> 2. Identify which category of Literary Devices of 8 words you find in the text, such as the the use of rhetorical devices of metaphor, or other rhetorical devices as you can find in the text.

MGN431 CRA Assessment Item 2

MGN431 Strategic HRD: Assessment Item 2 HRD Plan (60%)

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail KS (1.1) Demonstrate and apply integrated and advanced discipline and professional practice knowledge

Demonstration of current knowledge of Strategic Human Resource Development (SHRD) issues and approaches relating to design, implementation and evaluation Weighting: 20/60

The SHRD Plan demonstrates a comprehensive and in- depth knowledge of relevant theory. Application of relevant theory contributes well to achieving the goals of the SHRD Plan.

The SHRD Plan demonstrates a comprehensive and mostly in-depth knowledge of relevant theory. Application of relevant theory contributes to achieving the goals of the SHRD Plan.

The SHRD Plan demonstrates some in- depth knowledge of relevant theory. Application of theory makes some contribution to achieving the goals of the SHRD Plan with minor errors or flaws.

The SHRD Plan demonstrates basic knowledge of relevant theory. Application of theory attempts to contribute to achieving the goals of the SHRD Plan but there are flaws, errors and/or omissions.

The SHRD Plan demonstrates little or no knowledge of relevant theory. There is little or no application of relevant theory to contribute to achieving the goals of the SHRD Plan.

HO (2.2) Exercise creativity & intellectual independence & make informed decisions & judgements in planning, designing & executing responses to address issues

Application of critical thinking and creativity to development of appropriate recommendations Weighting: 20/60

All recommendations are thoroughly explained and justified by the correct and scholarly application of theory taking into account the issues previously identified in the case organisation. The recommendations provided follow in a strictly logical way from the critical analysis and are highly appropriate.

The recommendations provided are explained and justified by the correct application of theory taking into account the issues previously identified in the case organisation. The recommendations are mostly well linked to the critical analysis, and they are appropriate.

Most of the recommendations are explained and justified by the application of theory taking into account the issues previously identified in the case organisation. The recommendations show links to the critical analysis, more strongly in some areas than others. Most solutions and recommendations are appropriate.

Some of the recommendations are explained and justified by the application of theory taking into account the issues previously identified in the case organisation. The recommendations show some linkage to the critical analysis, though this could have been strengthened. There is a degree of appropriateness in the recommendations put forward; but they are not necessarily totally appropriate.

There is little or no explanation and justification of recommendations. There is no linkage of recommendation(s) to critical analysis. Any recommendations made are not appropriate and/or do not relate to the case organisation.

MGN431 CRA Assessment Item 2

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail PC (3.1) Ability to create and present professional documents and/or reports using high levels of analysis/synthesis/evaluation for a range of contexts and audiences

Structure and presentation of plan Weighting 5/60

The plan is professionally presented with substantial attention to detail and high standards of written expression and grammar. It is well structured, coherent, with logical organisation.

The plan is professionally presented, and is well structured, coherent, with a logical organisation, and high standards of written expression and grammar.

The plan is generally clearly structured and coherent with clear standards of written expression. The document is substantially free of spelling and grammatical errors.

The plan has some structure and coherence. The written expression is at times unclear/ some grammatical problems.

Plan is poorly structured, poorly written, and lacks coherence. Spelling and grammar is poor.

Use of sources and referencing Weighting: 5/60

Well-judged and well- integrated selection of a quality range of sources to support content; all sources appropriately acknowledged; referencing consistently accurate

Good number and range of quality sources, mostly critically integrated; all sources appropriately acknowledged; high level of accuracy in referencing.

Adequate number of sources with attempt to give a range and critically integrate; all sources acknowledged; only minor inaccuracies in referencing.

Adequate number of sources though range may be restricted, and sources not always well integrated; some instances where failure to acknowledge sources is evident; some inaccuracies in referencing

Sources used are insufficient, inappropriate, or uncritically used; lack of proper acknowledgement of sources; referencing inaccurate.

Executive summary Weighting: 10/60

The executive summary provides a high quality, clear, concise and professional summary of the report’s purpose, analysis and recommendations.

The executive summary provides a clear and concise summary of the report’s purpose, analysis and recommendations.

The executive summary provides a reasonable summary of the report’s purpose, analysis and recommendations.

The executive summary provides a summary of parts of the report however elements are missing or not well summarised.

The executive summary does not adequately summarise the purpose, analysis and/or recommendations and would not be sufficiently informative for a management team.