Organizational Communications assignment 5

profilekarthik.madee
MBA5013_ChapterReactionPaper_Rubric4.pdf

MBA 5713 - Organizational Communication Name: ______________________

Chapter ____ Reaction Paper Scoring Rubric Each performance area is evaluated based on your understanding and engagement with the content of the chapter.

Total Score: ____/50

Performance

Area

Excellent

10

Good

7-9

Satisfactory

4-6

Poor

0-3

Score

Content

Analysis

Content is accurate,

focused, and

consistent; clearly

articulates

understanding of

chapter content.

Content is accurate

but lacks clarity;

solid but slightly

ambiguous analysis.

Content is

somewhat vague;

lacks clarity of

content; off topic at

times.

Content is unclear;

lapses in coherence;

unrelated to task;

simplistic,

underdeveloped

ideas.

Critical

Thinking

Skillfully evaluates

information

gathered from

observation,

experience,

reflection, or

reasoning.

Adequately

demonstrates

reasonable

relationships among

ideas.

Simplistic analysis;

limited clarity and

complexity of

thought.

Insufficient

relationship among

ideas; lacks

complexity of

thought.

Practical

Application

Accurately links

real world

examples to chapter

content.

Links mostly

accurate real world

examples to chapter

content.

Attempts to link

real world

examples, but lacks

accuracy and

clarity.

Completely

unrelated examples

OR no attempt to

link real world

examples.

Organization Method of

organization is well

suited-suited to

thesis; clear

introduction, body,

and conclusion with

effective transitions.

Organization

supports thesis and

purpose; sequence

of ideas could be

improved; easy to

follow.

Some signs of

logical

organization; may

have abrupt or

illogical shifts and

ineffective flow of

ideas.

Poorly organized;

demonstrates

serious problems

with progression of

ideas; reads like a

written form of

speech.

Writing

Mechanics

Essentially error

free; APA

formatted; meets

word count

requirement.

Some mechanical

errors; violates 1-3

formatting rules;

meets word count

requirement.

Repeated

weaknesses in

mechanics; pattern

of flaws; violates

major formatting

rules; does not meet

word count

requirement.

Severe mechanical

errors; unable to

identify formatting

approach; extreme

lack of progress

toward word count

requirement.