dynamic startegy
Disruptive strategies
Week 11 Workshop
MBA501 Dynamic Strategy and Disruptive Innovation
Boiling frogs
Play Video
• What does French poet-diplomat
Saint-John Perse mean when he says:
Small Group Discussion
The only menace is inertia.
Small Group Challenge Tokyo, Japan 1998
In groups, suggest a strategy that Mari could implement to improve her team’s chances of success.
Mari Matsunaga, senior designer at Japanese mobile phone
operator NTT DoCoMo, has a problem. Senior management has
grown increasingly nervous about the risks of disruptive innovation to
the company. DoCoMo is Japan’s predominant mobile phone
operator and telecommunications is a highly dynamic market. There
is a real threat that the company’s competitive advantage could be
jeopardised by a disruptor with a new mobile technology.
Mari also fears that the size and structure of NTT DoCoMo is an
obstacle to successful innovation. Nevertheless, her task is to
assemble and lead a team of designers who will be responsible for
developing a new mobile phone technology that will enable NTT
DoCoMo to maintain its position as market leader.
Disruptive innovation strategy
• Critics of disruptive innovation theory
argue that it can only explain market
disruption after it has already happened
and has little to no strategic value
• Let’s ask the question: ‘What essentially
would decide or contribute to an
organisations’ success in disruptive
innovation?’
Internal perspective
• The internal perspective examines
business models and organisational
challenges including:
1. human resources
2. organisational culture
3. resource allocation
4. organisational structure
Human resources
• Senior managers may not understand
the promise of disruptive innovation
because they were trained in
conventional business programs
• An additional team at the corporate
level is required to be responsible for
collecting disruptive innovation ideas
and implementing them
Organisational culture
• When great changes such as disruptive
innovation occur a sub-optimal
organisational culture can generate
inertia and resistance
• It is important then for incumbents to
prepare for and institute organisational
change and unlearn deeply entrenched
values that inhibit change
Resource allocation
• Resource allocation processes that have financial returns as the key evaluation factor can hinder the development of disruptive innovation
• One solution is to use strategic buckets to manage sustaining vs disruptive projects independently so potential disruptive innovation projects are allocated sufficient resources
Organisational structure
• The larger an organisation is the less
likely it will successfully develop and
implement disruptive innovation
• Organisations can modify their business
structure to promote flexibility by having
smaller business units so that decision-
makers stay enthusiastic and take
emerging opportunities seriously
NTT DoCoMo
• NTT DoCoMo set up their development
team as an autonomous entrepreneurial
organisation
• High risk takers were selected to join
the development team
• The team was also given strong
executive level support
i-mode
• The NTT DoCoMo team developed
i-mode, a wireless industry disruptor
that introduced interactive on-line
content to mobile telecommunications
• Within 18 months subscriptions to the
service exploded from 0 to 18 million
Rodriguez
Play Video
• What does American businessman
Jack Welch mean when he says:
Small Group Discussion
On the face of it, shareholder value is the
dumbest idea in the world.
Small Group Challenge Hangzhou, China 1993
Hong Liang Lu, entrepreneur and founder in telecommunications
company Unitech Telecom, has a problem. His company has
developed a cordless phone called the Personal Access System
(PAS) that he hoped would become a disruptive technology in
telecommunications.
Hong attempts to launch the PAS in Japan but quickly discovers
the regulatory environment and national culture do not encourage
entrepreneurship. The financing system is also too inefficient to
support disruptive ideas.
These environmental factors conspire to prevent PAS from gaining
traction in the marketplace and, much to Hong’s dismay, the
innovation fails.
In groups, suggest a strategy Hong could implement to realise his hopes for the PAS.
External perspective
• The external perspective examines the
organisation’s context and environment
and includes:
1. commitments and relationships
2. regulatory and economic conditions
Commitments
• Organisations are often locked into
commitments reflected in the
expectations of investors and analysts,
and existing relationships with resource
providers and suppliers
• Before entering such commitments
organisations should assess their
potential impact on innovative capacity
Apple
• Steve Jobs skillfully managed the
expectations of Apple’s shareholders by
letting them know they would not
interfere with Apple’s pursuit of its
original customer focused purpose: to
make a contribution to the world by
developing tools for the mind that
advance humankind
Regulation
• Disruptive innovation can be hindered
by regulations and cultures that fail to
encourage entrepreneurship
• Financial systems may also prove
inadequate to support the development
of disruptive ideas
Unitech Telecom
• In 1993 Unitech Telecom introduced a
disruptive innovation, the Personal
Access System (PAS), to Japan but it
failed to catch on
• One year later the exact same
innovation succeeded in China and
within 10 years the company’s revenues
had risen from $10 million to $2.7 billion
• Do you agree with Apple founder
Steve Jobs when when he says:
Small Group Discussion
Get closer than ever to your
customers. So close that you’ll tell
them what they need well before they
realise it themselves.
