Applied Sciences Assignment

profilesonia87
med450.docx

Team Leadership Project Rubric (Online): 35 points (26 pts team project + 9 pts responses to three teams)

Points

0-1 points

2-3 points

3-5 points

Healthcare Problem and Background, Critics

Chosen problem is somewhat clear

Provides some historical background

Chosen problem is clearly stated

Historical background is provided

Meets minimum requirement of root causes

Chosen problem is clearly stated

Historical background is provided

Meets minimum requirement of root causes, presents counterargument (from another perspective) to solution.

Points

0 points

1-2 points

3-4 points

Agency/Organization

No agency or organization was identified

Agency or organization is selected

Mission is somewhat clear

Agency or organization is selected

Mission is clearly stated

Provides in-depth background on the organization

Points

0-4 points

5-7 points

8-10 points

Leader

Leader is selected

Little information on what he/she has done about the problem

Little analysis on leader’s skills using some class concepts

Leader is selected

Moderate information on what he/she has done about the problem

Moderate analysis on leader’s skills using some class concepts

Describes negative trait(s), but doesn’t give examples how to improve

Leader is selected and clearly states how problem is managed

Shows an in-depth analysis of the leader’s skills citing a variety of class concepts (3+) Provides example of 1+ ethical behaviors

Describes negative trait(s) and gives recommendations how to improve based on concepts presented in class

Points

0 points

1-2 point

3-4 points

References: APA format

No references listed

1-4 references listed, no citation of counterargument

The presentation makes some connection to course content and uses APA formatting for in-text citations and includes a reference list at the end.

5+ references listed (1+ from counterargument)

The presentation includes a clear connection to course content and uses correct APA formatting for in-text citations and includes a reference list at the end.

Points

0 points

1-2 point

3 points

Overall professionalism

Presentation has many errors

Presentation length less than 3 minutes

Inappropriate language use

Presentation has few errors

Presentation length was < 5 min. and > 8 min.

Student writes paragraphs and reads slides

Presentation was error free

Presentation length was > 5 min. and < 8 min.

Student lists bullet points on slides and provides overview

Average Peer Evaluation %

Multiplied by total score

Points

0-3 points

4-6 points

7-9 points

Discussion

Response to 1 post, showed no understanding

Book was not cited as support for comments in all posts

Response to 2 posts, showed some understanding

Book was cited as support for comments in some posts

Response to 3 posts, showed good understanding

Book was cited as support for comments in all posts

In a 400-level course, it is expected that projects:

·       Cite sources using correct APA citation

·       Use quotes when language is taken directly from resources (and cite correctly)

·       Cite sources even when an idea from a resource is in your own words

·       Clearly explain connections to course materials

Recording your presentation

You may record your presentation whatever way works best for your team.  You may record it individually and put it together, give one person your slides/scripts and have one person record it, or have the whole team record on Zoom at the same time. 

Leader Section

The leader section is worth the most points.  This is where you want to spend the bulk of your time/effort.  Please relate and give examples of leadership concepts, theories, assessments ideas learned in class.  For example, please talk about 3 or more of the following when describing the traits of your leader. When discussion your leader’s negative trait(s), give examples of how to improve the negative trait using suggestions from the text, Maestro, or the assessments. Please cite where you found these concepts.

EQ, PI, True Colors

Values

Ethics/Integrity

Desire to make a change

Commitment

Cohesiveness/Collaboration

Conflict Management