Week 5 - Assess an Organization's Structure and Propose Changes

Report Information from ProQuest January 06 2018 20:02

Document 1 of 1

Measuring organic and mechanistic cultures Reigle, Ronda F . Engineering Management Journal : EMJ; Huntsville  Vol. 13, Iss. 4,  (Dec 2001): 3-8.

ProQuest document link

ABSTRACT  

Knowledge workers in today's high-technology organizations require environments with organic characteristics. To

retain highly skilled knowledge workers, managers need to determine whether their organizations exhibit organic

or mechanistic cultures. Culture is an important factor in successful technology implementation, innovation,

mergers, acquisitions, job satisfaction, organizational success, and team effectiveness. This paper discusses

organic and mechanistic organizational cultures and the organizational culture assessment (OCA) tool. The tool

gives an organization's culture type and a numerical score for each of 5 culture elements. Survey results indicate

that the OCA adequately measures organizational culture. FULL TEXT  

Headnote

Abstract

Headnote

Knowledge workers in today's high-technology organizations require environments with organic characteristics. To

retain highly skilled knowledge workers, managers need to determine whether their organizations exhibit organic

or mechanistic cultures. Culture is an important factor in successful technology implementation, innovation,

mergers, acquisitions, job satisfaction, organizational success, and team effectiveness. This article discusses

organic and mechanistic organizational cultures and the organizational culture assessment (OCA) tool. The tool

gives an organization's culture type and a numerical score for each of five culture elements. Survey results

indicate that the OCA adequately measures organizational culture.

Introduction

Some of the challenges that make organizational culture significant today include downsizing, budget cuts,

globalization, and the rapid rate of technological improvements. Kanter (1983) states that to manage change in an

organization requires that people find their stability and security in the culture and direction of the organization.

Studies show that the type of culture an organization exhibits affects employee retention. One study indicated that

new employees voluntarily stayed 14 months longer in cultures emphasizing interpersonal relationship values than

in cultures emphasizing work task values (Sheridan, 1992).

Denison performed a study indicating that companies with a participative culture reap a return on investment that

averages nearly twice as high as in firms with less efficient cultures (Denison, 1984). An effective organizational

culture is a key component influencing an organization's ability to compete and to succeed long term (Morris,

1992). Lack of insight into culture leaves managers vulnerable to forces of evolution and change which they may

not understand and which they may have difficulty controlling (Schein, 1992).

Existing organizational culture measurement tools measure one element of culture or certain organizational

characteristics. However, they are not based on all culture elements as defined in engineering management

literature.

The purpose of this study is to develop a tool to measure culture as defined by the leading authors in engineering

management literature. The OCA measures organizational culture and provides a five-dimensional score, one for

each of five culture elements.

Culture Definitions

Organizational culture is defined by numerous authors. Some of the significant definitions related to engineering

management are:

Ott (1989) and Westbrook (1993) define organizational culture as a function of language, artifacts and symbols,

patterns of behavior, basic underlying assumptions, and subcultures.

Culture is formally defined by Schein (1992, p. 12) as "a pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group

learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be

considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in

relation to those problems."

Ouchi (1981) states that organizational culture consists of a set of symbols, ceremonies, and myths that

communicate the underlying values and beliefs of an organization and its employees.

Rogers and Ferketish (1993) state that an organization's culture is based on the shared values reflected in the

behaviors of leaders and employees at every level. The answer to the question "What's important around here?"

provides positive or negative insight into what is valued in an organization.

Dyer (1985) describes organizational culture as artifacts, perspectives, values, and assumptions shared by

members of an organization. He defines artifacts as verbal (language, stories, myths), behavioral (rituals and

ceremonies), and physical (art, attire, layout, and technology). Perspectives are the socially shared rules and norms

applied in given situations. Values are the evaluations people make of situations, acts, objects, and people. They

represent the organization's goals, ideals, and standards. Assumptions are the implied beliefs that underlie the

overt artifacts, perspectives, and values.

Blake and Mouton (1969) describe corporate culture as the routine ways of doing things that people accept and

live by. Organizations have norms and values that influence how members conduct themselves. These norms may

prevent members from applying a maximum effort or may encourage them to do so.

Culture Elements. Based on the culture definitions above, along with others, an author matrix of common culture

elements was developed. The author matrix yielded the following five culture elements:

Language-The language of an organization communicates its culture (Westbrook, 1993). Examples of how

language is used in organizations include jargon, metaphors, myths, slogans, ceremonies and celebrations, and

heroes and heroines (Deal, 1985).

Tangible artifacts and symbols-Artifacts and symbols provide tangible evidence of the culture (Westbrook, 1993).

Artifacts are objects manufactured by people to facilitate culturally expressive activities (Trice and Beyer, 1984).

