Where appropriate you shall introduce a company, give company data or description and site the communication issue or problem or any communication phenomenon according to the attached document; but also remember;
1
MGF 5921 FOUNDATIONS IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CLASS TEST MARKING GUIDE
STUDENT NAME …………………………………………….…………….. N = FAIL
PASS – CREDIT
DISTINCTION – HIGH DISTINCTION
Has the student understood the task? This will be indicated by: ! A statement about the intent of the
test question; ! Reference to 3 HRM activities from
Parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014 ! Reference to and use of readings from
this semester
The student: ! Does not offer a statement about the
intent of the test question and how the response will proceed;
! Does not identify 3 HRM activities from Parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014
! Does not indicate links between these activities and the response to the test question.
! Does not provide enough words to evaluate quality of the response
The student has: ! A statement about the intent of the test question
and how the response will proceed; ! Identified 3 HRM activities from Parts 2 & 3 of
Kramar et al., 2014 ! Indicated links between these activities and the
response to the test question. (there may be some gaps or confusions)
The student has: ! A statement about the intent of the test question
and how the response will proceed; ! Clearly identified 3 HRM activities from Parts 2 & 3
of Kramar et al., 2014 ! Clearly indicated links between these activities and
the response to the test question.
Has the student identified relevant and appropriate material from the text and relevant readings to apply to the test question? This will be indicated by ! Reference to and explanation of key
models, concepts, ideas and empirical evidence found in the readings parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014 and reinforced in the class discussions and lectures in weeks 7-‐12.
The student has in their use of reference material: ! Not made reference to and used to explain
models, concepts, ideas and empirical evidence found in the readings and parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014 and reinforced in the class discussions and lectures in weeks 7-‐12.
! Indicates a high level of confusion in explaining ideas from lectures and readings from weeks 7-‐12.
The student has, in their use of reference material: ! Made reference to and explained key concepts,
models, ideas and empirical evidence found in the readings and parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014 and reinforced in the class discussions and lectures in weeks 7-‐12 (and earlier).
! Used the material from lectures and readings from weeks 7-‐12 (and earlier) appropriately although there may be some over reliance on one or two sources rather than a broad spread;
! The response may show elements of description from the sources rather than critical analysis using the various sources as evidence.
The student has, in their use of reference material: ! Confidently made reference to and explained key
concepts, models, ideas and empirical evidence found in the readings and parts 2 & 3 of Kramar et al., 2014 and reinforced in the class discussions and lectures in weeks 7-‐12 (and earlier).
! Demonstrated a confident understanding of the material from lectures and readings from weeks 7-‐ 12 (and earlier);
! Used sources broadly critically & appropriately throughout the test.
Has the student being able to use the material from the readings critically? ! Critical argument in relation to the
question using the sources from weeks 7-‐12 (and earlier) to provide content and evidence for the test;
! Criticisms or limitations of HRM/SHRM.
The student in their test response: ! Offers an uncritical in that it does not
acknowledge or include different or competing perspectives;
! Demonstrates limited use of sources. ! Makes no attempt to attribute ideas,
models and concepts to the relevant sources.
! The student in their test response: ! Uses some to all of the sources from this semester.
There is a recognition of particular or competing perspectives between sources;
! There may be come confusion and/or over-‐reliance on one or two main sources to support arguments;
! Generally consistent in attributing sources of ideas in the test.
The student in their test response: ! Is critical in that it integrates various ideas,
concepts and models and acknowledges different and competing perspectives;
! Draws on a broad selection of sources from this semester. Sources are used to good effect to support arguments;
! Sources are consistently and systematically acknowledged through out the test.
Has the student been able to organise and structure their response to the test
The student has: ! Failed to provide a logical and clear
The student has: ! The structure of the response is generally clear but
The student has: ! Provided a clear and logical response to the test
Pass HD Credit Dist
2
question and their guided reading notes eg include an introduction, middle and conclusion.
response to the text question; ! Failed to respond to key aspects of the test
question;
may neglect to address some parts of the test question;
! Responded to the key aspects of the test question (may be some gaps or confusions).
question; ! Responded to the key aspects of the test question
in a competent and comprehensive way.
Has the student being able to integrate information from the sources from this semester to offer an appropriate response to the test question?
The student has not indicated that they have understood materials as they relate to the test question. This may be indicated by; ! Absent or confused definitions, concepts,
models and empirical evidence relevant to the test question;
! Failure to integrate knowledge from sources to respond to the test question;
! Descriptive and non-‐specific discussion of HRM with little or no link to the test question and relevant sources;
The student has: ! Provided a coherent response to the test question.
A pass level response may have some gaps and confusions but a pass is indicated by: o Identifying and providing definitions, relevant
concepts, models and evidence from empirical research to answer the test question;
o Shown evidence of critical argument supported by evidence from a range of sources;
o
The student has: ! Provided a high level of synthesis, analysis and has
confidently applied newly gained knowledge about HRM concepts theory, models and empirical evidence. Indicated by: o Demonstrated understanding by identifying
and providing definitions, relevant concepts, models and empirical evidence from a broad range of sources to answer the test question
o Critically argued a response to the test question supported by evidence from a range of sources;
o Has the student been able to communicate the new knowledge they are generating through their test response with an awareness of the discipline and social, cultural and ethical issues relevant to HRM.
The student: ! Uses general management or lay language
rather than relevant HRM concepts, ideas and language;
! Conversely the student may use “HR speak” but fail to indicate deeper understanding of HRM.
! The test may overly rely on use of direct quotes and/or have plagiarised passages of text.
The student: ! Uses language specific to the task at hand
and the readings used for the test; ! Indicates their own “voice” by translating
HRM concepts, ideas and language into their own words;
! Observes academic conventions for citing sources.
The student ! Uses language specific to the task at hand and the
readings used for the test; ! Indicates a confident “voice” in communicating
HRM concepts, ideas and language; ! Observes academic conventions for citing sources.
COMMENTS: