Project Management
Assignment will me marked based on these factors:
Criteria Fail
(<50%) Pass
(50% - 64%) Credit
(65% - 74%) Distinction
(75% - 84%) High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
Structure (0.25 pt.): How is the structure
of the proposal?
• Structure & physical layout detract from
work
• Many inaccuracies
• Considerable lack of detail in presentation
• Poor attempt at structure and
physical layout
• Many inaccuracies in presentation of
work
• Fair attempt at structure and physical layout
• Some inaccuracies in presentation
• Very good logical structure, physical
layout, and attention to detail
• Work presented in coherent and
accurate manner
• Excellent logical structure, physical layout, and appropriate attention to detail
• The work is presented in an accurate, concise, and coherent fashion
Grammar / spelling (0.25 pt.): Are there
grammar and/or spelling errors?
• Numerous spelling mistakes and/or
grammar errors detract from work
• Writing is not sufficient
• Multiple spelling mistakes and/or
grammatical errors
• Errors make reading difficult
• Occasional spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors
• Errors distract from reading
• Minimal spelling mistakes and/or
grammatical errors • No spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors
Conclusion and References (0.5 pt.): Have all statements been referenced?
Has referencing been done properly? How
is the structure of conclusion?
• Failures to appropriately
acknowledge the work of others
• Several errors in referencing or
bibliography formatting
• No references
• Unattributed statements
• Plagiarised statements
• Incomplete conclusion
• Poor use of referencing
• Multiple errors in referencing
and/or bibliography formatting
• Poor attempt to acknowledge the
work of others.
• Most statements are
unsubstantiated.
• Poor conclusion
• Fair use of references
• Errors in referencing and/or reference list
• Mostly acknowledges the work of others
• Many statements are unsubstantiated.
• Satisfactory conclusion
• Good use of references
• Appropriate referencing style with a correctly formatted
reference list
• Appropriately acknowledges the
work of others
• Many statements are substantiated with
references
• Concise and well written
• conclusion
• Excellent use of references
• Appropriate referencing style with a correctly formatted reference list
• Appropriately acknowledges the work of others
• All statements are substantiated with valid references
• Excellent conclusion
Executive Summary (0.5 pt.): Does the
summary address the whole proposal?
• Summary is unclear
• Poorly written
• Contains many errors
• Missing details
• Incomplete
• Plagiarised
• Poorly written
• Lacking details
• Wordy
• Satisfactorily written
• Missing details
• Concise and well written
• Addresses all or most sections within the
business case.
• Concise, detailed and very well written
• Addresses all sections within the business case.
Reasons for doing the project (0.5 pt.):
What are the reasons for doing this project
• Unclear
• Poorly written
• Contains many errors
• Missing details
• Incomplete
• Plagiarised
• Poorly written
• Lacking details
• Wordy
• Satisfactorily written
• Missing details • Concise and well
written • Concise, detailed and very well written
Objectives (1 pt.)
• Unclear
• Poorly written
• Contains many errors
• Missing details
• Incomplete
• Plagiarised
• Poorly written
• Lacking details
• Wordy
• Satisfactorily written Missing details
• Concise and well written
• Concise, detailed and very well written
Quantitative Analysis (2 pt.)
• Unclear
• Poorly written
• Contains many errors
• Missing details
• Incomplete
• Plagiarised
• Poorly written
• Lacking details
• Wordy
• Satisfactorily written
• Missing details
• Concise and well written
• Concise, detailed and very well written
List the Business Options (1pt): What
are the Business Options?
• Unclear
• Poorly written
• Contains many errors
• Missing details
• Incomplete
• Plagiarised
• Poorly written
• Lacking details
• Wordy
• Satisfactorily written
• Missing details
• Concise and well written
• Concise, detailed and very well written
Project Requirements (1.5 pt.): What are
the requirements to carry out this
project?
• Project requirements are not accurately
identified
• Omitted
• Unclear, shows lack of understanding
• Plagiarised
• Some project requirements are
accurately identified;
• Most project requirements are accurately identified
• Project requirements are accurately
identified
• Project requirements are accurately identified and presented in an excellent manner
Costs (1.5 pt.): How much does this project cost?
• Estimate is unrealistic and inaccurate
• Missing evidence to substantiate costs
• Omitted
• Unclear, shows lack of understanding
• Plagiarised
• Most estimates are unrealistic
• Most estimates lack
substantiation
• A somewhat accurate and realistic estimate of the project is given.
• Missing some evidence to back up costs
• An accurate and realistic estimate is given with evidence to back up the cost
• A very accurate and realistic estimate of the project is given with evidence up the cost
Risk (1.5 pt.): What are the risks
associated with the project?
• Risks are not correctly identified
• Omitted
• Unclear, shows lack of understanding
• Plagiarised
• Few risks are correctly
identified nor discussed in a clear manner
• Missing details
• Irrelevant or vague
• Most risks are correctly identified
• All risks are correctly identified
and discussed in a detailed manner.
• All risks are correctly identified and discussed in an excellent manner.
Timescale (1.5 pt.): How long is the
project?
• Missing most important milestones
• Missing out evidences to back up estimates
• Omitted
• Unclear, shows lack of understanding
• Missing many important milestones
• Missing evidences to back up estimates
• Some milestones are correctly identified
• Unrealistic time estimates
• Includes most crucial milestones
• Segments are well written
• Realistic time estimates
• All necessary milestones are correctly identified and included.
• Realistic time estimates