Symbols or company logos often summarize or condense what a company stands for (Deal, 1985).

Patterns of behavior, rites and rituals, behavioral norms-- Trice and Beyer (1984) define a ritual as a standardized,

detailed set of techniques and behaviors that manage anxieties but seldom produce intended, technical

consequences of practical importance.

Allen (1985) describes norms as encompassing all behavior that is expected, accepted, or supported by the group,

whether that behavior is stated or unstated. The norm is the sanctioned behavior, and people are rewarded and

encouraged when they follow the norms, and ostracized when they violate them. Schein (1992) defines group

norms as the implicit standards and values that evolve in working groups, such as the norm of "a fair day's work

for a fair day's pay" that evolved among workers in the bank wiring room in the Hawthorne studies.

Espoused values-Schein (1992) defines espoused values as the articulated, publicly announced principles and

values that the group claims to be trying to achieve, such as "product quality" or "price leadership."

Beliefs and underlying assumptions-Basic underlying assumptions of an organization are revealed in management

decisions, policies, and procedures. McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y describe management's underlying

assumptions about employees. Theory X managers assume the existence of only the culture that exists in top-

management circles. They believe employees' behavior must be directed, motivated, controlled, and modified by

management to prevent passivity. Theory Y managers recognize work group differences and understand that

different groups may have different subcultures. They believe their task lies in allowing employees to achieve their

own goals by directing their own best efforts toward organizational objectives (McGregor, 1960).

Organic and Mechanistic Characteristics. Burns and Stalker (1961) used the terms organic and mechanistic to

define organizational structure as shown in Exhibit 1.

Their studies identified that mechanistic structures are designed for stable environments while organic structures

are better suited for changing and innovative environments. Organic and Mechanistic Cultures. The terms organic

and mechanistic describe culture as well as organizational structure. Exhibit 2 shows organic and mechanistic

characteristics for each culture element.

Organizational Culture Assessment

The five culture elements and their definitions were used to develop the OCA. The OCA is a 45-question survey,

divided into five sections, one for each culture element. Each question in the survey is answered by marking one of

eight answers on a Likerttype scale with two possible answers in each of the following four categories: strongly

agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree.

The OCA score for an organization is determined by averaging the answers for all survey participants. The score

can range from 1.0 to 8.0. A score closer to 1.0 represents a mechanistic type of culture. A score closer to 8.0

represents an organic type of culture. A similar assessment can be made for each culture element.

Results

Thirty high-technology organizations were surveyed, with a total of 275 individual participants. Sixteen

organizations had sufficient data to perform analysis at the organizational level. Each survey participant

completed the OCA, the Likert Profile of Organizational Characteristics (POC-used for OCA validation), and a

demographics section. Exhibit 3 shows a graph of the OCA and Likert POC scores for the 16 organizations.

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

Reliability

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

A reliable survey is consistent in what it measures. The type of reliability used is internal consistency reliability.

Internal consistency uses a single survey to determine the degree to which the questions in the survey are

measuring the same thing. The methods used for measuring internal consistency are split-half reliability and

Cronbach's alpha.

Validity

A valid survey measures what it is intended to measure (Litwin, 1995). Concurrent validity is used to analyze

validity. Analyses were conducted on survey participants' opinion of the culture from the demographics form. An

examination ofthe organizations surveyed was also performed.

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

Concurrent Validity. Concurrent validity requires a survey have empirical association with some criterion or "gold

standard" (DeVellis, 1991). This requires identification of an established, generally accepted test (Litwin, 1995). A

high correlation coefficient between the survey and the standard test suggests good concurrent validity.

To validate the OCA, the results were compared to the Likert POC, Short-Like-Machine-Form (copyright 1978).

Rensis Likert Associates, Inc. is no longer in business. However, permission to use the Likert POC was granted by

Rensis Likert's daughter, Ms. Patricia Pohlman.

Likert describes an organizational theory of a continuum of four management systems (Likert and Likert, 1976).

System I is an exploitive authoritative system. Managers use threats and punishment for motivation. In System 2,

the benevolent authoritative system, managers use rewards along with punishment to motivate. In System 3, the

consultative system, managers use less punishment and more rewards and involvement as motivating techniques.

In System 4, the participative group system, managers use high levels of group involvement and group-developed

reward systems to motivate.

The POC can determine where organizations fall in the Likert System 1 to 4 continuum. The version of the survey

used consists of 16 questions on an eight-point scale. The POC version used is divided into the following six

sections: leadership, motivation, communication, decisions, goals, and control. The POC measures slightly

different aspects of culture than the OCA, however, it has been extensively used to measure organizational

characteristics and was considered similar enough to the OCA to be of use.

