ProfRubba Only!
!
„Research is Hard Work, it's Always a bit Suffering. Therefore, on the Other Side
Research Should be Fun.“
Anselm Strauss http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/562
© Julia Brandl.
!methodological fit of research designs
© albrecht becker. 4
ontology epistemology methodology methods analysis
What is the fun- damental nature of social reality?
What constitutes legitimate
knowledge? What is the
overarching re- search design?
Which methods are appropriate?
What kind of analysis can be
performed? • research goal /
questions • theoretical
contribution
• type of data • data collection • constructs /
measures
• goal of analysis • analysis methods
!learning objectives
5
research design alternatives:
1. quantitative
2. qualitative research
3. mixed-methods
© Julia Brandl.
• what they aim at
• how they “work”
• what can be achieved (or not
achieved)
!theory
6
“…a system of interconnected ideas. It condenses and organizes knowledge about the social world. We can also think of it as a
type of systematic “story telling” that explains how some aspect of the social world works and why.” (Neuman, p.57)
© Julia Brandl.
!theory building blocks
7© Julia Brandl.
1. assumptions (e.g., organizations are open systems, behaviour is intentionally rational)
2. concepts and relations (e.g., types of external resource
dependences, organizational characteristics)
3. normative statements (e.g., elect directors so that demographics reflect resource dependencies)
4. (empirical evidence)
!agenda
8
• 1 - quantitative research designs
• 2 – qualitative research design
• 3 – mixed-methods research designs
© Julia Brandl.
!research goal
9
“focus on elaborating, clarifying, or challenging
specific aspects of existing theories. …test a theory
in a new setting, identify or clarify the boundaries of
a theory, examine a mediating mechanism, etc.”
(Edmondson & McManus, p. 1159)
“proceeds through a process of hypothesizing fundamental laws and then deducing what kind of
observations will demonstrate the truth or falsity of
these hypotheses” (Neuman, p. 69)
© Julia Brandl.
1- quantitative research designs
theory
hypotheses
observations, facts
deducing
operationalizing, testing
!methods
10
• constructs & measures = operationalize the conceptual model (theory); measures need to be linked to existing theoretical
constructs
• type of data = standardized and focused -> quantitative
• collecting data = sufficient sample size and randomness of sample
© Julia Brandl.
1- quantitative research designs
!analysis
11
• goal of data analysis: explain why events occur or one factor produces certain results in terms of a causal explanation, i.e. • temporal order (i.e. cause and effect)
• association of events • eliminating alternatives
• specifying causal mechanism
• data analysis methods: cursory analysis shows relationships, statistical tests (e.g., correlation, regression) to get clearer view of the relationships
© Julia Brandl.
1- quantitative research designs
!contribution(s)
12
1. test a theory‘s predictions
2. elaborate and enrich theory‘s explanation
3. extend a theory to new issues or topics
4. determine which of several explanations is best
© Julia Brandl.
1- quantitative research designs
!reflection
13
Edmondson & McManus (2007) suggest to use the above research design for mature theories.
• How do you know the maturity of a theory (e.g., resource dependence theory)?
• What other theories - in your own field and/or beyond - do you consider as ‘mature’?
© Julia Brandl.
!summary
© Julia Brandl. 14
State of Prior Theory and Research
Mature
Research goal / questions Focused questions and/or hypotheses relating existing constructs
Type of data collected quantitative data; focused measures where extent or amount is meaningful
Illustrative methods for collecting data
Surveys; interviews or observations designed to be systemically coded and quantified; obtaining data from field sites that measure the extent or amount of salient constructs
Constructs and measures typically relying heavily on existing constructs and measures
Goal of data analyses formal hypothesis testing
Data analysis methods statistical inference, standard statistical analyses
Theoretical contribution a supported theory that may add specificity, new mechanisms, or new boundaries to existing theories
1- quantitative research designs
!agenda
15
• 1 - quantitative research designs
• 2 – qualitative research design
• 3 – mixed-methods research designs
© Julia Brandl.
!research goal
16© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
• “I designed an inductive study to explore
the following questions: (1) How do
managers construe events over time? and (2)
How are those viewpoints linked with the
process of change?” (p.10)
(Isabella 1990)
• develop or confirm theory
from concrete empirical
evidence and work toward
more abstract concepts and
theoretical relationships
!induction
17
induction = “approach to developing or confirming a theory that begins with concrete empirical evidence and works toward more
abstract concepts and theoretical relationships” (Neuman, 2014, p.38)
© Julia Brandl.
