Methodology and Rationale
INDS 400
Methodology and Rationale Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not present |
|
Methodology |
32 to 35 points Methodology is logically sound; a significant result will be largely trustworthy and not be marred by other variables. Student has a well thought through plan. |
25 to 31 points Methodology is strong but may need a little tweaking to be reliable enough to use. |
1 to 24 points Methodology is heavily flawed and may need to be discarded; student needs to begin again. |
0 points Not present |
|
Rationale |
32 to 35 points Rationale is convincing, clear, and keeps audience in mind as the student speaks in terms of someone else’s benefits. |
25 to 31 points Rationale is largely audience-focused and convincing but at times may miss opportunities, lack support, or lose focus on the audience. |
1 to 24 points Rationale largely forgets about the audience and is not convincing. |
0 points Not present |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not present |
|
Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, and Formatting |
27 to 30 points Few mistakes are evident. |
21 to 26 points Mistakes detract somewhat from the information being delivered. |
1 to 20 points Mistakes promote confusion or show a lack of professionalism. |
0 points Not present |