Organizational Dynamics

profileluke.ige1
MGMT2020CaseStudyRubric1.docx

MGMT2020 Case Study Rubric #1

Week 1 (Maintaining Core Values: The Case of Nau) & (Using Science to Match Candidates to Jobs: The Case of Kronos), Week 7 (Leadership Development: The Case of Starbucks)

Criteria

(Points)

Exemplary

Proficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Quality of Question 1 Answer

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question thoroughly, with clear connections to the chapter concepts, and includes original thought and substantial depth.

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question adequately, with some connections to the chapter concepts.

(21 pts)

· Addresses some aspects of the question.

· Answers the question in a limited way. Minimal connections to the chapter concepts.

(19 pts)

· Addresses few aspects of the question.

· Does not correctly answer the question. No connections to the chapter concepts.

(16 pts)

Question not answered.

(0 pts)

Quality of Question 2 Answer

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question thoroughly, with clear connections to the chapter concepts, and includes original thought and substantial depth.

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question adequately, with some connections to the chapter concepts.

(21 pts)

· Addresses some aspects of the question.

· Answers the question in a limited way. Minimal connections to the chapter concepts.

(19 pts)

· Addresses few aspects of the question.

· Does not correctly answer the question. No connections to the chapter concepts.

(16 pts)

Question not answered.

(0 pts)

Quality of Question 3 Answer

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question thoroughly, with clear connections to the chapter concepts, and includes original thought and substantial depth.

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question adequately, with some connections to the chapter concepts.

(21 pts)

· Addresses some aspects of the question.

· Answers the question in a limited way. Minimal connections to the chapter concepts.

(19 pts)

· Addresses few aspects of the question.

· Does not correctly answer the question. No connections to the chapter concepts.

(16 pts)

Question not answered.

(0 pts)

Quality of Question 4 Answer

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question thoroughly, with clear connections to the chapter concepts, and includes original thought and substantial depth.

(23 pts)

· Addresses all aspects of the question.

· Answers the question adequately, with some connections to the chapter concepts.

(21 pts)

· Addresses some aspects of the question.

· Answers the question in a limited way. Minimal connections to the chapter concepts.

(19 pts)

· Addresses few aspects of the question.

· Does not correctly answer the question. No connections to the chapter concepts.

(16 pts)

Question not answered.

(0 pts)

Mechanics

(8 pts)

· Answers are well written and clearly articulated in complete sentences with correct grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

· Sources are cited correctly using MLA format.

(8 pts)

· Answers are well written and clearly articulated in complete sentences with minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

· Sources are cited in MLA format with minimal errors.

(7 pts)

· Answers are written in complete sentences but have several errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

· Sources are identified but not in MLA format (for example, only a link to the source is included).

(6 pts)

· Answers have many errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling and/or are written in bullet points rather than complete sentences.

· Sources are not cited.

(5 pts)

No answers submitted.

(0 pts)

MGMT2020

College of Online Education

Johnson & Wales University