2- mixed-methods research designs
!(post-) positivism, verification, falsification
© albrecht becker. 18
General Principle; Law;
Theory Hypothesis
Generali- zation; Pattern
Observation 1
Observation 2
Observation 3
INDUCTIVISM
A Posteriori
HYPOTHETICO-DEDUCTIVISM
A Priori
A: Positivist/Verificationism
B: Postpositivist/Falsificationism
(Pernecky, 2016, p. 52, Figure 2.2)
!concerns with induction
19
The benevolent farmer. On a farm, there was a flock of chickens. One chicken started talking
with another, remarking "How good our farmer has been to us. I think he is an awfully nice man, because he comes every morning to feed us." The other chicken nodded in agreement, adding "and he has been feeding each and everyone of us here every day like clockwork, every day without fail since we were all just little baby chicks." Indeed, when queried, most of the other chickens clucked in agreement about how benevolent their farmer was. But there was one chicken, intelligent but eccentric, who countered saying "How do you know he is all that good? I
remember, not too long ago, that there were some older chickens who were taken away, and I haven't seen them since. What ever happened to them?” Some of the chickens may have slept a little uneasy that night, but in the morning the farmer came as usual, this time scattering even
more corn around. The chickens ate this with gusto, and this dispelled any remaining doubts about the benevolence of the farmer. "You see, there is nothing to worry about. Our farmer had a little extra food, so he gave it to us because he likes us! He is a good man," remarked one chicken to the others, and they all nodded in agreement, all of them, that is, except one. The intelligent but eccentric chicken became even more agitated. "He is just fattening us up! We are going to be slaughtered in a weeks time!" he squawked in alarm. But nobody listened. All the
other chickens just thought he was a troublemaker. A week later, all the chickens were placed into cages, loaded onto a truck, and driven to the slaughterhouse. The End.
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
http://frugosblog.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-chickens-and-benevolent-farmer_26.html
!grounded theory
20
A methodology invented by Glaser and Strauss and presented in their book The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for
qualitative research (1967).
• grounded = ‘grounds’ theory in actual data
• provision of procedures for building theory (esp., theoretical sampling, coding, memos, constant comparison)
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
!methods
21
• constructs & measures = to be created during the research process (nvivo i.e. natural constructs of particular interest)
• type of data = “all is data”-principle, in practice primarily
qualitative
• collecting data = emerging sampling strategy, aiming at finding examples of a construct and thereby elaborate and
examine this construct (theoretical sampling); collecting data interrelated with analysis
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
!analysis
22
• goal of data analysis: explain why events occur and the processes how people handle situations in terms of a
interpretative explanation, i.e.
• the subjective experiences of humans in specific situations
• making sense of the meanings of events and interaction
• data analysis methods: coding for developing and refining constructs (example see next slide!), constant comparison (refinement of
initial constructs and their relations) and memo writing
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
!
3- qualitative research designs
23
!abduction
24
abduction = approach to theorizing which examines the efficacy of multiple theoretical frameworks sequentially and recontextualizes
both data and ideas creatively in the process (Neuman, 2014, p.114)
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
!
© albrecht becker. 25
!contribution(s)
26
1. explain the meanings that humans construct to make sense of their
everyday experiences in specific situations (substantive theory)
2. clarify understanding of a problem,
when unsure of the precise nature of the problem (nascent theory)
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
(Neuman, 2014, p.70)
!new constructs introduced in AMJ articles
27
• relational demography (Tsui, o’Reilly, 1989)
• citizenship behaviour (Bateman & Organ, 1983)
• affect- and cognition based trust (McAllister, 1995)
• archetypes (Greenwood & Hinings, 1993)
• job embeddedness (Mitchell et al., 2001)
examples taken from Colquitt & Zapata-Phelan (2007, p. 1296f.)
© Julia Brandl.
3- qualitative research designs
!summary
© Julia Brandl. 28
State of Prior Theory and Research
Nascent
Research questions open-ended inquiry about a phenomenon of interest
Type of data collected qualitative, initially open-ended data that need to be interpreted for meaning
Illustrative methods for collecting data
interviews; observations; obtaining documents or other material from field sites relevant to the phenomena of interest
Constructs and measures typically new constructs, few formal measures
Goal of data analyses pattern identification
Data analysis methods thematic content analysis coding for evidence of constructs
Theoretical contribution a suggestive theory, often an invitation for further work on the issue or set of issues opened up by the study
3- qualitative research designs
!agenda
29
• 1 - quantitative research designs
• 2 – qualitative research design
• 3 – mixed-methods research designs
© Julia Brandl.