The correlation between the OCA data and the Likert POC data is .95 (Exhibit 5). An analysis of variance produced

a significant F-value of .000, indicating that the OCA and the Likert POC are related. Analysis of the residuals

indicated the errors are normally distributed and that the order of the model is correct. The high correlation and the

ANOVA indicate that the OCA has high concurrent validity.

Participant Culture Opinion. An additional analysis was performed to further validate the OCA. The participants'

culture opinions of their organizations were collected in the demographics section of the survey. They were asked

whether their organization was viewed as very negative, negative, neutral, positive, or very positive. The

organizations surveyed were high technology, so a very negative culture opinion corresponds to a mechanistic

culture (low OCA score) and a very positive culture corresponds to an organic culture (high OCA score). The culture

opinion was converted to a five-point scale, where 1 represents a very negative culture opinion and 5 represents a

very positive culture opinion.

Exhibit 6 shows a comparison of the organization OCA scores to the culture opinions. The figure shows the OCA

scores resemble the culture opinions for each organization surveyed. The correlation between the OCA scores and

the culture opinion is .82. Therefore, it can be concluded that culture opinion is related to the OCA score and this

relationship further validates the OCA.

Organization Analysis. Another way to analyze the validity of the OCA is to examine the organizations surveyed.

The organizations with OCA results in the organic range also happen to have reputations for being innovative,

flexible, and having loose organizational structures. The management of one of the organic organizations used the

survey results to implement changes, improving an already organic score. The organization's administrator

indicated management's intent to use the survey throughout the organization to examine and improve the culture.

On the other hand, organizations scoring in the mechanistic range of the OCA have reputations for being

bureaucratic, rigid, and rules oriented. Many are government organizations and government support contractors.

No reports of the survey being used to study or improve these organizations' cultures were received.

Culture Types

The OCA data were analyzed to determine whether it falls into groups. The data appeared to fall into four subsets

(Mechanistic, Mechanistic-Organic, Organic-Mechanistic, and Organic) as shown in Exhibit 7.

The boxplot for the four culture types is shown in Exhibit 8. The plot shows that the medians of the culture types

differ.

A one-way analysis of variance was performed to test the hypothesis that all the culture type means are equal. The

observed significance level is .000, so the null hypothesis that all the means are equal is rejected. Therefore, there

is a significant difference in the culture type means. A Levene test for homogeneity of variances was performed to

determine whether the group variances are equal. The significance level is .538. Since the significance level is

large, the null hypothesis that the variances are equal cannot be rejected. Therefore, the assumptions required for

the ANOVA have not been violated.

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

TheANOVA does not indicate which means are significantly different from each other. Therefore, a Duncan's

multiple range test was run to compare all possible pairs of means. The results of the Duncan's multiple range test

with a significance level of .05 indicate that each pair of means differs significantly (Exhibit 9). Based on the test

results, it can be concluded that the culture type model is adequate.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The intent of this study was to develop an instrument to measure organizational culture. Data was collected from

275 participants from 30 organizations. The results of the analysis show evidence that (1) the OCA is a reliable

survey and is valid for measuring organizational culture, and (2) there are four types of organizational culture.

Implementing the OCA. Managers in high-technology organizations should perform investigations using the OCA

to determine whether their organizations have organic or mechanistic cultures. When the results are tabulated,

managers will have an overall OCA score for their organization, as well as a score for each of the five culture

elements. Managers should then decide whether the score is appropriate for their environment.

Culture Type Change Initiatives. If there is a need to change the culture type, responses to individual survey

questions can be examined and initiatives implemented in an attempt to improve the culture score. Although the

following ideas are not part of the research, some examples of change initiatives are shown below:

* Minimize the use of jargon

* Refrain from using derogatory terms for management, nonmanagement, and customers

* Praise employees for going to extremes to get the job done

* Managers should have an open-door policy

* Managers and non-managers should dress similarly

* Employees should have comfortable work areas with updated computer equipment

* Celebrate work accomplishments

* Managers should focus on work performance rather than office hours

* Managers should encourage employees to be open-minded and work together to solve problems

* Managers should focus on quality of work instead of quantity of work

* Managers should encourage innovative ideas and quickly adapt new technologies

* Managers should praise good performance and offer training opportunities

* Managers should provide support to employees to reach organizational goals

* Managers should assume that employees are responsible, capable, and vital organizational assets

* Decision-making should be pushed down to lower levels in the organization.

After initiatives have been implemented, then the OCA should be administered again. This post-initiative study can

be used to determine the impact of the change initiatives.

As technology continues to expand throughout the world, an organic organizational culture will become

increasingly important. In order for organizations to compete in the marketplace, a strong emphasis must be

placed on developing a clear understanding of organizational culture and its impact on employees and

organizational success.

