Assignment 79
COURSE Project (25%)
2020-2021
Basic Mechanics-I
ME-270
Fall 2020
Course Project Guidelines
ME270: Design of Steel Truss Bridge
Dr. Ahmed Al-Makky
Dr. Saleh Mohmoud
Dr. Sherif Said
[Project Weight: 25%]
Semester: Fall
2020 - 2021
I. Introduction
II. Learning Outcomes
III. Project Files
IV. Project Summary (Scenario)
V. Deliverables & Project Management
VI. Plagiarism
VII. Marking Scheme
I. Introduction
The ME270 project is intended to demonstrate students’ ability to create mechanical designs
using the theories learnt in the class. In this particular project, the students are required to design
a steel truss highway bridge using West Point Bridge Designer software (available for free).
The challenge is that the students need to design a bridge strong enough to support a truck
weighing the 225 kN (two lanes) at the minimum possible cost. The bridge must have the
following specs.
Arch type
Bridge span (length) is 40 m
No peers allowed
No cables allowed
The appropriate design is the one that is able to support the truck weight successfully and be at
the minimum possible cost. To accomplish this task, the students have to decide among many
alternatives (minimum three designs are required) such as type of material, elements size, type
of the abatement, etc.
Once satisfied with the design, the students need to select two of most critical elements and
conduct hand calculations using the methods learnt in the class (Section and Joints). These
obtained results should be then compared with the software calculations and comments are
made for any discrepancies.
Group Size: 2 students
II. Learning Outcomes
ABET ( A-F), refer to the syllabus for the details
Basic Mechanics I Learning outcomes, refer to the syllabus for the details
Specific Learning Outcomes:
Ability to apply theoretical knowledge in ‘real work’ project
Ability to create mathematical models of real life situations and apply reasonable assumptions to come up with an acceptable solution.
Ability to present findings in clear and concise manner
Ability to draw meaningful conclusions Files associated with the project are posted on Moodle
Software useful tutorial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfZOkCK24qs
III. Project Summary (Scenario)
Imagine that you are a mechanical engineer working for a road construction company. Your
manager has given you the task of designing arch type steel truss bridge in one of the highways
to be constructed by the company. You have been given the freedom to design the bridge in
anyway like provided that the bridge is strong enough to support a truck weighs 225 kN and
that cost is kept as low as possible.
IV. Deliverables & Project Management
Deliverable Deadline Method of Delivery Grade
Allocated
D1
Short report includes abstract, introduction
related to the all types of bridges with more
emphasis on truss bridges. Introduction of
West Point Bridge Designer software.
(maximum, 5 pages including the cover
page)
W7 –
Midnight
Dec. 8th
Upload report on
Moodle on the
specified link
2.5%
D2
Final report which includes in addition to
items mentioned above, final results,
discussion, conclusion, and references. The
report contains the following:
Identification for all givens, constraints
and criteria (problem statement).
Your West Point Bridge design showing
a print out of the bridge itself and the
software calculations
other alternative designs (three designs
minimum) using the software.
Your hand calculations for two of most
critical truss members (Joints and
Sectoins).
Comparison between your hand
calculations and software calculations.
Discussion for the following:
- The reason of your choice of the best
design (cost, strength, etc.).
- Why there is a difference between
hand calculations and software
calculation?
- What is the systematic approach to
reduce cost?
W14-
Midnight
Jan. 26th
Upload update report
on Moodle on the
specified link (Turnitin
submission)
12.5%
D3
Final Presentation ( .PPT to be upload on
Moodle)
W15
PowerPoint
presentation uploaded
on Moodle and
presented in the class
10%
Total 25%
V. Plagiarism
Reference to the students’ handbook.
VI. Marking Scheme
Deliverable 100% 85% 75% 60%
D1
Well written initial
report includes all
elements mentioned
in D1 above
Initial report includes
all items but lacks
clarity
Initial report lacks
clarity and missing
one element
Initial report lacks
clarity and missing
two items
100% 85% 75% 60%
D2 (refer to
table in last
page)
Updated D1 report
includes -
very neat design and
- lowest cost
compared to other
class sections
-Accurate hand
calculations
- Well written report
includes all the
required elements
Updated report
includes -
very neat design and
- 2nd lowest cost
compared to other
class sections
-Accurate hand
calculations.
- satisfactorily written
report includes all the
elements
Updated report
includes -
neat design and
- 3rd lowest cost
compared to other
class sections
-Accurate hand
calculations
- Poorly written
report includes some
of the elements
Updated report
includes
- acceptable design
and
- 4th lowest cost
compared to other
class sections
-hand calculations
with some mistake
- Very weak report
100% 85% 75% 60%
D3
excellent
presentation
good presentation acceptable
presentation
Weak presentation