power point

Marking Rubric Unit code and name: MGMT11109 Introduction to Business Assessment type: Assessment Task 3 Powerpoint Presentation - Marking Criteria (40%)

Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit

Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory

Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass

Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent

Criteria 1. Evidence of your critical thinking regarding slide content regarding globalisation and social responsibility. 10 Marks

Non-submit No core concepts demonstrated from Unit materials presented.

The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing no clear conclusions.

The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing limited conclusions.

The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; providing some evidence of conclusions.

The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing fairly clear and well thought-out conclusions.

The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented from the Unit coursework; drawing clear and well thought-out conclusions.

Student achievement /10

Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit

Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory

Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass

Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent

Criteria 2. Evidence of your reflective practice in developing recommendations regarding an ethical position concerning the recommended social responsibility of Starbucks in Italy. 10 Marks

Non-submit Limited ethical argument adopted, presentation not clear and audience disinterested in conclusion.

Presents information in a poorly developed and illogical sequence which the audience cannot follow. The student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, is not expressive and cannot be heard by a majority of audience members.

Presents information and ideas at a basic level of logical sequence which the audience generally finds difficult to follow. The student's voice is: not clear at times; not expressive and/or the student pronounces a number of terms incorrectly.

Presents information and ideas at a reasonable level of logical sequence which the audience finds difficult to follow at times. The student has a clear voice, but is not expressive and/or pronounces some words incorrectly.

Presents information and ideas in a logical sequence which the audience can follow. The student has a clear voice, is expressive at times during the presentation. Significant ethical position adopted.

Presents information and ideas in a logical and interesting sequence which the audience enjoys following. The student has a clear voice, is expressive throughout the presentation. Well- argued ethical position.

Student achievement /10

Criteria 3. Relevant and accurate use of (scholarly and non-scholarly) sources with eight (8) scholarly and non-scholarly references required to pass this criteria.

Non-submit No effective research undertaken.

No research cited in an effective manner where quality of research could be determined.

The required research criteria minimum is met, however, not all research is well used or of the highest quality.

Use of research is fair.

Use of research is at a good standard and provides some original insight and reflection.

Use of research is at a very high standard and provides original insight and reflection.

Student achievement /10

Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit

Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory

Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass

Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent

Professionalism of the PowerPoint presentation to an intermediate skill level including choice of background to slide, graphics, font and general style, overall design, structure, length, including grammar, punctuation and correct spelling using Australian English and presentation skills including appropriateness of speaking style to suit an audience of Senior Managers, clarity of vocal expression, voice projection, voice clarity in recording, emphasis, engagement and speaker transitions. 5 Marks

Non-submit Quality of writing is at a very poor standard and is barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. The narration or recording was not present. Visually unappealing and unprofessional.

Quality of writing is at a poor standard. Careless spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading. The narration or recording was not audible. Visually unappealing and unprofessional.

Some problems with sentence structure and presentation. Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. Elements of the recording where not audible. Standard use of template for visuals with little originality displayed.

Quality of writing/recording is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. The visual aids show attention to design and effectively support the presentation.

Quality of writing/recording is of a high standard. Points are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. The visual aids are well designed, confidently used and effectively support the presentation.

Quality of writing/recording at a very high standard. Points are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. The visual aids show originality and are highly engaging to an audience.

Student achievement /5

Key Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0% = Non Submit

Below Expectations (Fail) 1-29% Unsatisfactory

Below Expectations (Fail) 30-49% Poor

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Pass

Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Fair

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Good

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Excellent

Strict conformity to the exact requirements of the CQU APA Referencing Guide (in-text References are to be used throughout the PowerPoint slides as appropriate and a dedicated final slide provides the reference list).

Non-submit

No attempt made to reference the assessment in any logical, coherent or meaningful way.

Has not applied the CQU APA Referencing Guide consistently throughout assessment.

Some problems with the application of the CQU APA Referencing Guide throughout assessment with some frequent errors.

A fair standard of application of the CQU APA Referencing Guide throughout assessment, however, some consistent errors.

A good standard of application of the CQU APA Referencing Guide throughout assessment is evidenced.

Less than two major errors in the application of the CQU APA Referencing Guide throughout assessment.

Student achievement /5