Who ready for COACHING SUCCESS STRATEGIES ?
Assignment #3 – COACHING SUCCESS STRATEGIES
1. Name specific strategies that enhance the coaching success of female athletes today. Using the panel discussions from the What Drives Winning videos, use this as a starting point for your thoughts.
Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length. Please follow APA format and include a reference page.
Resources that can be (suggestion) used:
Video:
STARTING THE CONVERSATION
On June 11th, 2015, a diverse and accomplished lineup of speakers gathered at the first What Drives Winning Conference. They shared energizing presentations and revealed ways to develop character (moral and performance skills) that actually create better people, better players, and thus, better results. Buy the book and view the videos below!
· Some of the discussions include:
The Truth About Achievement - Panel
Fear and Failure – Sue Enquist / Whiplash Review
Winning Championships. Building People. – Tim Walton – Softball
Grading Character – Anson Dorrance – Women’s Soccer
Rubric for Enhancing Coaching Success (Assignment #3)
|
Criteria |
Needs Work (0-17 pts.) |
Average (18-19 pts.) |
Accomplished (20-22 pts.) |
Exemplary (23-25 pts.) |
Points Earned (200 Total) |
|
Clearly defined understanding of videos and thoughts shared with the coaches. |
Did not describe |
Confusing or unclear description
|
Appropriate description. |
Thorough and engaging description using high level writing skills. |
/25 pts |
|
Depth in your description of each idea/thought of plans for your own organization. |
Did not describe |
Confusing or unclear description
|
Appropriate description. |
Thorough and engaging description using high level writing skills. |
/25 pts |
|
Interesting and relative topics/dates. New information for the class. Good connection with references. |
Did not explain |
Confusing or unclear explanation
|
Appropriate explanation. |
Thorough and engaging explanation using high level writing skills. |
/25 pts |
|
Writing style and language mechanics – follow APA format. |
A clear sense of direction is lacking; material presented is not effectively organized; Frequent errors in word use, spelling, grammar, punctuation ,and word choice; not acceptable for graduate level work |
Material is somewhat general or vague, supporting information is not evident, paragraphs structured satisfactorily; Errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, or punctuation that demonstrate a lack of proofreading |
Main ideas and purpose are evident, supporting information is incorporated, overall presentation fits together well; Nearly error free, evidence of conscientious attention to conventions of writing |
Clear communication, of process and critique;, logical sequence, strong supporting information effectively presented, smooth transitions, engaging to reader; Error-free, reflects careful effort, clear grasp of writing conventions and thorough proofreading |
/25 pts |
|
|
Total |
/100 pts |