Project Management

profileStudent of IT
Markingcriteria.pdf

Assignment will me marked based on these factors:

Criteria Fail

(<50%) Pass

(50% - 64%) Credit

(65% - 74%) Distinction

(75% - 84%) High Distinction

(85% - 100%)

Structure (0.25 pt.): How is the structure

of the proposal?

• Structure & physical layout detract from

work

• Many inaccuracies

• Considerable lack of detail in presentation

• Poor attempt at structure and

physical layout

• Many inaccuracies in presentation of

work

• Fair attempt at structure and physical layout

• Some inaccuracies in presentation

• Very good logical structure, physical

layout, and attention to detail

• Work presented in coherent and

accurate manner

• Excellent logical structure, physical layout, and appropriate attention to detail

• The work is presented in an accurate, concise, and coherent fashion

Grammar / spelling (0.25 pt.): Are there

grammar and/or spelling errors?

• Numerous spelling mistakes and/or

grammar errors detract from work

• Writing is not sufficient

• Multiple spelling mistakes and/or

grammatical errors

• Errors make reading difficult

• Occasional spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors

• Errors distract from reading

• Minimal spelling mistakes and/or

grammatical errors • No spelling mistakes and/or grammatical errors

Conclusion and References (0.5 pt.): Have all statements been referenced?

Has referencing been done properly? How

is the structure of conclusion?

• Failures to appropriately

acknowledge the work of others

• Several errors in referencing or

bibliography formatting

• No references

• Unattributed statements

• Plagiarised statements

• Incomplete conclusion

• Poor use of referencing

• Multiple errors in referencing

and/or bibliography formatting

• Poor attempt to acknowledge the

work of others. 


• Most statements are

unsubstantiated.

• Poor conclusion

• Fair use of references

• Errors in referencing and/or reference list

• Mostly acknowledges the work of others

• Many statements are unsubstantiated.

• Satisfactory conclusion

• Good use of references

• Appropriate referencing style with a correctly formatted

reference list

• Appropriately acknowledges the

work of others

• Many statements are substantiated with

references

• Concise and well written

• conclusion

• Excellent use of references

• Appropriate referencing style with a correctly formatted reference list

• Appropriately acknowledges the work of others

• All statements are substantiated with valid references

• Excellent conclusion

Executive Summary (0.5 pt.): Does the

summary address the whole proposal?

• Summary is unclear

• Poorly written

• Contains many errors

• Missing details

• Incomplete

• Plagiarised

• Poorly written

• Lacking details

• Wordy

• Satisfactorily written

• Missing details

• Concise and well written

• Addresses all or most sections within the

business case.

• Concise, detailed and very well written

• Addresses all sections within the business case.

Reasons for doing the project (0.5 pt.):

What are the reasons for doing this project

• Unclear

• Poorly written

• Contains many errors

• Missing details

• Incomplete

• Plagiarised

• Poorly written

• Lacking details

• Wordy

• Satisfactorily written

• Missing details • Concise and well

written • Concise, detailed and very well written

Objectives (1 pt.)

• Unclear

• Poorly written

• Contains many errors

• Missing details

• Incomplete

• Plagiarised

• Poorly written

• Lacking details

• Wordy

• Satisfactorily written Missing details

• Concise and well written

• Concise, detailed and very well written

Quantitative Analysis (2 pt.)

• Unclear

• Poorly written

• Contains many errors

• Missing details

• Incomplete

• Plagiarised

• Poorly written

• Lacking details

• Wordy

• Satisfactorily written

• Missing details

• Concise and well written

• Concise, detailed and very well written

List the Business Options (1pt): What

are the Business Options?

• Unclear

• Poorly written

• Contains many errors

• Missing details

• Incomplete

• Plagiarised

• Poorly written

• Lacking details

• Wordy

• Satisfactorily written

• Missing details

• Concise and well written

• Concise, detailed and very well written

Project Requirements (1.5 pt.): What are

the requirements to carry out this

project?

• Project requirements are not accurately

identified

• Omitted

• Unclear, shows lack of understanding

• Plagiarised

• Some project requirements are

accurately identified;

• Most project requirements are accurately identified

• Project requirements are accurately

identified

• Project requirements are accurately identified and presented in an excellent manner

Costs (1.5 pt.): How much does this project cost?

• Estimate is unrealistic and inaccurate

• Missing evidence to substantiate costs

• Omitted

• Unclear, shows lack of understanding

• Plagiarised

• Most estimates are unrealistic

• Most estimates lack

substantiation

• A somewhat accurate and realistic estimate of the project is given.

• Missing some evidence to back up costs

• An accurate and realistic estimate is given with evidence to back up the cost

• A very accurate and realistic estimate of the project is given with evidence up the cost

Risk (1.5 pt.): What are the risks

associated with the project?

• Risks are not correctly identified

• Omitted

• Unclear, shows lack of understanding

• Plagiarised

• Few risks are correctly

identified nor discussed in a clear manner

• Missing details

• Irrelevant or vague

• Most risks are correctly identified

• All risks are correctly identified

and discussed in a detailed manner.

• All risks are correctly identified and discussed in an excellent manner.

Timescale (1.5 pt.): How long is the

project?

• Missing most important milestones

• Missing out evidences to back up estimates

• Omitted

• Unclear, shows lack of understanding

• Missing many important milestones

• Missing evidences to back up estimates

• Some milestones are correctly identified

• Unrealistic time estimates

• Includes most crucial milestones

• Segments are well written

• Realistic time estimates

• All necessary milestones are correctly identified and included.

• Realistic time estimates