Unit 2 - Individual Project - CTU - MGMT600
Applied Managerial Decision-Making MGMT600-1804A-02 Instructor: Ryan Tipton Unit 2 – Individual Project Summarize and Present Information in a Meaning Way Wednesday 17, 2018
Big D Incorporated
Recommendations to the Board of Directors
Market Feasibility Assessment
Darkened picture background with full-color circle
(Intermediate)
Tip: For best results with the picture overlay on this slide, use a picture that is the same dimensions as the slide: 10” wide and 7.5” high. If the picture is not the same width and height, resize or crop to those dimensions before following the instructions below.
To reproduce the background effects on this slide, do the following:
On the Home tab, in the Slides group, click Layout, and then click Blank.
Right-click the slide and then click Format Background.
In the Format Background dialog box, click Fill in the left pane. In the Fill pane, select Picture or texture fill, and then under Insert from, click File.
In the Insert Picture dialog box, select a picture, and then click Insert.
Also in the Format Background dialog box, click Picture in the left pane, and then do the following in the Picture pane:
Click the button next to Recolor, and then under Color Modes, click Grayscale (first option from the left).
In the Brightness box, enter -50%.
In the Contrast box, enter -60%.
On the Insert tab, in the Images group, click Picture.
In the Insert Picture dialog box, select the same picture used for the background, and then click Insert.
On the Home tab, in the Drawing group, click Shape Effects, point to Soft Edges, and then click 10 Point.
Under Picture Tools, on the Format tab, in the Size group, click the down arrow under Crop, click Crop to Shape, and then under Basic Shapes, click Oval (first row, first option from the left).
Select the oval. Under Picture Tools, on the Format tab, in the bottom right corner of the Size group, click the Size and Position dialog box launcher. In the Size and Position dialog box, on the Size tab, under Crop from, enter values into the Left, Right, Top, and Bottom boxes to crop the oval as needed.
| Household Income Chicago U.S. U.S. Chicago | ||||||||||||||||||
| Median Household Income | $69,311 | $42,257 | $42,257 | Population | 281,421,906 | 281,421,906 | 64,635 | 64,635 | 64,635 | |||||||||
| Average Household Income | $114,615 | $56,643 | $56,643 | Total Households | 105,480,101 | 105,480,101 | 35,975 | 35,975 | 35,975 | |||||||||
| Per Capita Income | $63,791 | $21,231 | $21,231 | Total Workers | 103,811,842 | 103,811,842 | 45,551 | 45,551 | 45,551 | |||||||||
| 2000 Education Attainment | ||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||
| K – 9 | 1.95% | 6.11% | ||||||||||||||||
| 9TH – 11TH | 3.19% | 12.05% | ||||||||||||||||
| High School Graduate | 5.60% | 28.63% | ||||||||||||||||
| Did NOT Graduate H.S. | 3.19% | 12.05% | ||||||||||||||||
| Associates Degree | 1.90% | 6.32% | ||||||||||||||||
| Bachelors Degree | 44.19% | 15.54% | ||||||||||||||||
| Graduate Degree | 33.99% | 8.86% |
2000 Education Attainment
US
School: K - 9th School: 9th - 11th grade no diploma School: H.S. Grad College: Some College College: Associates College: Bachelors College: Grad Degree 6.1100000000000002E-2 0.1205 0.2863 0.21049999999999999 6.3200000000000006E-2 0.15540000000000001 8.8599999999999998E-2 Chicago
School: K - 9th School: 9th - 11th grade no diploma School: H.S. Grad College: Some College College: Associates College: Bachelors College: Grad Degree 1.95E-2 3.1899999999999998E-2 5.6000000000000001E-2 8.72E-2 1.9E-2 0.44190000000000002 0.33989999999999998
Household Income
US
Median Average Per Capita 42257 56643 21231 Chicago
Median Average Per Capita 69311 114615 63791
MARITAL STATUS
Divorced
US CHICAGO 9.7500000000000003E-2 7.5899999999999995E-2 Never Married
US CHICAGO 0.27100000000000002 0.54200000000000004 Now Married
US CHICAGO 0.51129999999999998 0.3095 Separated
US CHICAGO 5.3999999999999999E-2 3.7999999999999999E-2 Widowed
US CHICAGO 6.6299999999999998E-2 3.4599999999999999E-2
POPULATION
Employment
US
US Employed Unemployed 103811842 177610064
Chicago
Chicago Employed Unemployed 45551 19084
Questions to Consider
1. Is the reason for the high percentage of workers have to do with the education they attained and availability of in Chicago vs U.S.?
2. Does the high percentage of income in Chicago contributed to the greater level of employment by Chicagoans?
3. Is the reason higher education is attainable due to the greater amount of household income?
References:
Tableau Public. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2014 from http://www.tableausoftware.com/public/
Tipton, R. (2018). MGMT600 live chat 2. Retrieved from Colorado Technical University, MGMT600-1804A-02, Applied managerial decision-making: https://ctuadobeconnect.careerredonline.com