Media/Website Evaluation
cactusjack1234
mediaevaluationgradingrubric.docx3043 Community Nutrition – Media Assignment (75-points) – Grading Rubric –
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
0-points
Websites (2.5-points) Were the websites from the approved list? Web addresses used
were included.
Yes.
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
No.
Summary #1 (20-points)
1. Interest in website stated.
2. Accuracy Addressed.
3. Authority Addressed.
4. Objective Addressed.
5. Is it Current?
6. “Coverage” appropriate.
7. Summary and eval based upon the above 5-characteristics.
8. Potential areas of bias.
9. What did you learn?
ALL information and points were addressed AND provided in thorough detail. Thoughts are very well organized, clear, and easy to read. Correct interpretation and evaluation
of website.
Most information was provided in detail and correct. Organization did not distract from readability. Evaluation of website correct. OR 8:9 points addressed.
All information was provided. Additional detail would have helped with organization and readability. OR 7:9 points addressed.
Basic information provided and/or minor parts missing. Organization fair. OR 6:9 points addressed.
Information missing and/or organization is poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 5:9 points addressed.
Section addressed, but incorrect information provided; and/or organization poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 4:9 points addressed.
Information is not provided. OR >3:9 points addressed.
Summary #2 (20-points)
1. Interest in website stated.
2. Accuracy Addressed.
3. Authority Addressed.
4. Objective Addressed.
5. Is it Current?
6. “Coverage” appropriate.
7. Summary and eval based upon the above 5-characteristics.
8. Potential areas of bias.
9. What did you learn?
ALL information and points were addressed AND provided in thorough detail. Thoughts are very well organized, clear, and easy to read. Correct interpretation and evaluation
of website.
Most information was provided in detail and correct. Organization did not distract from readability. Evaluation of website correct. OR 8:9 points addressed.
All information was provided. Additional detail would have helped with organization and readability. OR 7:9 points addressed.
Basic information provided and/or minor parts missing. Organization fair. OR 6:9 points addressed.
Information missing and/or organization is poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 5:9 points addressed.
Section addressed, but incorrect information provided; and/or organization poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 4:9 points addressed.
Information is not provided. OR >3:9 points addressed.
Summary #3 (20-points)
1. Interest in website stated.
2. Accuracy Addressed.
3. Authority Addressed.
4. Objective Addressed.
5. Is it Current?
6. “Coverage” appropriate.
7. Summary and eval based upon the above 5-characteristics.
8. Potential areas of bias.
9. What did you learn?
ALL information and points were addressed AND provided in thorough detail. Thoughts are very well organized, clear, and easy to read. Correct interpretation and evaluation
Most information was provided in detail and correct. Organization did not distract from readability. Evaluation of website correct. OR 8:9 points addressed.
All information was provided. Additional detail would have helped with organization and readability. OR 7:9 points
Basic information provided and/or minor parts missing. Organization fair. OR 6:9 points addressed.
Information missing and/or organization is poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 5:9 points
Section addressed, but incorrect information provided; and/or organization poor making it difficult to read and understand. OR 4:9 points addressed.
Information is not provided.
OR >3:9 points addressed.
addressed.
addressed.
of website.
Format (2.5-points)
Each review starts with its own page. Typed. Standard Font.
Double spaced.
Paper is appropriate length, font, double spaced, and format.
n/a
n/a
Paper is of appropriate length, but incorrect format and/or font are used.
n/a
n/a
n/a
No grammar and/or spelling errors.
A few minor, grammar and/or spelling errors that do not distract from reliability of the paper.
Several minor grammar and/or spelling errors. Errors slightly compromise readability of the paper.
Few major errors and/ or several minor grammar and/or spelling errors. Do not distract from readability of the paper.
Several major grammar and/or spelling errors. Errors distract from readability of the paper.
Spelling and grammar errors compromise ability to understand content and readability of the paper.
n/a
Spelling/Grammar (10-points)
Correct. High ease or reading.
Updated: 17-Aug-14; KLS
