Need Help 8

Benchmark - Organizational Design, Structure, and Change Presentation - Rubric Total 90

points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Identification of Issue

Identification of Issue

0 points

Identification of a major

issue the organization is

facing, and in which

dimension it is

underperforming is absent,

inappropriate, or irrelevant.

3.33 points

Identification of a major

issue the organization is

facing, and in which

dimension it is

underperforming is weak or

marginal with gaps in

presentation.

3.56 points

Identification of a major

issue the organization is

facing, and in which

dimension it is

underperforming is provided,

but at a cursory level.

3.92 points

Identification of a major

issue the organization is

facing, and in which

dimension it is

underperforming is clear and

integrated.

4.5 points

Identification of a major

issue the organization is

facing, and in which

dimension it is

underperforming is thorough

and well-integrated.

Ramifications and

Consequences

Ramifications and

Consequences

0 points

Explanation of the

ramifications the

underperformance is

currently having on the

organization and the likely

consequence of failure to

improve in the selected

dimension is absent,

inappropriate, or irrelevant.

6.66 points

Explanation of the

ramifications the

underperformance is

currently having on the

organization and the likely

consequence of failure to

improve in the selected

dimension is vague or

incomplete.

7.11 points

Explanation of the

ramifications the

underperformance is

currently having on the

organization and the likely

consequence of failure to

improve in the selected

dimension is provided, but at

a cursory level and may

contain some

inconsistencies.

7.83 points

Explanation of the

ramifications the

underperformance is

currently having on the

organization and the likely

consequence of failure to

improve in the selected

dimension is clear and

integrated.

9 points

Explanation of the

ramifications the

underperformance is

currently having on the

organization and the likely

consequence of failure to

improve in the selected

dimension is thorough and

well-integrated.

Effect of Organizational

Structure, Design, and

Culture

Effect of Organizational

Structure, Design, and

Culture

0 points

A discussion of internal and

external forces that influence

the choice of organizational

structures and an analysis of

the current organizational

structure, design, and

culture, and their influence

on organizational

effectiveness in relationship

to the dimension in which

the organization is struggling,

is absent, inappropriate, or

irrelevant.

6.66 points

A discussion of internal and

external forces that influence

the choice of organizational

structures and an analysis of

the current organizational

structure, design, and

culture, and their influence

on organizational

effectiveness in relationship

to the dimension in which

the organization is struggling,

is weak or marginal with gaps

in presentation.

7.11 points

A discussion of internal and

external forces that influence

the choice of organizational

structures and an analysis of

the current organizational

structure, design, and

culture, and their influence

on organizational

effectiveness in relationship

to the dimension in which

the organization is struggling,

is provided, but at a cursory

level and may contain

inconsistencies.

7.83 points

A discussion of internal and

external forces that influence

the choice of organizational

structures and an analysis of

the current organizational

structure, design, and

culture, and their influence

on organizational

effectiveness in relationship

to the dimension in which

the organization is struggling,

is clear and provides

citations.

9 points

A discussion of internal and

external forces that influence

the choice of organizational

structures and an analysis of

the current organizational

structure, design, and

culture, and their influence

on organizational

effectiveness in relationship

to the dimension in which

the organization is struggling,

is thorough and provides

citations to support the

analysis.

Embodiment of Conscious

Capitalism

Embodiment of Conscious

Capitalism

0 points

Identification of whether the

organization embodies the

principles and values of

conscious culture and

management and its

relevance to improving

organizational function is

absent, inappropriate, or

irrelevant.

6.66 points

Identification of whether the

organization embodies the

principles and values of

conscious culture and

management and its

relevance to improving

organizational function is

weak or marginal with gaps

in presentation.

7.11 points

Identification of whether the

organization embodies the

principles and values of

conscious culture and

management and its

relevance to improving

organizational function is

provided, but at a cursory

level and may contain

inconsistencies.

7.83 points

Identification of whether the

organization embodies the

principles and values of

conscious culture and

management and its

relevance to improving

organizational function is

clear and integrated.

9 points

Identification of whether the

organization embodies the

principles and values of

conscious culture and

management and its

relevance to improving

organizational function is

thorough and well-

integrated.

Improvement Plan

Improvement Plan

0 points

A plan to bring about

necessary improvement

using the 8-step change

model is absent,

inappropriate, or irrelevant.

6.66 points

A plan to bring about

necessary improvement

using the 8-step change

model is weak or marginal

with gaps in presentation.

7.11 points

A plan to bring about

necessary improvement

using the 8-step change

model is provided, but at a

cursory level and may

contain inconsistencies.

7.83 points

A plan to bring about

necessary improvement

using the 8-step change

model is clear and

integrated.

9 points

A plan to bring about

necessary improvement

using the 8-step change

model is thorough and well-

integrated.

