Disaster and Risk Management 6 – 10 pages
TMGT 221 Group Presentation Evaluation Form
GROUP MEMBERS:
EVALUATOR: ___________________________________ TOTAL MARK: /100
|
The purpose of the presentation was unclear The purpose of the presentation |
The purpose of the presentation was clear was clear |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The introduction to the presentation was unclear or title |
The introduction to the presentation was clear |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The presenters did not engage the audience right away |
The presenters engaged the audience right away |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The presenters provided information in a confusing sequence |
The presenters provided information in a logical sequence with flow |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The presenters read directly from notes with little eye contact with the panel |
The presenters referred to notes but looked at the panel often |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
Criteria, method, recommendation or conclusion with results was not presented |
Criteria, method, recommendation or conclusion with results was presented |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The visual aids did not effectively support the presentation |
The visual aids directly supported the presentation |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The recommendations or conclusion was poorly supported |
The recommendations or conclusion was strongly supported |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The criteria was not analyzed and set out in a clear way |
The criteria was analyzed and set out in a clear way |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
|
|
The presenters were unprofessional, unprepared and disorganized |
The presenters were professional, prepared and organized |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
TOTAL MARKS FROM ABOVE: / 100 /15
|
Presentation Strengths: |
Presentation Weaknesses: |
|
|
|
Other Comments:
1
Bus\179\A0084
2