Order 927929: Research Report on Samsung

ACC706

ACC706 ACCOUNTING THEORY AND ISSUES T118 19/03/2018 10:07 PAGE 10 OF 16 *AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD © ABN: 72 132 629 979 CRICOS 03171A

Marking Rubric for ACC706 Accounting Theory and Issues (Assignment 1)

Criteria Fail

(0 – 49%) Pass

(50 – 64%) Credit

(65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%)

High Distinction (85 – 100%)

Research – extent and application Value 30% Mark awarded

Inaccurate, inappropriate or no use of literature. Analysis not developed. No original explanations provided.

Minimum number of sources, not all current or relevant. Paraphrasing used throughout but not always accompanied by original explanations. Theory relevant but not always linked to analysis.

Good selection of theory from a range of sources to build and adequately justifies analysis. Paraphrasing used throughout but accompanied by original explanations

Insightful and appropriate selection of theory from a good range of current and relevant sources to systematically build and justify analysis. Minimum paraphrasing

Integration and originality in the selection and handling of relevant theory to build and justify analysis. Wide range of current and relevant sources integrated in systematic way.

Analysis of the organisation Value 30% Mark awarded

Poor evaluation. Significant gaps in knowledge of the theory and lack of understanding of company’s capabilities. No analysis provided. Disjointed or no discussion.

Simple discussion of areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Work reflects limited engagement with organisational context or relevant theory. Not all aspects of task completed In sufficient detail. Most aspects of the task completed but assessment lacks cohesion.

Identifies and discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Discussion of some relevant issues in theory and organisational content in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed – some cohesion.

Identifies and clearly explains areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed with minimal errors in cohesion

Identifies and insightfully discusses areas of strength and weakness in the organisation’s capabilities. Strong links to organisational context and relevant theory in evaluation. All aspects of the task completed in a comprehensive and cohesive manner

Recommendations / conclusions Value 20% Mark awarded

Few or no recommendations made / no justification. Any recommendations made are not supported or are inaccurate.

Some recommendations made / not well linked to the results of the evaluation or relevant theory.

Good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation results / may not be linked back systematically to relevant theory

Very good recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used systematically to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities

Excellent recommendations made, linked to the evaluation. Theory used in insightful way to justify recommendations and discuss enhancement of the organisation’s capabilities

Presentation Value 20% Mark awarded

Referencing is absent / not systematic / incorrect

Acceptable presentation – obvious errors demonstrating lack of attention to detail. Some attempt at referencing but obvious errors

Good presentation overall but some obvious errors. Referencing is mainly accurate

Professional presentation – minor errors in some elements. Correct referencing throughout

Highly professional presentation – satisfies all presentation elements. Correct referencing throughout

Total mark out of 100 Comments:

Assessment mark _____ / _____