Enlarge this image.

Enlarge this image.

References

References

References

Allen, Robert E, "Four Phases for Bringing about Cultural Change," in Ralph H. Kilmann, Mary J. Saxton, Roy Serpa,

and Associates (eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture, Jossey-Bass (1985), pp. 332-350.

Blake, Robert R., and Jane S. Mouton, Building a Dynamic Corporation Through Grid Organizational Development,

Addison-Wesley (1969).

Burns, Tom, and George M. Stalker, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock Publications (1961).

Deal, Terrence E., "Cultural Change: Opportunity, Silent Killer, or Metamorphosis?" In Ralph H. Kilmann, Mary J.

Saxton, Roy

References

Serpa, and Associates (eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture, Jossey-Bass (1985), pp. 292-331.

Denison, Daniel R., "Bringing Corporate Culture to the Bottom Line," Organizational Dynamics, 13:2 (Autumn 1984),

pp. 522.

DeVellis, Robert F., Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume

26, Sage Publications (1991).

Dyer, W. Gibb, Jr., "The Cycle of Cultural Evolution in Organizations," In Ralph H. Kilmann, Mary J. Saxton, Roy

Serpa, and Associates (eds.), Gaining Control of the Corporate Climate, Jossey-Bass (1985), pp. 200-229.

Kanter, Rosabeth M., The Change Masters, Simon and Schuster (1983).

References

Likert, Rensis, and Jane G Likert, New Ways of Managing Conflict, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1976).

Litwin, Mark S.,How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity, Sage Publications (1995).

McGregor, Douglas M., The Human Side of Enterprise, McGrawHill Book Company (1960).

Morris, Richard M., III, "Effective Organizational Culture is Key to

References

a Company's Long-Term Success," Industrial Management, 34:2 (March/April 1992), pp. 28-29.

Ott, J. Steven, Organizational Culture and Perspective, Richard D. Irwin Company (1989).

Ouchi, William, Theory Z, Addison-Wesley (1981).

Rogers, Robert W., and B. Jean Ferketish, "Value-Driven Change Process," Executive Excellence, 10:3 (March 1993),

pp. 5-6. Schein, Edgar H., Organizational Culture and Leadership, JosseyBass (1992), p. 12.

Sheridan, John E., "Organizational Culture and Employee Retention," Academy ofManagement Journal 35:5

(December 1992), pp. 1036-1056.

StatSoft Electronic Textbook, Internet page at URL: www.statsoft.com/textbook/streliab.html (version current

June 12,2000).

Trice, Harrison M., and Janice M. Beyer, "Studying Organizational Cultures Through Rites and Ceremonials,"

Academy of Management Review, 94 (October 1984), pp. 653-669.

Westbrook, Jerry D., "Organizational Culture and Its Relationship to TQM," Industrial Management, 35:1

(January/February 1993), pp. 1-3.

AuthorAffiliation

Ronda F Reigle, United States Army Aviation and Missile Command

AuthorAffiliation

About the Author

AuthorAffiliation

Ronda Reigle received her M.S. in industrial engineering from TexasA&M University. She holds a B.S. in mechanical

engineering from the University of Kentucky. She is currently a reliability engineer for the U.S. Army Aviation and

Missile Command. She is completing her dissertation for a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering and

engineering management at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Contact: Ronda Reigle, USA AMCOM, AMSAM-RD-- SE-RA-MS, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898; phone: 256-313-- 6005;

[email protected] DETAILS

Subject: Studies; Corporate culture; Organizational structure; Measurement

Location: United States US

Classification: 9130: Experimental/theoretical; 2500: Organizational behavior; 9190: United States

Publication title: Engineering Management Journal: EMJ; Huntsville

Volume: 13

Issue: 4

Pages: 3-8

Number of pages: 6

Publication year: 2001

Publication date: Dec 2001

Publisher: Taylor &Francis Ltd.

Place of publication: Huntsville

Country of publication: United Kingdom

Publication subject: Engineering

ISSN: 10429247

CODEN: EMJOEH

Source type: Scholarly Journals

Language of publication: English

Document type: Feature

ProQuest document ID: 208951788

Document URL: http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/208951788?accountid=28180

LINKS Check Article Linker for full-text, Click here to request the full text article

Copyright: Copyright American Society for Engineering Management Dec 2001

Last updated: 2016-07-23

Database: ProQuest Central

Bibliography Citation style: APA 6th - American Psychological Association, 6th Edition

Ronda, F. R. (2001). Measuring organic and mechanistic cultures. Engineering Management Journal, 13(4), 3-8.

Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/208951788?accountid=28180

Database copyright  2018 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Contact ProQuest