Cultural Influences:*

profilejaydenson
markingrubricsThegoalofanargumentresearchproposalistocreateaworkingargumentstanceandabasicplanthatconsiderscontext.docx

The goal of an argument research proposal is to create a working argument stance and a basic plan that considers context, audience, and purpose and that presents potential approaches to research. 

Keep in mind that rather than being an outline or structural plan for your essay, this proposal should ground you in the conversation, should offer direction for research needs, and should give your professor ample focused material viable for providing effective feedback before you begin researching and writing

Review the course theme announcement carefully. Select the topic that you intend to use during the course for your Argument Research Essay. Review the Argument Research Essay Overview for a broad look at the essay guidelines.  

Next, review the Week 2 Argument Research Essay Proposal Example to see a sample idea of how to complete the template. Then, download the Week 2 Argument Research Essay Template, complete all the sections pertaining to the course theme topic selected, save and submit to the Week 2 assignment area. Be sure to complete all THREE sections of the template. 

Formatting

Complete the  template by filling in the blank areas for each section according to the instructions. 

Research Argument Essay Proposal

Research Argument Essay Proposal

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStance

20 pts

The debate is chosen from the options provided and includes an arguable stance within the debate.

16 pts

The debate is chosen from the options provided and includes a statement of stance within the debate that may not be viable for an argument essay.

12 pts

The debate is chosen from the options provided, but the statement is not arguable. The stance statement may be a statement of fact and not an argument.

0 pts

The debate is not chosen from the options provided or is off-topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons for Viability

20 pts

In at least 3 sentences, the reasons for the stance being viable are discussed well, with specific reasons that support the goals of an argument essay.

16 pts

In at least 3 sentences, the reasons for the stance being viable are discussed with reasons that support the goals of an argument essay. The sentences may lack detail or focus toward argument.

12 pts

The reasons for the stance being viable are discussed in fewer than 3 sentences or are lacking in specificity or an argument focus.

0 pts

The debate is not chosen from the options provided or is off-topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpposing Viewpoints

20 pts

In at least 3 sentences, the student addresses viable possible opposing viewpoints and explains why others might reasonably disagree with the student's stance.

16 pts

In at least 3 sentences, the student addresses viable possible opposing viewpoints and explains why others might disagree with the student's stance. The opposing viewpoints may fall short of being reasonable viewpoints, or the explanation may lack logic.

12 pts

Possible opposing viewpoints are discussed in fewer than 3 sentences or are lacking in specificity or an argument focus.

0 pts

No possible opposing viewpoints are addressed, or the viewpoints are off-topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience

20 pts

In at least 2 sentences, the student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience reflects a strong understanding of readers and of invested groups.

16 pts

In at least 2 sentences, the student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience reflects an understanding of readers and of invested groups, although the response may lack detail or reasons may lack specificity.

12 pts

The student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience may reflect a need for a deeper understanding of readers and of invested groups. The response may lack detail or reasons may lack specificity.

0 pts

No discussion of audience is attempted, or the discussion of audience is off-topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph of Understanding and Needs

35 pts

In a paragraph of 7-9 rich sentences, the student thoroughly addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student's chosen debate with strong detail and in a manner conducive to beginning research and writing.

30 pts

In a paragraph of 7-9 sentences, the student addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student's chosen debate. The paragraph may lack detail or may not be fully conducive to beginning research and writing.

23 pts

The student addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student's chosen debate, but the paragraph lacks length, depth, or viability toward research and writing.

0 pts

The paragraph is either missing or is off-topic.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Terms

20 pts

Five viable search phrases are listed, and the list covers discovering information, supporting the student's stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints.

16 pts

Five viable search phrases are listed, and the list covers most of the following goals: discovering information, supporting the student's stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints.

12 pts

Viable search phrases are listed, but fewer than five, or the list does not cover more than one of the following goals: discovering information, supporting the student's stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints.

0 pts

Search terms are not listed or are off-topic.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Formatting and Writing: Mechanics and Usage

5 pts

The assignment document itself displays correct APA Style in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

4 pts

The assignment document may have small errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.

3 pts

The assignment document may have major errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains numerous distracting errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation.

0 pts

The assignment document may completely lack APA formatting (header, pagination, title page) and/or may contain enough errors that reader comprehension is difficult.

5 pts

Total Points: 140

Previous Next