Small Group Challenge Minnesota, US 1995
Livio D. DeSimone, President and CEO of multinational
conglomerate 3M, has a problem. He is concerned that too much of
the company’s growth is coming from changes to existing products
and too little from innovative breakthroughs.
Sales in one particular product range, surgical drapes, have
stagnated. Preliminary research indicates that the drapes are failing
to provide fool-proof protections against microbes. They are also too
expensive for markets in developing countries. And they are not very
effective in hotter conditions.
Livio is eager for 3M to develop a breakthrough technology in
surgical drapes but does not know how to achieve this.
In groups, suggest a strategy Livio could use to develop a breakthrough technology in surgical drapes.
Marketing perspective
• The marketing perspective examines
how an organisation can find emerging
markets and understand potential
customer needs including:
1. customer visit programs
2. empathic designs
3. lead-user processes
Customer visit programs
• Customer visit programs help
organisations to gain customer insights
• Managers not only visit customers
individually but also as members of
cross-functional teams including
marketing and R&D
Hewlett-Packard
• At Hewlett-Packard marketing
managers and R&D managers hear the
same information from customers at the
same time
• This helps the company to overcome
the conflicts, implicit assumptions, and
poor communications that can exist
between marketing and R&D
Empathic designs
• Empathic design is a user-centred
design approach that pays attention to
the user's feelings toward a product
• The goal is to identify latent customer
needs in order to create products the
customers didn’t even knew they
desired
Continuum
• Design consultancy firm Continuum
successfully designed a series of baby
bottles by using empathic design
techniques
• A team of designers collected data on
user needs by observing infants in child
care centres and conducting research in
the homes of first time mothers
Lead user processes
• Lead users are early adopters of new
products or technology that is expected
to eventually receive widespread use
• A lead user process collects information
about needs and solutions from lead
users rather than users at the centre of
the target market
3M
• To develop a breakthrough technology
in surgical drapes 3M assembled a
team of lead users including a
veterinarian surgeon, a Hollywood
makeup artist, doctors from developing
countries, and military medics
• The team developed a proposal for
three major new product lines
• Do you agree with Hungarian
physiologist Albert Szent-Györgyi when
he says:
Small Group Discussion
Innovation is seeing what everybody has
seen and thinking what nobody has thought.
Small Group Challenge Korolyov, Soviet Union 1969
Vasily Pavlovich Mishin, Chief Designer of the Soviet Space
Program, has a problem. His team is responsible for designing and
building Luna 16, a robotic probe that will land on the moon and
return a sample of lunar soil to Earth.
Vasily and his team have worked under immense pressure and
tight deadlines since the Americans beat them in sending the first
manned spaceflight around the moon the year before.
The Luna 16 spacecraft has a camera but requires a light source to
be able to capture and relay images. The project has been stalled for
months because Vasily and his engineers have not been able to
design a light bulb that can survive take off and landing.
In groups, suggest a strategy that Vasily could use to solve the problem of the spacecraft camera light bulb.
Technology perspective
• The technology perspective examines
the technological strategies for
disruptive innovation
• To date there has been little research
into how organisations may
systematically approach the
identification or creation of potential
disruptive technologies
Challenges
• It may seem as though all an
organisation needs to do is be vigilant
and quick to spot a disruptive
technology opportunity
• However, the creation of some
disruptive technologies may be
extremely challenging, especially if they
are based on new scientific discoveries
TRIZ
• TRIZ is a problem solving, analysis and
forecasting tool that could help identify
new disruptive innovation opportunities
• It is a framework made up of 39
features, 40 principles, and 8 trends
• The nine box technique can be used to
look outside – and inside – the original
problem to find lateral solutions
Basic TRIZ framework
Luna 16
• Soviet engineers applied the nine box
technique to their need to design a light
bulb that would survive take off and
landing aboard spacecraft Luna 16
• The TRIZ exercise led them to the
realisation that the bulb, required to
keep oxygen away from the element,
was entirely unnecessary in space
Patent analysis
• Patent analysis is traditionally used by
organisations to gauge their current
technical competitiveness and plan
against potential competition
• But it could also be used to forecast
technological trends and identify
technologies from other areas that
could be incorporated into their own
Scint-X
• Swedish company Scint-X has adapted
an advanced technique used for
miniaturising space hardware to create
an x-ray camera so small that it can be
inserted into a dentist patient’s mouth to
take x-rays of their teeth
Playtime
Week 12 Workshop
MBA501 Dynamic Strategy and Disruptive Innovation
Preparing a disruptive strategy report for the InFocus board turns out to be
a much more challenging task than you anticipated. You spend the entire
night before the board meeting at your desk reading through a small
mountain of InFocus departmental reports, industry research, and the
scribbled transcripts of the thirty odd interviews you held with key personnel
over the past four weeks.
