Telecommunication Engineering Assignment Help
Assignment 1 and Submission Guidelines
School School of Information Technology and Engineering
Course Name Master of Engineering (Telecommunications)
Unit Code ME606
Unit Title Digital Signal Processing
Assessment Author
A/Prof Johnson I Agbinya
Assessment Type Assignment 1(Individual)
Assessment Title Image Decimation and Interpolation Using Discrete Transforms
Unit Learning Outcomes covered in this assessment
a., c., d.
Weight 10%
Total Marks 100
Word/page limit 10
Release Date Week 4
Due Date Week 8
Submission Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
The assignment must be in MS Word format, single line spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style for School of Business and School of Information Technology and Engineering respectively.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly through the AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures- and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
© MIT/SITE | ME606 Digital Signal Processing Laboratory Exercise 4 Page 2 of 4
ME606 Assessment 1
1 Introduction The objective of this assessment is for each student to undertake investigative review of literature and
study the techniques for image analysis using a discrete transform. A significant number of discrete
transforms may be used for image analysis including the discrete cosine, discrete sine, discrete Fourier
transform, Walsh and Hadamard transforms. This assessment is limited to the application of only one
of these transforms.
2 Part A: Review of Image Decimation and Interpolation
Algorithms The techniques a.k.a. algorithms for image and video analysis are well published and investigated by
engineers. Image analysis find applications in mobile communication devices (eg. handsets), the
Internet and in normal mobile communication services. To understand how discrete transforms are
used for the specific process of image size reduction (size reduction) and expansion (interpolation),
undertake a detailed review of algorithms for image interpolation using the following transforms:
Discrete cosine transform (DCT) and fast Fourier transform (FFT). You will find a reasonable number
of good publications in the IEEEXplore in the Library. Describe the methods using the DCT and FFT.
Compare and contrast the various methods in use in a written report of not less than four (4) A4 pages
with single line spacing length. Do not use the Wikipedia for this assessment.
3 Part B: Image Decimation and Interpolation Using Matlab Through your review of image interpolation and decimation algorithms in journal articles, undertake
the analysis specified below and provide a written report. Add this report to Part A report and include
how you decimated and interpolated your image using the discrete cosine transform.
Matlab provides functions and commands which allow you to decimate and interpolate images.
Discrete cosine transform (DCT) is in many ways similar to the fast Fourier transform with one major
exception. The DCT provides real coefficients as outputs while the FFT coefficients are complex
numbers. The following equation describes the forward DCT for an image in one dimension:
1
0
1 22 cos
N
n
n
n k X k x
N N
Where n
x are pixels taken from an image and N is the number of pixels being transformed. There are
various forms of the DCT and you should identify and review them too. Since an image is a two-
dimensional matrix consisting of rows and columns, the DCT need to be applied row and column wise.
© MIT/SITE | ME606 Digital Signal Processing Laboratory Exercise 4 Page 3 of 4
It does not matter if you undertake the DCT along the rows first or along the columns first, the results
will be the same.
a) Perform the DCT of the image given to you (use Matlab). Show your algorithm and its Matlab source
code. Decimate the image by half by keeping only the first quarter of the two-dimensional coefficients
returned by Matlab and display the interpolated image in your report. You will be required to
demonstrate how this code runs to your unit lecturer and tutor in class.
b) Show how you will use the inverse DCT for interpolation to give an output image of the same size
as the input image. The decimated image and the interpolated image should be visibly displayed in
your report. Compare the original full-size and the interpolated images and comment on your results.
What are the major advantages and disadvantages for interpolating images using the DCT method?
4 Format of Report Your report should be in three parts: Part I, literature review report; Part II (Decimation) of your image
showing that your Matlab code works and Part III (Interpolation) of the decimated image showing the
algorithm used and the Matlab code as well. Your report should have a reference list at the end of the
report. The report should not be more than 10 A4 pages long (11 point font size using Calibri font
type).
Marking criteria Part I, II and III: Marks are allocated as follows:
Section to be
included in the report
Description of the section Marks
Literature Review Review analysis of image decimation and interpolation using
discrete transforms and Fourier transform
30
Image decimation Working Matlab code for image decimation, demonstration of
working code and presentation
25
Image interpolation Working Matlab code for image decimation demonstration of
working code and presentation
25
Reference style Correct IEEE referencing 10
Poor writing Poor writing style, not putting captions and figure numbers, not
numbering equations, copy and pasting of figures without
referencing them, inability to explain concepts, wrong grammar
and typographical errors will lead to loss of marks.
10
Plagiarism Type of plagiarism
- Copying of Matlab codes
- Copy of other peoples works and journal articles
- Contract cheating
-100%
© MIT/SITE | ME606 Digital Signal Processing Laboratory Exercise 4 Page 4 of 4
Marking Rubric for Exercise Answers Grade Mark
HD 80%+
D 70%-79%
CR 60%-69%
P 50%-59%
Fail < 50%
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Evaluation
Logic is clear and easy
to follow with strong
arguments
Consistency logical and
convincing
Mostly consistent
and convincing
Adequate cohesion and
conviction
Argument is
confused and
disjointed
Sophistication and effectivity
The presented solution
demonstrated an
extreme degree of
sophistication
The presented solution
demonstrated a high
degree of sophistication
The presented
solution
demonstrated an
average degree of
sophistication and
effectivity to
secure
The presented solution
demonstrated a low
degree of sophistication
and effectivity to secure
The presented
solution
demonstrated a poor
degree of
sophistication and
effectivity to secure
Explanation
All elements are
present and well
integrated.
Components present
with good cohesion
Components
present and mostly
well integrated
Most components
present Lacks structure.
Reference style
Clear styles with
excellent source of
references.
Clear referencing/ style Generally good
referencing/style
Unclear
referencing/style
Lacks consistency
with many errors
Report structure
and report
presentation
Proper writing.
Professionally
presented
Properly written, with
some minor
deficiencies
Mostly good, but
some structure or
presentation
problems
Acceptable
presentation
Poor structure,
careless presentation
The End