Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity

Assessment 3 Information

Subject Code: MBA502

Subject Name: Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity

Assessment Title:

Individual Reflections

Assessment Type:

Two Individual In-Class Activities Reflection One (Week 6) Reflection Two (Week 12)

Word Count: Reflection One (500 words) (+/-10%) Reflection Two (1000 words)

Weighting: Reflection One (15%) Reflection Two (25%)

Total Marks: 40

Submission: Reflection One and Reflection Two will be submitted as Two documents in week 13. Reflection 1 via Moodle, Reflection 2 via Turnitin

Due Date: Reflection One (In-Class Activity) based on the Industry Speaker - Week 6 Reflection Two (In-Class Activity) – Week 12 Submission of both Reflections on Monday, Week 13 @11.55pm

Your Task To create TWO (2) individual reflections that apply the Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity theories and concepts that have been covered in the subject. Both reflections will be conducted as in-class activities.

Assessment Description An important part of undertaking postgraduate study, is that you actively reflect on what you’ve been learning and how you could apply it to assist your own professional development and/or future career. Reflection One will be conducted in-class in Week 6 and will be based on the Industry Guest Speaker, linking the theory and the application to the hallmarks of an Emotional Intelligent Leader covered in topics to date. You will be asked to identify and critically discuss 3 points covered by the guest speaker that you found most relevant to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader covered in Week 5. Attendance at this class is a requirement in order to complete the assessment. Discussions, participation and self-analysis activities will be conducted in class and will form the basis of your reflection. You will submit this Reflection in Week 13 at 11.55pm (via Turnitin), as part of your final reflection. Reflection Two will be conducted in Week 12 and will give you the opportunity to reflect on how to improve in your professional life. This reflection will give you the opportunity to explore the first two tenants of Conscious Capitalism from week 10 (Higher Purpose and Stakeholder Orientation) and your two top Core Virtues from week 11 (Cognitive Core Virtues, Emotional Core Virtues, Interpersonal Core Virtues, Core Virtue of Justice, Core Virtue of Temperance and Core Virtue of Transcendence). You must include a minimum of 4 academic references to support your statements.

Attendance at this class is a requirement in order to complete the assessment. Discussions, participation and self-analysis activities will be conducted in class. You will then be required to upload your final submission (Reflection One and Reflection Two) on Monday, Week 13 at 11.55pm. Assessment Instructions In order to complete these in-class reflections, you are required to attend classes in Week 6 and in Week 12. To assist you in developing your reflections, you should be writing weekly diary notes recording your experiences (both positive and negative), on the topics and discussions.

Please refer to the Assessment Marking Guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria.

Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.

Assessment Marking Guide (Reflection One)

Criterion Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-00%) Identification of at least three (3) the core concepts discussed by the speaker

(6 Marks)

No identification of three (3) core concepts or demonstrated understanding of the core concepts discussed by the speaker. No clear links to the theories/concepts in the subject

Student has provided a limited identification of the core concepts (less than 3). Limited demonstrated understanding of the core concepts discussed by the speaker and how it links to the theories/concepts in the subject

Student has clearly identified three (3) core concepts. Good demonstrated understanding of the core concepts discussed and how it links to the theories/concepts in the subject.

Student has very clearly identified three (3) core concepts. Very good demonstrated understanding of the topic discussed and how it links to the theories/concepts in the subject

Student has done more than just identified three (3) core concepts and has demonstrated an excellent understanding of the topic discussed and how it links to the theories/concepts in the subject

Critical analysis of how the core concepts link to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader (6 Marks)

No analysis of how the core concepts link to hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader.

Limited analysis of how the core concepts link to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader.

A good level of analysis of how the core concepts link to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader.

A very detailed level of analysis of how the core concepts link to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader

An excellent and very detailed level of analysis of how the core concepts link to the hallmarks of the five components of emotional intelligent leader

Academic structure, presentation, and referencing (3 Marks)

The academic structure, presentation and referencing was poor and failed to meet the minimum standards of postgraduate study.

The academic structure, presentation and referencing was sufficient but major improvements needed.

The academic structure, presentation and referencing was good but could have been more comprehensive.

The academic structure, presentation and referencing was very good but there is scope for some improvement.

The academic structure, presentation and referencing was of exceptionally high standard.

Assessment Marking Guide (Reflection Two)

Criterion Fail (0-49%) Pass (50-64%) Credit (65-74%) Distinction (75-84%) High Distinction (85-00%) Self-Analysis and Reflective Practices

(5 Marks)

The student has not demonstrated any selfanalysis or reflective practices or has not discussed them with enough substance.

The student has demonstrated the use of some self-analysis or reflective practices but hasn’t conducted the analysis required of a postgraduate subject.

The student has demonstrated the use of interesting self-analysis or reflective practices, but more clarity is required

The student has demonstrated the detailed use of self-analysis or reflective practices throughout.

The student hasn’t just demonstrated more than just the application of selfanalysis or reflective practices thoroughly and in detail.

Demonstrated use and application of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism (8 Marks)

No use or application of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism

Only limited use or application of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism

The student has demonstrated a good understanding and application of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism

The student has demonstrated a detailed understanding and application of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism

The student has demonstrated more than just an understanding of the issues of the tenants of Conscious Capitalism

Demonstrated use and application of at least two top Core Virtues

(8 Marks)

No critical analysis use or application of two core virtues

Limited critical analysis use or application of two core virtues. They are not convincing or well connected.

The critical analysis, use or application of two core virtues, some improvement but there is a solid attempt at linking the ideas.

The critical analysis use or application of two core virtues are of high standard but would be more convincing if worded more clearly

There is no doubt, that the critical analysis, use or application two core virtues are of an exceptionally high standard

Academic structure, presentation, use of at least 4 academic references using correct referencing style (4 Marks)

The academic structure was poor and failed to meet the minimum standards of postgraduate study. Use at least 4 academic references are missing or incomplete, with no/limited integration Incorrect referencing style

The academic structure was sufficient but major improvements needed. Some use of the 4 academic references but major improvements needed in integration Referencing style inconsistent

The academic structure was good but could be more comprehensive Good use of the 4 academic references but more is required including integration Referencing style is consistent with minimal errors

The academic structure is of a high standard there is scope for some improvement. 4 academic references are well used and integrated. Referencing style is very good but still with some errors

The academic structure is of an exceptionally high standard 4 references are used to an exceptionally high standard and are well integrated Referencing style exceptionally well incorporated