Managing Challenges

Managing Challenges

0 points

Identification of possible

challenges to the suggested

change, plans for managing

6.66 points

Identification of possible

challenges to the suggested

change, plans for managing

7.11 points

Identification of possible

challenges to the suggested

change, plans for managing

7.83 points

Identification of possible

challenges to the suggested

change, plans for managing

9 points

Identification of possible

challenges to the suggested

change, plans for managing © 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

challenges, and explanation

of subsystem realignment

needed to bring about the

change is not included.

challenges, and explanation

of subsystem realignment

needed to bring about the

change is incomplete or

incorrect.

challenges, and explanation

of subsystem realignment

needed to bring about the

change is included but lacks

relevant supporting details.

challenges, and explanation

of subsystem realignment

needed to bring about the

change is complete and

includes relevant supporting

details.

challenges, and explanation

of subsystem realignment

needed to bring about the

change is extremely

thorough and includes

extensive supporting details.

Strategies for Leading

Teams and Fostering

Collaboration (B)

Strategies for Leading Teams

and Fostering Collaboration

(C1.5)

0 points

Lessons learned and

evaluation of strategies to

avoid or engage in when

designing the structure,

building culture, and

managing change in an

organization as a manager

are absent, inappropriate, or

irrelevant.

3.33 points

Lessons learned and

evaluation of strategies to

avoid or engage in when

designing the structure,

building culture, and

managing change in an

organization as a manager

are weak or marginal with

gaps in presentation.

3.56 points

Lessons learned and

evaluation of strategies to

avoid or engage in when

designing the structure,

building culture, and

managing change in an

organization as a manager

are provided, but at a

cursory level and may

contain inconsistencies.

3.92 points

Lessons learned and

evaluation of strategies to

avoid or engage in when

designing the structure,

building culture, and

managing change in an

organization as a manager

are clear and includes

citations.

4.5 points

Lessons learned and

evaluation of strategies to

avoid or engage in when

designing the structure,

building culture, and

managing change in an

organization as a manager

are thorough and provides

citations to support claims.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear

point of view and logical

sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive

information. Sequencing of

ideas is unclear.

6.66 points

The content is vague in

conveying a point of view and

does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes

some persuasive

information.

7.11 points

The presentation slides are

generally competent, but

ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization

or in their relationships to

each other.

7.83 points

The content is written with a

logical progression of ideas

and supporting information

exhibiting a unity, coherence,

and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from

reliable sources.

9 points

The content is written clearly

and concisely. Ideas

universally progress and

relate to each other. The

project includes motivating

questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives

the audience a clear sense of

the main idea.

Recorded Video

Presentation

Recorded Video Presentation

0 points

The recorded video

presentation is absent.

6.66 points

The recorded video

presentation is included but

does not address the items

from the PowerPoint

presentation.

7.11 points

The recorded video

presentation is included and

may address some items

from the PowerPoint

presentation.

7.83 points

The recorded video

presentation is included with

a logical progression of ideas

and supporting information

from the PowerPoint

presentation.

9 points

The recorded video

presentation is clear and

concise. Ideas progress and

relate to each other while

providing a clear sense of the

purpose of the presentation.

Layout

Layout

0 points

The layout is cluttered,

confusing, and does not use

spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the

readability. The text is

extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small

point size for fonts, and

inappropriate contrasting

colors. Poor use of headings,

subheadings, indentations,

or bold formatting is evident.

3.33 points

The layout shows some

structure, but appears

cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of

white space or a distracting

background. Overall

readability is difficult due to

lengthy paragraphs, too

many different fonts, dark or

busy background, overuse of

bold, or lack of appropriate

indentations of text.

3.56 points

The layout uses horizontal

and vertical white space

appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read,

but in a few places the use of

fonts, italics, bold, long

paragraphs, color, or busy

background detracts and

does not enhance

readability.

3.92 points

The layout background and

text complement each other

and enable the content to be

easily read. The fonts are

easy to read and point size

varies appropriately for

headings and text.

4.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing

and contributes to the

overall message with

appropriate use of headings,

subheadings, and white

space. Text is appropriate in

length for the target

audience and to the point.

The background and colors

enhance the readability of

the text.

Language Use and

Audience Awareness

(includes sentence

construction, word choice,

etc.)

Language Use and Audience

Awareness (includes

sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

0 points

Inappropriate word choice

and lack of variety in

language use are evident.

Writer appears to be

unaware of audience. Use of

primer prose indicates writer

either does not apply figures

of speech or uses them

inappropriately.

3.33 points

Some distracting

inconsistencies in language

choice (register) or word

choice are present. The

writer exhibits some lack of

control in using figures of

speech appropriately.

3.56 points

Language is appropriate to

the targeted audience for the

most part.

3.92 points

The writer is clearly aware of

audience, uses a variety of

appropriate vocabulary for

the target audience, and uses

figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

4.5 points

The writer uses a variety of

sentence constructions,

figures of speech, and word

choice in distinctive and

creative ways that are

appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive

enough that they impede

communication of meaning.

3.33 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader.

3.56 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting to

the reader.

3.92 points

Slides are largely free of

mechanical errors, although

a few may be present.

4.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of

standard, written academic

English.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources

(citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography, etc.,

as appropriate to assignment

and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.33 points

Documentation of sources is

inconsistent or incorrect, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, with numerous

formatting errors.

3.56 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, although some

formatting errors may be

present.

3.92 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is

mostly correct.

4.5 points

Sources are completely and

correctly documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free

of error.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.