!Whenmixedmethods are not effective
30
!
research goal (1)
• „…writings suggest that, when all other
factors are held equal, the display of
positive emotions by employees can, act as
control moves that bring about gains for an
organization“ (p.463)
© Julia Brandl. 31
(Sutton & Rafaeli, 1988)
• reinvestigate a theory or
construct that sits within a
mature stream of research
2- mixed-methods research designs
!
research goal (2)
• „a subsequent qualitative study suggested
that sales is an indicator of a store‘s pace,
or the amount of pressure on clerks and
customers, and that pace leads to displayed
emotions, with norms in busy settings
supporting neutral displays and norms in
slow settings supporting positive displays“
(p.461)
© Julia Brandl. 32
(Sutton & Rafaeli, 1988)
• generate greater
understanding of the
mechanisms underlying
quantitative results in at
least partially new
territory
2- mixed-methods research designs
!
research goal (3)
• “Reanalysis of the quantitative data
confirmed that clerks in rapidly paced stores
with high sales and long lines were less likely
to display positive feelings than clerks in
slow-paced stores.” (p.461)
© Julia Brandl. 33
(Sutton & Rafaeli, 1988)
• increase confidence that
the researchers’
explanations of the
phenomena are more
plausible than alternative
interpretations
2- mixed-methods research designs
!methods
34
• constructs & measures are derived from existing theory as well as generated from empirical observation
• type of data = quantitative + qualitative
• methods for collecting data = sufficient sample size (quantitative) and focussed on matters that are likely to promote understanding of phenomena and how they relate
(qualitative)
© Julia Brandl.
2- mixed-methods research designs
!analysis
35
• goal of data analysis: integrate qualitative + quantitative data
• triangulation “a process by which the same phenomenon is assessed
with different methods to determine whether convergence across
methods exists.” (Neuman, 2014 p.115)
• options for order in data analysis:
• explanatory (1. quantitative; 2. qualitative)
• exploratory (1. qualitative; 2. quantitative)
© Julia Brandl.
2- mixed-methods research designs
!contribution(s)
36
1. intermediate theory = ”provisional explanations of phenomena, often introducing a new construct and proposing
relationships between it and established constructs” (Edmondson & McManus, 2007, p.1158)
2. integrating previously disparate bodies of literature to a
theory that adds new specificity to existing theoretical models in a given body of literature
© Julia Brandl.
2- mixed-methods research designs
!summary
© Julia Brandl. 37
State of Prior Theory and Research
Intermediate
Research questions Proposed relationships between new and established constructs
Type of data collected Hybrid (both qualitative and quantitative)
Illustrative methods for collecting data
Interviews; observations; surveys; obtaining material from field sites relevant to the phenomena of interest
Constructs and measures Typically one or more new constructs and/or new measures
Goal of data analyses Preliminary or exploratory testing of new propositions and/or new constructs
Data analysis methods Content analysis, exploratory statistics, and preliminary tests
Theoretical contribution A provisional theory, often one that integrates previously separate bodies of work
2- mixed-methods research designs
!further topics
38
• Off-diagonal opportunities
• research goals: descriptive
• basic and applied
© Julia Brandl.
Other topics
!
off-diagonal opportunities
• A and B as risky design options –
possibly less compelling research but
also opportunities
© Julia Brandl. 39
(Edmondson & McManus, 2007, p. 1168)
!A - nascent theory & quantitative design
40
!From explanatory to exploratory
41
!
B – mature theory and qualitative design
• Research on self-managing teams
• What makes self-managed teams effective?
© Julia Brandl. 42
(Edmondson & McManus, 2007, p. 1160)
• Barker (1993)
• How do team members create and cope with the social pressures of self- management?
Switching the theoretical framework (‘reframing’) “A very general theoretical system with assumptions, concepts, and specific social theories.”
!descriptive research
© Julia Brandl. 43
“Research in which the primary purpose is to ‘paint a picture’ using
words or numbers and to present a profile, a classification of types, or
an outline of steps to answer questions such as who, when, where and
how.”
(Neuman, 2014, p 38)
!basic and applied research
© Julia Brandl. 44
• Basic research “Research designed to advance fundamental knowledge
about how the world works and build/test theoretical explanations by
focusing on the “why” question. The scientific community is its primary
audience.” (p.26)
• Applied research “Research designed to offer practical solutions to a
concrete problem or address the immediate and specific needs of
clinicians or practitioners.” (p.27)
(Neuman, 2014)
4- interventionist research designs
!practitioner and researcher orientations
© Julia Brandl. 45
(Saunders/Lewis/Thornhill, 2012, p.10)
Management researcher practitioner
Focus of interest • basic understanding • why knowledge • substantive theory
building
• usable knowledge • how to knowledge • practical problem solutions • local theory in use
Methodologal imperative
• theoretical & methodological rigor
• timeliness
Key outcome • academic publication • actionable results with practice impact
Views of other • distain of practitioner • desire to make a
different to practice
• ignore • belief research can provide
relevant fresh insights to managers‘ problems
4- interventionist research designs
!wrap-up research designs
© Julia Brandl. 47
decisions to be made in social
research
1. use and audience of research
2. goal/purpose of research
3. methods
4. analysis
(based on Neuman, 2014, p. 26)