By sunrise, you finally feel you have all the relevant information you need
to prepare your report and begin by jotting down the most important points
on a notepad.
You start with InFocus’s general lack of capacity to embrace disruptive
innovation because of a lack of understanding at the senior management
level and a cultural resistance to change, evidenced by the cost and
inefficiency of past process change initiatives.
There is also the annual budgeting process that focuses almost
exclusively on financial performance and the organisational structure itself:
InFocus is a very large organisation with most departments working across
every business portfolio and even product lines.
Then you note down how Sergey’s managerial style and overemphasis on
shareholder value has created expectations among the shareholders for
demonstrable links between corporate strategy and investment returns. Also
of relevance here are the Australian government’s generous tax incentives
for Research & Development and the current willingness of the major
financial institutions to offer finance on favourable terms for innovation
projects.
Next you write about InFocus’s customer focus group program, operated
and managed exclusively by the marketing department, and based solely on
traditional market research methodologies.
And, finally, you note that the company’s approach to the identification or
creation of new technologies has been sporadic, random, and ad hoc.
What a mess!
You check the time and realise you have only twenty minutes left before
the board of directors expect you to present your report and
recommendations…
Group One
In your group, prepare a disruptive strategy report for
the InFocus board
Focus on the following:
• Explain why an internal perspective can help
InFocus
• Discuss, from an internal perspective, InFocus’s
current prospects for successfully implementing
disruptive strategies
• Recommend four changes InFocus could make to
better position itself for disruptive innovation
success
Group Two
In your group, prepare a disruptive strategy report for
the InFocus board
Focus on the following:
• Explain why an external perspective can help
InFocus
• Discuss, from an external perspective, InFocus’s
current prospects for successfully implementing
disruptive strategies
• Recommend three changes InFocus could make to
better position itself for disruptive innovation
success
Group Three
In your group, prepare a disruptive strategy report for
the InFocus board
Focus on the following:
• Explain why a marketing perspective can help
InFocus
• Discuss, from a marketing perspective, InFocus’s
current prospects for successfully implementing
disruptive strategies
• Recommend three changes InFocus could make to
better position itself for disruptive innovation
success
Group Four
In your group, prepare a disruptive strategy report for
the InFocus board
Focus on the following:
• Explain why a technological perspective can help
InFocus
• Discuss, from a technological perspective,
InFocus’s current prospects for successfully
implementing disruptive strategies
• Recommend three changes InFocus could make to
better position itself for disruptive innovation
success
Group One Group Two
Group Three Group Four
Present your disruptive innovation report and recommendations to
the board of directors.
Exactly twenty minutes later you enter the boardroom just as everybody is
taking their seats.
Dustin starts the board meeting and invites you to present your disruptive
innovation report and recommendations.
Dustin thanks you for your presentation and addresses the directors.
‘We will now cast our votes by show of hands on whether we accept these
recommendations regarding disruptive innovation. All those in favour please
raise your hands. Thank you. All those against please raise your hands.
Thank you.’
Dustin tallies the votes.
‘The decision is …’
You collect your presentation papers and turn to leave.
‘Would you mind sticking around while we resolve the next agenda item?’
Dustin asks you.
You nod and take a seat at the boardroom table.
He continues, ‘We will now cast our votes by show of hands on which of
our two final candidates will be offered the position of InFocus CEO. All
those in favour of Candidate A please raise your hands. Thank you. All those
in favour of Candidate B please raise your hands. Thank you.’
Dustin tallies the votes.
‘The unanimous decision is … Candidate A.’
Dustin asks if you believe the board has made the right choice.
‘I don’t know who Candidate A is,’ you reply.
‘You’re Candidate A,’ Dustin says.
The directors break into applause taking great pleasure in your obvious
shock and bewilderment. Dustin is beaming with satisfaction.
‘Thank you,’ you finally say, choking back tears, ‘I accept.’