Applied Sciences Assignment
Team Leadership Project Rubric (Online): 35 points (26 pts team project + 9 pts responses to three teams)
|
Points |
0-1 points |
2-3 points |
3-5 points |
|
Healthcare Problem and Background, Critics |
Chosen problem is somewhat clear
Provides some historical background
|
Chosen problem is clearly stated
Historical background is provided
Meets minimum requirement of root causes
|
Chosen problem is clearly stated
Historical background is provided
Meets minimum requirement of root causes, presents counterargument (from another perspective) to solution. |
|
Points |
0 points |
1-2 points |
3-4 points |
|
Agency/Organization
|
No agency or organization was identified
|
Agency or organization is selected
Mission is somewhat clear
|
Agency or organization is selected
Mission is clearly stated
Provides in-depth background on the organization |
|
Points |
0-4 points |
5-7 points |
8-10 points |
|
Leader |
Leader is selected
Little information on what he/she has done about the problem
Little analysis on leader’s skills using some class concepts
|
Leader is selected
Moderate information on what he/she has done about the problem
Moderate analysis on leader’s skills using some class concepts
Describes negative trait(s), but doesn’t give examples how to improve |
Leader is selected and clearly states how problem is managed
Describes negative trait(s) and gives recommendations how to improve based on concepts presented in class |
|
Points |
0 points |
1-2 point |
3-4 points |
|
References: APA format |
No references listed |
1-4 references listed, no citation of counterargument
The presentation makes some connection to course content and uses APA formatting for in-text citations and includes a reference list at the end. |
5+ references listed (1+ from counterargument)
The presentation includes a clear connection to course content and uses correct APA formatting for in-text citations and includes a reference list at the end. |
|
Points |
0 points |
1-2 point |
3 points |
|
Overall professionalism |
Presentation has many errors
Presentation length less than 3 minutes
Inappropriate language use |
Presentation has few errors
Presentation length was < 5 min. and > 8 min.
Student writes paragraphs and reads slides |
Presentation was error free
Presentation length was > 5 min. and < 8 min.
Student lists bullet points on slides and provides overview |
|
Average Peer Evaluation % |
Multiplied by total score |
|
|
|
Points |
0-3 points |
4-6 points |
7-9 points |
|
Discussion |
Response to 1 post, showed no understanding Book was not cited as support for comments in all posts
|
Response to 2 posts, showed some understanding Book was cited as support for comments in some posts
|
Response to 3 posts, showed good understanding Book was cited as support for comments in all posts
|
In a 400-level course, it is expected that projects:
· Cite sources using correct APA citation
· Use quotes when language is taken directly from resources (and cite correctly)
· Cite sources even when an idea from a resource is in your own words
· Clearly explain connections to course materials
Recording your presentation
You may record your presentation whatever way works best for your team. You may record it individually and put it together, give one person your slides/scripts and have one person record it, or have the whole team record on Zoom at the same time.
Leader Section
The leader section is worth the most points. This is where you want to spend the bulk of your time/effort. Please relate and give examples of leadership concepts, theories, assessments ideas learned in class. For example, please talk about 3 or more of the following when describing the traits of your leader. When discussion your leader’s negative trait(s), give examples of how to improve the negative trait using suggestions from the text, Maestro, or the assessments. Please cite where you found these concepts.
EQ, PI, True Colors
Values
Ethics/Integrity
Desire to make a change
Commitment
Cohesiveness/Collaboration
Conflict Management