Voice Of Customer
MBA 715‐Week 5
Preeti Gopalani
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Discussion Question: What do you see as the relationship between Giving Voice to Values and Sustainability?
1
Giving Voice to Values(GVV)
• What would I say and to whom? How to say it?
• What are the typical objections or arguments?
• What will my response be to those arguments?
• How can I be the most effective in acting on values?
When I face conflicts to my values
GVV starts with recognizing that people possess values and ethics. And normally, many will encounter value
conflicts in their careers when the way people want to live and the things they want to accomplish seem to
conflict with the expectations of various stakeholders. In these situations, they want to choose to act on their
values and would like to have the ability to voice their value successfully and effectively. People have the
potential to act on and express those values, however, often remain silent. Mary Gentile’s goal in creating
Giving Voice to Values (GVV) is to help individuals learn to recognize, clarify, speak, and act on their values
when conflicts arise.
The GVV program is based on the research that practice makes perfect. It focuses on scripting, creating
ethical action plans, and practicing the script, which builds the skills, and confidence to voice their values.
Practicing what to say develops a habit of voicing values (“ethical muscle memory”). The GVV approach
includes:
An emphasis on self‐assessment and understanding of one’s strengths. This leads to understanding one’s core values and purpose and is helpful when looking for a way to align one's individual sense of
purpose with that of an organization.
Opportunities to construct practice responses to frequently heard reasons and rationalizations for not acting on one's values
Positive examples of times when people have found ways to voice and thereby implement their values in the workplace.
Learning to provide peer feedback and coaching to enhance effectiveness. Communicating our values, by using the style with which we are most skilled and comfortable with, will
most likely enable us to speak up.
2
Consider what is at stake for others as opposed to focusing exclusively on our own needs and desires. Objections, arguments, and justifications for not acting ethically will always be encountered. Identifying
these arguments and developing responses to counter them will build confidence to act in effective
ways.
2
Giving Voice to Values(GVV)
To develop the ability to face challenges in the form of reasons and rationalizations
What are the arguments? What are the reasons and rationalizations you need to address?
What’s at stake for others, including those who disagree with you
What levers can you use to influence those who disagree with you?
What is your most powerful and persuasive response? To whom it should be made? When and in what context?
Identifying the stakeholders and potential inhibiting arguments and rationalizations in advance helps us to
recognize them when we encounter them and to understand the way of thinking that produces them. This
provides an opportunity to script our responses and practice those responses.
Common arguments/rationalization examples encountered in values conflict include:
Expected or Standard Practice: “Everyone does this, so it’s really standard practice. It’s even expected.” Materiality: “The impact of this action is not material. It doesn’t really hurt anyone.” Locus or Responsibility: “This is not my responsibility; I’m just following orders here.” Locus of Loyalty: “I know this isn’t quite fair to the customer, but I don’t want to hurt my
reports/team/boss/company.”
Some examples of patterns of reasoning and levers can identify over time and include: Thinking in the long run was well as the short run. Considering the situation in terms of the group and the firm’s wider purpose, rather than in terms of the
immediate transaction alone. Positioning oneself as agents of “continuous improvement” as opposed to the source of complaint. Consider who we need and can attract as an ally in our efforts Considering the costs to each affected party and looking for ways to recognize and mitigate these in order
to make our arguments more appealing. Assuming our audience members are rationalists and are looking for ways to make it feasible for them to
the right thing.
3
Ethical Values/Issues What & How do I say?
Define Purpose & Acknowledge Choice
Identify Stakeholders
Voice/Communicate Self Assess
Scripting & Practicing
Anticipate conflicts & arguments
GVV Process/Pillars
Keep it going/improvement
Put plan in place
CSR Guideline for getting started
Engage others and gather support
Where you want to go Understand where
you are now
Relationships between Giving Voice to Value and Sustainability
Understanding risks
‘Never doubt that a small band of caring and committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has’ —Margaret Mead page 401 of The Sustainable MBA, Giselle Weybrecht
To be successful in the long term, these sustainability values must be embedded at all levels of the
organization. Sustainability generally starts in an organization with a suggestion or demand from the CEO, or
one of the stakeholders of the organization. It usually starts when an individual starts exploring an idea based
on one’s own values, that would perhaps bring social and environmental change from within any company or
at any level. This entails collecting information and understanding where the company is at and where it
should be to be socially responsible. It requires identifying the different stakeholders who would be affected
with these choices, engaging with them, and gathering their support and aligning your values with that of the
business that is looking at the way to embed sustainability goals across all functions. It requires understanding
the risks, answering any arguments or rationalizations against implementation. After an action plan is agreed
upon, and put in place, efforts need to be continued to bring improvements by continuous evaluation and
feedback.
As it can be seen from the above discussion, to be successful on its journey, communicating effectively at
every level is key—at the start, during and after the plan has been embed.
GVV with its process of learning to solve the problems of how to speak up for your values can be applied to
sustainability. It is concerned with implementation of the conversations about our values and focus is on
building skill in voicing those values. An individual interested to bring sustainability issues to the forefront can
seek guidance from GVV on how to they can use their voice to bring focus on the CSR. It’s acceptance of
presence arguments and addressing them by scripting, practicing would enable individuals to communicate
effectively when rationalizations and objections to the change resulting from bringing in sustainability are
raised.
4
An instance where GVV can be applied is where one of the arguments is regarding the question of
“responsibility” and rationalization against the sustainability process (sustainability is often voluntary) is that
‘This is not my responsibility; I am just following orders here.” GVV concept teaches to accept that presence of
such arguments is normal and prepares the individual to be ready to be able to face such a situation. We can
pre‐script our response as we know that this means the problem is already being acknowledged. The best way
to respond is to not argue that it’s their responsibility but rather to engage them to come up with ways in
which the situation might be effectively addressed and how CSR strategy can be embedded in the job.
Motivating people may be easier with logic and rational thought. This could be the first step toward engaging
others in the organization to bring a change.
Source: How to act on your values, with Giving Voice to Values founder, Mary Gentile ‐ Young Leaders of the Americas Initiative (state.gov), Jewellel Saunders
4