negotiations
Men and women negotiate differently and
these differences affect outcomes.
There is some merit to the popular
stereotype that women are more
cooperative, pleasant, and relationship-
oriented in negotiations than are men.
These gender differences can be lessened at
both the organizational and individual level.
14-26
LO 5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
How Individual Differences
Influence Negotiations
14-27
LO 5
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roles and Function of
Third-party Negotiations
Negotiating in a social context:
Reputation: the way other people think and
talk about you.
Develop a trustworthy reputation –
competence and integrity.
Relationships: think about what’s best for the
other party and the relationship as a whole.
Repeated negotiations built on trust provide
more options.
14-28
LO 6
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Roles and Function of
Third-party Negotiations
When individuals or group representatives
reach a stalemate and are unable to resolve
their differences through direct negotiations,
they may turn to a third party.
A mediator
An arbitrator
A conciliator
14-29
LO 6
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Implications for Managers
Choose an authoritarian management style in emergencies, when unpopular actions need to be implemented, and when the issue is vital to the organization’s welfare. Be certain to communicate your logic when possible to make certain employees remain engaged and productive.
Seek integrative solutions when your objective is to learn, when you want to merge insights from people with different perspectives, when you need to gain commitment by incorporating concerns into a consensus, and when you need to work through feelings that have interfered with a relationship.
14-30
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Implications for Managers
Build trust by accommodating others when you
find you’re wrong, when you need to
demonstrate reasonableness, when other
positions need to be heard, when issues are
more important to others than to yourself, when
you want to satisfy others and maintain
cooperation, when you can build social credits
for later issues, to minimize loss when you are
outmatched and losing, and when employees
should learn from their own mistakes.
14-31
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Implications for Managers
Consider compromising when goals are important
but not worth potential disruption, when opponents
with equal power are committed to mutually
exclusive goals, and when you need temporary
settlements to complex issues.
Distributive bargaining can resolve disputes, but it
often reduces the satisfaction of one or more
negotiators because it is confrontational and
focused on the short term. Integrative bargaining, in
contrast, tends to provide outcomes that satisfy all
parties and build lasting relationships.
14-32
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. 14-33